Just so glad I'm not American right now... Tough choice. The stupid compulsive agressive billionaire so full of himself you'd think he would explode, or Hitlery?
Never, never, ever believe that someone who talks at an IQ level of 100 and who is a billionaire is stupid. |
|
|
|
Well, no. I can't feel the been and never will. I consider myself to be fairly anti-communist, something Bernie is not.
He is offering everyone free stuff. Whether it's free university, free healthcare or something else, he wants to shred our country apart, destroy competition and give us MORE debt. He's a tax and spend kind of guy which never works in the end.
Also, about these "companies" who are stealing too much -- they aren't. It's called competition. If a company makes 100% of something it is in control of the price. If you want to change that, find a different company or start up your own. You don't need government to help you.
Finally, Wall Street is not as evil as you may say, and a tax will literally kill the economy. We'll lose so many investors just because a few people want to stop working and get FREE everything!
Sorry bud, Bernie got destroyed last night in ALL 5 states and will continue down that path.
Me, I'm not feeling the Bern, I want to Make America Great Again.
Actually (bolded above) socialists promote krony kapitalism, at which point they actually can whip up a fury about the "companies who are stealing too much..." |
|
|
|
But you see, he has no evidence whatsoever that Bldg 7 was a controlled demolition. None. He only says that because it implodes inward. The outward appearance and phenomena of the building are identical if a key structural member is 1.blown up, 2.melted by thermite, 3. softened by several hours of fire. You can't choose one of these just because it fits with the conspiracy theory you already hold. That makes no sense. |
|
|
|
If the West was responsible for all the troubles, where have all the troubles gone to in Japan? China? Russia? Chile? Germany? Alaska?
If there is a "West" that is the great evil, where is it and who is it?
If "the West" is responsible for all the trouble in Iraq, why is there no trouble in Japan or Germany?
Does "the West" include Israel?
All dictators in the world say to people of their countries that the "West" is responsible for all their troubles, but of course they are lying. IMO if all countries of the world were governed like like "Western" countries the people there would feel much better. But in a literal sense, anytime some war started in the Middle East and reinforcements came, might they come from "the West?" EG, that is the Compass Direction they come in. So these terrorists with two brain cells head in that direction of West, somewhere and blow themselves up. Is it that simple. |
|
|
|
Moloch,
You did such a good job predicting Michigan, what are your predictions for tonight's voting?
A broken clock is right, dice they say. |
|
|
|
.....
Clearly the Pentagon also fit that criteria (went down without a plane hitting it.) Unless one considers a cruise missile to be a plane:
......
I do agree with the pentagon getting hit with a missile of some sort. There is no way a plane that big, with solid engines, flies into a building only leaving a circular hole. Leaving debris small enough for few agents to walk away with it...
Nonsense. The Pentagon is not your average building. |
|
|
|
Gravity points down. That's where things fall. Down. And saying "the fires didn't weaken<Blah blah blah>" does not make it true. It doesn't even make an argument. It's more like random words.
Finally, there are huge differences between 7 and the towers. For example, the primary support for the towers were the beams around the outside. The primary support for the bldg 7 was far to the interior. Again, just saying something isn't even an argument.
Does that make sense?
Hey, I didn't know about building 7 but the picture above are rather... Evidences. Seems like some buildings went down without anything hitting them no? According to conspiracy theorists, "Something hitting them" DOESN'T bring them down. It takes additional hundreds of ninja type guys secreting explosives in the dead of night. Why that kind of thinking would be required when simple fires would do it, I don't know. |
|
|
|
....building 7 collapsed hours after the towers. There were reports of they were gonna "pull the building".....
Pull means pull with cables. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htmI really don't know how American people swallows all of this? There are so many evidence about this topic that can trigger some really dangerous talks in Congress but still nothing happening. How is this possible?
.... Well if it was for safety, sure... But wait... Wouldn't they need days, or at least hours to setup the demolition? Plant all the equipment to bring down the building in an orchestrated fashion? .... Building 7 was burning uncontrolled for hours, during that time showed evidence of structural failure, and then collapsed. I don't understand what is complicated about this, or what even lends itself to a plausible need for a conspiracy. Uncontrolled fire. It burned, then it fell. Period. So what? |
|
|
|
Islam teaches peace and tranquility.....
Does Islam teach peace and tranquility if I am Muslim and decide that for my own peace and tranquility I am going to leave Islam? We all know the answer. I just want to hear you say it. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Sure, you are just repeating misinformation.
First, let's look at the ACTUAL thing happening in the blog I suggested you look at. Quoting the final paragraph is a nice way to get to the heart of the controversy.
Here’s Scientific American on the story yesterday:
The disagreement may seem esoteric, but it underpins the biggest climate disagreement of the past decades. Climate models, which are virtual representations of our planet, project that temperatures were much higher in the early 2000s than was the case in reality. Scientists have been trying to understand why.
Here the question is the disagreement of climate models with reality. So you don't even have the subject right, do you? Strange that you blow the horn of triumph on your bicycle that just sailed off the cliff of reason, but hey, stranger things have happened.
Nope. It has nothing to do with the subject. You wanna say models have problem confronting reality? Well sure go on, I'll agree on that with you no problem. That's not with this statement that I have a problem as it is a rather true statement! Next,
Please look at the EXACT claim that I made, which for convenience you may call the "Pause Claim." It has to do with satellite data, very specifically the lack of any statistically significant warming showed in a particular data set.
You are not refuting this claim, and neither are those you quote. Rather you are just sort of talking side by side, like babies do when they play side by side with other babies. Babies have not yet learned to play with others.
That's very simple and should be obvious. Is it not?
Lol, so you're actually claiming people saying the rise of temperature is of 0.1° per decade are saying there is a pause in temperature increase...
What's obvious is that you quoted a shitty blog claiming scientists admited there was a pause in temperature increase, and when you look in the source of this shitty article you see that it's not the case. Not the case at all.Apparently you are completely incapable of reading and comprehending. |
|
|
|
......Trump is a wanker, but the thing is, he's talking honestly and liberals and the left hate him for it and they are rabidly attacking anybody that disagrees with them whether they actually support Trump or not, that kind of hostility will always come back to bite them and what it will do is just push people to vote for Trump because the alternative is worse.
Think about it for a moment, people who spew their bullshit without thinking, why the fuck would you vote with a group of people who are smug, arrogant and try to paint you as a racist no matter what your opinion is or if you defend yourself? Not nice is it? I don't blame people who vote for Trump at all.....
Seems it's NOT just the liberals and the left who hate him for it. Very curious things going on now. |
|
|
|
A mind is a wonderful thing to waste...
- berniebot, 2016
Or for the berniebot convention disrupters.... a boot is a wonderful thing to lacefor Trump advocates... Time is running lets make haste
Make America great.
And don't be late.
Yes, the smell of Soros is in the air. |
|
|
|
If the West was responsible for all the troubles, where have all the troubles gone to in Japan? China? Russia? Chile? Germany? Alaska?
If there is a "West" that is the great evil, where is it and who is it?
If "the West" is responsible for all the trouble in Iraq, why is there no trouble in Japan or Germany?
Does "the West" include Israel?
people talk about that, a lot of them said it's because of the west and the west who gave Israel kinds of guns and tech to attack Palestine. I think it's just some of western people, not all of them Ok, so...some terrorist full of hate, listening to foolish mullas, he thinks "I'm going to attack the West." Is there a West? Or has he focued on a false generalization? |
|
|
|
What do you think? If I had just heard about 911, I might be being polite to the kid by my brain certainly would not be on reading the kiddie book. But I am certain that the conclusion reached by Moore has to do with the IQ of Bush. |
|
|
|
[im]https://i.sli.mg/7wAVb0.png[/img] I can almost believe in reincarnation now. Wow! The difference being that Patton actually fought for his country and freedom  Whereas Trump and Trumpers want to kill anyone not believing in the same things than them... Time will tell whether Trump is 'fighting for his country and freedom'...it's what they all say..., but it is pretty clear that he is in a fight for his life (literally or close to it) and that he volunteered. As Trump obviously knows, there are certainly easier ways to make a buck than running for president of the U.S. against the establishment with their two entrenched political parties, the media, and a fair number of pretty twisted people in the general public. I've got some respect for the guy due to the above observation alone among other things. Enough to where I am at the point of supporting him with some reservations as would be the case for anyone. Thus, I guess I would be a 'Trumper'. So I know for sure that there is at least one 'Trumper' who is completely against ' wanting to kill anyone not believing the same thing' that I do. That would make the world a boring place. If you only believe the propaganda about who believes what without researching it for yourself you will have a very poor and unbalanced understanding of reality and will be chronically surprised as events unfold. Your skepticism is refreshing and welcome. Instead, cogitate on the amount of energy that has been deployed to stop him, and all the people that are together to do it. I have never seen this. The latest news is Anonymous is back, again, for a total, super total war against TRUMP. Again. Maybe the Pope will try again? I find this fascinating. Here's why everyone should be for Trump. I'm going to make it very, very, very Simple. If not for Trump you'd see a Jeb Hillary competition right now, in all it's glorious fakeness. Like a puff of smoke, Trump blew that away. He exposed the fakeness, which we should all benefit from. Second reason is that Trump is not a Democrat or a Republican. That's enough. |
|
|
|
Are you asking proper questions, because it looks like your blaming them all the way through. At some point you have to accept what happened in the past and look forward to what can still be achieved. It's either we learn to work together, or humanity gets wiped out like the blip in time it was.
I think I am asking the right questions, not from my own confusion, but as an observer. |
|
|
|
|
If the West was responsible for all the troubles, where have all the troubles gone to in Japan? China? Russia? Chile? Germany? Alaska?
If there is a "West" that is the great evil, where is it and who is it?
If "the West" is responsible for all the trouble in Iraq, why is there no trouble in Japan or Germany?
Does "the West" include Israel?
|
|
|
|
Yep. As soon as school hours are over you are back at it, full of zombie berniebot energy... So predictable.  Weird. Oh, wait. Weird is expected from Weirdo-in-chief advocacy shill. |
|
|
|
By "structurally sound" I mean, "not unsound, structurally." I don't mean that the engineer who built the house out of playing cards didn't use superglue to hold the house together. I meant that he though any kind of house of playing cards was structurally worth anything other than show.  It doesn't matter that what you have just posted does not make sense. Phrases like "structurally sound" have very specific meanings. Put it this way - If I was an investor and had that kind of money and was looking at Building 7, no to buying it. It just plain looked kind of shakey. It would be nice if the things that I posted made sense to you. You could be quite a fantastic person for explaining things that made sense, if you only understood some sense. At the base of it, the things that apply to Bulding 7, apply to the Twin Towers as well. The fires didn't weaken the Towers enough that they could have come close to falling from them. But, if they fell from some fires, they wouldn't have fallen into their own footprint in 11 to 14 seconds as they did. They would have toppled. Gravity points down. That's where things fall. Down. And saying "the fires didn't weaken<Blah blah blah>" does not make it true. It doesn't even make an argument. It's more like random words. Finally, there are huge differences between 7 and the towers. For example, the primary support for the towers were the beams around the outside. The primary support for the bldg 7 was far to the interior. Again, just saying something isn't even an argument. Does that make sense? |
|
|
|
Argument? Great leader? Huge Fan? WTF? Boil it down to the basics. One dude says he wants to Make America Great Again, the other says Get Your Free Stuff Here. Take your pick. I know which losers will pick. Talking about how Wilikon said on another thread that we should kill a guy who just ran to the stage where Trump was. All the Trumpers on the thread where like "yeah we should just kill him" and in fact the guy didn't even have a weapon... [/quote] Did he? Did they? Where? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
