To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC
TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b
TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927
TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28
I will give info on this shortly.
this detail would reveal source but not destination but the key question is documenting that this transaction is linked on the block chain, from A to B to C - I haven't seen any proof of that |
|
|
|
/quote]
You use same amount for test.
Can't tell. 2 address popup.
post the 2 address's Oh my bad.. Just one XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn This one also used XXPwPgua2u7Psa6PCR6noHR7XrsyRVfh1x But main is XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn thats not the address I used Could you post the used address, and do the test with chaeplin again please. [/quote] I'm setting up a fresh wallet for a new test.. will post the TX ID# in a few minutes for this test |
|
|
|
Chaeplin is actually helping the coin, not hindering it.
It's like some of you don't want any testing or questioning, because you're scared of the price of your bag.
I'm holding a lot too and the only way the coin will move forwards is by rigorous testing.
Guess what, I hold DRK too. Am I now banned from the cult?
that's true. I agree 100%, I want this kind of feedback and data to resolve any issues, we need real world testing to improve the product |
|
|
|
/quote]
You use same amount for test.
Can't tell. 2 address popup.
post the 2 address's Oh my bad.. Just one XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn This one also used XXPwPgua2u7Psa6PCR6noHR7XrsyRVfh1x But main is XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn [/quote] thats not the address I used |
|
|
|
|
/quote]
You use same amount for test.
Can't tell. 2 address popup.
[/quote]
post the 2 address's
|
|
|
|
You use same amount for test. Can't tell. 2 address popup. can you reveal the source wallet or not? |
|
|
|
I think Chaeplin just filter the recent transactions.  ?? Well regardless, new test data has been posted, lets analyze it for any issues and I will update the code as needed. |
|
|
|
If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ? After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty. Lets wait and see IF this is true at all  No luck, pattern. XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine. The main point though is 2 things 1. This XNode was setup before v1.35 2. XNodes require a fresh wallet, with 1 address, and then make deposit to that new wallet and this is the first public release of the code, to get feedback from the community and testers on potential bugs. Lets have another bounty/test on the v1.35 code... ATCSECURE |
|
|
|
ATCsecure can u plz explain how it is prevented from a mixer stealing coins during this beta wallet?
a mixer on its own can't steal coins, but with out the REV2 trust system and multi-path there is a potential risk of loosing coins through a bad node. I have setup "hardened" servers for testing, PM for details Is a "bad node" one that has a technical malfunction, or one that is operated with evil intent ? Either one, as I stated I have setup some secure servers for testing and personally guarantee that those servers work as advertised, PM me for details |
|
|
|
ATCsecure can u plz explain how it is prevented from a mixer stealing coins during this beta wallet?
a mixer on its own can't steal coins, but with out the REV2 trust system and multi-path there is a potential risk of loosing coins through a bad node. I have setup "hardened" servers for testing, PM for details |
|
|
|
ATC any command or something to know what going on behind the scene ?
-number of xnode running
-number of transaction passing through xnode
-volume of xc passing through xnode
perhaps its too early in this rev.
For the 1.36 right now wallet is working like a charm and xnode is running on a separate computer with 15xc and reservebalance=20 but i dont know how i can get something useful for you for now i have no fee (running 1h) .
Unfortunately not at this time, we are looking at certain features similar to this in REV2... |
|
|
|
@atcsecure Thanks for all your hardwork you´re definitely doing a great job. I have a suggestion could you maybe implement a way for running an xnode for less coins based on trust earning, i really would like to help by running a xnode on south america (São Paulo, Brazil) but i dont have this much coins and i have a great machine (i7,ssd,8gb ram) and 200mb fiber optics internet that i would love to use it for this amazing tech. Thanks once again  Yes I'm always open to suggestions |
|
|
|
|
If anybody setup an XNODE on the old version before the user guide, you will need start with a fresh wallet, with 1 address. Transfer the 15-20 XC's to that new wallet. [so transfer money out, delete wallet.dat, transfer back in]
Also remember this software is still beta, so please report any bugs or issues.
thank you
ATCSECURE
|
|
|
|
xnode with 15xc up and synced (#reserved balance at 20)
Does the second Wallet for the Xnode still use the same .conf as your original wallet? If so do you then put the reservedbalance = 20 in that .conf? the reserve balance is only for the XNODE itself |
|
|
|
Nah, more than 10 min, getting old too v1.35 is not broken based on my testing, but I am looking any issues that have happened and still testing |
|
|
|
Let me clear Redbboxed is mixer tx 2 attemps. 2coin, after 3coin  I use this  this is first 2coin tx  This is the block tx included  2 coins didn't get in.  Maybe this is my problem only. But something is gone bad. I lost my coin. Let me review the details and determine the root cause.. mixer's don't steal coins but I will take a look and see what the issue is |
|
|
|
Are there any benefits already for running xnodes?
Potential benefits currently include the fee's received and helping fine-tune the code logic In the running and Xnode user guide, you mention reserving 10000 XC in the guide. Did you mean 1000? For this release - it is 20 - but thank you for pointing it out for me and I will correct the guide. |
|
|
|
Are there any benefits already for running xnodes?
Potential benefits currently include the fee's received and helping fine-tune the code logic |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
