I would have thought that the Activity count would be that of 2, in accordance to the two posts made on Meta. While trying to figure it out, I stumbles upon a couple of weird additional Newbie cases: a) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2744380This account has 7 posts according to the post count, but 0 Activity, and actually no posts in the “show the last post of this person” link. If fact, the account made at least 10 posts, all being deleted at some point (see http://loyce.club/archive/members/274/2744380.html). b) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2756879This account has 1 posts according to the post count, but 0 Activity, and actually no posts in the “show the last post of this person” link. If fact, the account made at least 2 posts, all being deleted at some point (see http://loyce.club/archive/members/275/2756879.html). Additionally, this account is banned. So there do seem to be some isolated circumstances that throw the Activity counter off its path. |
|
|
|
DM: Direct Message; PM: Personal Message In the context of this forum, it means to use the “send this member a personal message” feature to communicate with someone, as opposed to posting a publicly viewable post. <…>
virtually snap or jink there … |
|
|
|
<…>
Not sure what you mean behind personal notes, but the idea behind the Trust ratings is to make information available to others (specifically related to Commerce), so that others may use that information to get an idea of what that person is like in terms of trading. With that in mind, a personal note that (may have) no use for the general public is probably not the right use of the system here. |
|
|
|
<…>
I’m pretty sure that has already been pondered multiple times. Software projects that get delayed well behind an intended schedule may start spinning well off-budget, and evolving requirements on the current running platform pile up to that delay. What is going to dictate the outcome is the willingness to go ahead (which seems to be there), controlling the budget/scope/managing changes, and the skills of the team currently allocated to the project. Without there being a specific dire need to migrate platform, I’d say that anything longer than an additional year may be a turning point, and a point in time to reconsider. I’ve seen large projects go down the drain after years of investment with large consultancy firms. It does happen. |
|
|
|
|
El artículo de Cointelegraph no hay por dónde cogerlo. No veo los fundamentos de su titular, y luego el texto teoriza sobre todo lo contrario en grandes masas. Total, dice una cosa y lo contrario, lo cual equivale a no decir nada, con un tufillo a desinformación por el camino. De paso, ironiza y desvía la atención sobre "anime Bitcoin" (how much for some anime Bitcoin?): A alguno ya se le estará ocurriendo hacer un fork …
|
|
|
|
<…> Si usamos blokchair; otro explorador, vemos que se ha confirmado hace 4 minutos <…> Pues tardó lo suyo, y a una tarifa más alta que hace pocos días atrás. Por curiosidad, no sé si conocéis algún buen estimador "a priori" del tiempo que puede tardar una TX a lanzar, en función de los sats/byte que se marque como fee. Por ejemplo, la siguiente página da una estimación del tiempo en función del fee, aunque con unas horquillas bastante holgadas: https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/Hay otros estimadores del tiempo una vez transmitida la TX, como por ejemplo: https://www.blockonomics.co/api/tx?txid=c9ab639cd94781d3992e1358a4faf949ed0f6e247b32e2eb9b595f9483ba307dNota: Desconozco la bondad de sendos enlaces anteriores, y los pongo a modo ilustrativo. |
|
|
|
<…> A partir de hoy por fin se puede salir a pasear o hacer deporte, veremos el resultado en 10 o 14 días, esperemos que los datos sigan disminuyendo.
Algunas fotos que ya circulan en los diarios son de traca (de las que para algunos son dignas de 50 sMéritos). Lo del 1km de distancia radial no lo va a respetar ni el tato, y ya he visto casos que incumplen por doquier, como era de esperar. Es lo que hay, y en parte, me imagino que se cuenta con ello. Lo que habrá que ver es el impacto, aunque aislar la variable de socialización respecto de la de la subida de temperaturas no va a ser factible. Toca esperar y ver … |
|
|
|
Históricamente, se han emitido 515 TXs por un valor facial de 50 sMéritos (ver https://public.tableau.com/views/BitcointalkMeritDashboard/PostSummary?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link), el 0,15% de todas las TXs. Se puede consultar el detalle aquí: https://public.tableau.com/shared/GMTYXSM6T?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link (por cierto, que 3 son en nuestro foro local). En general, las TXs de 50 sMéritos me parecen bastante innecesarias, y son casi siempre cuestionables a pesar de la subjetividad que se les supone. Lo que si denotan en ciertas ocasiones (como las del post ante-anterior) es la variación de criterio en su otorgamiento, y la vanalidad de su valor por comparativa, lo cual merma un tanto el espíritu del sistema y, hasta cierto punto, la fe en el mismo. Si queremos ver la lista de los que han recibido sMéritos (he ubicado el umbral inferior en 10), y no han enviado sMéritos, podemos verlo aquí: https://public.tableau.com/shared/ZW4J69QN5?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link. Los primeros de la lista lo son por cuestiones obvias (Satoshi, Hal), y luego vete a saber el motivo en los demás casos (aquí no contabilizo los casos con airdroped sMerits, que no son datos públicos). |
|
|
|
En el foro Español, no hay demasiada actividad, y menos aún en el ámbito de la minería actualmente. En todo caso, la sección adecuada para poner este hilo sería en Hardware y Minería. Lo adecuado sería mover este hilo a dicha sección para contextualizar mejor tu petición. En el caso que domines en el inglés, lo ideal sería poner la trasucción de tu post también en la sección de minería en inglés: Mining Support. Mírate los hilos de paso, por si localizas algo que te pueda servir mientras tanto. |
|
|
|
|
He procedido a actualizar los resultados de todos los miembros del foro que había incluido en los dos posts anteriores, con datos a fecha del 01/05/2020.
Si alguien más quiere ver sus datos, no hay más que solicitarlo.
|
|
|
|
|
Data actualizados a 01/05/2020
Actualizadas las listas en el OP, a fin de reflejar los miembros del foro que cualifican con los criterios reflejados en el OP.
Actualmente, en las citadas listas tenemos con <= 20% méritos para escalar de rango (la Actividad puede o no haberse logrado):
- 2 Hero Members (en camino hacia Legendary)
- 2 Sr. Member (en camino hacia Hero)
- 2 Full Members (en camino hacia Sr. Member)
- 3 Members (en camino hacia Full Member)
- 2 Jr. Members (en camino hacia Member)
|
|
|
|
Se ha procedido a actualizar el OP con los datos a fecha 01/05/2020. 1 Legendary, 7 Hero Members (*), 3 Sr. Members, 8 Full Members, 38 Members, y 109 Jr. Members han precisado sMéritos para escalar de rango, y han obtenido al menos 1 sMérito en nuestro foro local. No todos son autóctonos del foro local, dado que algunos "invocados" has sido meritados en nuestro foro. Relación Completa (no caben todos en la lista del OP): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14YERBif4m4Jyrz1JFilOMvKzC5Z1YdrcEqcrwm8sWDg/edit?usp=sharingLa variación mensual es prácticamente nula ... |
|
|
|
He procedido a actualizar los listados mostrados en los primeros posts, con la relación de todos los meritados en nuestro foro local, con datos a 01/05/2020. El total de sMéritos otorgados en nuestro foro local es de 5.825, acorde a la siguiente distribución: año mes nMerits
2020 4 200
2020 3 209
2020 2 301
2020 1 292
2019 12 265
2019 11 208
2019 10 147
2019 9 194
2019 8 147
2019 7 237
2019 6 252
2019 5 147
2019 4 150
2019 3 213
2019 2 160
2019 1 192
2018 12 172
2018 11 217
2018 10 235
2018 9 359
2018 8 140
2018 7 281
2018 6 127
2018 5 170
2018 4 161
2018 3 146
2018 2 279
2018 1 224
|
|
|
|
Data as of 01/05/2020Updated the lists in the OP (and subsequent post) to reflect the forum members that still qualify in each of those lists. Currently, on those lists there are, lacking <= 20% merits to rank-up (activity may not be met though): - 44 Heroes (on their way to Legendries) - 40 Sr. Members (on their way to Heroes) - 43 Full Members (on their way to Sr. Members) - 37 Members (on their way to Full Members) - 202 Jr. Members on their way to Members) Added this week (10): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
1925869 Tytanowy Janusz Active 1883 728 N 802 Hero Member Old Era Newbie =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1925869
1073690 andy_pelevin Active 1286 980 Y 209 Full Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1073690
2772969 blue Snow Active 134 70 N 93 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2772969
2423580 CristianOff Active 420 420 Y 85 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2423580
2709246 BIT-BENDER Active 181 126 Y 81 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =1 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2709246
1755161 Seph213 Active 37 37 N 9 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1755161
2689982 vachevskij Active 154 154 Y 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2689982
2556617 derBowler Active 136 136 Y 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2556617
2675975 Neoterix Active 41 41 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2675975
1416455 MikeJ_NpC Active 32 32 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1416455
(*) this week (9): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
1164368 GreatArkansas Active 2760 840 Y* 1000 Hero Member Full Member =+3 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1164368
1289002 Maus0728 Active 574 532 N 502 Hero Member Member =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1289002
1024933 RaltcoinsB Active 1342 658 Y 254 Sr. Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1024933
1573369 casperBGD Active 1010 742 Y 102 Full Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1573369
2505788 ChefImGartenPavillion Active 401 401 Y 100 Full Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2505788
2756407 Captainowl Active 227 98 N 101 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2756407
1937811 Aircryptico Active 83 83 N 18 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1937811
1456131 sergw Active 148 148 Y 10 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1456131
2383571 Lavrentiic Active 30 30 N 10 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2383571
(*) Due to enough merits for the next rank, or being banned.
|
|
|
|
Update 01/05/2020:The dashboard gives you access to anyone’s complete merit history in the TX tab, surpassing the 120 day limit. Link: BitcoinTalk Merit Dashboard. Updated the Merit Dashboard to reflect the most recent sMerit available data: Total sMerit: 655.978 Total Txs: 342.659 From Users: 22.029 To Users: 33.918 minDate: 2018-01-24 22:12:21 maxDate: 2020-05-01 02:51:51 Aggregate awarded sMerit for the last complete week (20/04/2020 .. 26/04/2020) is 4.744 which is down 8,80% from the previous week. In addition, there are 1 more Legendary and 1 more Hero members this week: Veleor -> Legendary from Full Member during Merit System kick-off. Maus0728 -> Hero from Member during Merit System kick-off. Note: Copper Members and non-native ranks (staff, etc) are displayed as real (regular) ranks.
|
|
|
|
<…>
The OP kind of reminds me of one of those HR questions that nobody answers with sincerity, although on a professional ground it is easier to envision one’s hopes for himself five years down the road (at least, at certaing ages, whilst one is still hungry for climbing the ropes, and before finding that it’s pretty much more like a game of snakes and ladders). In the crypto context, I figure that, for the most, it is a lateral hobby and not a main driver in live (with obvious exceptions), and as such, setting roadmaps to obtain knowledge (as opposed to a financial gain) is pretty much far from what the average Joe will do. It’s likely more of an exploratory ground, where one will go at his own pace and time, bearing to the fact that live goes on and, as such, will command the main thrive and needs, leaving leisure to be what it is, with no real need for goals and roadmaps. In retrospect, going back 2,5 years (to become a virtual Newbie), I recall hearing the buzz and fuzz on the media, and exploring (a very small portion of) just what all this was about. No compass to wade the uncharted muddy waters. No plans (some halfwit hopes though). |
|
|
|
Quizás, en el apartado de aspectos del foro, hablaría algo acerca de las reglas no escritas del foro, comprendidas en parte por el segundo nivel de vigilancia (implementado a través del Sistema de Confianza), y las reglas del fairplay (relativo a la tenencia de múltiples cuentas, el meritaje entre ellas, el comprar/crear cuentas y usarlas tras ser baneado en el foro, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
De alguna manera, el patrón se ha ido repitiendo, pero quizás la perspectiva es muy alta. Repetir un salto porcentual en el tiempo, como ha sucedido en los halvings pasados es más factible a valores absolutos de valor comedidos. El salto que ahora va dibujándose en los distintos charts juegan con saltos porcentual similares, pero con valores absolutos del 100K hacia arriba por unidad de BTC. Digamos que ahora, adicionalmente hay que franquear una barrera mental, que supone pasar de pensar de BTCs como unidades enteras a SATs como fracción. Para el inversor puro y duro probablemente sea irrelevante, pero para los nuevos entrantes quizás tenga un cierto peso.
Adicionalmente, la cobertura mediática del ATH y el posterior descalabro de precio está más en la retina de la gente, siendo un factor que puede tener mayor peso que en ocasiones anteriores de cara a la integración de nuevos inversores que empujen las cifras del valor del BTC a los niveles proyectados.
We'll see ...
|
|
|
|
<…>
Merit Sources are not confined to a specific board, so any board may be merited as a result of their forum surfing interests/habits. Local boards are pretty heterogeneous: - A few have a large amount of awarded sMerits, but also many posters. - Others have a reasonable amount of sMerits for the amount of posters, and the better posters are normally spotted there. - About half of the local boards are pretty inactive, and lack a Merit Source acting there. Normally if a board (any) is considered undermerited, the best way to draw attention to it would be to report some details specifics in a thread (such as this one). By specifics I mean something in the line of: a) Providing some numbers on the number of posts (quantitative). b) Providing some numbers on the number of merits awarded there (quantitative). c) Providing a "lengthly" list of posts that are unmerited/undermerited there (subjective quality). The former two can be derived in multiple ways (for example using the Merit Dashboard). The latter requires more time to compile, but with the above you can make a concrete case that draws attention to the situation with specifics. |
|
|
|
They are not illegal, but you also have to make sure that the one you are interested in is legit. After all, they are going to trade on your behalf and use an exchange API to access your account, so you need to assess pretty well the reputation of the trading bot, and consider just how much you are willing to let it manage (that is to say, the amount you can expose). It would be nice if others with hands-on experience could bear their testimony here. Unfortunately, I am not in that situation, but a couple of years ago I did take some time to look into them. Bearing no relation to it whatsoever, and without intending to vouch for it, I did find it interesting to read through a thread here on the forum at the time: [GUNBOT] Trading Bot with 136 exchanges available. Even if you are not interested in that particular software, reading through the thread and the wiki is pretty interesting, and let’s you get a view on what this sort of software can do (you’ll also need to figure out what it can’t and the associated risks). Just don’t assume that it’s plug and play, click, and get rich. The algoritms need to be selected and parametrized according to your needs, and sudden market sways may not be played well if parameters are not thought through. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
