There are a lot of sites out there that can calculate your potential activity (including mine). Most are based on the same script (but not mine!) that calculate potential activity. To do it manually, you need to go through the pages of posts and you can use the spreadsheet and information from this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=582736.0 to find the two week time periods. You earn 14 potential activity for each two week period that has at least 1 post. do it manually may generate problems for posts too close to the end of activity period, considering that the activity doesn't update exactly every 14 days(it is 14 days plus some minutes) I think that use a script is better even if you don't care about losing your time The spreadsheet in the thread I linked to has the timing down to the second, and your posts are recorded down to the second so it is possible and relatively easy to calculate potential activity. I had to do that in order to make sure the data on my site was correct. |
|
|
|
Please vote if you desire or not for Andreas M. Antonopoulos to have the Bitcoin Alert Keys currently being held by Satoshi, Gavin Andresen, and theymos.
This makes no sense. No one's Alert Key should be "taken away" unless they willfully abuse it or improperly use it. He doesn't have one yet. The poll is for whether he should get one. Nothing is being taken away. I don't honestly see what Andreas Antonopoulos can have with these keys. I mean I love the men, I love the way he speaks about Bitcoin and represents the community, I love his dedication and knowledge, but what alert messages will he be sending for God's sake?
These keys need to rest in the sole possession of the devs and Bitcoin creators, just like they were until now.
I agree with this statement, but then why does theymos have an alert key? |
|
|
|
There are a lot of sites out there that can calculate your potential activity (including mine). Most are based on the same script (but not mine!) that calculate potential activity. To do it manually, you need to go through the pages of posts and you can use the spreadsheet and information from this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=582736.0 to find the two week time periods. You earn 14 potential activity for each two week period that has at least 1 post. |
|
|
|
Cant be sold an account with red trust them are worthless the one thing an account here having a value is that because you can make money with it thru sig campaign, and obviously having a red trust will get an account disqualified.
I know  I'm not a native speaker, so i might have worded my question wrong: does anybody have any tips on how to publicly aknowledge the account has defaulted their loan, without getting the account some red trust... The account is basically my investment when i gave out the loan, so i would hate it if it became worthless... If at some point it was said which account would be collateral, then just make a post saying that he has defaulted on the loan and that you have collected the collateral. If not, then post saying that you have collected his collateral which was the account that made the loan. If anyone give -ve trust to the account for loan defaulting, pm that person and inform him that you have collected the account as collateral so that he should remove the red trust. |
|
|
|
Thank you guys. Yes it's there now.
About that -000 thing, the TXID was copied directly from my wallet. Is this just one of those things I'm supposed to know but don't?
the -000 has something to do with output numbers, but I'm not entirely sure what it is for. I'm thinking it's not a transaction until the receiver opens his wallet which he may not have done, if that makes any sense.
That doesn't matter. There is no way that any node would know whether the receiver has opened his wallet to see the transaction or not. Everything is recorded in the blockchain, not sent to someone's wallet. |
|
|
|
Can you post more of the log? The little bit you gave doesn't help us at all.
It's a bit big, so I'm having issues posting it here. Here's a direct link. Do you want me to post a hash of the file and a virus scan? EDIT: went ahead and did itThat is a large log file. There doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it. The only thing I can think of right now is that there are too many transactions which is causing the mempool to grow too big. Maybe try to change the settings to limit how large the mempool can get. Otherwise, the only other solution I can think of is to see if reinstalling and resyncing will help. |
|
|
|
Thanks for teaching me this method.
my wallet is now rescanning.
When i check the address that i sent the 2.5btc to, looks like someone spent it already so i m sure that is someone else's wallet. but why my wallet sent my btc to this address instead of the correct address?
yes, i have cleaned my wallet by replacing with an early backup that is long time ago(~2 years), but i found out the wallet missing most of my addresses so i change it back to my original wallet file with conflicted transaction. Apart from that, no one else have touched the wallet file.
It is possible that you have a virus on your computer. There have been several cases of various viruses that will steal your Bitcoin wallet thus allowing the attacker to spend your funds. This may have happened, so get an antivirus and scan your computer to make sure that there are no viruses. |
|
|
|
|
The conflict is that your wallet had a transaction that it doesn't see on the network. Go to Help > Debug Window and click on the console tab. Then type in zapwallettxs. I think that should fix the problem.
|
|
|
|
your estimator is not really reliable. I don't think a newbie that has 252 potential activity and has very poor posts could be sold for almost 0.1 BTC.
I with a hero that has been sold for around 0.45 BTC, and the value, according to your estimator, was around 0.55 BTC
And I think you understimate positive trust, I tested with a hero with more than 600 activity and dark green trust and his value was not different than similar accounts with n
Ok thanks for letting me know. I will be updating the algorithm as prices go down. |
|
|
|
Thank you for the response... But unfortunately, transactions aren't even listed. I'm about to be out $287 :/ Also, all I did was enter the seed so that I could try to get my wallet back..
Did you try to change the server as I suggested above? |
|
|
|
I can probably do this. Just for clarification, you want two graphs, one for each proposal, which charts the maximum block size as if your proposals had been implemented since the genesis block. Also assuming 1 MB was the initial limit for the genesis block. Is there a reward BTW, this doesn't belong in tech support, I have already reported this so it should be moved. |
|
|
|
|
Try changing the server you are connected to. Go to Tools > Network and uncheck autoconnect. Then select a different server and connect to it. That might help.
Also, move this to the electrum subforum. You will get better help there. I will report this to the moderators so they will move it for you if you don't.
|
|
|
|
|
In the lower right hand corner, is there a green circle?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think pools cause centralization. They help to prevent large mining farms from becoming the only miners, and that would actually be centralization. The pool operators only set the software which determines what blocks to mine. Small miners mine in the pools so that they can still compete. And if the miners don't like what their pool is doing, they can just switch to another one.
Can you explain how you think pools cause centralization?
|
|
|
|
|
What wallet are you using?
Based on the fact that it is a 12-word key, I am assuming you are using an deterministic wallet. Have the wallet generate a bunch of addresses. All of those addresses are addresses that are yours and should be exactly the same as your previous addresses since it deterministically generates them.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you post more of the log? The little bit you gave doesn't help us at all.
|
|
|
|
For the record, during the last spam tests/attack, btc prices when up.
There hasn't been a spam attack like this in the past and it forces down the price for obvious reasons. What do you mean that there hasn't been a spam attack like this? The last spam attack was sending dust to the brainwallet for cat which people were trying to claim. The attack before it was pretty bad. I'm fairly certain that all three of these attacks are run by the same people. |
|
|
|
|
uncheck autoconnect and try connecting to another server. Also check to see if your firewall is blocking electrum
|
|
|
|
I was referring specifically about you colluding with someone. Everything else is impossible to prove either way.
Should I take you saying that you are "done with this flame war" as you declining my request (that you put 5BTC into escrow that would be due me and you leave forever if I can prove my claim)?
If he declines, and you fail to prove he was colluding, does that mean you were bluffing? No. I'm not bluffing. Then why don't you just post the evidence and explain how you came to those conclusions? Why do you demand a payment for that? If you already came to those conclusions then you have already spent the time researching that and that time will still have been wasted and essentially for nothing if no one agrees to pay you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
