Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 07:31:41 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 141 »
901  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] Red Star Mining - 180(GH/s) on: April 17, 2013, 02:04:06 PM
Is there any expected date when the BFL should start shipping?

They've stated they are going to start shipping Jalapeno's next week and maybe even a few to developers this week.  As that is the only model they have boards for that they can power ATM.  They state they will have the boards for the SC soon and they should start start shipping in a couple of weeks IIRC.  The chips are now rated to use a lot more electricity.  As Josh@BFL quoted us $20 a month for hosting each SC I don't know if he has revised this figure.  He has not stated so or contacted me about it.
902  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The UK Public & Bitcoin on: April 16, 2013, 07:22:53 PM
No its just UK banks charge extortionate fees for international and even just EU intra-SEPA transfers for UK personal accounts.  You can tho use TransferWise to get money into Bitstamp or MtGox for just £1 but I'm not sure if it works the same for withdrawals.

My bank charges £25 per SEPA transfer, what a joke!

I know, the UK is part of the SEPA zone it should take a similar time and cost for a SEPA transaction in the UK as else where in the zone.  I know they have to convert GBP/EUR but that shouldn't be too expensive as all big money transfers is basically just binary and not the exchange of actual notes and coins.  The more stupid the banks are like that the bigger a benefit for bitcoins even if it makes it more expensive as a whole to buy bitcoins in the UK due to the costs of international arbitrage.

If you look back the 1980's there was a limit on the amount of money you could take on holiday out of the UK.  The current situation is probably in effect due to the legacy of that monetary policy.  Until a similar time you wasn't even allowed to buy physical bullion you needed a coin collectors license. 
903  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 06:20:51 PM
We went below $50 last week, what if this is just the start of the correction.  I know it'd take a lot of real bad news but its possible.  The Bitcoin price was stress tested and it crumbled but the whole bitcoin network is growing larger and stronger all the time but the powers that be could shut every (major) exchange within a month if they wanted to.

Look at this this way: During the majority of it's existence as a practical application it has been valued between sub dollar and 10 dollars. Practical uses for Bitcoin include: Silk Road, other illegal stuff, small scale money laundering and donating to your favourite website.
Then there is the cargo cult which includes: Bitcoin ATMs, Bitcoin stock exchanges, cancerous endeavours like bitpay, and the army of Internet zealots preaching the gospel. They provide zero economic value and always end in disaster. (The pirate ponzi, bitcoinica, Bruce Wagner & the bitcoin show, GLBSE, etc...)

I agree. The value of Bitcoin has nothing to do with it as a practical application. Bitcoin works just fine at $2 as it does at $200. Bitcoin usage could surge 50000% and the USD rate of Bitcoin could very easily go down. People using it as a currency doesn't cause the price to go up.

People seem to think the exchange rate of Bitcoin is tied to how well it's doing. How many people are using it. How many businesses are accepting it. When really it has nothing to do with any of those factors.

The price is based on supply/demand, day traders, investors and market manipulation. When someone dumps 50,000 BTC and the price tanks, that doesn't mean Bitcoin is suddenly "doing worse". When someone blows $300,000 buying Bitcoins driving the price up, that doesn't mean Bitcoin is "doing great". The exchanges are their own entity in the Bitcoin ecosystem. The exchange could be up while adotion/usage is down. Exchange could be down while usage/adoption is up. The link between the two is iffy at best.

Anyone projecting Bitcoin value is talking out of their ass. It's an unregulated exchange, no oversight, no transparency, and the more money you have the more influence you have on the price. The swings are based on a small group of people dumping or a small group of people pumping. Currently when the price starts sliding, people read that as "bad news, sell". When the price is rallying people read that as "good news, buy". When most times it's a handful of people throwing their weight around on the exchange.

Yes but this is the (price) speculation sub-forum and this post is about the bitcoin price (value) not about the values of using bitcoin its self.  I've been very interested in bitcoin since I first properly heard about it in 2011 and litecoin since its inception.  I was suggesting the potential low (price) of bitcoin this year and that would ever be reached again.  If the price did drop that low it would only increase my purchase amounts.  I've been with bitcoin since ~$5 and to floor at $30 two years later would still be a healthy above inflation growth.  For the record I expect another major and even bigger rally about six months after the next block reward halving if the network continue to grow for bitcoin over the next four years as they have done for the last four years.  Followed by a correction again.  Also that floor price is about as low as I think is possible at all to be ever reached again and even then it would take some major amounts of bad news.  Or for the growing pains to get even worse yet.

The price on these exchanges don't mean much about the actual value of a Bitcoin at this moment. It's still too early to say if it is over valued. Wait a few more years.

You have to agree tho for people who have been steadly buying bitcoins for at least a couple of years now.  That to see price rises of that magnitude so quickly can cause nerves and to a correction is actually settling.  Unlike the new money that came in on the bubble the price drop is disheartening.  Tho after seeing the 2011 bubble as well maybe more of those who bought in at the top may stay in longer this time compared to the amount of short selling in the months after the 2011 bubble.  I don't think the media will be able to call bitcoins death if the price was even to drop >$20 this time.  I think/hope the price stays $50<$100 for a while before continuing on a stable growth.  As sudden massive price rises and changes are not the best for the whole system to grow.  Even if massive price rises bring lots of press attention and therefore even higher price rises.  The only reason the bubble popped like in 2011 was due to growing pains of the system and not actual failures of the bitcoin protocol
904  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 01:50:01 AM
^This. It's a free market.

Until big money gets involved then its the centralised (hate to say this) Rothschild anarco-capitalism central driven export wealth to the top system.  This is why the uber-rich are always getting tax cuts (even under austerity) as the wealth trickles down of course isn't it  Huh
905  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 01:37:26 AM
I want to make something very clear here: I wasn't against bitpay until I noticed how their business model works.

They publicly admitted on numerous occasions that they "play the market" with their clients coins (ie: "short squeezing" pirate). So essentially they increase the volatility of the bitcoin price and make it more difficult to use bitcoin the way it was intended: Accepting it directly. This is subject to a positive feedback mechanism in which the higher the volatility is the more Bitcoin users will have to rely on bitpay and the more funds they have available to manipulate the market.

Well at least they have competitors.  It's when they all join up or get bought out into a monopoly and start fixing the price (in a un-regulated market) in there favour that we all want to be worried.  Bill Gates or Apple could buy into every single one of them if they thought they could pull a nice big buck.  Is that when we all move to litecoin and so on then.  
906  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 01:24:43 AM
We went below $50 last week, what if this is just the start of the correction.  I know it'd take a lot of real bad news but its possible.  The Bitcoin price was stress tested and it crumbled but the whole bitcoin network is growing larger and stronger all the time but the powers that be could shut every (major) exchange within a month if they wanted to.

Look at this this way: During the majority of it's existence as a practical application it has been valued between sub dollar and 10 dollars. Practical uses for Bitcoin include: Silk Road, other illegal stuff, small scale money laundering and donating to your favourite website.
Then there is the cargo cult which includes: Bitcoin ATMs, Bitcoin stock exchanges, cancerous endeavours like bitpay, and the army of Internet zealots preaching the gospel. They provide zero economic value and always end in disaster. (The pirate ponzi, bitcoinica, Bruce Wagner & the bitcoin show, GLBSE, etc...)

 Roll Eyes

They'll always be snake oil salesmen until we only have dominate monopolies.  That's free market (anarco-)capitalism (unless Co-operatives can become main stream [but if you can have Co-operatives you can have monopolies]).
907  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 01:04:30 AM
I don't really see a bottom.

If MtGox goes offline again (for any time long) or even if Bitstamp shuts down after BTC24 shuting down or any other major bitcoin FUD I can definitely see a floor of ~$30.00 being hit hard.

What's your basis for that assumption? Besides managing to use major, or even and FUD in the same sentence?

Now I see why "ignore" is highlighted next to your name in bright colours.  If you look at the charts you can see $30 is definitely possible for a good while yet even if the rally where to continue (for a while).  Yes I think bitcoin was undervalued but after the largest bitcoin exchange having to shut down under stress recently then all bitcoin needs is nudging off its pidgin stool to crash.  Although if you look at the post I don't think it'd be a bad thing for bitcoin long term and the one plus two year averages will continue to grow grow against USD inflation via the block reward inflation.  

I still don't get how you can draw a floor at 30. I mean so long this bubble pops completely symmetric at the best.

We went below $50 last week, what if this is just the start of the correction.  I know it'd take a lot of real bad news but its possible.  The Bitcoin price was stress tested and it crumbled but the whole bitcoin network is growing larger and stronger all the time.  As well as the powers that be could shut every (major) exchange within a month if they wanted to.

EDIT:  In fact I think the powers that be could collapse the dollar and every major currency within a week if they wanted to.  Then bring back the gold standard after a loaf of bread =£100/$100 if they really wanted.  Tho after the FED becoming the largest USD debt holder above China due to QE to give China confidence in USD debt ffs!
908  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 12:52:36 AM
The moving averages don't match up to the mid August crash which is almost identical to this one so far. Otherwise really not sure what the value should be atm, it looks like the panic is coming to an end so the backing is more solid but there's only promises of an expanding infrastructure using Bitcoin so far and promises don't make something useful. I think Ripple may be causing some uncertainty too.

Yeah but Ripple could really help bitcoin while bitcoin doesn't offer Ripple anything special (borrowed from another thread).
I've only really started reading up on it and the debate on its effect on Bitcoin is a big lump of posts but I find myself asking "why do we need Bitcoin if we have this?" so I'm guessing others are doing the same. The only real benefits I can see Bitcoin offering are:

A known rate of coin generation possibly better than PM and other commodity IOU's form trusted sources.
Possible for completely anonymous transactions.
Independent to the Ripple network.

I'd love to hear other points but don't want to derail the thread with a discussion on Ripple. It sounds like it could potentially become the default way of exchanging virtual value (currencies, stocks, shares, licenses, contracts, etc.) and make more or less all existing exchanges obsolete. If Bitcoin became the gold in that then... omfg, but if the system proves sound and your guaranteed of receiving real gold in exchange for your Ripple IOU's then I don't see where Bitcoin fits in.

Bitcoin has a place as a digital commodity (like gold/silver) and Ripple has a place of p2p credit expansion if it can take off.  Tho if you look at it bitcoin is for users as Ripple is for bankers/organisers.  I think if both Ripple and Bitcoin remain non mainstream then bitcoin will out live ripple but if both ripple and bitcoin become mainstream then yes bitcoin usage could in effect be a sideline compared to ripples usage in the curerrent fiat world.  Tho IMO I can see either the dollar or the yen pegged to gold by 2020'ish as we're not coming out of this 2008 economic crises any time soon.  These are new times and we've only lived under a fiat world wide banking economy since 1972 (when the US took the world off the gold standard to pay for the Vietnam war [if you ask why I blame America it was agreed after the British Empire collapsed after debt from WWI and WWII that the dollar would be pegged to gold while every other major currency would float against the dollar).
909  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 12:40:21 AM
I don't really see a bottom.

If MtGox goes offline again (for any time long) or even if Bitstamp shuts down after BTC24 shuting down or any other major bitcoin FUD I can definitely see a floor of ~$30.00 being hit hard.

What's your basis for that assumption? Besides managing to use major, or even and FUD in the same sentence?

Now I see why "ignore" is highlighted next to your name in bright colours.  If you look at the charts you can see $30 is definitely possible for a good while yet even if the rally where to continue (for a while).  Yes I think bitcoin was undervalued but after the largest bitcoin exchange having to shut down under stress recently then all bitcoin needs is nudging off its pidgin stool to crash.  Although if you look at the post I don't think it'd be a bad thing for bitcoin long term and the one plus two year averages will continue to grow grow against USD inflation via the block reward inflation.  
910  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 12:26:55 AM
I don't really see a bottom.

If MtGox goes offline again (for any time long) or even if Bitstamp shuts down after BTC24 shuting down or any other major bitcoin FUD I can definitely see a floor of ~$30.00 being hit hard.
911  Economy / Speculation / Re: Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 12:14:19 AM
The moving averages don't match up to the mid August crash which is almost identical to this one so far. Otherwise really not sure what the value should be atm, it looks like the panic is coming to an end so the backing is more solid but there's only promises of an expanding infrastructure using Bitcoin so far and promises don't make something useful. I think Ripple may be causing some uncertainty too.

Yeah but Ripple could really help bitcoin while bitcoin doesn't offer Ripple anything special (borrowed from another thread).
912  Economy / Speculation / Is bitcoin even still after the crash over valued??? on: April 16, 2013, 12:02:29 AM
If you look at the exponential moving averages for one and two year time scales you can see a long term correction between $30 to $20 possible -



And if you look at the simple moving averages for one and two years then you can see prices correcting long term to between $16.50 and $20.50 -



Most people (aka the market) thinks bitcoin is undervalued hence the recent rally.  Maybe bitcoin is undervalued but the system as a whole has a long way to grow before it can reach and stabilise above its next major mile stone of market capitalisation above $30Billion (value of all above ground Silver).  Maybe bitcoin will crash and stablise @~>$20 and the media can all call bitcoin a bubble again  Roll Eyes but bitcoin will continue.  As like bittorrent there's no real way to really kill bitcoin apart from turning off the whole worlds internet.

BTW:  Give me cheap bitcoins  Tongue
913  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How to solve UK Bitcoin Exchange Problem? on: April 15, 2013, 10:37:33 PM
Ripple can connect together businesses who each do one thing well. In that way, it's easier for those businesses to be compliant. If you want to buy BTC with GBP, here's how it works (... snipped ...)

Thanks ribuck (and matthewh3), your explanation of how Ripple can facilitate a banking system funds for bitcoin trade is very helpful.

I had contemplated a cash-less exchange, but I hadn't contemplated the possibility of a cash-less and bitcoin-less exchange! It is obvious though once you start breaking down what an exchange really is.

I do hope Ripple (or something like it) takes off, though I wonder if the concept will prove too abstract.

One possible criticism is that Ripple simplifies problems (which is good), but it also multiplies them; instead of my original problem of finding one trustworthy UK bitcoin exchange, with Ripple I now have three problems:

  • How to find a trustworthy gbp -> ripple-gbp agent?
  • How to find a trustworthy ripple-gbp -> ripple-btc agent?
  • How to find a trustworthy ripple-btc -> btc agent?

Smiley





Bitstamp is all three that's what the trusted gateways are for and they will be relied upon heavily until Ripple is about as big as PayPal AFAIK and you can call in cash/BTC/whatever debts from trusted peers or trusted local shops for example as your gateways.  
914  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The UK Public & Bitcoin on: April 15, 2013, 09:45:14 PM
I totally understand where you are coming from, UK is rip off when it comes to bitcoin. I have looked into all the methods posted here, as op stated Localbitcoins and Bitbargain seem rather expensive, one guy is advertising to buy at £40 on one site and is selling at £100 on the other. Extortionate UK bank charges for international transfers make the big exchanges nonviable for someone just wanting one or two coins to get into the system, BitcoinFridge seems to have died, I put in a buy request and have had no response and other methods take at least 48 hours, which is unrealistic when prices can move by as much as £20 in an hour.
There must be many more people like the op and myself here in UK who are frustrated at the situation here, especially when you consider that for example I bought a laptop battery from Hong Kong on ebay, paid by paypal and received it within 3 days and yes I understand the problems re paypal chargebacks.
It seems the rest of the world doesn't trust the British banking system, can't say I blame em with George Osborne in charge.

No its just UK banks charge extortionate fees for international and even just EU intra-SEPA transfers for UK personal accounts.  You can tho use TransferWise to get money into Bitstamp or MtGox for just £1 but I'm not sure if it works the same for withdrawals.

I keep seeing people trying to push TransferWise but like I said before 48 hours is too long to make a translation with the current volatility of Bitcoin.

To be honest I think the TransferWise pushing is partly due to the affiliate program lol. Regardless it is one of the very few options available s...o Tongue. It does kind of negate the whole instantly sending coins when it can take days just to get the BTC into an account. Whoever does find a way around this could dominate the UK market, I don't really believe the UK citizens trust their government. At least all the people I know hate every banker/politician and would rather those corrupt officials got sent to the highest volcano peak and asked politely to jump of the edge.

There was only ever really one way to buy coins on an exchange quickly and that was at Intersango plus that only lasted for a few months the rapid deposits until they were shut down for banking reasons.  It's always taken days to get money into MtGox AFAIK especially from the UK.

EDIT:  They has always been a massive demand for bitcoins in the UK.  Before Intersango shut down and MtGox Barclay's stopped, GBP was the second most traded fiat pair with BTC after USD.  The problems in the UK are probably suppressing the average bitcoin price IMO.  If you could get GBP into an exchange with instant free UK bank transfers I think they'd be a much bigger buying demand for bitcoins.  If you could open an exchange like MtGox that accepted instant free GBP deposits (and withdrawals) you could corner at least 10% of exchange traded volume.  Or around at least >£30Million ($40Million, EUR35Million) a month in trade.  It's just the money laundering laws in the UK are so tight that HSBC has to go to Mexico to do it  Wink
915  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The UK Public & Bitcoin on: April 15, 2013, 06:42:40 PM
I totally understand where you are coming from, UK is rip off when it comes to bitcoin. I have looked into all the methods posted here, as op stated Localbitcoins and Bitbargain seem rather expensive, one guy is advertising to buy at £40 on one site and is selling at £100 on the other. Extortionate UK bank charges for international transfers make the big exchanges nonviable for someone just wanting one or two coins to get into the system, BitcoinFridge seems to have died, I put in a buy request and have had no response and other methods take at least 48 hours, which is unrealistic when prices can move by as much as £20 in an hour.
There must be many more people like the op and myself here in UK who are frustrated at the situation here, especially when you consider that for example I bought a laptop battery from Hong Kong on ebay, paid by paypal and received it within 3 days and yes I understand the problems re paypal chargebacks.
It seems the rest of the world doesn't trust the British banking system, can't say I blame em with George Osborne in charge.

No its just UK banks charge extortionate fees for international and even just EU intra-SEPA transfers for UK personal accounts.  You can tho use TransferWise to get money into Bitstamp or MtGox for just £1 but I'm not sure if it works the same for withdrawals.
916  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How to solve UK Bitcoin Exchange Problem? on: April 15, 2013, 05:03:13 PM
You can use Ripple to do exactly what you describe.

Yes, I guess so but perhaps I'm not understanding Ripple very well.

It all seems very general and a bit circular.

Let's suppose I have GBP in a bank account. I want to trade them for bitcoins.

I can issue an IOU for my GBP funds via Ripple.

jbloggs can issue an IOU for his bitcoins via Ripple.

That's great, now we can exchange IOUs via Ripple.

I now have jbloggs's IOU for bitcoins, and jbloggs has my IOU for my GBP funds.

So now I have GBP in my bank account (which I've promised to jbloggs via Ripple) and jbloggs has bitcoins (which he's promised to me via Ripple).

But now what do we do? We seem to mostly be back at square one!



I've got GBP credits on Ripple, I sold some BTC at Bitstamp then used the funds from that to issue GBP Bitstamp IOU credits.  You can use the p2p exchange built into Ripple to trade any gateways (like Bitstamp) IOU's.  As the Gateways IOU's are trusted.  Tho I can't personally send anyone the credit IOU's until the other party gives me trust for at least that amount but you can trade them on its inbuilt exchange easily.
917  Economy / Economics / Re: Interesting cover from the BBC on: April 15, 2013, 03:15:20 PM
Any idea how many ATM's there are worldwide? Those things have to be using at least a 100w average. They publish blockchains estimated figure (likely based on GPU's) as an accurately monitored figure and then obfuscate that figure using different time scales and finally scale the Bitcoin global energy usage estimate against US national energy usage. Lies, damn lies and statistics but at least it means we're in the final stage (...then they fight you...).

They're about 2.2Million ATM's worldwide AFAIK IIRC.  So if they all use 100W that's 220MW or 5.28GWh per twenty-four hours against bitcoins 0.982GWh.  Plus that's just the actual ATM and not any of the network servers ect.
918  Other / Off-topic / Re: Bitcoin vs boinc on: April 15, 2013, 02:39:15 PM
I used to do BOINC years ago but I too stopped as it wears and slows your PC down while BIG money is made off some of the research.  As for mining ASICminer are on about bringing out tiny USB powered ASIC mining chip sticks.  There expected to hash at ~600(MH/s) each IIRC and only draw from the USB socket for power.  You could get a RaspberryPi (<5W), a USB hub and start mining cheaply.  Butterfly Labs are offering 5(GH/s) for $274 so a 0.6(GH/s) USB chip stick should be a cheap and the electricity used by the RaspberryPi and ASIC chip sticks minimal.  Tho you might have to wait as I paid for my BFL ASIC last July FFS but ASICminer already have there chips hashing?
919  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Dark Exchange: a 100% decentralized p2p exchange on: April 10, 2013, 10:08:10 PM
Hi all,

Don't get too enthusiastic yet. I've done some research today on p2p exchanges. Indeed, the dark exchange is brilliant. I've read all pages today. They do run into some trouble though: how can you make sure the dollars for the btc are transfered. And how do you do that decentralized? My conclusion, which I'm discussing with user "ConceptPending", is that there are p2p bitcoin exchange projects that solve this. Yes, there are other projects that have the same goal as this topic. One of them is p2px. It doesn't have any code yet but the concept is right. The other one is bitcoinx. It has code, a website, and an hour ago I decided to join them (I'm going to spend 2 months of fulltime coding). So don't forget to explore your options before joining anything!

Users will loose nothing in setting this up other than five minutes of there time.  As all actual BTC and fiat trading is done off the app.  This app just matches orders and could do with some development.  Although as shown by the (new) Ripple project unless the development can be monetised it's a lot less likely to happen.

Thanks for the heads-up I will check out p2px and bitcoinx but a dark/deepnet p2p exchange is the best option IMO especially as more alt-coins gain momentum. 
920  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin client with I2P patch on: April 10, 2013, 09:33:21 PM
With my patch you can run your wallet using i2p only ("-onlynet=native_i2p" option) or in a mixed mode. If you run the client in the mixed mode, your wallet will be like a gate between i2p bitcoin subnet and the rest net. If you run the client using i2p only, you have to communicate with the gates run in the mixed mode (maybe indirectly). Otherwise, your wallet will be separated from the rest net.

Let's say wallet1 and wallet3 running in i2p-only mode. And wallet2 running in mixed mode (gate).
Code:
|wallet1|  <-----I2P----->  |wallet2| <---clear internet---> (others)
   ^-- I2P--> |wallet3| <--I2P--^
In this case wallet1, wallet2 and wallet3 will communicate only through I2P. Wallet1 and wallet3 cannot communicate with the rest bitcoin net directly. But wallet2 will retranslate their transactions to the rest net. If wallet2 is down, wallet1 and wallet3 will be separated from the rest network. Some people help me and run their clients in the mixed mode with a static I2P-address. I add their I2P-addresses to source files as seed-nodes. That allows other people use the "i2p only" mode and do not fear to be separated from main bitcoin network.

As I know, blockchain shows IP-address of a node which first retranslate a transction. So I guess it will be an IP of a gate-node. Anyway no one can to know you real IP if you use "i2p only" mode. Moreover, you can firewall all your network connections except i2p-connections and your wallet will work.

Thanks for the simple explanation, so gateway nodes will always be needed to the clearnet blockchain.  I think there's room for an alt-coin where its blockhain solely only exists inside the I2p network.  It could still be used on clearnet sites that acted as I2p proxies.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 141 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!