دعني اضيف لك بعض التفاصيل: SegWit: هو ترقية لبرتوكول البيتكوين والهدف منه اساسا هو زيادة حماية المعاملات وزيادة سعة الكتلة في بينة جديدة تعرف ب witness حيث تنقل التوقيعات والنصوص الي هيكل جديد بحيث نحافظ علي حجم الكتل عند 1 ميغابايت ولكن ال witness تكون 4 ميغابايت تقريبا حيث يكون ال block size عبارة عن 1 ميغابايت و ال Block weight 4 ميغابايت وبالتالي تمكنا من التخلص بشكل مؤقت من مشكلة زيادة الرسوم دون الحاجة الي زيادة سعة الكتل او ما يعرف ب block size لاحظ ان اغلب الفوركس Bitcoin forks كان الهدف منها زيادة سعة الكتل الي اكثر من 1 ميغابيت وبالتالي رسوم اقل ولكن زمن اطول حيث انك ستحتاج الي الكثير من الوقت للتاكيدات " في الحقيقة فان Bitcoin SV تحتاج الي حوالي 1008 تاكيد في الوقت الحالي مما يجعلنا نضحك عليهم بسبب زيادة سعة الكتله. الان كيف فعلوا ذلك: المعادلة بالاسفل توضح ذلك: Block weight = Base size * 3 + (Total size = Base Size + Extra size) حيث : Block weight: الحد الجديد للكتل ويمكن حسابه من المعادلة بالاعلي. Base size: 1 ميغابايت Extra size: صفر اذن بالمعادلة السابقة نجد ان الحجم الجديد سوف يساوي 4 ميغا الان نرى كيف توفر هذه التقنية الرسوم: لاحظ حتى نفهم الارقام التالية قم بمراجعة الاتى: سلسلة تعلم ★ كيف تحسب رسوم البيتكوينبالنسبة للعناوين ال legacy: 180+68+10= 258 بايت بالنسبة لعناوين ال SegWit: 171+68+10=249 او 168 Vbytes بالنسبة لعناوين ال Native Segwit: مقابل نقاط جدارة من يستطيع شرح كيف تقلل الرسوم ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif) القائمة بالكامل موجوده في هذا الرابط اتمني ترجمته واضافتة لهذا الموضوع -------> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bech32_adoption** مهمة وهي ان العناوين Native Segwit تعاني من بعض المشاكل في التحقق من التوقيعات لذلك اذا اردت اثبات ملكية حسابك فلا بد لك من التوقيع باستخدام legacy addresses قراءت مره ان ارسال بيتكوين من عنوان يدعم سيغويت الى عنوان لا يدعم لا يمكن او العكس لا اتذكر صراحه هل هناك تأكيد لهذه المعلومة ؟
المشكلة تكمن في برمجة المحفظة حيث ان بعض المحافظ لا تدعم بعض صيغ العناوين لان اغلب المحافظ تتاكد من البادئه وهي 1 وعندما تجد عنوان يبدا ب bc1 تعطي خطأ ايضا هناك بعض المستكشفات لا تقم بعرض تلك العناوين لذلك يظهر الخطأ
|
|
|
I wish you success but I think you were not successful in the idea of the site. The goal of cryptocurrencies is to break the barrier of need for a trusted third party who manages coins between sender and receiver. You offer a service similar to banks where you have to trust in your site until the process of sending and receiving.
+ This type of service does not provide an extra layer of privacy but makes connecting between users very easy. Also, what exchange API do you use in BTC/altcoin exchange?
|
|
|
- No fees from BestRate
- Free trial period for testing
There is a discrepancy between the concerned or in other words: you will pay a fee but when the trial period expires and make the first advantage useless. I read here ----> https://bestrate.org/faq/ that the exchange is done by Changelly, ShapeShift,...etc. What happens when these platforms impose some restrictions (KYC)? Will the account be verified by this service and then you can use this option? If the above option is acceptable, will there be a re-fund "We returned to the trust box after verifing the identity"? Overall the interface looks good. I may use it in the future ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Binance and coinbase are the two main pillars that will turn to the next central crypto banks, and will move-away the link between cryptocurrencies and dark activities manipulation, money smuggling, drugs.
They have plans to expand in many countries in addition to some charitable activities, which is a sign that this platform will try to be like Google, but its focus on emerging countries, unlike what coinbase does.
|
|
|
I assume they are attacking the Electrum's servers so their malicious ones can be the only ones working. The user will try servers/close and reopen Electrum until one synchronizes (the bad one), which will give him the “please update” fake message. [/quote] Many people are still on older versions. If this is true and there is a profit from these attacks do not expect to disappear soon. There will be tours that will continue from time to time until profits reach zero. Also, do not rule out attacks because of trying to distorting electurm wallet reputation for another new rising wallets. <I do not expect that is the reason this time.>
|
|
|
It is not only that Indian platform, but the collapse of Bitcoin's price to $ 5000 and volatility as well as more hodlers makes the acceptance of BTC unstable and may lead to heavy losses. India has no clear regulatory rules and despite the demands, the government is delaying regulation, which makes it worse. So we must look at the bright side and it is the continuation of Unocoin. they accept only Indian Rupee. Can it be the reason for not being listed on CMC?
Because it is famous in India. I think Andreas M. Antonopoulos followed them as they held many meetings discussions.
|
|
|
Any acceptance is considered a good news whatever the reasons.
Although I consider accepting using Bitpay to be a kind of soft acceptance, because the third-party payment processing means that they still have reservations about this technology, but as long as there is an increase in demand, there is no objection to getting more profit.
Maybe if the price/volatility stabilizes, there will be more motivation to accept BTC directly without the need to exchange it to paper currency.
|
|
|
Verifying the signature is the only way to be sure that the downloaded file is the one uploaded by ThomasV (assuming that ThomasV knows how to protect his signing key, which he most probably does).
If the user does not check the site, he will not verify the signature. Verification of the signature is important in hacking the official site cases but will not be useful in such cases. To solve the problem definitively there must be collaboration between browsers and search engines. There is an authentication badge next to each official account "just as it happens in social media" and therefore when a person visits any site similar to the official domain the warning appears.
|
|
|
Thank you for sharing this, litigation does not necessarily require official recognition of cryptocurrencies, but proof of scam, theft or SCAM ICOs. Having such experts will help a rapprochement between the judge and the complainant, but if governments do not intervene with regulatory rules, it will turn into initiatives that are less than the speed of crime.
|
|
|
Kris Marszalek, CEO of Crypto.com Chain, explained in another article that the reason for the donation was for charitable purposes, especially that the donation of one BNB is worth many days in school for children, but I think the purpose is manipulation. At the conference, CZ announced that 1 BNB donated would equate to 66 days of school for a kid supported by Binance Blockchain Charity Foundation. The CEO of Crypto.com Chain said, The currency (Crypto.com Chain (CRO)) has risen more than 28% in addition to some gains with Binance. Overall it is good to see some charity acts in the cryptos market.
|
|
|
If you mean by the cycle Bitcoin Block Reward Halving [1], It is true because because Halving directly affects on the supply and therefore the price increase. Otherwise, there is no cycle in which the price rises every period of time. Following the previous patterns without taking into account the temporal and the latest variables leads to false predictions and therefore can not be relied upon as successive patterns. It's not symphonic music [1] About 402 days for the next Halving
|
|
|
As the members mentioned above, it depends on your country but if you get some positive trust in this forum it is easy to do transactions with zero fees.
So the cheapest way is P2P transactions with a trusted member on this forum using a native segwit address "Bech32." As for platforms, the rule says: the more docs (KYC & AML) are submitted the lower fees.
|
|
|
It's up to you if you have "a lot of" time plus experience "Scalp trading" in BTC/USDT is very profitable especially if trading between BTC and shitcoins/tokens ex: Bitcoinus gained 28.36% last hour ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif) . Otherwise, playing from the less risky side is *especially* profitable with these fluctuations. For beginners it’s better to start with Swing trading. My style is a long time HoDling ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
The problem lies in the payment method that you chose and not Paxful escrow service, I really hate Paxful but you can not blame them for that. mistakes always happening. Next time try to deal with active sellers and then check each seller's ratings "responding to feedbacks/trying to adjust them or ignore them.." Also, active sellers will be afraid of freezing their funds by paxful support because of your communication.
A lot of regulatory rules will be imposed on Paxful and thus the cases of the competition "timeframe on dispute" will be more accurate.
|
|
|
I always bookmark trusted sites that I frequently use or use Google Search through this forum "[banned mixer] ANN bitcointalk or "cryptamixer.io" review." If the site/crypto service does not have an advertisement on this site, I do not expect it to be of any importance.
Sorry for your loss, I hope this $ 5 will save you a lot of loss in the future.
It seems that scammers are winning a lot of these phishing scam sites so the number will increase soon. maybe we need a phishing detect browser.
|
|
|
It's a tough week for Craig Wright (Fake satoshi) ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) . It started with Binance ( Binance Will Delist BCHSV), and then the announcement of Kraken ( Should Kraken delist Bitcoin SV (BSV)? ), now this plus a lot of time until coinbase confirme the transactions (1008). I do not expect too much time to die, the price has already fallen and the candidate is heading for further collapse. The real question is why was it listed?
|
|
|
IIRC I think he was involved in stealing funds from brainwallet addresses. He has a good technical knowledge but chooses it to use it for his own to steal funds.
This seems to be true, and unfortunately this member continues to post in the local board because trust does not appear in that section. Can anyone translate what is written in that board? Why mods did not ban "permabanned" that account? ----> If it was a "phishing/malware" links, he must be banned, or was it due to spam? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
He claims he is "Team member of that project" he never says he is Bounty manager, I saw bounty was managed by someone else. I think he is a member of the team with any position. I think bounty manager and team member is different. But don't know what he thinks. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Did you mean that member was a scam campaign manager who participated as a member of another campaign and did not run the campaign? What is the reason for - 20 negative trust? Is scam, selling accounts or something else? Generally, no fire without smoke. If you are skeptical about any project and you have a strong motivation, post more about it here and stay away from investing/joining in that project.
|
|
|
|