Can you add an arrow to where their signature is? I can't see a signature in the screen grab you provided (your thread says "same signature") the title of their post would no doubt come from clicking "reply" hence it looks the same and as to their actual post they would have had to fill in this form:
#JOIN Signature campaign
Bitcointalk username:
Telegram link (via @):
ETH address:
.
So I went to your link
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4948249.msg46321552#msg46321552 and found that it was archived:
http://archive.vn/VaXQe on the second of Jan. I have also archived it again today.
http://archive.vn/ojNsvso... twenty posts on a page.
12 do not have any signature, eight posts do.
Of the eight posts that do have a signature, five are for
Roger Ver. The remaining posts are one each for
Desico,
Mycro Jobs and lastly
bitcoinair.orgOf the five posts for
Rodger Ver...
turkmachiavelli posts twice. Firstly their signature details (post
2043 (1of5)),
five minutes later secondly to add their Telegram details (post
2045 3of5)) with
HiatusGG (2of5) posting roughly half way during the five minute period.
40 minutes later
Puyol (Post
2048 (4of5)) then 32 minutes after that Suzukigsxr250 (post
2049 (5of5)) a total of 1 hour 17 minutes from first of five to fifth of five posts. The fifth post appears to be for a lower level (member) campaigner
Suzukigsxr250.
From first post
2014 at 30 September 2018, 04:34:24 to post
2060 at 30 September 2018, 15:59:24 takes eleven and a half hours. In that time
*three* not five full members (and one
member) with the same signature apply. (
five posts; four UID's)
Of the next twenty pages, there are barely a dozen posts that have a signature; the rest have none (12/400) (ie 3/100 ie 97%)
You asked for an opinion...
... my opinion is I think you found a bounty and scrolled every page until you saw a handful of signatures that were for the same signature campaign and said
"Gee, they must be the same because the majority (97%) don't have a signature."
When I look at this:
Name: HiatusGG
Posts: 1309
Activity: 476
Merit: 103
Position: Full Member
Date Registered: 21 August 2017, 01:40:57
Name: Puyol
Posts: 781
Activity: 462
Merit: 101
Position: Full Member
Date Registered: 04 September 2017, 02:52:31
Name: Suzukigsxr250
Posts: 250
Activity: 250
Merit: 13
Position: Member
Date Registered: 20 September 2017, 00:10:32
Name: turkmachiavelli
Posts: 739
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
Position: Full Member
Date Registered: 10 October 2017, 01:27:19
I see nothing to connect any of them other than being registered in a three hour band of the day over a fifty day period.
Just one last question:
In two separate posts 23 hours apart you've made the assertion there are five members of this ring:
(New proofs added in this post.)
All of those accounts have an old post history in this section of the forum:
Local / Konu Dışı3/5 accounts have strange "other contact infos on profiles", idk what exactly are, can be EOS 12 numbers contract addresses? I've tried to search with EOS explorer but 0 results
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FCreHA%2Fb3ebbabc34.png&t=665&c=zizH7MDIIuxfLg)
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FCreIj%2Fad6b433cac.png&t=665&c=fPGu8Ejlkx9ipg)
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FCreIw%2F60f599b19b.png&t=665&c=e732r1yoRYR1IA)
I count four.
You say
elcezireex is a member - based on what evidence? They don't have a signature
and never have http://archive.vn/VaXQe#selection-3371.0-3471.55 (2nd Jan) and
http://archive.vn/ojNsv#selection-2847.0-2853.55 (4th of Jan)
The three with gibberish in their
Other Info *might* be connected on that basis alone, but as The Pharmacist said I've given up on ETH connections - not the least I won't touch ETH to start with, but because these connections are tenuous at best.
Why did you add
Name: elcezireex
Posts: 1637
Activity: 532
Merit: 151
Position: Full Member
Date Registered: 13 June 2017, 20:32:48
to the list ?? Walk me through that thought process.
Go back and see if you can connect
*just* the three full members with gibberish in their
other info... Can you do that? Connect *just* those three?
@
rhomelmabini screen shots don't prove anything, and once the image provider decides to remove them, your "proof" is lost forever. Use an archive service such as
archive.vn to archive your work - and use text to walk people through what they are looking at (your posts don't tell me anything)
I'm now away for the week-end but will look back in on this thread early next week.