|
Still looking for ANY TF2 items, just PM me with your backpack link to get BTC
|
|
|
|
and again: just another reason why u shouldnt buy a placebo  GNU/Linux is the shit. Hail Stallman! Linux has no games. |
|
|
|
Interesting they only mention disabling it on computers - I'm pretty sure many late model phones use Java too.
I don't think the exploit affects mobile phones, unless i'm wrong |
|
|
|
Very few do that though, mainly because of course what they produce is rubbish and they know you'd cancel the pre-order if you saw a proper preview of what to expect, why these people can't just provide good products to begin with is beyond me.
They want to save money while making maximum profit. |
|
|
|
|
If you guys dislike BFL so much, why did so many of you preorder?
|
|
|
|
|
Can you provide a video demonstration?
|
|
|
|
|
Can you do anything with them apart from wearing them?
|
|
|
|
What if the community later found 21m is really not enough?
You can always use smaller units (0.1, 0.01, 0.001 etc.) |
|
|
|
Meh, i'm not too good with the technical details but from what i've gathered over the years it seems like the possible problems would be more from those who could disrupt the blockchain but even then that'd take alot of power and bandwidth and is more of a dick move than anything. "Stealing" or somehow creating bitcoins seems impossible or close to it (excluding user related mistakes/exploiting human nature)
Maybe some kind of trojan style exploit that would have to be spread through a bt client or market (some poker/gambling site that uses flash/java or requires users to download anything) that would be scripted to funnel coins to a set address?
I'm sure along the way some users will figure out ways to fuck things up but given how good the track record has been so far I'm optimistic.
Malicious / hijacked websites exist, and have always existed. It's your responsibility to protect yourself. |
|
|
|
what do you mean by "power is free for me" ?
He doesn't have to pay for electricity, someone else does. |
|
|
|
|
If you use an online wallet, like blockchain.info/wallet, or a client like Electrum, you won't have to worry about this.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure you entered the correct info into the miner?
|
|
|
|
payment through only paypal
Shouldn't this be in offf topic or trashcan? Yes, i think it should. |
|
|
|
|
I think they have that type of graph on blockchain.info, not sure if it's what you're looking for though
|
|
|
|
|
BUY BUY BUY before it's too late
|
|
|
|
|
Cool website, thanks! I'll try it out later.
|
|
|
|
I did a little more research. I think the client is written in C++. And in C++ you have a 64 bit integer that goes up to 9.2 quadrillion ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primitive_data_type). So it means that quite a large part of the 64 bits are being used. It also means that the money supply could have been easily doubled or tripled without getting problems of computing it on a 64 bit processor, but this would have a little impact on the amount of time it would take to mine all coins. Thanks for other good information. I don't think that was how it was decided, but interesting theory nonetheless. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
