People would be able to make 0 posts in a week and 100 posts in the following week and receive 2 full weeks of payment instead of one ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Doesn't look like spam if someone is posting 100 posts only to get paid for the bounty? To me is "clever" way to spam in my opinion, but whatever.
|
|
|
Btctalk name ✅ coinlocket$ Rank ✅ Sr. Member BTC Wallet Address ✅ 12XUa8iczkvz2mdu4yBRDDeUB9nBfGFBaj Wear Appropriate Signature ✅ If accepted Wear Personal Text: Make winning bets on sports with Sportsbet.io! ✅ If accepted Wear Avatar: ✅ If accepted
|
|
|
I'm surprised you didn't react when I posted them on your thread ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I've reported over 500 accounts so far, hard to remember everything ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Almost 1 year later ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Better than nothing I guess.
|
|
|
So now that one of his accounts his banned, he can't post with other accounts?
Is this ban evasion?
|
|
|
Till we have some restrictions, you can do nothing except to report to mods.
|
|
|
It’s amazing just how lazy people can be. I mean those plagiarized posts could be freshly created from the top of the head in under a minute (ok, two tops), but why think if you can simply copy the content from somewhere else
Easy answer, often they have dozens of accounts to join more signatures possible. Copy paste is the faster way.
|
|
|
Most likely a scam ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FCi796%2F5bd9bf5681.png&t=663&c=u7z6tCMapvmp_w)
|
|
|
I think it will be more effective if we can have a % value.
|
|
|
Why not just ban all these accounts cause they are shit posters and ban anymore if you find anything else. You searching for them specifically can actually be time consuming, just do you, and these dumbfucks would be banned eventually. Don't worry too much about it mod dude.
If he ban them, we have thousands of alts to ban who reports only bounty reports on the forum. Isn't the same thing?
|
|
|
Wow questa è una delle notizie più grosse lette.
|
|
|
Be care, we already have "new accounts alts" with 1 activity posting here ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) . I suggest to require 1 merit to join or a 6 month old account...
|
|
|
We can create a formula to use for bumping threads with a cooldown with some rules.
1 - If OP posting bump cooldown every x hours can be 1-24-x, your call 2 - If total posts of user < 20 don't bump 3 - If total posts of user >= 20 & merit earned/activity=0 don't bump 4 - If total posts of user >= 20 & merit earned/activity>0 bump with a cooldown= activity/(1+merit earned)/ Trust (based on DT rating), result in minutes 5 - If a normal poster is posting bump the thread with a cooldown = Activity/(1+merit earned)/ Trust (based on DT rating), result in minutes 6 - If the normal poster is posting on the same thread, increase the cooldown of bumping x 2 every time
This can work, I can't find How to abuse it in a long-term, merit will run out.
This will count, activity, merit earned (not airdropped) and trust.
Good posters and trusted people will have a short cooldown for bumping the thread, shitposter will almost never bump the thread.
|
|
|
~If I may ask a somewhat noobie-type question: what's the difference between nuking and banning an account? I've always used those terms interchangeably. Anyway, it's good to see these fuckers getting banned. It all looks like sloppy texting to me, but there's little doubt in my mind that those accounts are connected.
Nuke=ban+remove post history can be done only on newbies accounts. (before the jr 1 merit requirement, idk now if is linked to the activity since we have newbies with > 30 activity) Ban=ban without removing the post history.
|
|
|
(someone please archive their website - we are unable - getting a blank page every time)[/b][/color] Try to use this alternative website: https://web.archive.org/Idk how much trustworthy it is buts seems big website.
|
|
|
|