some reports can remain unhandled forever, and that doesn't mean moderators are not around or anything. Especially reports for posts in Meta or Reputation often stay unhandled. If it's not clear spam, those 2 boards allow more than other boards. You asked that your comments be deleted and LoyceV did in his self moderated topic, your not in the position to ask that he should delete his as well. I have nothing to do with this ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
I am waiting for LoyceV or theymos to create some topics like 10k merits I made 5 years LoyceV! just 2 years ago. That's more than enough to last me 3 more years: Once every 5 years, I get to brag ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I can't do this for every breath I take: I noticed someone feels the need to give himself weekly medals ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Back on-topic: Sorry, LoyceV, I wish I would have a thick skin like you and your gang members) That's what the ignore button is for. The internet isn't supposed to be a place where you interact in ways you don't like. If you don't like a user: ignore them! I have reported the above post twice but no response from the mod. Did you report it as off-topic? I've noticed OPs get a bit more leeway to go off-topic in their own topics.
|
|
|
I don't see any sane person to support CSW claims. I think it's like the flat earth people: of course they know the earth is a cube round, and of course they know everybody else knows it too. But they love the fact that there's always someone willing to debate them, even though no amount of sane arguments can convince them.
|
|
|
I'll make my WARNING! a bit bigger: you too are linking to a site that promotes a known and confirmed scam site! DO NOT use those sites to create a paper wallet, you will lose your funds!
|
|
|
Binance has BSC so it will stand a chance of getting richer and richer I hate BSC with a passion. Binance tricks customers into withdrawing their own made-up tokens instead of Bitcoin. If I am not wrong his networth is around 96 Billion while FTX founder's networth is around 30 Billion If those numbers are correct, I'd say this isn't right. It can't be good for crypto if 2 guys collected a few percent of the total market cap just from creating exchanges. Someone has to pay those billions, and it's not helping Bitcoin. Those huge profits mean there's not enough competition. Binance's $30 withdrawal fees are a clear sign of that. The fact that they scam users after they themselves made a mistake shows Binance doesn't care about anyone else.
|
|
|
Third year paid and third estrous cycle started (simultaneously the best and worst part of being a vixen, which I'm still not getting tired of ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ). I had hoped to have more to offer for this year's "festivities", but it proved a bit too much to manage with everything going on in the world. Guess this will have to suffice (though we all know it usually does more than that ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) ). Who's first? 💓![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ft.facdn.net%2F23502347%40400-1494623311.jpg&t=663&c=TVmGG4NJ5VmM8w) Thanks again for another year of flawless payments! Title updated! My apologies for being late. I'd blame the kids, but MehMeh can't help it that she's ill ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
0.657 TB That seems a bit much. Any chance there's 200 GB of other data included? Please explain chainstate. Allow me to copy Pieter Wuille: the blocks directory contains the actual blocks. The chainstate directory contains the state as of the latest block (in simplified terms, it stores every spendable coin, who owns it, and how much it's worth). Console command for that? It's just a directory, by default on this location:
|
|
|
what can explain the difference in my copy? Most sites don't update the total size, so the longer ago someone typed it, the smaller the number. I currently have 4.6GB chainstate and 420 GB blocks.
|
|
|
Yesterday I was looking for some hosting services for BTC and honestly speaking I haven't found anything I would trust. For projects like this topic I don't really need AWS-level uptime, so I gladly go for the budget hosts. I run this project at Racknerd (good deals via Lowendtalk.com), and (so far) I'm quite happy with it. If I look at prices on their own site, it's much higher. You could also go for RamNode, pay by the hour and less cheap, but from what I've seen RamNode has very solid performance too. I don't think any of those are run from their garage ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I run this project at Gullo's Hosting (again: see Lowendtalk.com for deals), which has the unique feature that it's run by one guy. Servers are international, so not from his garage, but you'll always deal with the same guy. He'll try his best, which for this project is everything I need. I also found out that several of the higher range VPS providers don't accept Bitcoin, or demand a copy of my passport (yeah, right!) first. That's not a VPS, so won't help me much.
|
|
|
How do you currently extract the data you publish? See: (nobody ever reads the OP)Memory usage to get balances: ~18GB. That would take a strong VPS.
|
|
|
I've updated all links to the new host. Torrents should work again too:
You could run Bitcoin Core and processing script on local device, then upload the result to your VPS/seedbox. Apart from the fact that I wouldn't know how to do this, I don't really want to add more load to my local PC.
|
|
|
Ugh ... that leaves me with no other choice than use touch. I used wget instead, this should preserve file dates. How do you download this dump ? Also using wget. Are you downloading every update at 100kB/s ? Yes. If yes, we'd "only" save some time if you upload it to my end. Using rsync would be so easy ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Giving you the ability to blink my hardware's light emitting diodes might be pointless. It should be going wild now. If the "input outputs transaction" dump is something like a csv file, just compiling the "missing" data with Bitcoin Core and append it to the dump could do the trick. Until I can get the full data from my own Bitcoin Core installation, I'll keep using the data dumps. And even if I can get the data from Bitcoin Core, it would further increase the VPS requirements. The people who showed me the path to emacs warned me about vi users. What's emacs? ![Image loading...](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Floyce.club%2Fother%2Femacs.png&t=663&c=shRyLXZja8IpAQ) I kid you not ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Is that true that if you tell average user to leave vi It can't be: the average user doesn't use vi.
|
|
|
In other words, you got scammed $80k by Binance. Sorry to hear your lose brother. He got scammed for the amount he had in his account (hopefully a lot less than $80k). In-fact they were liable to compensate you for the security breach in your account There was no security breach. Just a dumb mistake of broadcasting a low-fee transaction for 19 months, so lack of internal wallet maintenance. or you are going to take legal actions against them. There's of course a reason Binance is hiding in the Caymen Islands. If Binance would really have a case against shasan, they would have been the one taking legal action.
|
|
|
However we'll go with SCP for this one. LoyceV I'm PMing you the credentials soon. I actually prefer rsync, because scp changes the original file date, which is undesirable. Yes, this is the one I meant to use for my project. (Bitcoin addresses with a balance) In that case, just get the latest version ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) No need for me to upload that one. I can find the 700 GB and host "inputs, outputs and transactions" ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Luckily the bandwidth is unmetered so I can also provide a mirror for some of the other dumps. It would be great to have a mirror with decent bandwidth. If I don't have to upload 665 GB again when my host fails, it's already worth it. How is the data processed ? Running on Bitcoin Core ? If only I had the skills for that! I use this: (f*ck vi ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) "<esc> :wq!" wtf) What's wrong with vi? I literally use it every day ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Are you sure it's still 4€ in all places? €3,17 per 100! Or €6,10 to go a bit bigger. Or €3,83 if you settle for thinner rings. Cheap stuff ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Another thought: how fun would it be to use euro coins to stamp seed words into? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Does this mean that someone thinks that Binance is worth between €40 trillion and €50 trillion? The assets they hold aren't the same as the bank's value. I'm actually surprised by how low the value of large Dutch banks is: ING is worth 37 billion, ABN AMRO is worth only 10 billion. That means Coinbase is worth slightly more than ING. As for Binance: I wouldn't be surprised if they're mostly forgotten 10 years from now. New Fintech competitors can emerge much faster than competitors for traditional banks.
|
|
|
I didn’t explicitly mention derivation path as I didn’t want to mess up things. Maybe it’s better to state the obvious? “Don’t use any fancy wallet to generate the seed? I should include a derivation washers”? Might be unintelligible by the person who should get the Satoshi? If you use a non-standard derivation path, it doesn't hurt to hammer it into another washer. Or hammer the wallet name + version.
This makes me wonder if some people use a very high derivation path to avoid someone stealing their coins: if you use for instance m/44'/44'/1875626591'/0 and even if someone gets your seed words, I doubt they'll ever find your (shit)coins.
|
|
|
Did you consider Hetzner? From 3.45 for 1T, unlimited traffic. I need a VPS, this looks a bit like "shared hosting". I guess I wasn't specific enough. It could work, but having to upload updates instead of just processing them on the server is far from ideal. A bigger deal breaker is the fact that Hetzner doesn't accept Bitcoin. I don't want to link my credit card to anything crypto-related. From what I've read, I'd expect Hetzner to offer good quality hosting.
|
|
|
People still use FTP these days? I remember using FTP with FileZilla long time ago. I still use FTP on my local network, where I don't mind the lack of encryption. I would demand partial/full refund. It's paid per month, and really not worth the effort. I'd much rather have them fix the problems so I can finally keep this data online. I've uploaded it too many times already, and the whole point of having it on a server is so I can access it when needed. If anyone finds a good offer on 1 TB storage, feel free to post it.
|
|
|
I don't see why you're upset. When uploading, I usually like to count the blinks on my switch and compare with the amount of packets really circulating on the wires. Much fun. Don't you do that ? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Lol. I'll have to stand in the hallway to count the blinks. I'm still uploading data, but I'm not sure if I'll extend this hosts contract. It's now spitting out hardware errors: Message from syslogd@le6-1-93ghostman at Mar 15 08:42:07 ... kernel:[220101.842800] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no action required.
Message from syslogd@le6-1-93ghostman at Mar 15 08:42:07 ... kernel:[220101.846023] [Hardware Error]: CPU:8 (15:1:2) MC4_STATUS[-|CE|MiscV|-|AddrV|-|CECC]: 0x9c44c00001080a13
Message from syslogd@le6-1-93ghostman at Mar 15 08:42:07 ... kernel:[220101.849212] [Hardware Error]: Error Addr: 0x0000001f8d366350
Message from syslogd@le6-1-93ghostman at Mar 15 08:42:07 ... kernel:[220101.852463] [Hardware Error]: MC4 Error (node 1): DRAM ECC error detected on the NB.
Message from syslogd@le6-1-93ghostman at Mar 15 08:42:07 ... kernel:[220101.855864] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, mem/io: MEM, mem-tx: RD, part-proc: RES (no timeout) More seriously, I can help hosting "balances" if that interests you. Which "project" do you mean exactly? List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance? That one is covered, it only takes 20 GB to host. Although by now the 2 TB monthly bandwidth isn't enough anymore, at day 15 it already used 1.2 TB so it'll go offline at the end of the month.If you happen to have 700 GB available, by all means, share "inputs, outputs and transactions" ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Let me know, I can provide an FTP access to you. FTP, scp, rsync, anything works for me ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|