Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could help me trouble shoot some trouble I am having with (I think) a cgminer mapping issue.
[SNIP]
You are having multiple problems. Does the 5970 work or are you another hopeful that bought a dead GPU? Most of these are way beyond working status thanks to being abused by miners. Do you have enough system ram to scrypt mine on that many GPUs? Did you read the EXTENSIVE section on using --gpu-map in the readme? |
|
|
|
|
AMD are awesome at breaking stuff. Manually download the AMD APP version 2.7 and install it and try again. You will need to log in/out or even reboot for the modified paths to work.
|
|
|
|
Why would you put almost every single other miner software, and NOT include the most popular one, CGMiner?
Its there. Under "CG" Downplay its importance by not giving it a full name entry. Subtle...  |
|
|
|
|
CPU speed is close to irrelevant with GPU bitcoin mining. However there is a small but demonstrable benefit to changing CPU frequency governor to high speed with scrypt GPU mining so therefore CPU speed matters slightly. I wouldn't get too excited though, it's only marginally more than a trivial speedup.
|
|
|
|
0.15 usd each now  why is there like an equivalent amount of buyers for litecoin at same time as bitcoin........whats goin on Speculators |
|
|
|
|
13.1 is broken shit. Try 12.8
|
|
|
|
Hi ckolivas/kano, I'm curious if in previous versions (2.8.0/2.9.0) has been known bug where cgminer switched from Stratum back to Getwork? Today some people reported that although they're using newer cgminers with Stratum support, they're still mining on getwork interface (although pool reports X-Stratum correctly and Stratum backend works). They also reported that Stratum worked for them for some time, but then "it switched itself".
I recommended them to update, but I'd feel safer if this has been known and fixed...
So many stratum bugs have been fixed since then I can't even tell you exactly. I would certainly recommend upgrading to the stable 2.10.5 release. |
|
|
|
|
Second card sold for $365. Third up for sale now.
|
|
|
|
1300 bucks a day ? Am I figuring that up right ? I believe he has 5 now. That's sickening if so.
Not for long. But long enough. |
|
|
|
|
No, as the maintenance burden isn't worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
Because CPU mining with cgminer is deprecated, unsupported, and undeveloped.
|
|
|
|
I decided to be a guinea pig and try 2.11.0 on a single rig. Took a nap and it locked up the second I went to sleep. I guess it was trying to switch from Ozcoin to BTCGuild (both stratum connections). I was mining on a single 7870 with Catalyst 12.10 drivers on Win 7 x64.
Afterburner shows it was still burning up the GPU but apparently no shares were being submitted. I just force-closed it and reverted to 2.10.5
I can confirm this bug too, after some time it just stops submitting shares but it stil responsive.. a restart helps I wonder if this has nothing to do with the GPU code since that is actually unchanged (apart from the kernels) and is related to the USB+hotplug code since it's windows only... Kano? |
|
|
|
|
First official release of cgminer that supports the new agreed upon resume protocol is out, 2.11.0
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't more people mining for LiteCoins increase demand for LiteCoins? Then people can exchange litecoins for Bitcoins or for fiat. No, more people mining litecoin would increase supply, not demand. This will certainly profoundly impact litecoin. Prices will drop, and the difficulty is already projected to rise 35%. In the long term, there is no saying what will come out of this. Mining only has an indirect effect on price. People mine to make money, the value of their currency does not inspire them and they want their mined coins to be valuable, so some of them branch out into other ventures which actually do affect price, such as selling goods with their currency etc. If people don't do the latter, the price will not rise, as the value of the currency is determined by speculation and trade, NOT mining. By virtue of the way Satoshi designed the original successful cryptocurrency (obviously BTC), mining doesn't affect production either. Production varies slightly from difficulty to difficulty, but overall is relatively constant. As for the original question [Can the the rise of bitcoin price keep GPU and FGPA in the mix?] - that question is easy to answer: No. |
|
|
|
|
Not even BFL knows the answer to that.
|
|
|
|
Why doesn't Deepbit support at least X-Roll-NTime? :/
I don't think Deepbit has updated their pool servers since before X-Roll-NTime was invented FTFY |
|
|
|
I decided to be a guinea pig and try 2.11.0 on a single rig. Took a nap and it locked up the second I went to sleep. I guess it was trying to switch from Ozcoin to BTCGuild (both stratum connections). I was mining on a single 7870 with Catalyst 12.10 drivers on Win 7 x64.
Afterburner shows it was still burning up the GPU but apparently no shares were being submitted. I just force-closed it and reverted to 2.10.5
Probably the new kernels as I said. Ironically when your clocking is set close to fail levels, it's during fluctuations in hashrate (such as during network outage and then pool switch) that usually leads to crashes. This has always been the case. |
|
|
|
is anyone up on POT? thinking of giving up on it, but i'd love to hear some success stories  I'm about 4 days' mining ahead thanks to luck. However I gamble big, setting my diff to 10k. |
|
|
|
LOL |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
