Calo Natalizio   |
|
|
|
In the terms and conditions says "Duck Dice" lol Did you just copy and paste theirs wonder what else is copy paste or cheaply done. https://imgur.com/a/ygBWT3sHow do you explain this? I see no answer to this accusation. |
|
|
|
Interesting fact that the actual merit generation is decreasing while the amount of sources increased.
Does that mean the sources have a lower a quota, or simply are there some sources that are inactive, thus less merit sent to them because of unspent source merit?
Does anyone have a clue?
I think some of the old inactive sources with a big amount of smerit (old sources, bigger smerit) have been removed. Keep in mind this is a personal guess and can be wrong. |
|
|
|
Can you add an arrow to where their signature is? I can't see a signature in the screen grab you provided (your thread says "same signature") the title of their post would no doubt come from clicking "reply" hence it looks the same and as to their actual post they would have had to fill in this form: The 1st screen is from one old bounty where those accounts have done an application. This is not the latest bounty they had participated on so now their signature it's gone, for a ban or because they remove it, but the application for the bounty is still there. Since it is a very old bounty for a different signature/avatar(I'm pretty sure the ban on one account remove the signature) it quite strange that they posted in a short amount of time on the DESICO bounty, and after some months they all have the same different signature. ... my opinion is I think you found a bounty and scrolled every page until you saw a handful of signatures that were for the same signature campaign and said "Gee, they must be the same because the majority (97%) don't have a signature." Absolutely not, I will not look for every bounty on the forum for every page and scroll for this particular. I do not reconcile the motivation for which I struggled on one of these profiles, but I found myself on looking at the chronology of one and I found an ethereum address, and where I live se say "from what is born what". As I consider myself a person who has an higher attention to the details then the avarage, I immediately noticed the anomaly, where a consecutive series of accounts have posted and after several months are all with the same new signature. I see nothing to connect any of them other than being registered in a three hour band of the day over a fifty day period. The ethereum connections between accounts are provided and archived on #1 and later when new proofs has been discovered on #8 post of this thread. As @Marlboroza noticed some accounts has been banned and I pretty sure (not 100% sure) that one banned account have the signature privilege removed. Si if the page has been achivied after the ban we can't see the previus signature on the profile. Here we can find also eclezireex with a ban https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=elcezireex I've included elcezireex account for 2 reasons 1- 0x2aD2095C9a563fA4aa2bE6d23Af4B92C62aB9751 elcezireex https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4948249.msg46322488#msg46322488 http://archive.fo/heA2I#selection-3441.13-3441.55With this address https://etherscan.io/address/0x2ad2095c9a563fa4aa2be6d23af4b92c62ab9751#tokentxnsWe can find a lot of transactions with 0x4288F22e8432241F5E49243b55885dC4328c444F Puyol https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2322644.msg32914190#msg32914190 http://archive.fo/iu2gk#selection-6431.13-6431.55 2- I've added one more old address for this user on post #8, I copy here the essential part Where we can find more connections with some of the others accounts:  |
|
|
|
|
Of course no, it will be to easy and not ethical level up alts in this way and is nice to see that everyone so far has voted no.
|
|
|
|
|
Hanno aggiunto 3 nuove source e ne hanno rimosso alcune.
Hanno anche cambiato la quantità di sMerit di alcune soruces.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you add one more column, "merited by"?
It can be useful and it can save time without opening the link of the post to see who merited who.
|
|
|
|
I do appreciate your work but let me ask, how is having multiple accounts against the forum rules? based on this thread > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0i don't see a single rule that prohibits having multiple accounts on the forum, it's only the rules of the signature campaign mangers, therefore it's their job to monitor the people wearing their signature, and even if someone was caught violating the signature campaign rules, how is that relevant to DT members tagging those people? signature campaigns are one of the main reasons for the forum turning into mostly a shitpost place, why is it anybody's duty to protect the signature campaign rules? let them handle their own work, also given the fact that the majority of these camps belong to some shitcoins that will probably vanish "scam in a way or the other" i think it is a waste of resources trying to find the signature campaign abusers, we rather be digging deep on scammers instead. it is also hard to be 100% sure with just the proof you posted, there will be 100s of explanations by those users on how are you wrongly accusing them, even though chances you are right, it's just not enough evidence that you are 100% right. Having more accounts is ok, using on the same campaign where you can't use more than one account is against the rule and it's abusing the bounty. 90% of managers don't care about anything, and since almost none of them is tagged for negligence, the only way is to report abusers here. Also, remember signature abusers are one of the main reason for the problem of spam on the forum. You can never sure if one is guilty but we have DT members for this, you can never 100% sure of a crime neither in real life. @Timelord2067 I will write the deep analysis this evening. |
|
|
|
|
Ty my winning guess has been rewarded!
Next try
20 21 22 23 24
|
|
|
|
Your street view search is incorrect, your screengrab shows Oxford Street not Oxford Road. Although the address postcode does not match the street, it is probably in an area of South London known as Crystal Palace and refers to a 3 bedroom private house in the neighbouring postcode SE19 3JH  This was a doubt but this is what they have on their website. https://hashpalas.biz/?a=supportArchived: http://archive.fo/FEqmfScreen:  Maybe is something wrong with the Google API Anyway thanks for the info about the license, I have more of "those websites". |
|
|
|
I don't claim to understand how their particular hash generations work but it seems to me like you're right in that you can't use forum posts as a statistically valid way of counting winners. It is only potentially indicative of something and doesn't constitute as proof of anything.
Also, 20x50 is 1000 posts and is not statically relevant as a number because we have a very low % of winning numbers (under 1%), we need a bigger number to get a realistic value besides variance. Does this website haven't a public list of rolls? |
|
|
|
amazing, i got the correct number and my post is removed somehow,Nevermind... My post is still there, I got the correct number you probably missed @TrueFlip.io 20 21 22 23 24 I will never win, Next time I will copypaste bitmover's numbers.  same as me, i got the correct number too but he not included it here the proof wow, congrats for bitmover win twice in a row
for the next lottery i pick 23. 24.73.38.79
and i will pick the different number now 33. 14.53.58.59 Probably he skipped as for a mistake, hoping to get a response Any way always same numbers 20 21 22 23 24 |
|
|
|
|
Just saw, confirming I got payment x2, as said I'm ok with the premature payment for the next week I will do my task. Happy holidays.
|
|
|
|
amazing, i got the correct number and my post is removed somehow,Nevermind... My post is still there, I got the correct number you probably missed @TrueFlip.io 20 21 22 23 24 I will never win, Next time I will copypaste bitmover's numbers. |
|
|
|
|
If you have one post worth of merit, send me the link here and I will merit it.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
