|
Just went to IGG cash to satisfy my curiosity and the entire website is in Russian, so is the casino names mostly it seems. Not trying to discriminate but if it's not in English it's going to be very hard to market.
Also, I checked out 1 casino: Bitcoinplay. Mainly slots. Also a lot of Russian text... and most important of all, no provably fair gaming. Bitcoin/crypto gambling you MUST have this minimum requirement!
|
|
|
|
Investing in a casinos bank-roll is not considered a high risk investment. The only factor that is considered high risk can be if you are trusting to some site with your money. But if you do your research and find a site with great reputation and are sure they won't do an exit scam, then its a pretty good investment.
Keep in mind that due to the house edge the odds will always be in your favor. There are times however when there could be a bad month and you might have to wait it out until you turn a profit. However it much safer than trading some alts on Bitmex in my opinion.
I completely disagree here. The only things considered investments and considered low risk to me is a government bond, because that is insured by your government. Casino bankroll is not insured at all. If something happens to it, it's totally gone. And you never know what happens if some big whale comes and wins everything. For me, there is no such thing as low risk for crypto investment. Medium risk is what I would say it can be. |
|
|
|
|
Helping these kind of people probably means we're just encouraging low-quality spammers and multi-account holders.
1. They are asking for newbies when it's a member account. This suggests multiple newbie accounts just waiting for activation.
2. Asking for signature campaigns when a simple search even on Google will take you to the direct thread.
|
|
|
|
Finally, more gambling sites embracing crash games. But there's one thing I've noticed about Bustabit and its clones.
Why don't they feature affiliates? Faucet is one thing but at least affiliates incentivizes promoters.
Because it's pointless.They have enough traffic and players and those fauce/crashing games can't generate enough revenue for affiliate commissions.I've never been a fan of crash/dice games,but I might try crashdoge as well. Affiliate marketing is getting more and more difficult to do but it is surely not pointless! Almost every game I play or rather site I visit frequently, I was either introduced because of an ad (that I'm sure had a referral link), or was because of someone who shared me a site and I don't mind signing up under their ref link, always no harm to me, and maybe an incentive for him to help me further. If faucet and crash games can't generate revenue, then it's pointless in itself. |
|
|
|
Poker requires a marketing that needs to go get the poker players from other places instead of actually grabbing the poker players in current crypto space. When you create a brand new dice game for example, you can get other dice players from older dice websites that are bored with it and want to try something new, even blackjack can be considered like that, the market is big enough to get more and more dice websites (some of them will survive while others will die quickly) but poker is not like that, when you want to start a new poker game in crypto you need to get people into crypto as well as into your website which is a lot harder because they are accustomed to play with fiat so playing with crypto will be harder for a lot of poker players. The current poker base in crypto is not big enough to sustain too many websites, hell even one website.
To be honest I'm not sure if any of our presumptions work in the space. Any new business move should be qualified by actual market research, which I believe is still quite lacking in this space. If you think about it, most people are just doing what feels right, but I don't think anything is set in stone. With dice I do agree based on my own experience that dicers like playing everywhere. If they like 3 places, they play at 3 places. And so new dice sites can always benefit from having a good system, because old and existing players will always come to play. Poker is different I guess. But there isn't a crypto poker place that's really tried to make it big without relying on outside software. I'm not confident it's for BitDice in that sense. |
|
|
|
I think City will win handily today. Chelsea will be up for it, but I expect a couple of early goals from City to put this match to bed by half-time.
I think everyone wants City to win, so that Liverpool will again be on the same level of points (and City top by GD). Chelsea won 5-0 in their last game but this is a very different Chelsea that beat City. They beat them at Stamford Bridge, and they hadn't lost all those matches by then (but remember, City also hadn't lost all those 4 games in EPL until Chelsea). Very tough game to call, I don't think it will be easy for either side. First to make a mistake loses. |
|
|
|
IMO gamblers ( especially professional gamblers ) don't care at all about ETF , if you are a gambler and living in a country where gambling btc is the only way to gamble then you will use it regardless of ETF
and if you already have access to another fiat sites but still find value or fun in certain bitcoin site then you will use it as well regardless of ETF
I have no idea though if it will have some impacts on the sites , for example can we see more new sites offering bitcoin ?
I still don't get it. ETF is a trading derivative, completely different product and I would say completely different industry to gambling, so why would we even be thinking ETFs lead to gambling sites increasing Bitcoin? Also, isn't the US now thinking to make all online gambling illegal, even the ones supposedly already allowed to operate? |
|
|
|
Very nice UI! I see all the CUB raining now, good luck! If you are allowing free version then you should allow the user to play in guest mode without any login.
This. So common with crypto sites now, everyone kind of has to do it now. I'll second that. This is crypto and this is gambling. Two activities that people really value their privacy now. Of course, allow guests the free non-login mode but give them the option to sign up and create an email-linked account so they can always recover their password. OR, like some sites are doing now, allow people to link to a BTC address that they can later sign to recover their account. This is the best way to use crypto! |
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone want to pay a stolen code or clone, that's published publicly on this forum, for everyone else to see from a guy with multiple red trust feedback?
At any price, that's a really bad deal, might as well just publicly announce on your website that you've bought some coding rip off.
Might as well just be a freebitcoin affiliate. At least that's legit.
|
|
|
|
I thought it's a new site but upon researching, I saw that they have an existing thread in the forum but they are not active anymore since their last post was made on Sept last year. I accessed the site and it looks neat, I hope they'll come back here and continue their competition. Not last year but 2017, so their representative in this forum has been inactive for more than a year. They tried to announce it here with a competition but seems that it was not run as expected. They should be more active here if they want to attract bitcoin players. Otherwise it wont get significant traffic improvement. Strange that someone else other than original owners are posting this thread, but fair enough, Bitcoin bonuses belong here. My early impression isn't too impressive though. First landing page tells me that it's another one of those slot websites, all the same familiar look and feel. Different titles and graphics but it's just slots in the end, maybe for casual mobile gamers but I don't think these are ever popular with Bitcoin gamblers, especially when slots from those providers aren't provably fair. |
|
|
|
I remember when Man City lost to Newcastle at the end of January, Liverpool fans were bragging all over Twitter saying that they have the Premier League title won lol. Its amazing what a couple of games can do as now all the pressure is back on Liverpool to win, that is why I never get too excited as we never know what can happen in the final weeks of the season. Man City have come behind to win the title in the past and so have many other teams and lets not count out Tottenham either as they are right there if Man City and Liverpool drops a couple of matches.
I think there will be lots of surprise results before the end of the season. The lead will probably change hands every week. It will definitely be an exciting run in. I never like the braggarts, so yeah that sort of turns me off about Liverpool when I see, but thankfully the forums here have the "good" type of fans, for all the teams, so I feel happy here. Twitter and FB are so poisonous. But yes, so many surprises left, as we can all see from our weekly predictions gone wrong. Liverpool shouldn't feel worried, they just need to play football like they do, draws and losses are part of the game. Just enjoy it. Spurs also, just play. Kane will come back soon with Dele so meanwhile just go and play football. |
|
|
|
i remember playing on this site few months ago, the withdrawals were instant and the deposits were confirmend after 1 confirmation too.
Wish OP good luck with this
Right, really? OP barely posted this site even 4 days ago and you're claiming to have played, deposited and withdrawn all this a few months ago? @deisik, house edge in blackjack is not impossible to calculate. I have seen several sites show their house edge for it. Generally, you know it's very low if BJ pays 2:1, and if dealer has to hit on soft 17. Most BJ change the odds on 2:1, or use insurance, or other things, all to change the edge. |
|
|
|
Coutinho hasn’t set the world alight at Barca so I could actually see that move to Chelsea as Hazard’s replacement happening. He would be a good fit for Chelsea.
To be fair, he wasn't exactly ever going to have a proper chance at Barcelona. He simply is not a good fit, even though earlier days even the media did their best to make it seem like he was fitting in with the others especially with Luis Suarez. I agree he will make a really good move to Chelsea, Sarri ball is what Coutinho can do better than now. Hazard's replacement I'm not sure though. |
|
|
|
|
No point helping people out with threads like these, sorry to say. It's been done countless times before... and yet people still don't understand the simple meaning. I've actually even seen bounty managers themselves get the definition of stakes wrong for months, and hunters never point it out til it's too late.
This altcoin bounty business has really revealed so much about the so-called industry. The managers, the promoters, the influencers, the projects. All in it for the money, most have 0 blockchain experience. I bet most don't even know how to sign transactions!
|
|
|
|
Real madrid definitely miss the big opportunity to stay ahead of Barcelona on first leg.Barcelona was struggling last night, Suarez and Coutinho showed poor performance.I can't believe Coutinho is worth of 160M.Anyway, Barcelona will get Dembele and Messi on 2nd leg.Though, RMA have the away goal advantage now but I think 2nd leg will be more tough for them.
Barcelona did great, especially in the second half. However, they were still missing the shots and the shots on target in order to score a goal. I was very impressed with Vinicious performance. I think that this guy has great potential to be one of the top players worldwide in the future. And he is in a team that he can work hard for it. I think it is Barcelona who missed the big chance, because now they have to travel to Madrid and get all the pressure there. Then again, they didn't exactly have problems beating Real Madrid at their own home, so I guess they're not worried. Coutinho must so regret being in Barcelona now, but I guess Chelsea don't mind paying for him? Messi will be fully fit for Round 2, so watch out Madrid! |
|
|
|
|
The worst thing about all the failed ICOs is that so few (if any) of the developers were made to pay for their negligence. Just last week, I saw an ICO I followed but luckily never invested, just post a message after almost 1 year of saying they were negotiating, that the token is not working and they have ran out of funds and etc etc.
The CEO even said this is not an exit scam, we all lost money.
No, only investors lost money. CEO and team all paid themselves salaries! Disgusting behavior and I hope people make these guys pay for it one day.
|
|
|
|
Nice graphics and name to the site.
But you need tokens to be able to play on the site?
This might be a turn off to some gamblers here as they like to be able to use bitcoin or ethereum instead of exchange them in order to play at alt coin crypto casino.
I have to second this. I'm all for playing with a new token and new crypto, I think gambling shouldn't be restricted to Bitcoin (but it should always be the primary one). My own promoted site is BitDice which has its own CSNO tokens, but this token serves a unique purpose of distributing dividends for a share of the house bankroll profits. It's worked well and of course people speculate with it too on exchanges, but it doesn't force people to use CSNO. Always allow Bitcoin, and some big alts. Otherwise you will never take off. |
|
|
|
Yeah, a good signature campaign should definitely be in the pipeline
Regarding chats (aka trollboxes) specifically, they are a required feature as most people like sharing their wins with others and look for support when they lose. But please don't fetishize it, i.e. don't make a fetish of it (as some casinos as well as exchanges often do) as trollboxes can be annoying as fuck, especially if you can't switch them off for good (in the very least, hide them)
Exactly, I mean people online when they gamble with Bitcoin all share a common trait, (if they are public and use the same name, not like those mysterious whales I mean), they just like to share, discuss strategy or really just kill the time while playing. Personally I don't use chat very much at all at any of the dice sites I play at but I always keep an eye out for it. And the popular sites have chat, simple as that. AND OF COURSE as you said, make it optional so it doesn't screw up the site look or speed. |
|
|
|
Put it back to bitcoin and don't have a second thought about this. I committed a mistake too for purchasing an altcoin and now it's dropping low and I don't think that the choice I've made will recover. It's sad to see that the value of my portfolio drops every each other day but that's the matter that I should accept for now. We'll never grow to this market if won't experience such lows, I'm a HODLER and I have few regrets but I'm willing to wait for that awaited bull run.
Me too. I enjoyed the alt ride for a while, made profits here and there, and some coins even made 2x several times, but the problem for me was investing in ICOs. Chose the best ones, took my time to research, and yet ended up with poor ICOs, whereas others I knew invested in hype like EOS and made money. Taught me a great big lesson that alts are just a gamble in the end. Bitcoin is where the true value will always be. |
|
|
|
|
Seems like we don't have many guessers yet, so I'll put in my random guess of 8765. Let's see how close the roll can get to 10,000.
Will there be a prize for closest guesser? Also, you didn't respond to some of our comments. Either way whichever happens, I am curious to see what I could do with a bitcoin game if I won it, haha. Maybe just put it up to show off as part of lotto history or whatever.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
