what did mtgox do exactly?  you mean besides place themselves at the epicenter of the most promising revolutionary bid for liberty in the last 2 centuries and then milk it for their own benefit rather than take their role seriously? nothing I guess |
|
|
|
|
yeah, this thing could still break down with a vengeance...or not
|
|
|
|
|
glad to see you take it seriously Z
|
|
|
|
|
lol
me too
order filled at 5.27, sold at 6.8, 30 ish BTC
|
|
|
|
|
does the exchange have to fill the role of the moneychanger
there is a place for fiat interface for a fee in the market, doesn't mean it needs to be an effective monopoly on trading
|
|
|
|
so what do you mean by decentralize the exchange?
How do you do that with fiat currency?
Or do you mean have more exchanges that talk to one another?
that would be a good step ultimately a fully open source decentralized platform on TOR maybe? |
|
|
|
anyone in touch with MTGOX wake them up!
they are all in the van going to home depot for more box fans |
|
|
|
|
it aint real, you can't trade it
|
|
|
|
|
it executed my 5.27 buy...long ago abandoned
good for me, but be CAREFUL people
|
|
|
|
|
fuck, get out guys, it is totally executing old cancelled orders
|
|
|
|
|
I'm out...you can't tell fuck like this
|
|
|
|
|
those big shorts have to cover
|
|
|
|
|
about $18
I feel your pain nick
|
|
|
|
|
I'm in cash, got a bid in at 5.27 against an echo crash
I would have to see it over 6.20 to set up bullish again
|
|
|
|
|
Strong words, I know
It is painfully obvious that we need to decentralize the exchange if we want bitcoin to survive
we are one well placed STUXNET or drone strike from total disaster
this single point of vulnerability is unacceptable
not to mention the fact that they refuse to keep pace with the currency's hardware and bandwidth needs
|
|
|
|
|
him I think, some message about rehosting
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
