That sounds quite risky, especially given your status as a student without a stable income. I would recommend an alternative approach. Instead of investing that money, why not explore online work opportunities that offer payment in Bitcoin? This way, you can mitigate the risks associated with investment and simultaneously invest by holding onto what you earn. It's a form of investment in itself.

I have reservations about that being safe. If you happen to win a substantial amount of money, it will undoubtedly be noticeable in your account balance. Even if you opt to make small withdrawals on a regular basis, the system will likely perceive your actions as consistently withdrawing without placing any bets. Therefore, it's reasonable to assert that if your goal is to achieve a significant win at a casino, you must be prepared to fulfill the KYC  requirements

First and foremost, we are already aware of the wagering requirement and its corresponding rules. If we agree to those terms, there should be no issues or complaints when we're required to meet those requirements in order to enjoy our winnings. This is simply a fundamental aspect of the process.

As investors, it's necessary for us to understand how to manage risk. Some of us here use money from our businesses to invest in crypto, while other investors make money in crypto and use some of their funds to start businesses. The point is, having multiple businesses or sources of income is always better than focusing on a single investment alone. As an investor, I understand that putting all our eggs in one basket is very risky, so it's necessary to diversify our funds effectively across different investments.

Moreover, investing in crypto does not guarantee a profit; it's akin to gambling where the outcome is uncertain. Therefore, we shouldn't rely solely on this and think of it as a surefire success. It's crucial to consider the possibility of failure.

Liable is not the right term; it should be 'reserves the right to change any of the above terms...'. However, a regulated casino can only change its terms if it's lawful or would not violate the guidelines of a license provider. Therefore, there's nothing to worry about because as long as it's legal, it's usually right.

I believe that when this forum was created, it did not attract users with the intention of earning from using the forum. Forums are typically created because people enjoy discussing ideas on a specific topic. Since this is the Bitcointalk forum, it primarily focuses on discussions related to Bitcoin. As time went on and the forum grew in popularity, it naturally expanded its scope to include discussions about altcoins.

As the forum gained popularity, it caught the attention of many companies and projects that wanted to advertise here. Active members began to benefit from these opportunities. However, it's important to remember that the benefits we receive here are privileges and they could be discontinued at any time. Nevertheless, if you genuinely love the forum, you would likely continue to contribute even if you weren't benefiting financially from it.

You seem to be implying that making money through bounties, advertisements, signature campaigns, and similar methods is the main focus. However, I want to emphasize that these are secondary to the knowledge we gain here. The information and insights we acquire are valuable assets that can lead to success in investing and trading. Therefore, even though there's a risk involved, being knowledgeable is worth it.

Yes, not paying taxes is illegal. If people do not pay taxes, the government's stability would be compromised. Let's not forget that taxes are the lifeblood of a country. We must acknowledge the reality that as employees, we cannot avoid paying taxes, as our income is readily visible and declared by our employers. Although everyone is required to pay taxes, business owners have a more advantageous position than employees. They can manipulate their financial records, avoiding detection for tax evasion, as long as they understand how to navigate the system.

In accounting principles, there's a concept known as tax avoidance, which is legal and mainly benefits companies, rather than employees.

---

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tax_avoidance.asp

We can only enjoy freedom if we have anonymity; that's supposed to be what crypto would bring into our life, complete freedom. However, with the advent of regulation, cryptocurrencies are not fully anonymous anymore, as coins are regulated through exchanges and companies that facilitate transactions.

It's not the big companies that are to be blamed, as they are just following what is mandated by law; it's the regulators, it's the government that should be blamed for the loss of freedom.

If we are aiming for full freedom, these should exist:

-Blockchain
-Decentralized exchange
-No government intervention.

Might be honest, but I doubt it will link to a breach of agreement. You know that gambling sites are very smart; they would always ensure that the TOS are always in their favor, so I don't think they will put themselves in a situation that will attract lawsuits. Now it will boils down to the debate of reputation as there are gambling sites that operate legally at yet they don't have a good reputation.

We are proud of investing in Bitcoin, but we can never say that it will definitely yield more profit or success in the future. When we talk about investment, there's always an inherent risk involved. What we are betting on here are its chances to grow in the future, which could be influenced by a multitude of factors. More good news might lead to success, but what if the situation turns the other way around? That could certainly result in failure.

That's why it's never guaranteed to be profitable, and we should never convince someone to invest in Bitcoin solely based on its potential for profit. It's essential to discuss the risks as well, so investors are well-informed that there's risk to manage. Once they understand the risks and potential rewards, they can make a responsible decision and won't blame anyone if their journey doesn't go as planned.

Nah it's too soon that AD will get injured and cannot contribute to the championship because the season haven't even started yet and discussing about them going to the championship rounds is a bit premature for now. Knowing AD, he is likely to get injured and that will not get out of his system just like KD, but both stars are known to make a comeback and will be utilized in the playoffs to help the team in their run unlike any other players that after injury, there's not much to expect because their play is not that the same anymore.

Is Dmitry Bivol included in the 3-fight deal that Canelo signed with Al Haymon? Because I'm not that sure if Canelo is still making a move for that one as it seems that the discussion between them has gotten cold now and already fell into pieces as Bivol's camp are in the silent zone as well. So anyway, a fight with David Benavidez is what I wanted to see in the future and hopefully there will be no excuses like the kid is not yet on that level to become rightful to fight Canelo because that just doesn't make any sense. And if Canelo will try to delay that fight, I hope he knows that the advantage is gradually transitioning towards Benavidez as there's no high hopes anymore for Canelo if he's already a year or two older than his age now.

I think that is not the plan because we both know specially them as the much experienced fighters that each boxer/fighter have their own style and power which can be incomparable if ever they will try to imitate someone like Mike Tyson just because of the fact that Ngannou will be fighting in the same division.

Tyson will surely not teach Ngannou to move like him but instead he will give some points to consider how to fight and behave like a boxer in the ring because the latter is not a boxer in the first place. It will be a big thing because Mike can still teach a few old tricks that can be useful in certain situations while fighting Fury in the ring. Also, stamina conservation will be a big factor.

It's somehow debatable that is why we are seeing a mixed votes between the two champions, but for me, I chose Regis Prograis to win by a way of KO/TKO. I know that Haney does have an impressive style specially in his defense and counter punches but he doesn't have that much power to KO an opponent and certainly I don't believe that he can do it against Regis which is also an experienced boxer and had the same bouts as him. Now if Regis can utilize his power and speed, I think he got more chances in this fight compared to the upcoming challenger, Devin Haney.

There's not much to see in the first place Just two good actors fooling the crowd while collecting their paychecks at the end of the event. Sadly, that figure you mentioned is just too high from what did Nate Diaz got from that fight because in this article, it was said that Nate was just given a guaranteed $500k (PPV not included) while Jake Paul brought home $2 Million. On the bright side, that is 150k more from Nate's last fight against Tony Ferguson in the UFC as he was just given $350k at that time.

We're in the same page because Rubio is now 32 years old and given that he'll just be gone for a while (which is still not sure) will not make a difference because he is already going towards the sunset of his career and so I think his decision is already for good, and that his days in the court playing professionally is now over.

It's not that bad because he had a good run and achieved so many things while playing in FIBA and NBA. He should just take his time to spend with his family and to take care of himself physically and mentally.

It's not even debatable whether if greed can cause troubles or not because that is situational and it depends how you handle it, and not to let greed to handle you. And to start with, greed is already with us even before we start on betting specially after the fact that we are there to make money while entertainment comes second.

What I want to say is that greed can sometimes be your friend because having greed is somewhat the same as having a gut but again, don't let it drive you as that will really put you in a situation that you never wanted. No need to eliminate it as greed is just like luck, you never know when will it hit you.

We cannot really say that men are more risk takers because that is quite debatable specially to the women that would loved to argue about this topic  kidding.
Let's just put it in a way where gambling is a gentleman's sport. Nobody said that it should be played only by male but it is a place and entertainment where most participants (gamblers) are male, female are more than welcome as well but somehow I cannot deny that it would be weird as it's kind of unusual to see a female gambling in a room full of alpha males.

Quite easy to say because we are not in their position, I mean we can surely say stuffs like they should do this and that instead of doing this but in reality, there is a big chance that you will be overwhelmed and at that same moment, you probably don't know what will be your next move anymore because your brain is already exploding with ideas that you should do this first before doing that. In the end, money and time was wasted.

Furthermore, of all the people that was lucky enough to win a jackpot prize, most of them haven't had the time to think what should they do because in the first place they were not ready for that situation and that just make it more complicated.

That I cannot disagree but that is very true mate, that is one of the downside of America because they are not minding their own business even if it doesn't directly involve them. It is a habit that sometimes put the whole country at risk and this time, they will face a dangerous situation again because a big event like the World Cup will take place in their country and they cannot avoid the factor that there might be some guys who are planning something in the guise of being an audience in one of the games. That means that while the country is having fun, let's expect that their medium in security will be tough including the screenings of every port and airport.

I was shocked as well when I know that they've been expecting some form of competition between Mane and CR7, and that will make the team more competitive and stronger. In fact, Ronaldo and Mane already had a history with each other when they both played together in one team in the past (I forgot which club was that) for 3 years and that is also one of the reasons why Al Nassr acquired Mane because of that history, the club didn't mean for them to race with each other just like what the other people was expecting because the plan was to compliment each other, and that will happen soon.