This already exists. There is a « notify » button at the top-right corner of the thread. I believe you get an email every time someone posts on the thread you enabled that option.
|
|
|
There was no hack attempt. Don’t worry about these emails. As explained, all someone did was put your username in the « Recovery password » screen, sending you the email. There is 0 things he can do with that. Even if you click the link, you will be one changing the password, and not him. He is the one who needs the link (which is on your email).
If you do the same with « theymos », is his account at risk? No.
|
|
|
Coincidência ou não o volume realmente está baixo e o preço está corrigindo um pouco... Achei interessante um detalhe que ele comentou no video, a questão é quantas pessoas acreditam que o Ano novo Chines influencia... pois basta a maioria acreditar para que isso tenha influencia independente se na prática realmente influenciaria ou não. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) A verdade é que o ano chinês influencia apenas pelo fato das pessoas acharem que ele influencia. É o famoso « buy the rumora, sell the news ». O feito raramente cauda movimentações no preço quando a especulação já vem antes mesmo dele. Até parece que natal/ano novo/etc... tankam o preço das moedas pelo fato das pessoas supostamente « venderem para comprar presentes ». Pra mim isso é uma narrativa criada por quem quer espalhar FUD para controlar e lucrar com o mercado.
|
|
|
You may have bought BTC on Coinbase, but you technically don’t have any BTC. All you have is a number in their database saying your account X has Y BTC. When you transfer your BTC out of Coinbase exchange, they will send the amount from their wallet (which they fully control) to your specified address, which if owned by you (if you have the private keys) will mean you will now own them.
It’s like having money on your bank account VS having the money in bills stored in your safe box.
|
|
|
Forex é um mercado que movimenta trilhões de dólares por dia e não é scam, mas diversas corretoras naquele mercado são desonestas - a corretora pode aumentar o spread além do normal durante as operações, ocasionar slippage nas ordens, ... . Como a volatilidade em moedas nacionais é em geral baixa naquele mercado, para se ter algum lucro, é necessário utilizar alavancagens extremas, algo muito arriscado. Operar em Opções binárias no curto prazo tem tudo para dar errado, no prazo de dias/meses/anos é possível a pessoa lucrar se acertar a tendência. Porém
Forex em sí não é scam. MAS... o mercado de cursos de forex ou sites de operação binárias não existem para te fazer lucrar, e sim te utilizar para o próprio lucro (venda de cursos, basicamente servindo de cassino online ou lucrando com comissões). É basicamente a mesma coisa que as cloud mining legítimas de hoje em dia. Você dificilmente terá lucro, pois você é o produto e não o cliente. Porém eu falo isso com certa ignorância, principalmente originada pelo grande número de sites fraudulentos por ai. Tavez haja algo que realmente funcione. Eu só não tenho paciência e nem interesse de encontrá-los.
|
|
|
WARNING: Addresses beyond the gap limit will not automatically be recovered from the seed. To recover them will require either increasing the client’s gap limit or generating new addresses until the used addresses are found.
You have to export private key [to avoid when something happens] and save it. The seed holds all his private-keys beyond the gap limit. He doesn’t need to export anything because all the article you quoted says is that the keys aren’t generated automatically. However, they can be generated (“manually”) without any issues.
|
|
|
Would it be racist if I suggested to Vispilio that it's time to unbunch her panties and lock the thread?
It must have been that Kalemder pretended to be turkish all this time but he is actually not. I’m sure he PM’ed DarkStar with his non-turkish KYC otherwise he wouldn’t have been accepted. What other explanation would there be?
|
|
|
What is a “local board representative”? I’m pretty active in the Portuguese board, AFAIK. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) Anyways, I doubt anyone has a problem with “Turkish users”, and people keep saying this, but you keep using the same argument. The issue is the user and its personality and not its nationality. This obvious isn’t going to change anything if you keep using that card. You are basically calling the same discussion that there is every time.
|
|
|
Funcionário insatisfeito? Sinceramente, acredito que o dinheiro realmente foi gasto em coisas fúteis e direcionadas aos funcionários (de alto cargo). Mas a pergunta é, qual era o plano do Rodrigo e dos executivos à longo prazo? Uma hora a merda ia acontecer. Acho que provavelmente tentariam introduzir outros produtos para tentar gerar lucro com os clientes existentes, como a compra e venda de BTC, mas toda a merda que deu fez o esquema ruir. E nada de resposta quanto às postagens... eu sinceramente já teria perdido a esperança. Mais uma que você pode ter perdido/não viu: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F05%2F14%2Fblob1bf3e9b707bdd328.jpeg&t=663&c=pirntVrZBZhZlw)
|
|
|
-snip-
Eu tomaria cuidado colocando esses links de “reviews de mixers” ou “best mixers lists”. A qualquer momento eles podem colocar links falsos de mixers, tanto que isso já aconteceu várias vezes. Além de eu pessoalmente achar alguns mixers altamente suspeitos, tais como esse Anonymix. Edit: esse BestBitcoinMixer.org < SCAM coloca vários scam mixers conhecidos no topo da lista. Ele é controlado pelo mesmo dono dos sites e foca em enganar os usuários à utilizá-los. REMOVA-OS DO SEU POST. Os outros eu não olhei por estar no celular e com internet limitada, mas provavelmente seguem a mesma linha. Sei que quer ajudar, mas pesquisar “Bitcoin Mixers List” e postar o link aqui sem consultar sua autenticidade é algo irresponsável.
|
|
|
What do you think about it now?
I still don’t care, sorry. I remain only holding Bitcoin. Btw, I can’t visit these links since this exchanges tries to force me to download their app. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Oh, sorry. It looks like I misunderstood your question. Looks like your issue is that your first address reaches the addresses gap limit (the initial ones were used already) and generated more, but when you recover a wallet from the seed, this info isn’t stored anywhere so it could not be searching for transactions in addresses “far away” from the initial ones. Try increasing the address gap limit on the wallet which txs aren’t showing up. Run on console: wallet.change_gap_limit(100) Or a higher number.
|
|
|
1- i did a new wallet, seed ex:"1234567890" if i go to another computer, make a wallet, say already have seed, add the same seed ex:"1234567890", then in theory both are the same, im right?
If you restore a wallet from its seed, it will be the same. Just keep in mind what is the seed since they look like a group of words and not a sequence of numbers/characters. 2- if i do transfers using the GUI of electrum, both wallets are sync, and both can see both transactions... 3- if i go to console, and ask about "getunusedaddress" he give me the next address without use. I do operation and both are the same....
Yes. Both are 1:1 the same. Now come the thing i dont understand. 3A- if all the addresses from the first wallet are used, they give me a new address, but if i transfer to this address, the wallet where i get the address see the transactions, but the wallet we imported before no..... how can that happens?? 3B- i tryed the same with the command "createnewaddress" and same case as before........ any idea?? 4- if i import the public key just to watch, same case....
Basicly i need one wallet sync on both computer... before its works, so i dont knows whats happens now :// maybe last version of electrum wallet? (3.3.8 ) Linux
It doesn’t matter. Just go to the “Addresses” tab (View -> Show Addresses) and pick an unused address. In all cases, reusing an address is possible. New addresses are given for privacy purposes but you can use them as many times as you want.
|
|
|
You are the one denying it, saying that 1 sat byte get dropped and not stuck. I saw that, it was a fact: they didn't drop, they were waiting for confirmation for some hours/days, in the All Time High Congestion. Just like I said before.
I’m presenting a fact. These txs CAN be dropped if they get stuck for too long. This HAPPENED WITH ME. Nodes DO drop transactions. It is possible and this opens a window for users to “replace spam” the transaction and steal from Burker King’s processor. That’s the whole point of the discussion. People CAN steal BK and send the tx back to them. TryNinja, I get your point. Ok, You want to justify that we shouldn't use 1 sat byte fees, but we should use higher fees. I don't agree, but that's ok.
Your "possibilities" like a suddently BTC adoption that will make BTC become highly used by common people in a few hours, or that someone very rich like Jeff Besos is going to spam the network with 100sat/byte for months didn't convince me.
Those "peaks" of congestion are much more like an attack (when BCH was listed in coinbase for example and BCH were spamming the network) or very uncommon situations, and they don't last for more than like 2 days.
Please quote me when I said you/we shouldn’t use 1 sat/byte transactions. I never did that. The last major spam lasted days and even months w/ spam waves, not 2 days. This sounds like a very arbitrary number from you. I will continue using 1 sat /byte fees as I always did, since 2017, and I am ok with that. I know someday one transaction my be dropped, although it is very unlikely and I have never seen it, and I have done at least 30 1sat/fee txs. (and if it get dropped, I will sent it again with 1 sat byte fee until accepted!)
Good. You should as long as the mempool is empty and allows you that. Now, when you see a big congestion, you will see your tx won’t get confirmed in 24 hours. And this is a really big problem for BTC that WILL happen in the current state OR won’t let BTC go mainstream. Don’t go denial on that ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) You can keep pushing them, making them never really get dropped (dropped? Put it back). The whole point of the discussion is users seeing the BK tx getting dropped and not pushing it back, but spending somewhere else and stealing that.
|
|
|
However those 100 sat/byte tx will stop coming sooner or later, making room for 1 sat/byte tx. From my experience, sooner than later. I never saw a dropped Tx, I will take a look if I can find one.
I keep making 1 sat fee tx and they keep getting confirmed within a few hours. As I said, I made one last week during our price spikes. No issues ,8 hours to get 1 confirmation.
I think more people should do 1 sat/byte tx. Most of those 100 sat/byte are probably done by exchanges and shitful wallets which don't let users control fees, artificially inflating fees to benefit miners... literally abusing newbies lack of knowledge. But that's another discussion..
Yes... that’s the situation NOW. This in no way means 1 sat/byte transactions are drop-safe. What happens if suddenly someone starts spamming the mempool like they did some years ago? Or if China starts encouraging BTC usage and a big part of the population follows them? Possibilities. You never saw a 1 sat/byte get dropped =/= no 1 sat/byte have ever been dropped. I have seen plenty and limiting facts to what you saw is wrong. Wasn’t you here when the mempool hit its ATH and you literally had 1-3 sat/byte stuck for days? You can’t deny that... it happened. It’s a fact. I can literally spend million in 100+ sat/byte tx for weeks. Isn’t that possible and totally viable if I have the money to burn? How can you deny that and affirm 100 sat/byte tx will stop showing up? You don’t know that. And I personally had 1 sat/byte txs get stuck for days.
|
|
|
If you sent bitcoin with a near-zero fee, there's a chance it could get sent back to the originating wallet if I'm not mistaken. That happened to me at least once a couple of years ago when the network was extremely congested.
This doesn't happen any more. I always use 1sat/byte fee (the minimum fee allowed) and I never saw any transaction go back. It will just take long confirmation times (never saw it takes more than 20hours even when extremely congested. Only because the network isn’t extremely congested as TP said. The sad truth is that whenever we peak the mempool tx ATH, 1 sat/byte and even higher can be dropped and « refunded » to the origin wallet. Mainstream levels of usage would probably do that a lot. This DID happen a lot since it’s how Bitcoin was made to work. If you have tons of 100 sat/byte+ tx, why would a miner pick your 1 sat/byte? If 100+ keep comming, they will keep getting priorized, never making room for your tx. Then, nodes will start to drop it.
|
|
|
Eu esperei (involuntariamente) e fui banido da campanha da yobit ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Pelo menos não promoveu diretamente e deixou estampado o esquema fraudulento da Yobit.
|
|
|
Será que isso se aplica também a essa última campanha que ainda está rolando ou somente às passadas onde deu aquela treta?
Pelo que eu entendo, apenas quem usou a assinatura que tinha o “X10 daily”, que foi logo após a do CryptoTalk e antes dessa atual. Quem esperou e não usou a assinatura do X10 está livre para tentar. O ódio pela Yobit pelo jeito será eterno aqui no BitcoinTalk. Espero que sim. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Eu comprei um tempo atrás de uma pessoa que comprou do exterior. Se o valor + taxas valer a pena, não vejo por que isso não poderia ser uma opção. No fim ele (e consequentemente, eu) pagou menos do que o preço que era praticado pelos revendedores BR na época. Não sei como está a situação agora, mas da última vez que vi os preços tinham ficado muito mais em conta.
Não consegue também considerar comprar de um revendedor BR? Faz tempo que não vejo a comunidade do Bitcoin Brasil no Facebook mas sempre tinham alguns confiáveis por lá.
|
|
|
Only one BurgerKing in Venezuela is accepting Bitcoin (as a test). Double spending is possible and not hard and they even mention using a RBF transaction to send the coins back to yourself. In all cases, the payment processor is accepting the risks and possibly countering the losses by putting some extra fees in it (the user from the tweet got charged way more than he should, but that was probably a mistake).
Maybe the win/loss ratio is good enough to let people not have to wait 10-30 minutes for a fast food mea.
|
|
|
|