I'm looking for local asian sites for promoting a crypto project. Video content is preferred.
You should check out Cryptodiffer. They have a list of reputable (well, more or less "famous") crypto/ICO reviewers. One of them is ICO Pantera (which I believe based on Asia). I personally love to read Luntik reviews. They can provide a good tl;dr for ICO projects. |
|
|
|
|
I use this exchange once to sell one of my shit tokens, and the experience is far from ideal. I'm pretty sure something like this will happens eventually (OP is not providing a screenshot so there is no proof yet, but the probability is high imo).
Why did you go to this exchange in the first place? They don't have any volume and their site looks like a rip off from Yobit.
|
|
|
|
Yea sadly, how possible those promotion with high rank didn't know about that project were scheme ponzi / MLM.
From my observation, they know about it but they don't care. Some accounts were already tagged from their previous issues but they still continue to promote Bizzilion because they can still get the money. There are more than 10 people that I see promoting this ponzi, ranging from Full Member to Hero iirc. Put it simply, as long as they can get money, they don't care what kind of project they're promoting. |
|
|
|
Can someone who is using N26 share the experience please? I have been checking it out and considering it for quite a while now, but would like to hear some first hand experience about it.
You might need to wait for several days/months before somebody who've used it before come here and tell you about them. Why don't you try it on your own first? Let's say use $10 to test them. |
|
|
|
Where's my negative trust? I have shows zero!
Change your trust setting to DefaultTrust and you'll see that you got negative trust(s). I'm pretty sure they use DefaultTrust to judge this issue. |
|
|
|
Bump for new board "Bitcoin Forum > Bitcoin > Development & Technical Discussion > Wallet software > Hardware wallets"  Will you still post analysis about Ledger Live? And how about your experience with the latest firmware? I think it's a nice addition for this thread, especially the Ledger Live one. I still use the Chrome extension sometimes tbh, when Ledger Live stuck. |
|
|
|
|
Do you have any plan to write this for Linux? Or provide a guide to compile it on Linux?
I might try it on my Linux and will compare it with Vanitygen (my laptop is old, so it might worth to compare directly here).
|
|
|
|
|
# Proof of participation
Campaign: Content campaign
|
|
|
|
Has anyone tested? It appears to be very slow. But it could be better them ForkDelta
It will definitely better than Forkdelta. Maybe they just implement basic Cosmos/Tendermint stuff at this moment (Binance Chain is built from Cosmos/Tendermint iirc) and focus on getting user feedback. Tbh there's already a good dex alternative for Forkdelta, Switcheo. It is quite good imo, and definitely better than Forkdelta, even though it still lacks volume. Binance might be superior in this aspect as they have market maker. |
|
|
|
|
Tanggal 21 Februari 2019 besok akan ada AMA dengan Tim Boss & tim development dari ShareRing (jam 15:00, UTC+11). Link AMA menyusul, silakan follow di Telegram ShareRing untuk mengetahui link AMA ketika akan dimulai (@ShareRing). Di AMA besok, Tim akan mengumumkan salah satu partnership ShareRing yang baru. Jangan sampai ketinggalan kalau yang mau ikut AMA dan mengetahui perkembangan ShareRing.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the advice. If understand you correctly youre refering to providing information about their trust,rank and numbers of participate they can handle? I will be more than happy if you could emphasize efficiency you mean in particular.
I think more or less something like that. As a suggestion, here's the metric that you can use: 1. Trust 2. Rank 3. Portfolio (how many bounties managed, etc) 4. Speed and accuracy of updating/checking participant stakes 5. Responsiveness in Telegram/bounty channel to clarify participant issues 6. Do they tend to promote spam or not (some bounty manager accept low quality poster in sig campaign, some don't) 7. How many projects that they managed turn out to be a scam project (not directly related to their management quality, but more to their due diligence) |
|
|
|
Thanks for the timely warning. I stopped participating in this campaign. There are enough people involved in investigating scams here. Why don't managers contact them before promoting? Why not?
Some managers do their DD, some don't. I never know it would scam or not, and I always lock bounty thread of each project that has problem ... I hope you will delete redtrus and I'll be more careful in running project
You should at least do your DD. This is not the first time people join a scam project being managed by you (and the sign is clear enough, plagiarized WP should be easy to find). If you're really serious being a bounty manager then you should be prepared if something like this happens. If you want to avoid it, then do some DD (at least check their team, and their WP, etc). |
|
|
|
|
The same reason mentioned by ETFbitcoin technically applies to any crypto that you want to buy. If you can buy lower than the current market price, then it's quite possible the seller has some reasons that make them can't sell it for market price (not always bad, as mentioned by pooya). Another reason is that they need quick buck but they don't know where or they can't access the market. For example, a bounty hunter who sells ICO tokens for 0.1x ICO price.
Just be careful if you want to buy top coins, it's definitely shady af if somebody will sell 1 Bitcoin for $100 if the market price is $3k.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a classic connection problem. How long have you waited for it to connect?
Aside from what has been mentioned by ETFbitcoin, you can try to:
1. Use VPN.
2. Use an alternative internet connection.
|
|
|
|
But lately we have been witnessing a tightening of tracking cash flows.
And I would not be surprised if in the near future large cryptocurrency exchanges require confirmed cryptocurrency transfers, that is, signed ones.
So I think we will come to this sooner or later.
Are you saying in the future we'll probably see each time we make a crypto transaction from an exchange we need to sign papers via DocuSign or something like that? Wow, will it is definitely possible, I doubt users would love that. A better alternative would be to record special words or key in order to make a withdrawal, 2fa and something like that. It's quicker and safer than signing papers. |
|
|
|
|
How does this actually works though? I mean, how will Amazon recognize that we paid them with Moon? There's no description about it (I'm a noob at this issue).
Harlot raises a good concern, you should respond it if you want to prove that you're legit. Would love to see if you also open source the extension.
|
|
|
|
|
A project that I know of (ShareRing) already started building their blockchain using Cosmos/Tendermint, but it's still very early. They said it is still in beta last time I checked and they've been doing commit/upgrade by themselves. So probably, Cosmos is not production ready but you can start using it and fix the bugs by yourself.
But according to Cosmos blog update, they'll roll out mainnet soon, so I assume it has become better. Why don't you try and make a testnet first?
|
|
|
|
My suggestion is that, instead of creating new coins for each separate businesses, why don't they use an established coins like Bitcoin or ETH. Instead of issuing digital tokens, they can issue a contract note which can be converted to either bitcoin or ETH after certain interval. We can think of a process for that but I seriously think that new tokens need to be stopped at any cost as it is only ruining the market without doing any good to it. The investments are getting divided and demands are dropping due to the existence of too many tokens and coins in the market. Think through and let me know what do you feel!
Issuing new tokens/coins is fine as long as it's needed imo. For example, there's no way Bitcoin can be used in the ETH ecosystem, and therefore they need to create new tokens/coins, as well as Zilliqa compared to Ethereum. But I do agree that a lot of projects create unnecessary tokens for their ICO. The main reason is clear I believe because they run an ICO, and they need to give their investor something, which is why they created the tokens. Another solution that I can think of is investor should be smarter when they invest in a project. There's no way we'll have 2000 tokens when investor didn't invest in them, but this is quite difficult because most people are greedy. Just see the recent BTT ICO, it went crazy, did 5x gain after it was listed in Binance without any real product. |
|
|
|
thank you, I've contacted team to clarify this problem. bounty thread for whilst I lock and will unlock until this problem clear
Did you do any due diligence before you start to work as their bounty manager? If yes, would you mind sharing the result here?
Btw, it seems like you've started or managed a lot of bounties recently, one of them include the previous FIX Token that is also being accused as a scam project. |
|
|
|
|
Seems like there are more LN tips apps on the internet. Just a few days ago I see the same tipping bot in Telegram where a user can use a simple command like /tip to give funds to other users (not sure about the code though). I think it's cool, definitely interesting to see how will this increase the adoption and popularity of LN.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
