Parerea mea e ca era ok daca stergeai strict ceea ce era legat de acel service. De exemplu, in loc de numele service-ului, sa scrii <REMOVED> sau ceva similar. Daca stergi postarea pe de-a intregul, creeaza dubii (parerea mea).
Exact. Comportamentul actual poate fi foarte usor interpretat ca @CristianOff a incercat sa ascunda urmele scam-ului incercat. Internetul nu uita si unii nu iarta. Deci stergerea nu ajuta pe nimeni. Singurul care poate sa stearga un feedback este cel care l-a creat. Deci el trebuie rugat sa stearga. Bineinteles cu argumente si fara pisalogeala. Si eu am fost etichetat de Vod pentru o prostie si (partial) neintelegere. Norocul meu a fost ca a fost feedback neutru. Dar a durat ani (!!) pana s-a induplecat sa-l stearga. Bine, nici eu nu am insistat. Dar ca idee, trebuie prins omul si in toane bune... sa aiba rabare sa iti dea atentie din nou si sa "plece urechea" la povestea ta.
|
|
|
7900 here we come! at 7892
Good morning WO. Observing 7923$ and feeling good. Waiting for 8000 and beyond ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Din ce am vazut cand m-am uitat la Shitcoins.Club pe site ultima data, aveau un curs extrem de bun daca vroiai sa cumperi si curs destul de rau daca vinzi.
Deci spreadul exista, dar nu este uniform distribuit. Deci probabil aveti amandoi dreptate.
|
|
|
I have made quite a lot of profits on buying low and selling high gold in Bitforex exchange
I don't want to be the "bad guy", still, your post is incomplete. I'll help you fill the gap with some questions: 1. did you also get to withdraw your funds (or earnings) from that exchange? 2. were they small funds (under 0.1 BTC), medium (under 1 BTC) or bigger funds? (of course if you see a problem with this question, don't answer it)
|
|
|
In the current situation with the global economy, of which the crypto economy is a part, people on the contrary will want to keep money rather than try to raise even more in gambling.
Keep in mind that not everybody (staying at home because they have to) has money problems and they may get bored much more than usual. Gambling is a good way to spend some time.
|
|
|
Halving may or may not be already priced in. But keep in mind that even without halving we had one year ago 13800 price. There may be indeed a lot of manipulation going on, from a pre-halving pump to simply playing with our minds. Also all the markets are rather unstable now because of oil.
But.. keep in mind that Bitcoin has finite supply and the mining costs will rise for most miners. Imho the price will rise eventually.
|
|
|
I l-am dat eu pe ultimu' pentru tine ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Mersi, i-am dat si eu acum. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Depinde de ATM - am gasit unele care-mi veneau la burta sau aveau camera fix in dreptul ochilor (Bitcoin Romania), eventual am sa imi pregatesc ceva folie cu care sa acopar bine camera inainte sa il folosesc. Dar mi-e ca incerc sa fiu anonim si fix eu cad "in plasa" de suspecti ca mna, ar fi cam suspicios ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Ehee, s-au schimbat vremurile. Nu mai e nevoie. Iti pui o acoperitoare generoasa peste fata, ca deh, COVID, si esti binisor asigurat ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Ca nu tii crypto in portofelul tau pe perioada aia de un an. Crypto did get some clarification at the beginning of March, with BaFin (The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) guidance saying crypto firms will be considered custodians if they have access to customer’s private keys. This might rule out tech providers who only see encrypted versions of private keys, but how it affects multi-party computation companies is less certain, Winter said. (Matthias Winter, fintech lead at Eversheds Sutherland Germany, a firm working directly with German regulators on how the law should be enforce) https://www.coindesk.com/germanys-crypto-custody-law-hits-a-snag-startups-cant-get-bank-accountsDeci trebuie sa le dai lor crypto. Un fel de depozit la termen si in cel mai bun caz ai si tu acces la cheile tale private. Parca nu mai suna la fel de bine ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Wow. Intr-adevar nu mai suna la fel de bine. Si eu care ziceam ce fain au gandit-o... Na teapa. Foarte interesanta informatia, iti raman dator cu niste merit. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Collateral: I would give all of my personal contact info and information. and updates at will via social media/discord etc. (I'm not going anywhere) (edit) I have my own crypto that I can confirm 1 to 1 and would sell my car for lost damages up to a large dollar amount should something go awry on my end.
I could guarentee up to 40K with my collateral, maybe more.
I think that you should start with reading what proper collateral is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577765.msg6311902#msg6311902Your proposal doesn't look like proper loan request with proper collateral that can be escrowed.
|
|
|
I know it won't be added, I just wanted to complain about it...
I agree with the others: most probably it should not be added. My reason is not the overhead though. My reason is that theymos should focus on the new forum software, not this one. But if you (and maybe others too) want such a feature, maybe you should discuss with the guys who already made nice user scripts for the website, maybe they can help you and write a script for this purpose, at least for images. I am not 100% sure it's possible, but it worth a try. This way only the ones who want it will have it.
|
|
|
OP, it depends on your computer skills. If you can safely generate a paper wallet, that's the cheapest. Also if the idea is to store for long period of time, cryptosteel can be an option. If you want to spend now and then or the computer skills are not so much reliable, go for hardware wallet - Ledger and Trezor are the typical options. (make sure you write down the seed onto a PAPER, not a FILE).
|
|
|
certified that chlorine dioxide to be the most effective bacterial killer in human history.
And are there any studies about the effectiveness of bacterial killers ... against viruses?
|
|
|
This is also incorrect. Bitcoin is fungible coin within its network and it should be so only in own network, because it doesn't have value outside the blockchain. No matter how bitcoin could be named outside blockchain, the place where consensus rules are important and are being followed, it continues to work as neutral network that doesn't care whether a person a criminal or not. More importantly, it's a permissionless network, everyone can participate and make transacions with any coin, bitcoin will be equal to another bitcoin. By giving control of your private keys to the intermediaries, you are losing your right to participate in the network on permissionless level. You are losing your ability to transact freely and can't decide by yourself what coins you want to be spended. In this case, bitcoin might become non fungible coin for you, because you're outside the network and its consensus rules.
I understand your logic, but I don't agree with it. Or at least I don't agree with the labeling "incorrect". As you know, everything is relative. And while I agree that to the network all coins are identical, I think that what matter most is the way humans are seeing them.
|
|
|
I have been talking about this for a long time, mining does not bring any income at all now
Let's think a little. Let's assume there is big mining business that's running for more than 2 years. Let's assume that the investor was smart enough and also invested in renewable energy (solar panels, hydro..). This would mean that there's a good chance his only costs are the maintenance / salaries. Of course, this may be a rare situation, but the mining cost wold be very small, so even now he would be on profit. A more expected case is that the investor has his mining warehouse near a hydro power plant and gets electricity almost for free. The result is pretty much similar: he's still on profit. All in all, don't assume all the miners have the same costs for the coins they mine. I myself simply don't know if the majority of them are doing bad or doing great.
|
|
|
Bank transfers are expensive and painfully slow. Whenever I can I avoid them. But credit card payments should not be slow. Or at least not that slow. I do SEPA payments in less than 2 working days (that's the fastest international payments I experienced). Quite a shame ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) There may be somethings else you may have been missing in all this story. I don't know... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Maybe he was was out of stock and blamed the banks? No matter Bitcoin is rising, you could have bought Bitcoin with credit card at spot price (+ about 5%, probably). Obviously, next time you know. But I also agree with the post about reversible payments.
|
|
|
I think that the better option is to avoid them. Those wallets are either broken, either empty, so the effort is useless.
|
|
|
The best sports to watch now is the e-sports, however there are also some problems like the internet connection which we have differently every country. And also the Olympics that suppose to be happening this year is cancelled, so I think if the the quarantine ends we'll be bombarded by sports events on our TVs.
I think that this is a matter of taste. The few sports I like and follow are not e-sports. And since it's a lot of money going on around these sports, most will continue as soon as it's safe enough, even if that means the arenas will have no spectators and everybody will just watch TV. I'm confident the things will get back to (almost) normal in a matter of weeks, especially in Europe.
|
|
|
because I hit a big milestone today.
Nice number indeed. Congratulations! I envy you, but you do deserve all that merit.
|
|
|
|