Signature updated sir.

I think it's more accurate to say Inter prefer to wait, it doesn't mean they don't focus on possession because they also try to do that but if you look at the match Inter are not better in midfield especially in terms of teamwork so Fiorentina try to take advantage of that to create better ball possession.
But it needs to be admitted that Inter's attack in this match is very good and the proof that they can score 4 goals in this match is the result of their good momentum.

Next week is likely to be a bit different because Inter and Milan will be in a prestigious derby and I think one of them will drop points. On the other hand Napoli just lost their first 3 matches this time but of course this is a little different if you look at the record of the previous 2 seasons they rarely get defeated at the beginning of the season but things like this are good because they will definitely improve again considering they want to defend the Scudetto and the competition will be better.
Osimhen is also still quite consistent so far because 3 matches have passed Osimhen has scored 3 goals for Napoli

Inter won again in a very impressive manner in today's match.
Their possession was poor but their attacks were really very dangerous especially their counter-attacks in the match at Sansiro.
On the other hand Thuram and Lautaro really played very well and their duo now seems to be the best duo for 3 matches running now especially by looking at the records of the matches that have occurred they are a club that is still cleansheet and this is really very good for Inter.
They are now quite comfortably at the top of the table.

Now that's not important in my opinion because regardless of what Perez and Ancelotti have made the choice of not bringing in any new players for Madrid so with this they have to work on how to maximize their players because currently they also have some good young players like Vini and Rodrygo. Apart from that, regarding striker problems, they will probably continue to trust Joselu as an option if young players such as Vini, Rodrygo and Jude experience deadlock.
What they have to think about is a new scheme as a backup for 2 strikers and 1 second striker because if this continues to be used, it is possible that the longer it goes on, the more gaps there will be in this scheme, so Ancelotti needs to prepare it from now so that when the 4-3-1-2 stuck they can still try with other schemes.

Isn't it in the end when the price goes up there is a condition where demand is high, meaning that when you say you can't afford to buy it is actually like something that is hard to believe when there is a lot of demand that makes the price of bitcoin higher.
On the other hand, we also know together that buying bitcoin does not mean we have to buy 1 bitcoin at a time because in this case whatever money you have if you seriously want to buy bitcoin then everything can be done regardless of profit in the end everything depends on ourselves whether we are willing or not to buy at the risk of higher prices.
Therefore, when we are already serious in bitcoin and try to keep buying at the current price then it is the right thing to do.

Yeb, I also feel that there will be many people who lose this bet because sometimes results like this are not really expected but still possible. This is football, where when you're so confident in your bet, it can backfire because the game lasts 90 minutes.
Overall, there was nothing wrong with Napoli's game as they did well in terms of dominance, but Lazio also defended very well in this match and we need to give them credit as their defence made it difficult for Napoli's players to attack. Osimhen was also unable to move freely in this match as Casale literally tailed Osimhen when he was in the Penalty box.

Problems for Napoli were again seen in terms of gaps when they tried to go all out in this match.
Lazio's counter-attacks were really good and fortunately there were 2 goals that were indeed VAR'd by Lazio because otherwise it would have been a massacre for Napoli where they still had many gaps when doing so.
This is a good lesson for Rudi Garcia because in this match they know there are some gaps that they must fix so that Napoli can compete for the Scudetto again.

Quite an interesting match where Lazio can finally get their first 3 points this season and Napoli began to taste defeat at the beginning of the season after the previous 2 seasons for the beginning of the season Napoli was very difficult to lose
Napoli played very well in this match only they failed to provide opportunities on target because Lazio defended very well in this match.
Lazio's defense was quite tight which made it difficult for Napoli to penetrate the penalty box from Lazio and several attempts outside the penalty box did not go well.
This 1-2 score is enough to make me lose my bet.

I think rather than saying Nottingham were lucky it would be better to say Chelsea still can't be consistent.
Even if in the previous week they were really good and got 3 points with a striking score but in today's match they still have the same problem with the difficulty of finishing for them.
Nottingham did something good by capitalising on the momentum of Chelsea's lack of focus at the start of the second half which allowed Elanga to easily create the winning goal there.

On the other hand, Chelsea's finishing was very poor in this match, they played with full control and they created a lot of opportunities but if you look at the statistics of this match, 21 shots taken by Chelsea are not comparable to their 2 on target so in this case they still have to improve themselves to be better because if it continues like this it will be very natural if there are still a lot of people who still doubt them even though they have won in the previous match,

Actually in this case I don't suggest or consider that trading is also a mistake because those who do it have their own thoughts and their own strategies to collect bitcoins regardless of others doing DCA or trading I think it's their right but when talking about investment then one of the best strategies is DCA. and when we want to be a good investor for the long term trading is too difficult to do because as you said a profit for a few days/weeks or months can just become a loss in one day when trading is bad so traders do have bitcoins but they are not investors for me because they have their own role which is as traders.
Unlike the DCA which is indeed one of the very good bitcoin buying strategies for today because this is a way of collecting bitcoins without having to worry about the bitcoins that we collect experiencing losses if we don't sell that.

Right now Milan just have to focus on their performance and I agree with what you said because Milan still have consistency problems in the middle of the season but actually things like this don't only happen to Milan because looking at last season, only Napoli I was not too affected by consistency problems, the rest they remained the same as before.
Currently Milan must try to be stronger so that they can return to compete in the race for the Scudetto that Napoli took last season.
On the other hand, I still feel that this time the club in Serie A will be more stretched because not only Milan will try to rise but some big clubs like Inter or Juventus will also still do the same.

For now, I haven't seen too much of that. Ansu's start was very good but considering the time Xavi is getting now it's very little for Ansu and we can see that he rarely starts as he's mostly on the bench.
Competition for young players at Barcelona is so strong because there are so many talents who have good progress, now Ansu must be able to prove himself that he can be better because it can make him in the core squad which is still very rare to see him in that position.
On the other hand, his hopes may currently fall on Lamine Yamal because he has been trusted in several matches as a core player even though he is still very young but his progress is quite promising.

I still feel that this is not a big problem because it has always been there from the beginning and even though there are effects produced, the influence of bitcoin is still very much felt and its users are growing until now.
I will not talk about other countries in this case but I will talk about my country Indonesia.
Indeed, for now bitcoin is still prohibited as a legal means of payment but until now the spread of bitcoin in my country has actually continued to increase and even the government is quite welcoming actually it's just that for payment tools it is not allowed.
But I don't think it's a big problem because as long as there are no harmful regulations then I don't mind if the legal means of payment for bitcoin is not enforced in my country.
On the other hand, why do I say the government is quite welcome to the existence of bitcoin, this is evidenced when one of our governors some time ago attended and became a speaker at the bitcoin conference 2023 (in Miami) and said that they would endeavour to provide mining facilities by looking at their resources and I think that is one form of my country's support for bitcoin.

Whilst it's great that Luton managed to keep the score down, I didn't like Luton's goal in the 90+2nd minute.
I had high hopes when I bet 0-2 on West ham and those hopes were dashed when Luton's stoppage time goal reduced the deficit, making my bet worthless.
It's unfortunate, but it was a deserved goal because they worked hard in this game too. Even if their late goal couldn't bring them a point but at least seeing how hard they attacked was worthy of appreciation.

His reply was equally interesting when he saw this tweet


Source

But on the other hand I do agree with what was said because at the end of the day DCA is a bigger winner than trading because as discussed earlier in the tweet "trading btc has been proven to be a losing strategy over the long run" and we have seen many people who were eventually ruined by trading and liquidated so in this case it is important if you really want to be a good investor then adopting the DCA strategy is not the wrong thing.
On the other hand, our discussion from so many pages is not wasted because this is in line with what we will plan and think about in the bitcoin collection scheme as investors.

Even though gambling is done responsibly, there will definitely be impacts, but it can be minimized because by realizing that expenses do not interfere with gambling, I think we can also minimize the risk by maintaining our relationships with those closest to us.
Because what I have felt in this case is that when we are unable to manage spending money on gambling, our financial condition becomes hampered, which makes me often argue with the people closest to me, in this case my wife, and of course this will trigger a rift in the relationship.
So by looking at this condition, as long as we don't disturb our finances for other needs with the gambling activities we do, I think the impact is still there, but it's not as big as those who are not disciplined in gambling.

Agreed, because when talking about the poor for example when they are given as much money as possible but without being equipped with knowledge and opportunities it will only be used up and they are still the same in terms of life, although not all will be like that but most will definitely be like what I said.
Sometimes it is better to give them access to opportunities such as decent jobs or business development opportunities while getting guidance. It doesn't mean that we can't give money but when we give money, it will only be a temporary help in their lives and by doing something like this they will continue to be passive and wait for others to do the same by giving money so that they can survive in life.

Now it will be a little complicated because even though they can still be said to be quite good but there are still some shortcomings that these two clubs have to improve such as for Manchester United about the quality of their attacks which are sometimes not very good and only waste opportunities or for Arsenal whose performance is still up and down and their rhythm is not too erratic.
Chasing Manchester City is definitely one of the things that must be done because looking at the conditions since the rolling epl it seems that Manchester City still hasn't found obstacles even though some of its players cannot compete.

btw that's also a pretty good odds but seeing from the current conditions actually a draw is also possible to happen.

Looking at the actual conditions I don't think it's just about playing home.
Indeed it will also be one of the benchmark odds because seeing from Arsenal who will play at the Emirates of course this will get good support from their fans but on the other hand there are other things because seeing the current statistics Manchester United always loses momentum and their defence is still inconsistent especially Varane and Shaw as one of the defenders who are good enough for them will not be in the match which makes this a good gap and can be exploited by Arsenal.

Being in United with big odds is still something that is quite good but the risk if you see their consistency in defence is a little difficult for me to make a bet.

Copenhagen after getting the first goal and increasing the aggregate goal played a bit passive in the match as despite the chances they had, they were more careful not to get a quick counter-attack from Rakow which made their chances wasted.
On the other hand, Lukasz Zwolinski's goal in the crucial minutes was not really predicted and Rakow tried better in the last few chances because they realised that they had to go all out in the remaining matches even though the result was that they still had to be eliminated.
The 2-1 aggregate means Copenhagen join the other clubs for the Champions League draw on Tuesday and Wednesday.

As long as we live we always have risks and when we are in bitcoin there is always a risk and indeed this is not safe but of course when we are sure then saying it is not safe is included in the risk so we have to face it.
And I agree with what you said because in the end whether this will change our lifestyle for the better or not depends on how we do it in bitcoin. As long as we do it right from the investment procedure and learn well, the results will also be good and will affect the life we run but when our orientation is only to money and quick profits then we can fall into the trap like most people who now give up and consider bitcoin a scam.

I understand what you mean because there are indeed a lot of things that are inherited and I understand where you are going but when looking at the initial context of the discussion we are centred on how to pass bitcoin to the next generation so as not to widen into other discussions the focus must remain there.
We all understand that there is a lot that we need to pass on to the next generation after we are gone but currently the discussion is still referring to bitcoin as the main focus so I think it will be out of line if discussing others to be discussed in this thread because the discussion becomes irrelevant to the original topic (off topic).