I've seen a video where a guy said that electrum will not allow to get free bcc. I guess it is just against the fork or that sort of thing.
Anyway, I guess one gets the equal sum in bcc regardless to usd price, so for 0.01 btc one will get 0.01 bcc. At least, this is how is was when we had eth hard fork. For 10 eth on recieved 10 etc. It can be inferred from the things written here: https://poloniex.com/press-releases/2016.07.26-responses-to-common-etc-questions/.

We can observe the market but it will only make us nervous for we can't buy or sell anything till the thing is done, right? even if we could, I think these would have been a risk of having our btc lost today, so I wouldn't do that. I agree the price will go up. At least today. After it is successfully implemented, I believe lots of people will do what they always do  - sell high. This will result in the drop of price for a week, I guess, and then bitcoin will recover.

In the ANN thread of bcc I got an answer from on of the members that BCH is an "altcoin spinoff" and it "will never have anything to do with bitcoin (BTC)". Do you agree with this? Because if yes then I don't understand why would btc holders get free bcc. Is it just becauce those who release the coin decided that it should be this way?
This sounds like a story with eth and etc where eth holders after the fork got free etc. I thought it was so due to a hard fork. This time we are more likely to deal with a soft fork and so natural split of btc is not likely to happen. Why would btc holders get bcc then?
Edit: I've watched a video on it and the guy there said that basically bcc was supposed to be a back up plan but too many people got interested, so it's like a forced hard fork from now on.

Thank you for clearing that up for me, because when I read the first message in this thread it sounded as if bcc has strict connection with bitcoin. Other people where even writing that perhaps the have the price connected and so if one is a few hundreds up then the other is down in the same sum.
How can it be live at yobit if segwit is not implemented yet and I guess miners haven't started mining it yet?

As I think there aren't many people out here who mainly gamble in good old casinos, could you tell us about the difference in experience? Do you spend more time when it's real? Does it take more money when you gamble seeing real people around you? Why do you prefer casinos? And where do you gamble? Are these lega; casinos or just some undercover ones?

I see many coins around. Even a year ago there were some casinos accepting litecoin and dogecoin. As bitcoin is now really expensive and slow plus some people are afraid of tomorrow's segwit thing, I thought it would be interesting enough to create a poll and see how many people still gamble with bitcoin and are there many fans of other coins. Nowadays the range is really wide, so we have what to choose from What do you think?

I think you are right on this matter. I got a question though. Perhaps I just didn't get it well at first place but segwit is supposed to result in a soft fork, right? And basically there should be just one currency, because if we have two 'bitcoins' then it is actually a hard fork already.
What is bcc then? Is it potential currency is case of the hard fork? Then how does it have its price while being no premined and no ico thing? Or will bcc exist in any case and it will still somehow be a soft fork? Is bcc going to take btc's place and all the money will be transferred there? Or is it just in hard fork case?

Why do you think the price will drop? Because miners will probably stop for some time and will need to be upgraded? Or are you saying this based on experience of litecoin that went up before segwit and down after it? Maybe people will try selling what they bought a few days ago but I think the profit is too small here, so they will probably not do that. I think bitcoin will just go hugely up.

Moreover, some have even invested recently. Rothschilds did on the sum of $130k or something like that.
I think people calmed down because bip was successfully activated and now they believe btc will succeed and the price will go to the moon right after tomorrow (just look at prediction threads, that's what most vote for). Thus, people buy even more until they can before the price goes crazy.

Ι live in a country where only 5% at best have heard about bitcoin. I don't watch TV but my mother used to watch it regularly and she said that every now and then there are some small news related to bitcoin here. We also have the most famous local bank where almost everyone keeps their money. On this bank's website they write how mush btc costs along with usd and euro. I think advertising bitcoin on TV will not help much if there won't be the hell lot of ads on it.

What I heard is that Rothschild Investment Corporation decided to give bitcoin a chance and said goodbye to their previous currency which was good old dollar. Six days ago they bought bitcoins worth $230k, so I guess this is quite a big investment. Moreover, Rothschilds are among the most rich families in the world. So, I think the answer to the question op asked is a definite yes.

I don't think the price will remain equal, actually. Such a stressful event will cause many people do panic selling. They will probably try to invest their btc into some alts not to lose everything. Let's just hope no hard fork is awaiting us, for it will inevitably make lots of people lose their money and that is not good for the market. Especially if the king itself causes the losses. I believe it may even destroy the whole cryptocurrency market or at least destabilize it hugely.

I disagree with this point. First, some people may respect you for other qualities than money. For instance, for you being smart or raising good kids. Secondly, if you have a lot of money that doesn't mean everyone respects you. Some people may even despise you, because you probably got your money in some evil unfair way. Finally, the one thing  money surely doesn't give you is happiness. And that is quite a problem, because poor people may be unhappy and at least have reasons for that, whereas when people who can afford everything realize they can't buy happiness, it is likely to end up with a serious depression or even a suicide.

Before reading posts in this thread I thought that etc was earlier than eth which made it classic, actually. I hope no fork awaits us in a couple of days but if it does I guess it's up to websites where people stored money to decide whether they give them other coins or not.
If you mean two potential currencies which result from bitcoin split than I guess it's obvious that Satoshi is quite responsible for both. Some right on the new coin may belong to those coders who got segwit implemented. And yet it doesn't mean much anyway, for there is no such thing as a currency owner in such a case, I guess.

I would be happy to join your campaign. I will change my signature right when (and if) I am accepted.
Username: kryptqnick
Rank: Hero Member
Starting post count: 1469
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=559842
BTC address:1DjE4XNs1h3FSpqtr9YEC4yU5ki5TmvjFn.

Hi. My month in this campaign comes to an end today and I would like to ask whether it will continue for the next month as well. It is very nice to be working with you!
Edit: Sorry, I have found another campaign now. I has been nice to be working with you for all these months. I will remove my signature now (28th of July). Still wait for the payment for the previous month.

On the other hand, as Segwit now has big chances to be implemented successfully because of bip91 being locked in, ethereum is not having its best times with all these hacks and shows its disadvantages more than ever. That's why I suggest to wait till 1 of August and if Segwit gets activated - buy btc ASAP. If something goes wrong - buy ethereum (or litecoin).

I think this equation is wrong. Just look at the first line to see that: "Divide BTC by Gold to get a value". Bitcoin's value has nothing to do with gold. It is fool demand and offer thing. Gold lives its own life. Even fiat nowadays is not backed up by gold. Ethereum is currently having big security problems and lots of shitty projects built on this platform. If in the future it deals with them then it may become as good as bitcoin.

I see you guys writing that icos can't be stopped. Nobody can forbid them releasing new and shitty coins, that's true, but it is us who are actually responsible for the effects, for among us there are people who sort of know ICOs are not good as an investment and yet they can't resist the temptation to buy something and get rich.
We have to ignore icos and they will die themselves. Or, who knows, one day we may really have a great coin released this way. ICOs are something we have to be formally tolerant with if we value freedom.

I think you are wrong. Hackers don't have to give a break. They are very annoying but useful people. They show the lack of security over and over again and one day it might stimulate Vitalik to do something about it. We have to respect hackers, for they are really smart people. It is the code that has to be unbreakable, not hackers not doing their job IMO.