Bitcoin Forum
October 08, 2024, 04:14:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 »
881  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ^-^-^- SPACE COIN [SPACE] REVIVAL POS / POW ^-^-^- on: September 04, 2018, 02:48:53 PM
Good news. Spacecoin on cryptopia has 8 connections and is back in business! 17 nodes running the wallets. We are still looking for a new exchange. Any ideas where there is a reputable exchange we can get listed at?

Great news, thank you for taking care of it!

Regarding exchanges: I liked coinexchange.io and nlexch.com so far and made personally good experiences with both. But as they say YMMV and they are probably both too expensive to get listed there.
882  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ^-^-^- SPACE COIN [SPACE] REVIVAL POS / POW ^-^-^- on: September 02, 2018, 12:25:22 PM
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, meanwhile I also got exactly 12 connections on both nodes, though my nodes show a POW diff of ~10 right now which seems wrong to me (it should be at least 10times more as it has been in the past weeks).
I will mine a few blocks to see if they persist.
883  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] LINDA-PoW/PoS-99% APR- MASTERNODE-MULTI-WALLET ( NEW THREAD) on: September 02, 2018, 12:04:44 PM

Got any idea how many people are subscribed to this thread here to compare the figures?


No. But you can get some idea by comparing the posting frequency.

On here there's typically what, half a dozen posts per day ... at best? The Linda Discord channel frequently receives more than that in a minute.

First let me say that I appreciate your kind response a lot, thank you.

Which basically is because nobody gets answers here since the thread has been abandoned by the LINDA leaders. If you check the views of this thread, it seems that quite a few people (investors?) try to inform themselves here about LINDA (and they end up with a wrong wallet since quickdeal doesn't seem to care to update the OP):



I would have no problems if the coin was launched on Discord, but I do really dislike this tendency to shovel the community from one platform to the next (i.e. Slack, Telegram, Discord etc.). If a coin has been launched on bct it should at least maintain minimal information (like link to current wallets, explorer, exchanges etc.) here, that shouldn't be asking for too much.
But it seems to be a general problem with LINDA, as even coinmarketcap links to the old wallet source. I guess it too is asking too much from the leaders to keep at least this information current and accurate. I guess cmc has even a few views more than bct.

Anyway, I understand that you are not in the position to change this and I am certainly barking up the wrong tree. We 'bct-leftbehinds' are actually very thankful for those few like you and Xenomole that from time to time forward essential information from discord to this thread here.
884  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ^-^-^- SPACE COIN [SPACE] REVIVAL POS / POW ^-^-^- on: September 02, 2018, 11:42:46 AM
Two of my SPACE nodes died yesterday upon receiving block # 1405731 at ~09/01/18 03:27 GMT.

Seeing my network connections now down from ~25 to ~6 I suspect this happened to others as well.
Spacecoin explorer stopped working around the same time.

That block # 1405731 seems now accepted in the chain and I wonder what might have caused the nodes to stop/crash. If this is reproducable it could be nicely abused to DoS the SPACE network.



Not sure why the nodes dropped off.
Mine where down yesterday but it is usually attributed to spectrums internet service going down or just acting flaky.

I do not believe that this was coincidence. Cryptopia's wallet is down too (though can't say if that is since the same point in time):



Also both of my nodes are in different locations, on different networks with redundant uplinks and both's debug.log ends exactly with the same line:

Code:
received block 00000000023f27205c86
SetBestChain: new best=00000000023f27205c86  height=1405731  trust=29474282056660516  blocktrust=466087502913  date=09/01/18 03:27:08
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED

<quite a few linefeeds and then my watchdog restarted the wallets:>

SpaceCoin version v1.0.1.4 (Jun  7 2018, 19:26:38)
Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1t  3 May 2016
Startup time: 09/01/18 03:30:06
...
885  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ^-^-^- SPACE COIN [SPACE] REVIVAL POS / POW ^-^-^- on: September 01, 2018, 01:46:11 PM
Two of my SPACE nodes died yesterday upon receiving block # 1405731 at ~09/01/18 03:27 GMT.

Seeing my network connections now down from ~25 to ~6 I suspect this happened to others as well.
Spacecoin explorer stopped working around the same time.

That block # 1405731 seems now accepted in the chain and I wonder what might have caused the nodes to stop/crash. If this is reproducable it could be nicely abused to DoS the SPACE network.

886  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] LINDA-PoW/PoS-99% APR- MASTERNODE-MULTI-WALLET ( NEW THREAD) on: August 30, 2018, 11:25:14 AM
Guys, the best place to keep up-to-date and get help with your wallet issues is Discord: https://discord.gg/gyfGdBP

Almost nobody posts here anymore. Linda is very active on Discord, with hundreds of posts every hour and lots of developer participation.

That's a problem this entire industry has - - - poor marketing. You tell people that no action is here and they need to join the discord. Yes, I am well versed with discord but there is a demographic of people that use bitcointalk for their information. Think about that. There is no reason somebody from discord couyldn't step up and keep this thread up to date.

just my 2 satoshi's

exactly!
there are many people who have registered here at bitcointalk to get informed about their coins and either cannot or don't want for several reasons to register at another place for these informations.




Times change.

It's not just Linda that has moved to Discord, many have. Bitcointalk is old and clunky. It's just not practical to discuss all the separate elements of Linda (wallets, staking, masternodes, trading, etc, etc) here in a single thread, while providing support and keeping people up-to-date on developments. Discord provides a much more modern, organised interface that makes it easy for the developers to be more involved with the community.

Personally I think Discord was a good choice. It keeps all of the discussions about each crypto development conveniently organised in one place, while making it easy to add more 'servers' to switch between the discussions of all the different crypto development that you might be following with just a single sign-up. And you can access it in a browser on a desktop computer just as easily as you can from a mobile device.

When you buy a product that requires support, you wouldn't expect the manufacturer to participate in every related forum on the internet -- in most cases they would have their own forums, which you would be required to subscribe to if you wished to be kept up-to-date on developments. At least with Discord you only have to register once, yet each development team has its own 'forum'.

Linda's Discord channel has around 7000 members presently and typically over 600 online at any one time. Compare that to this place. It would be difficult for the developers to justify spending time maintaining and supporting this thread when it reaches so few people.

Got any idea how many people are subscribed to this thread here to compare the figures?

Discord is a free gamers chat which is able to run apps in your browser and is run by a company that wants to make money, while bct is a simple crypto forum run by a person who doesn't need to make money from our personal data.
Discord on top of that is a security and privacy nightmare in my eyes. Read the privacy terms and ask yourself why you need a platform to run applications in your browser to simply exchange information (i.e. chat, posts).

If people think discord is superior, they should probaly launch their coins there and not here so we simple "bct-only" folks don't have to deal with these repeating discussions trying us to convince to join a platform that we do not like for a multitude of reasons.

887  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] LINDA-PoW/PoS-99% APR- MASTERNODE-MULTI-WALLET ( NEW THREAD) on: August 27, 2018, 07:41:31 AM
I am seeing this issue even after downloading with the Boostrap and starting over.

Anyone know if / how this can be fixed? I see it back even years ago with Bitcoin and Doge same ORPHAN BLOCK 751 issue

I can't get the chain to download at all now that I've updated to 2, is there a bootstrap?

All I get for days now is:

ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=1d23dc1f131a0d677d0123423049ebc366740db42c9ccf3bfcb85159659dff35
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=4fb0e6463dbd360266626199e8d2fdf23170f7c8dc4e3ab96e135b4f409395b6
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=4e6c766c3a4902c6ac8b1b8967ec25f940d575c9f39d03b44dd7aba70fdecbad
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=ede9d7bcf62d82cdb54799634d70503c2a79d57d444e641170628f68d403ce93
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=582425ec066f4d34e906d6a982440ebbd55fe10619a761c325f757e8fb7913af
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=352486049cf44c03af3f3ef1de4372c3d9ce8186c9edb20f929b0c4f138f6c07

.....

Try to start with -maxorphanblocks=2000 or higher.

HTH
888  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] LINDA-PoW/PoS-99% APR- MASTERNODE-MULTI-WALLET ( NEW THREAD) on: August 24, 2018, 07:13:25 AM
I mean since the mandatory v3.0.0.0 update .....

<irony>
A wonderful example for a well planned, deeply tested and properly communicated hard fork.
</irony>
889  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SFC][POW] ★★ Solarflarecoin Rebrand ★★ New dev team ★★ on: August 23, 2018, 07:28:46 AM
Are there any more requirements? In terms of CPU capability, traffic or harddisk?
And are there any specific regions that the server should be in? I mean if someone does US I could do Europe and/or Asia.

No, not really, the only hard requirement is RAM. SSDs and powerful cores make synching and indexing faster, but you'll get there with spinning disks and slow CPUs as well but you can't do it with 512MB RAM.
Also the server location doesn't matter at all. If people can reach the BE to check a transaction they will certainly not care if it is in Africa, Alabama, Albania or Anywhere.
Since SFC has 4min block spacing, there are only ~133'250 blocks now, that further reduces the requirements for a block explorer, other coins have already several mio blocks and that takes a lot of time and ressources to run a BE for.

And may I ask how you are involved with the project?

I am not more involved than you or most of the readers in this thread: occasional miner and hodler of SFC.
I am currently running block explorers for 3 projects I support, but I am running out of ressources and need more servers before I can expand on that so I am only offering to help but not to run it myself.

890  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SFC][POW] ★★ Solarflarecoin Rebrand ★★ New dev team ★★ on: August 22, 2018, 01:20:21 PM
Please note that this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385763.msg43930211#msg43930211
is not the original SFC SolarFlareCoin project.
This is only an attempt to speculate, but holders of this 3.0 project have not access to github repo, original source code and not hold any rights about the coin listed on Cryptopia
This is the original project listed on Cryptopia and we arwe working with exchange admin to solve the issue and reopen market very soon.
We are also considering to swap soon with a new masternode and proof-of-stake blockchain

In the meantime if there's anyone that what to setup a blockexplorer let us know!

Hi,

I would be willing to set up a node and carry the costs for one or two small server for this. I am not heavily involved as an investor, but I see this as an opportunity to learn. Not very tech savvy though (i can compile and run stuff on Linux though Wink). If you give me a helping hand, I'd be glad to help out.

Kind regards


Nice to see some community involvement here!
I'd be happy to support you in setting up an Iquidus or ABE block explorer if you have decent enough VPS for it (min. 2-3GB RAM).

HTH

891  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] LINDA-PoW/PoS-99% APR- MASTERNODE-MULTI-WALLET ( NEW THREAD) on: August 17, 2018, 01:55:40 PM
coin related news doesnt seem to get announced on this thread...for those who don't know v3.0 of the wallet is out, and will be a mandatory upgrade as of block 585200..after that block, lower versions will be disconnected from the network.

you can get it at https://github.com/TheLindaProjectInc/Linda/releases

below are the notes from the github post

Linda 3.0.0.0g
This is a mandatory upgrade. Please upgrade by August 21st to avoid any interruptions


Changelog
Critical Fix
- fixed issue where wallet was stuck on syncing block 0 when syncing a new blockchain
- Beginning from block 555000, consecutive blocks created through PoW will be rejected by the network. This is to address a potential security concern if an attacker has a vast amount of hash power at their disposal.
Sync Improvements
- track peer block downloads to auto remove stalled peers
- disconnect peer when reached ban threshold (needs proper ban logic implemented)
- disallows access to nodes running wallets less than 2.0.0.0
- nodes running wallets less than 3.0.0.0 will be disconnected from the network starting after block 585200
- dump orphan blocks from peer when disconnected (prevents filling orphan block list with unusable blocks)
- add maxorphantx startup flag to cap orphan transactions held in memory for running on lightweight machines
General Improvements
- masternode should ignore if wallet is unlocked for staking only
- locked masternode coins will be ignored when staking
- masternode start will check all possible coin inputs instead of just the first
General RPC improvements
- updates listreceivedbyaddress RPC command to return only your addresses when running with minconf=0 and includeempty=true instead of returning all addresses including send addresses from your address book
- fix GetAccountAddress not committing the new account to the walletdb causing duplicates to be made when running the command again
- setaccount no longer can create new addresses. This was a confusing feature and gave no way to change account names without creating new addresses
- setaccount returns error if trying to change the account of an address that doesn't exist in your wallet - listreceived now returns (change) addresses
- added RPC commands for masternodes
- masternode status dumps your masternode status. includes your active time and status to determine if your masternode is running correctly
-masternode status-all dumps the above info for all masternodes on the network (only your masternode will include status field)
- masternode init ip:port allows you to initialise your masternode without editing the linda.conf or masternode.conf files and or restarting the program. Running masternode start will then start your masternode
- masternode addremote ip:port - adds the info to your masternode.conf file (no need to restart Linda-qt or Lindad) running start-many or start-alias will start the appropriate remote masternodes
- masternode removeremote - removes the related account from your masternode.conf file (no need to restart Linda-qt or Lindad) you will need to run the masternode stop to stop these masternodes
- masternode isInit - returns boolean if masternode is enabled and capable of running
- masternode kill - disables masternode. can be re-enable by running init command
- Masternode tab performance improvement.
Thanks to @Tumba24
- fixed the masternodes UI tab uses a lot of resources when it refreshes
. - added sorting to the masternodes UI tab

Thank you for the heads-up. It is very unfortunate that the people behind Linda decided to ignore us bct users.

I also noticed the repo changed silently from the existing one (https://github.com/Lindacoin/Linda) to https://github.com/TheLindaProjectInc/Linda .  I personally will wait with updating my node until Cryptopia lists the new github source in their coininfo page:

https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/CoinInfo/?coin=LINDA&view=links
892  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [MARKS] Incentivize Content Creators & Build a Reputation Value Framework on: August 14, 2018, 08:49:26 AM
Those large wallets almost certainly belong to the "selfish miner" which mined from the Fall of 2016 until perhaps early 2018, the exact period with the highest emission rate. You can read about this problem, and how we as a community have dealt with it here:    Hard Fork #1 Criteria and Motivation.   The selfish miner did not attack the chain _per se_, that is, they did not double-spend or anything like that, they merely employed their superior hashing power (certainly above 51%) to mine the chain, and they are almost certainly the holders of the large sums as detailed above.

After early 2018, there is a much less pronounced emission rate from a relatively short period of honest, native SCrypt-only mining, and, now, once again, much higher emission from honest, distributed mining on the 8mPoW algos, dominated by merge-mining. Honest merge-mining, yes, but very cheap to produce merge-mining, which is driving the price down.

 I do believe that there must be a reward policy which accounts for the production cost differential of pure native mining from near zero-cost merge-mining. I think it's unwise to foster a complete reliance on foreign chains for our mining.   I do believe the best way to maintain balance, retain dedicated native Bitmark miners and still benefit from the security of a measure of merge-mining is simply to account for that production cost differential in the subsidy.

And yes, certainly that selfish-mining period was centralized mining, and it is for that very reason that we went from a primitive diffalgo with single PoW SCrypt  to  8mPoW with DGWv3 diffalgo.

You don't need 51% for selfish mining at all, roughly 30-40% are sufficient depending on the specific selfish mining technique used by the attacker/selfish miner, even much less if the chain is stalled for weeks like BTM was at that time.

Selfish mining is not to be confused with a 51% attack where the goal is to doublespend inputs. The selfish miner just wants all blocks at lowest possible (hash-)price and to annoy honest miners until they leave by constantly invalidating the blocks the honest miners find.



Thanks for the clarification @psycodad. And this is what was happening. Nobody but Mr./Ms. Selfish mined Bitmark until they left, and shortly thereafter we switched to 8mPoW with DGWv3 anyway.  

 IIUC, this selfish-mining is possible (at least in part) because a larger chain can appear out of the blue and is accepted by all the nodes, because it is the longest, most-work chain, although the "honest" nodes had not seen the selfish node before at all.
Thus, the "selfish" part: The Selfish Miner did not share their work (and thus allow possible competition) until they were sure they hade a stronger chain to show.   Can you shed some more light on this ?

This is perfectly right as you describe it, though the selfish miner is at all times connected with the honest network and nodes.
The selfish miners two or more nodes are connected to the whole network and they seem to agree on the chain all nodes have (while in hidden the selfish miner advances the chain on his 2+ nodes secretly).

Say, the honest network is on block # 1000 and all nodes agree on that, then the selfish miner mines say until # 1010 but leaves the network thinking it is still on # 1000 by not releasing these blocks. Only when the selfish miner hears from one of its peers that a block has been found and broadcasted by a honest miner, he/she will release 2 or 3 blocks to invalidate the honests miners work. If he he has and advantage of ten he can even wait longer to invalidate the others blocks.

There are certainly checks and balances in most wallets that limit how many blocks one can release at once and so on, I can't say much about this as I never dug into these parts in the code. Though the attacker knows this exactly and has "tuned" wallets/nodes that make sure other blocks are only seemingly accepted from honest nodes and he/shee only releases his blocks when needed and in an interval that is acceptable for the specific network currently attacked.

In the last 2-3 yrs we saw this very same attack on quite a lot scrypt chains (don't know about others, I am only into scrypt chains) like BTM, EAC, WDC, TIPS just to name a few and I am pretty confident it is still going on, ABY seems to be a current example of it.

893  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [MARKS] Incentivize Content Creators & Build a Reputation Value Framework on: August 13, 2018, 03:56:53 PM
Those large wallets almost certainly belong to the "selfish miner" which mined from the Fall of 2016 until perhaps early 2018, the exact period with the highest emission rate. You can read about this problem, and how we as a community have dealt with it here:    Hard Fork #1 Criteria and Motivation.   The selfish miner did not attack the chain _per se_, that is, they did not double-spend or anything like that, they merely employed their superior hashing power (certainly above 51%) to mine the chain, and they are almost certainly the holders of the large sums as detailed above.

After early 2018, there is a much less pronounced emission rate from a relatively short period of honest, native SCrypt-only mining, and, now, once again, much higher emission from honest, distributed mining on the 8mPoW algos, dominated by merge-mining. Honest merge-mining, yes, but very cheap to produce merge-mining, which is driving the price down.

 I do believe that there must be a reward policy which accounts for the production cost differential of pure native mining from near zero-cost merge-mining. I think it's unwise to foster a complete reliance on foreign chains for our mining.   I do believe the best way to maintain balance, retain dedicated native Bitmark miners and still benefit from the security of a measure of merge-mining is simply to account for that production cost differential in the subsidy.

And yes, certainly that selfish-mining period was centralized mining, and it is for that very reason that we went from a primitive diffalgo with single PoW SCrypt  to  8mPoW with DGWv3 diffalgo.

You don't need 51% for selfish mining at all, roughly 30-40% are sufficient depending on the specific selfish mining technique used by the attacker/selfish miner, even much less if the chain is stalled for weeks like BTM was at that time.

Selfish mining is not to be confused with a 51% attack where the goal is to doublespend inputs. The selfish miner just wants all blocks at lowest possible (hash-)price and to annoy honest miners until they leave by constantly invalidating the blocks the honest miners find.

894  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FAILCoin | EMPOEX EXCHANGE IS CLOSING | UPCOMING RELAUNCH on: August 11, 2018, 08:17:17 PM
~2hrs ago PoW officially ended on FAIL.

Happy staking  Cheesy
895  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: August 10, 2018, 07:57:28 AM
The PoS went back up again.
Did you re-started the stacking on your node ?

86% for the last 100 blocks. What is the point to keep this. It would be nice to shut it completely or to share the code (for a implantation in a new wallet version).

K.

I didn't go through iguanodon1's code but he gave a github URL with his POS-optimized code that he claims to use:

https://github.com/iguanodon1/Slimcoin/tree/optimized-pos

896  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FutureBit Moonlander 2: The Most Powerful and Efficient USB Stick Miner! on: August 06, 2018, 01:39:53 PM
i looked into the crashing, it has nothing to do with Power. both my hubs can provide enough power, i have stress tested it with plugging 3 Moonlanders 2s into 1 Hub, this ran fine without any speed drop. I now have 2 Hubs running 2 moonlanders each.

i wanted to know if anyone has managed to write a Crontab script that restarts the SH file every 1 or 2 hours? if so how did you do it! any help would be great.



Regards

Paul

You might want to look into timeout, it should do what you are looking for. Basically run your script in a construct like this:

Code:
while true; do timeout 7200 /path/to/your/script-executable; sleep 3; done

HTH
897  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][HUZU] HOLD SWAP | Staking Pool | Masternode | Voting | Governance on: August 03, 2018, 04:38:01 PM
The quantity of 0-activity-newbs postings in this thread is truely intriguing..
898  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Stellar Holdings (HOLD) Revamped - POS/MASTERNODE - on: August 01, 2018, 12:59:46 PM
If there is going to be a swap then I need to get my wallet to sync up.
A couple months ago it wouldn't sync, then it finally did.
Now, 2 months later, its stuck in "out of sync" again with my whole total of coins "staking".  Been like this for 2 weeks now...
I guess I can always delete everything and reinstall it, but this is getting annoying.
I do have the newest wallet that they released recently that changed all of the staking value.

It sounds like you are beginning to stake before you have finished synching, thereby creating your own fork of the chain.
You can try to set reservebalance to something higher than your balance until you are fully synched to avoid your wallet trying to stake for blocks that have been mined/minted already.

HTH
899  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SJWcoin -- scrypt -- 5k / 60sec blocks -- FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE on: August 01, 2018, 09:17:02 AM
Since the prohashing explorer seems to be gone I am offering a block explorer for SJW for the time being:

https://sjw.netcraft.ch

I will notify Cryptopia, Yobit and CMC about the current explorer link.

If you would like to support the operational costs of the block explorer, please use the referal link at the bottom of the explorer pages when you sign up for Cryptopia - thanks.


[Updated to correct my error regarding prohashings BE]
900  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: G3N INFORMATION PLATFORM on: August 01, 2018, 09:13:41 AM
Good news:

Novaexchange G3N deposits and withdraws are enabled since a few hours.

I have therefor changed the block explorer to display current prices from Novaexchanges G3N/BTC-market.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!