Show Posts
1) Bounty manager. Of course, this is not the most important, sometimes the rank of newbie moderates a good bounty, but still you can pay attention to it.
Completely agree on this one and I would rather choose up these newbie manager compared to those who are known or do have a bad record on handling bounty campaigns.Rank doesn't really always imply on how a manager do handle a campaign.
2) The number of weeks for the bounty. I think this is very important, when the date of the end of the bounty is known at once, especially I like short bounties for 3-4 weeks.
For me the longer the better yet 3-4 weeks might not really be a sufficient period of time on completing a sale but though it will depend on the demand of a certain crowdfunding and also there 2 phase of sale (Pre-sale and Main sale) which mostly last up 6-8 weeks.
3) The amount of money allocated to the bounty. Also affects the number of bounty participants, but still, if allocated, for example, 100k$, I think this is small and try not to participate in such bounties (Exception, if the bounty is for a short period). On the other hand, if the number of participants is large, this indicates a strong project. Maybe they will not pay a lot of tokens, but they are likely to grow in price (because this project is probably good)
Not possible, even no matter how many participants are there,if the allocation is already been given since from the start of the bounty program it would be always fixed.
4) I try to study the project a little. See the presence of white paper, command. Also look for this project in different ICO ratings.
Well, in general, that's all. In general, I try to take quantity, not so much quality, so my studies are probably a little superficial.
As a bounty hunter having these kind of behaviors or routines should really be done on seeking potential projects for us to know which do are really worth to join up.
Completely agree on this one and I would rather choose up these newbie manager compared to those who are known or do have a bad record on handling bounty campaigns.Rank doesn't really always imply on how a manager do handle a campaign.
2) The number of weeks for the bounty. I think this is very important, when the date of the end of the bounty is known at once, especially I like short bounties for 3-4 weeks.
For me the longer the better yet 3-4 weeks might not really be a sufficient period of time on completing a sale but though it will depend on the demand of a certain crowdfunding and also there 2 phase of sale (Pre-sale and Main sale) which mostly last up 6-8 weeks.
3) The amount of money allocated to the bounty. Also affects the number of bounty participants, but still, if allocated, for example, 100k$, I think this is small and try not to participate in such bounties (Exception, if the bounty is for a short period). On the other hand, if the number of participants is large, this indicates a strong project. Maybe they will not pay a lot of tokens, but they are likely to grow in price (because this project is probably good)
Not possible, even no matter how many participants are there,if the allocation is already been given since from the start of the bounty program it would be always fixed.
4) I try to study the project a little. See the presence of white paper, command. Also look for this project in different ICO ratings.
Well, in general, that's all. In general, I try to take quantity, not so much quality, so my studies are probably a little superficial.
As a bounty hunter having these kind of behaviors or routines should really be done on seeking potential projects for us to know which do are really worth to join up.
Thanks for your feedback. So you think that the optimal duration is 6-8 weeks? You say the more, the better: in my opinion, if the bounty lasts a very long time, it is suspicious, it is likely that the project can not collect the necessary amount, which is very dangerous.
Regarding point 3: in some projects a fixed amount is allocated, and in some projects, a percentage of the collected funds. In your opinion, which of these options is preferable, or is it not worth paying attention to? It seems to me that if the project is strong and collects a lot of money, then the percentage is better.
