I think the increase in searches is probably a combination of the two comments mentioned above... people looking for an explanation for the drop (and the drop having penetrated major media outlets) as well as the BCH fork, which was a reasonable catalyst behind the drop.

Interestingly, searches for the term "cryptocurrency" have still continued to drop during the last 6 months, and searches for the term "blockchain" have been remarkably stable over the last 6 months...

The average number transactions per day are also on the rise... Really I think any activity is good activity. When bitcoin really starts to wane out of popularity is when we need to be worried.

I had to laugh internally when you said "spread the taint around," but really that (and your previous comment) makes a lot of sense, and I'm wondering if you (or anybody) know of some sort of free-to-use blockchain analytics service where this kind of phenomenon can be visualized. I know some addresses are labeled in the block explorer at blockchain.com which makes it much easier to perform analytics, and then I know that Chainalysis exists, but I'm wondering if there's any such free analytics tools out there.

Interestingly, in the 4 days since this story was published, there have been 3 transactions sent from one of the addresses to the Bitcoin Genesis address, which now has a whopping 66.90094937 BTC. Wonder what the purpose of that was.

It absolutely is price manipulation. The chart for your token is one of the most bizarre things I've ever seen. Its just an extreme pump that was followed by a drastic dump. Your token has no innate value or utility, nor have you laid out any plans to achieve this. You're an anonymous token creator which anybody can be and do.

Peddle your garbage elsewhere.

Wrong again breher. It peaked in search popularity on November 26th. You just insist on peddling falsehoods don't you, or else you just sincerely love being wrong about things. To each their own...



Its currently at 29 BTW:

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%201-m&q=Bitcoin%20SV

This is if you go over the last 30 days and include the world.

I have a new name for Bcash... Its Bitcoin Crash 

And its younger brother, Bitcoin Crash SV (Silly Version)

Funny how your go-to move is to ridicule people's intelligence when you're the one who believes BSV is the new bitcoin. Its going to be fun pointing out exactly how wrong you were you for years to come.

I've been in crypto for a lot longer than you have and no, this is not normal. Its well-calculated price manipulation.


You said this already and I already told you you CAN'T "release" more coins because its a token and the supply is fixed. You are, however, sitting on a pile of 6 trillion tokens that you can easily crush the market with if indeed there is any upward price momentum from here on out (but I suspect there won't be any).

- Anonymous dev
- No business goals, no plans, no reason to purchase token other than promised magical profits
- 10 TRILLION supply

By the time I wake up tomorrow this will have sunk back down below 300 in the rankings.

However I will be paying attention to it to remind people that this is a scam if need be.

^^

What's interesting is if you look at the markets where price is 350x higher than the others their total transaction volume is a whopping $153. This is the cheesiest token I've seen in the CMC top 100* in at least 3 years.

*Edit: now down to #194, and falling

An infinitely large blockchain is not the same thing as "minimal" or "stable." What it will do is insure centralization by making it impossible for anybody to run a node who has less than a 10 terabyte hard drive.

But the SV blockchain will never come close to being the size of BTC, just as BCH failed to do, because nobody will ever use it.

Yeah let us know how it went for you, we'd like to know.

I feel like whoever that photographer is they must be questioning the nature of their existence.

"I only got into this business because I wanted to work for National Geographic..."

Calls people "largely irrational" and bitcoin "Segwit" in the same comment 

You seem to have forgotten that any sort of adoption requires the public to get onboard with an idea, which requires a degree of likability, of which your camp is totally devoid.

If there's one thing for sure, you absolutely don't believe in the wisdom of the crowd.

I'm assuming this is you. Founder and Operations Head. How is this _not_ anonymous?



People don't use LinkedIn to create anonymous profiles like this, they use it to establish business credibility, something that you are pretty far from doing.


It's far worse than that. I know your token is a scam (its not a coin, its a token that took 3 minutes to create in an Ethereum contract), so its my duty to warn the community of such. Pretty much everything you've said is a lie and you won't answer basic questions like _what_ would make your token increase in value?

You just admitted you're still sitting on 60% of your coins! That's 6 trillion you can dump at any moment! You can't "bring new coins into circulation" because that's not how Ethereum tokens work -- I thought you would have at least known that tidbit.

You never answered my question. _Why_ would the price of your coin increase? You don't have legitimate market orders -- your price just fluctuates back and forth between 1 satoshi and 0.00000001 ETH.

Your coin's actual volume is dismal -- look at it compared to its neighbors in the CMC ranking. Nobody is actually buying your coin (excuse me, token).



On top of that one of your most chatty Telegram members admitted the whole thing was a giant Pump N Dump scheme:



You can try to suggest that we should go away but really you're the one who should probably go away.

Oh, one last thing: why are you choosing to remain anonymous?

But what incentive do people have to purchase this coin? All your website and whitepaper talk about is how its going to increase in value and that's why people should buy it. But why would this happen?

The entire token seems to be based on the art of tricking people into buying it in terms of BTC, whose smallest possible denomination is far greater than Ethereum's. But you have massive sell walls on both pairings so there's no way anybody is going to profit from this besides selling their tokens on a new exchange before you get the chance to.

This is another MLM/Ponzi scamcoin with nothing interesting to offer in terms of technology. Do not purchase this coin, you will only lose money.

This is incorrect. According to your whitepaper you're only selling half the tokens (they are not coins) until its price reaches certain targets, which it is currently very far from reaching. Therefore at most only half of your coins are in circulation, but good job on tricking CoinMarketCap into believing otherwise.


So why would people buy your token other than because of your promises that it will increase in value? Your whitepaper says nothing about this.

No you can't, the URL in the LinkedIn box redirects to an Instagram page.

Uhhh so the whole point of this coin is to buy it for ETH and then place a sell order in BTC in hopes of that 600 BTC wall being eaten up? At current volumes that will only take about 700 days, lol.

"FREE" Coin (not free) is definitely a scam. It will end poorly for everybody who purchased it. Its just another ETH token with a gigantic circulation and zero plans for real world utility.

Lets break down your main objectives:

"1) Support the mass adoption of Cryptocurrency"

OK so you mean Ethereum, seeing as how this is an ETH token and you need ETH to move it. Ethereum is already doing pretty well without you.

"2) Make cryptocurrency INCLUSIVE, allow also access to cryptocurrency profits to people with less financial means"

What "profits"? You mean from other people buying the coin at a more expensive price than you? Why would they buy it in the first place?

"3) Create global wealth, by distributing a cryptocurrency coin that will increase fast in value"

This is the same point as #2. What will make it increase fast in value?

 - Your founder and Operations Head is completely anonymous. His LinkedIn profile redirects to the token's Instagram page.
 - Your whitepaper is completely devoid of any information on how it plans to achieve any sort of growth, usability or what people are _actually_ supposed to do with it.
 - You're pretty much insisting that the real reason why people should buy this is because the price will go up, something you cannot possibly guarantee, which makes it sound like a Ponzi scheme at best and an utter scam as most probably.

"How will the price of the FREE coin evolve over a longer period of time ? We do of not have a crystal
ball to precisely predict how Demand and Supply will work, but we took 2 assumptions :
1) The price of the Ether will continue to increase (value per year see chart below)
2) The price of the FREE coin expressed in Ether will multiply each year with a factor 10"

HOW ON EARTH could you POSSIBLY know this? Multiply each year with a factor 10? First of all, "factor 10" means nothing, you should have hired a better writer. Second of all, this is some low-level Ponzi bullshit.

The worst thing of all about this "coin" -- ITS NOT EVEN FREE!

And if that didn't sketch you out enough, they are offering their coin for sale via PayPal! I've never heard of a token that did that. There's no way this could be legal (in most countries).

This is just awful. Everybody that has anything to do with promoting this pile of garbage should be ashamed of themselves.

Perhaps Craig Wright bought the account (and the Satoshi Twitter account that likes to delete its tweets) to coordinate a publicity stunt for SV...

I wonder what the significance of adding that Brazilian dude as a P2P Foundation friend was... In any case, the whole things reeks of shenanigans and of course none of it has anything to do with Real Satoshi.

Nobody can actually sign a message from an address known (or almost certainly known) to be owned by Satoshi (private keys stored as metadata in the blockchain don't coint). Until this happens, Satoshi isn't back.

Pretty cool.

"Interesting(ly), the category was left untouched until the end of the round..."

I'm surprised they included #4, I don't think most crypto people (or anybody) knows what Kik is... I only know about it because I write about obscure coins for my job.