Opinions are fine and all and perhaps you are correct but I prefer evidence instead of speculation and that I have not seen yet
Bullshit.
When you say "provably fair" the burden of proof is on YOU at that point.
The Double Bullshit on you since I did pass on the burden of proof to B!z whose opinion I do trust but I presume you didn't read that part and took the top out of context while Ignoring the rest of the message like a debater your method of attack is simply that of an opinion piece while their is a burden on the casino to prove its fairness aiming to verifying that information second hand is what I posted here originally for.
I'll put it another way
If I don't trust Bob but give Bob the benefit of the doubt then simply I ask Alice to check on Bob through a third party mechanism which is this thread or Biz I didn't come in to listen to accusations but I came in asking for evidence and verification from others who can do hash functions understand secret keys and prove it through cryptography, which I presume some users can do considering that this is a list of gambling websites and a well traveled thread.
I'm not really going to argue with you considering you are using their signature, but that thread is not about their sig program. It is mainly about how they claim to be provably fair but are not. I will update the thread with that.
I agree with you RGB wasn't here to argue what I was posting here for is the burden of proof which was requested in this thread the entire fairness of the site and not the discussion as a result of me putting up a request for it from some community members who can verify the data.
Freedom of choice in the things you do is a freedom we all have a voluntary and free system such as Bitcoin has no one is forcing you into it, this is a voluntary transaction with ritz and the Burden of Proof to challenge darkmules argument is not on the Casino Entirely but on the USER who decides to use the service
Or we are forgetting the lesson of Mtgox
Show Posts
