Ok, this is what I was looking for to complement what I said in a prior post about BTC ownership: “The custody system has 3 keys, 2 of which are always necessary for transactions, and is structured as follows:
1. a key is on the customer’s smartphone;
2. a key is on the Conio servers;
3. a key is kept by Hype offline and is divided between different operators.
To operate, the customer just needs to use his key: Conio automatically uses his own. If the customer loses the phone, Conio blocks any transaction. The key in Hype is used by the customer only in emergencies, to recover his funds.
The above looks like the customer does not really have the conventional private keys, but rather security is managed by a layer of security provided by distributed keys for use within the platform. That should be taken into consideration and studied in greater detail by the potential customers. I would infer from the above that the bank is the custodial really (if anyone from Italy can further clarify, please do (fillippone? – this may hopefully summon him to this thread …)) See: https://dailyhodl.com/2020/03/21/private-bank-launching-bitcoin-btc-trading-for-huge-customer-base-amid-ongoing-lockdown/Note: The service is Beta-testing, and is not expected to roll-out until end of month (according to the above article). |
|
|
|
<…>
I’ll look into it further along if I can. The silly little think that currently calls for a pre-calculation onf the information (as opposed to deriving the race information from the granular data already present on the Merit Dashboard) is the sorting by rank feature. I gave it a longish go last week-end, but did not find a way other than by pre-calculating for each day. Pre-calculating does open the option to finding some fun facts, like which was the top rank position and when the first occurrence took place of that position, in contrast with the current position: user_id name nBestPosition DateOfPositon nCurrentPos
2143453 1miau 13 2019-09-09 23:59:59.000 14
1878246 abhiseshakana 13 2019-07-30 23:59:59.000 23
290195 achow101 10 2019-08-29 23:59:59.000 12
465017 actmyname 10 2018-01-27 23:59:59.000 96
1762404 Alex_Sr 33 2019-03-10 23:59:59.000 89
1580039 asche 40 2018-03-15 23:59:59.000 80
1015954 aundroid 57 2018-01-28 23:59:59.000 75
1169179 BitCryptex 38 2019-03-12 23:59:59.000 50
1554927 bitmover 24 2018-07-06 23:59:59.000 44
1018510 Blacknavy 5 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 100
579628 bob123 19 2019-09-12 23:59:59.000 34
569455 BobLawblaw 8 2018-01-25 23:59:59.000 52
64205 Carlton Banks 13 2018-02-03 23:59:59.000 56
879277 Coding Enthusiast 34 2018-01-30 23:59:59.000 60
1339716 coinlocket$ 22 2019-04-26 23:59:59.000 58
1980983 Coolcryptovator 46 2019-02-21 23:59:59.000 62
2005913 Corrosive 68 2018-04-16 23:59:59.000 85
1052091 CryptopreneurBrainboss 63 2019-12-27 23:59:59.000 71
507936 DarkStar_ 17 2018-01-26 23:59:59.000 48
1582324 DdmrDdmr 2 2019-01-19 23:59:59.000 5
2003859 DireWolfM14 32 2020-02-29 23:59:59.000 33
580327 eddie13 51 2018-03-02 23:59:59.000 86
1067333 El duderino_ 5 2019-04-15 23:59:59.000 6
359716 ETFbitcoin 33 2019-03-27 23:59:59.000 53
1852120 fillippone 7 2020-01-29 23:59:59.000 7
155345 gentlemand 24 2018-02-06 23:59:59.000 37
11425 gmaxwell 10 2019-12-31 23:59:59.000 10
1039323 Goran_ 30 2018-02-02 23:59:59.000 74
181806 HairyMaclairy 11 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 24
867786 HCP 15 2019-08-03 23:59:59.000 19
881377 Hhampuz 8 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 22
397737 hilariousetc 5 2018-09-18 23:59:59.000 15
1059082 hugeblack 15 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 68
1827294 Husna QA 39 2018-05-04 23:59:59.000 47
1291828 iasenko 16 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 20
2204241 ICOEthics 37 2019-06-11 23:59:59.000 99
1094195 igor72 86 2019-01-13 23:59:59.000 93
41175 infofront 17 2018-02-19 23:59:59.000 88
252510 JayJuanGee 13 2018-01-25 23:59:59.000 32
698159 Jet Cash 7 2018-08-05 23:59:59.000 38
49008 jojo69 6 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 55
1275282 joniboini 9 2018-05-16 23:59:59.000 45
487377 Kalemder 30 2018-01-25 23:59:59.000 84
1000199 krogothmanhattan 10 2018-05-18 23:59:59.000 30
805820 Lafu 55 2018-01-26 23:59:59.000 94
479624 Last of the V8s 4 2018-07-08 23:59:59.000 8
101872 Lauda 2 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 29
379487 LFC_Bitcoin 17 2020-03-13 23:59:59.000 17
1982152 lovesmayfamilis 60 2019-12-18 23:59:59.000 64
459836 LoyceV 2 2019-01-21 23:59:59.000 2
1894120 madnessteat 81 2020-03-07 23:59:59.000 83
787736 marlboroza 9 2018-01-31 23:59:59.000 36
1283017 masulum 76 2018-03-22 23:59:59.000 82
2033515 mikeywith 13 2019-12-28 23:59:59.000 13
176777 mindrust 34 2018-01-29 23:59:59.000 92
346731 minerjones 6 2018-01-25 23:59:59.000 70
886521 mk4 44 2018-01-30 23:59:59.000 91
405464 mocacinno 10 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 66
1424178 mole0815 21 2018-02-03 23:59:59.000 67
1825672 morvillz7z 51 2019-09-20 23:59:59.000 59
1574226 mu_enrico 36 2019-05-07 23:59:59.000 54
1237156 nc50lc 38 2018-01-25 23:59:59.000 72
976210 nullius 3 2018-02-17 23:59:59.000 35
317618 nutildah 15 2019-10-25 23:59:59.000 16
1188543 o_e_l_e_o 4 2019-10-09 23:59:59.000 4
1304130 pandukelana2712 8 2018-01-29 23:59:59.000 79
1071136 PHI1618 19 2018-02-18 23:59:59.000 81
64507 philipma1957 9 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 61
188198 Piggy 13 2018-11-24 23:59:59.000 63
379147 pooya87 31 2020-03-12 23:59:59.000 31
358020 Quickseller 28 2018-01-25 23:59:59.000 97
24140 qwk 18 2019-05-08 23:59:59.000 27
2627711 Ratimov 68 2020-03-11 23:59:59.000 69
1051955 roycilik 31 2019-04-20 23:59:59.000 41
38894 SaltySpitoon 37 2019-05-24 23:59:59.000 77
3 satoshi 2 2018-01-25 23:59:59.000 11
1112531 Steamtyme 21 2019-11-04 23:59:59.000 25
164749 stompix 34 2018-01-25 23:59:59.000 90
234771 suchmoon 3 2019-05-10 23:59:59.000 3
1855828 taikuri13 49 2019-11-14 23:59:59.000 57
487418 The Pharmacist 5 2019-01-09 23:59:59.000 9
679341 TheFuzzStone 63 2018-02-03 23:59:59.000 98
35 theymos 1 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 1
1180530 theyoungmillionaire 11 2018-08-05 23:59:59.000 76
98986 TMAN 3 2018-01-26 23:59:59.000 43
239406 Toxic2040 13 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 78
1292764 tranthidung 44 2020-01-21 23:59:59.000 49
557798 TryNinja 16 2018-01-26 23:59:59.000 39
1311641 tvplus006 52 2018-05-24 23:59:59.000 65
1138727 VB1001 21 2020-02-22 23:59:59.000 21
1177936 Veleor 30 2019-11-22 23:59:59.000 40
30747 Vod 4 2018-01-24 23:59:59.000 28
84521 Welsh 26 2018-01-28 23:59:59.000 95
1433865 witcher_sense 51 2020-02-27 23:59:59.000 51
131333 wwzsocki 45 2018-01-28 23:59:59.000 87
1068464 Xal0lex 57 2018-01-26 23:59:59.000 73
120694 xhomerx10 14 2019-06-03 23:59:59.000 18
897509 xtraelv 11 2018-11-08 23:59:59.000 26
355846 yahoo62278 6 2018-01-26 23:59:59.000 46
140827 yogg 27 2018-01-27 23:59:59.000 42
|
|
|
|
Traduciré aquí algunas consideraciones que realicé ayer en el foro inglés al respecto: - Compras BTC a través del banco, bajo su esquema de tasas y comisiones. - La cantidad de BTC que puedes comprar está limitada a 50K€/año con una cuenta premium, (2,5K/año with una cuenta básica), la cual cobra 9,90€/mes (no es sólo para el manejo de BTC). - Hay una comisión del 2% commission por TXs (algunas fuentes citan el 1%, pero la nota de prensa en italiano cita el 2%). - Has de ser cliente de Hype para comprar BTC, lo cual require que te registres (precisa cuanto menos el nombre completo, documento identificativo, email y teléfono). - Aparentemente, el cliente tiene el control de las claves privadas, aunque no me queda claro cómo, dado que hablas de un sistema complejo de tres llaves: The sophisticated three-key system of integrated technology allows the customer to HYPE Bitcoin, unlike what happens through traditional exchanges, to actually hold the custody, and therefore the ownership of the currency, ensuring security against hacker attacks, identity theft or loss.
The customer has control of his or her private key and neither Conio nor HYPE can handle Bitcoin on its behalf. The first key is for the exclusive use of the customer, it is generated and encrypted on the access device so that no one else can use it. The second is kept by Conio and created only for each individual account to complete the transactions associated with it. The third key is one that allows the user to recover access to his or her portfolio in the event of loss of credentials and is kept by HYPE in a protected archive that is not connected to the network.
Como indicaba, no me queda claro cómo funciona este sistema de claves, y si realmente tienes una clave privada convencional (además de las otras dos que pueden ser derivadas de alguna manera para información del enlace con la cuenta del banco). Parece por tanto un sistema alternativo al de los Exchanges, con comisiones más altas, pero bajo el paraguas del ecosistema Hype, que te da acceso a más servicios integrados en tu cuenta. https://www.somagnews.com/italian-bank-starts-selling-bitcoin-amid-global-crisis/https://www.the-blockchain.com/2020/03/20/hype-bitcoin-trading-now-open-via-banca-sella-to-1-2-million-italians-customers-during-lockdown/ |
|
|
|
Es más dinámico que nuestro foro local, pero carece de la dualidad logal/global de Bitcointalk. Lo he ojeado alguna vez, sobretodo en la época de la campaña de Renta del año pasado, donde el diálogo era fluido al respecto. Tampoco tengo una perspectiva histórica de uno y otro que quzás puedas aportar. No obstante, creo que su foco es el público de España, por lo que es uno de los ejes de atracción del público objetivo allí residente, pero diría que no permite justificar la carencia de un volumen más notorio de partícipes provenientes de otros países de habla hispana en Bitcointalk. |
|
|
|
|
En España, a sabiendas de cómo de delicada es la situación ahora, y la insuficiencia de recurso de todo tipo, en la práctica la sensación de descontrol es extendida.
En mi caso, estuve en contacto con un confirmado positivo hace algunos días. Me enteré días más tarde, y el protocolo pide que te quedes en cuarentena 14 días, y llames al 061 si tienes síntomas. Síntomas no tengo (algo de tos, pero es habitual que tenga en invierno), y la cuarentena (que no aislamiento completo) la cumplo. Ya casi he agotado el periodo, por lo que sin problemas. Como se puede ser portador asintomático, uno no sabe si lo ha pasado o no (intuyo que no), y a su entorno.
Otro familiar está con fiebre recluido en casa con su familia. Lleva días con algunos síntomas previos adicionales, y las personas con las que convive no tienen síntomas por ahora, pero él se ha de confinar en una habitación y ya está. Llamar al 061 es una odisea, y de poco parece que sirva. Tiene tres o cuatro de los síntomas de la lista, pero no sabemos si la tiene o no (ni lo sabremos a este paso). Otros compañeros de trabajo suyo también tienen los síntomas. Ninguno sabe si tiene o no el Coronavirus o no, si lo ha pasado o no, o si su entorno es asintomático o no …
|
|
|
|
Esta entrada en un blog que he encontrado explica el tema de los colores: https://blog.qrstuff.com/2015/09/09/colour-qr-codes Básicamente: - La base de la lectura de los códigos QR es el contraste que permite distinguir entre background (fondo) y foreground (frente). - Muchos lectores (no todos) leen en B/N, trabajando por tanto en escalas de grises. La elección de colores que no generen un buen contraste hace que no se distingan bien al mapearlos sobre escalas de grises. - Se ha de buscar un contraste >= 40% (un color ha de ser cuanto menos un 40% más oscuro que el otro). - Esta tabla da una idea del grado de contraste entre dos colores:  - Muchas Apps no pueden interpretar un código QR con los colores de contraste invertidos (foreground claro, background oscuro). <...> Hice la prueba del modelo digital con fondo azul y piezas "negras" en verde pistacho y no hubo manera de leerlo...
Viendo la tabla anterior, no tendrán contrste sufucuente entre sí. |
|
|
|
Creo que a este paso tiempo va a haber para verlos … Físicamente tan solo he visto el British Museum, el Van Gogh Museum y la Galleria degli Uffizi (los de Madrid mira que los tengo pendientes). De ellos, mi preferido es el British Museum por su variedad y heterogeneidad. Las Uffizi no me chiflaron - no sé si no tuve el día bueno. <.> tengo cerca Dalí, Sagrada Familia, etc,etc,etc, la última visita cultural fue La Pedrera - Casa Mila (Gaudí).
"Falti". Los que citas tan solo los he visto por fuera, pero sí el Park Güell. |
|
|
|
Data as of 20/03/2020Updated the lists in the OP (and subsequent post) to reflect the forum members that still qualify in each of those lists. Currently, on those lists there are, lacking <= 20% merits to rank-up (activity may not be met though): - 42 Heroes (on their way to Legendries) - 45 Sr. Members (on their way to Heroes) - 46 Full Members (on their way to Sr. Members) - 35 Members (on their way to Full Members) - 199 Jr. Members on their way to Members) Added this week (12): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
1016855 JollyGood Active 9603 1022 Y* 815 Hero Member Sr. Member =+9 / =1 / -1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855
839568 AakZaki Active 1492 812 Y* 811 Hero Member Sr. Member =+5 / =2 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=839568
961598 ryzaadit Active 2075 952 Y* 808 Hero Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=961598
2160117 Harkorede Active 2287 560 Y 216 Full Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =1 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2160117
1176794 ChiNgadOr Active 12778 854 Y 213 Full Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1176794
1019922 mikhailr Active 665 665 Y 202 Full Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1019922
978304 Alveus Active 936 812 Y 201 Full Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=978304
1478835 Stryfe Active 1454 560 Y 200 Full Member New Era Newbie =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1478835
1781771 Mbitr Active 728 420 Y 95 Member New Era Newbie =+2 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1781771
2332405 Linkkoin Active 574 476 Y 81 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2332405
1124155 snarfbag Active 90 90 Y 9 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+5 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1124155
2383571 Lavrentiic Active 31 31 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2383571
Removed (*) this week (9): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
1283017 masulum Active 1791 714 N 1005 Hero Member Old Era Newbie =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1283017
1580039 asche Active 5571 812 Y* 1004 Hero Member Old Era Newbie =+5 / =1 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1580039
1452494 UserU Active 2078 518 Y 105 Full Member Old Era Newbie =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1452494
241548 Rizzrack Active 94 94 N 100 Member New Era Newbie =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=241548
2452754 CinErik Active 119 119 N 15 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2452754
1949590 Review Master Active 819 560 Y 11 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1949590
2757137 xiver88 Active 43 43 N 13 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2757137
2383451 Jeremy Franklin Active 67 56 N 11 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2383451
2757115 iHodler Active 82 56 N 11 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2757115
(*) Due to enough merits for the next rank, or being banned.
|
|
|
|
Update 20/03/2020:The dashboard gives you access to anyone’s complete merit history in the TX tab, surpassing the 120 day limit. Link: BitcoinTalk Merit Dashboard. Updated the Merit Dashboard to reflect the most recent sMerit available data: Total sMerit: 624.451 Total Txs: 324.167 From Users: 21.858 To Users: 33.317 minDate: 2018-01-24 22:12:21 maxDate: 2020-03-20 02:50:12 Aggregate awarded sMerit for the last complete week (09/03/2020 .. 15/03/2020) is 4.762 which is up 0,95% from the previous week. There are no new Legendries Heroes this week.
Just for fun, I added a tab at the end called "Received Merit Race" where we can observe the merit race for any user with more than 10 earned merits. The positions do not visually order on screen though in this version. I did additionally develop a Top 100 day-to-day Merit Race though, which does reorder positions: Merit Race Top 100 Data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1v8CT6AvjckH6SFYiRhEB8xIItw7lg65Q2O_S1Bg2uBw/edit?usp=sharingI will not be updating this latter one though, other than sporadically (It requires an additional pre-calculated Datasource which I prefer not to have to update each week). The one on the Regular Merit Dashboard updates each week though (but does not reorder positions on screen).
|
|
|
|
There are of course some things to consider: - You purchase BTC through the bank, at their rates. - The amount of BTC you can purchase is limited to 50K€/year with a premium account (2,5K/year with the basic account), which charges 9,90€/month. - There is a 2% commission for TXs (some sources cite 1%, but the official press release I’ve read in Italian states 2%). - You need to be a Hype customer, which require registration (requires at least full name, id, email, phone number). - Apparently, the customer has control to the private keys, although the information talks about: The sophisticated three-key system of integrated technology allows the customer to HYPE Bitcoin, unlike what happens through traditional exchanges, to actually hold the custody, and therefore the ownership of the currency, ensuring security against hacker attacks, identity theft or loss.
The customer has control of his or her private key and neither Conio nor HYPE can handle Bitcoin on its behalf. The first key is for the exclusive use of the customer, it is generated and encrypted on the access device so that no one else can use it. The second is kept by Conio and created only for each individual account to complete the transactions associated with it. The third key is one that allows the user to recover access to his or her portfolio in the event of loss of credentials and is kept by HYPE in a protected archive that is not connected to the network.
I personally don’t fully understand how it works, so whoever is interested should look into it further. So it looks like a way to bypass the use of Exchanges, but at a higher commission rate, although with access to the Hype ecosystem that allows you to spend those purchased BTCs through their platform. Not something to rush to in my opinion, but it may attract a segment of the novice crypto market there in Italy (the private keys thingy still bugs me as to the specifics). https://www.somagnews.com/italian-bank-starts-selling-bitcoin-amid-global-crisis/https://www.the-blockchain.com/2020/03/20/hype-bitcoin-trading-now-open-via-banca-sella-to-1-2-million-italians-customers-during-lockdown/ |
|
|
|
<…>
The Newbie highlighted information is void really since September 2018 (see enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements). He’d need to become at least a Jr. Member (1 Merit and 30 Activity) before being able to place a signature of some sort, and set out on his "Journey to xx rank" (and/or being nuked/banned) et al. |
|
|
|
<…>
¡La repera! Le ha costado un poco a mi lector interpretarlo, pero ha sido cuestión de varios reintentos (y subir el brillo de mi monitor). Lo ha leído y cuadra con el código que has reflejado. Como práctica didáctica tiene gracia, y posibilidades en talleres tecnológicos … |
|
|
|
<…>
Buen hallazgo @VB1001. Parece una situación similar a la del 2015, pero claro, desde entonces hemos pasado por el boom del ATH y de las Alts, para volver a comentarios afines a los del 2015. Ahora tenemos algunos numerillos que nos permiten ver la tendencia ( https://public.tableau.com/shared/F5YF8GJRZ?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link), pero la moderación creo que poco tiene que ver como sucedía en el 2015. |
|
|
|
<...>
El siguiente documento da las pautas éticas para la priorización de paciente Covid-19 en los hospitales (por lo que he leído, no es la biblia, pero si lo siguen muchos hospitales): https://semicyuc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/%C3%89tica_SEMICYUC-COVID-19.pdfSegún resumen en el artículo https://www.elespanol.com/espana/20200320/criterios-decidir-prioridad-falten-camas-uci/475954325_0.html, los criterios base de priorización: Pacientes con prioridad 1. Pacientes críticos e inestables, que necesitan monitorización y tratamiento intensivo que no puede ser proporcionado fuera de la UCI.
Pacientes con prioridad 2. Pacientes que precisan monitorización intensiva y que pueden necesitar intervenciones inmediatas. Son pacientes que no están ventilados de forma invasiva, pero con altos requerimientos de oxigenoterapia con fracaso de otro órgano.
Pacientes con prioridad 3. Se trata de pacientes inestables y críticos, pero que tienen pocas posibilidades de recuperarse a causa de su enfermedad de base. Pueden recibir tratamiento intensivo para aliviar su enfermedad aguda, pero también establecerse límites terapéuticos, como por ejemplo no intubar y/o no intentar reanimación cardiopulmonar.
Pacientes con prioridad 4. Pacientes cuyo ingreso no está generalmente indicado, porque el beneficio es mínimo o improbable por enfermedad de bajo riesgo, y pacientes cuya enfermedad terminal e irreversible hace inminente la muerte.
El otro día, un artículo de un diario apuntaba a un algoritmo más técnico, que dado 20-30 parámetros daba una probabilidad de fallecimiento. Ahora no lo he localizado, y no sé si realmente se sigue un algoritmo técnico, o unos criterios más al libre albedrío del equipo médico con arreglo a la priorización anterior. |
|
|
|
|
Sería curioso ver si es legible si pudieses acabarlo con las piezas que te faltan. Me imagino que las cilíndricas, triangulares y algunas más raras se malinterpretaría, pero posiblemente suceda lo mismo con los adheridos circulares que figuran sobre las piezas. Lo más seguro son las piezas lisas cuadradas y rectangulares, per de esas vas bien escaso …
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, so I’ve been in contact with a confirmed COVID-19 positive over the past 10 days, but have not developed any symptoms (this is true, and fortunately the person is recovering fine). Should I not post in the coming days, either the synthons have made their appearance, or I’ve got an overwhelming amount of work to do, even on lockdown (although in the latter scenario I could always pop a post or two every now and then).
By the way, there’s still a lot of fuzz around how the death rate is being calculated in different countries, and how it’s evolution is not necessarily due to clinical reasons, but rather statistical ones. For example, Germany seems to consider amongst the deceased only those where the Coronavirus was the primal cause of death. Other countries are considering those that, having died for any reason, had the Coronavirus.
Additionally, the more tests that are extended over to mild symptomatic cases, the less the death rate ratio. Spain is currently focused on testing those with clear symptoms, but not so much on those with mild symptoms, thus the death rate is higher, and will decrease as the test is extended on to the milder cases at some point.
|
|
|
|
<…>
The thing with external SEO analytic sites is that you can never be sure how much you can trust their data, meaning by that how accurate they are and how much estimation is pondered into the numbers. Take for example a simple indicator in the provided stats: Montly Unique Visitors: 1.2M. I’m assuming that those unique visitors are unique IPs. Lets compare with some inner forums stats that are available here: https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adstats (and summarized here from a historical perspective: [Chart] Bitcointalk statistics on impression counts for ads). The Adstats for a 10 day period, If I’m interpreting them right (*), point at 85K IPs from logged-out users, and 11,5K logged-in users over a nearly 11 day period. If we triple that to roughly equate a month’s reading, the best case scenario would point to 255K IPs and 34,5K logged-in users. Now we know those numbers are really more likely something like 120K IPs and 20K logged-in users (people log in over the 3 x 10 day periods I tripled to get the best case scenario). That renders a total around a tenth of that external site’s measure for the Montly Unique Visitors ... (*): The forum Ad stats provide data for 10 different ads per round (10 days aprox.), not an aggregate overall distinct set of values for them. It’s difficult to tell if one person will see one, a few or all those adds, and will therefore be counted in one or multiple Ad Slot stats. I’m assuming that people tend to see all the adds over a 10 day period in general, and thus the data for one slot will be representative for the 10 day period (that is not so for very sporadic, very quick forum visits). |
|
|
|
Pues ya van unos cuantos malware/ransomware con esta temática ... Si queréis ver los detalles de la App referenciada en el OP, el siguiente artículo los describe con esmero: https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/research/covidlock-android-ransomware-walkthrough-and-unlocking-routineLos autores del artículo anterior afirman que: - En realidad, hay parte de bluff en lo que indica la pantalla del ransomware, dado que la App no accede a internet, y por tanto, no es capad de enviar tus datos a ninguna parte. - La App realmente no logra encriptar nada, y usando el código 4865083501 puedes desbloquear el dispositivo. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
