Unfortunately, newbies come into the crypto world thinking that they could make a big change, but in reality they are not doing anything radical. They see some people on social media that turned a few thousand dollars into millions of dollars, and they think crypto world is a free money making place.

You will see them shilling some idiotic small time 2 million dollar or less trading volume tokens during the bull run, and thinking that project will be in top 10 and make them rich. They are so inexperienced that when there is a token with 0.00001 dollar or so price, they keep saying "if it is only 10 cents, we all will be rich" and not realize that would make the market cap 1 trillion dollars and that's impossible for that project.

I always thought that it's about how the casino would approach this. I mean think about it, if you build a casino and then people end up with buying the shares of it, then it would be a bit of a trouble. I mean think about it, if the ownership is with the people, and not with the team.

So in that case, people who are holding the income, telling the team to spend their limited amount that they used to sell the tokens, and use that for marketing to make a lot more money. I do not get it that much, what's the point of it for the team? That's why I believe we shouldn't really be doing anything crazy and expecting them to do something like that.

The monthly is not supposed to be your cashback or your rakeback or something, it’s something everyone gets and it's normal that people who wager 100k+ to get not a lot, you can't expect 1k back, that’s literally 1% house edge amount anyway. Plus, if you wagered 100k, then 570k should be doable in 6-8 months and that should be good enough to get you to another VIP level.

What you get based on your VIP level is not just a bigger cash back, it's literally thousand other things. In the end it’s a good thing and I suppose it could be done a lot better. I hope that we should be seeing a lot more of it and we could end up making a great big progress as a whole, I want to upgrade to a new VIP level as well.

I am not so sure, if you look at his minutes and goals scored, he is not "that" great, for that kind of money they could have found some good players for sure. They are also Milan, which means that they are not really lacking in players who would love to play for them, of course there would be some people who would play for them.

This is why I highly suggest everyone to just look at the current situation as Ibra getting a bit more money than he deserves and that's the problem. Think about it, if he got like 50% discount, then that same money could have been used as a deal to get a younger player with some potential, his salary is just way too much and doesn't look like a possibility to me.

All cruise ships all around the world is getting a bit of a trouble. I mean you can't just expect the world to get back to where it was suddenly. It's going to be harder for slow income places. Cruise ones have like a few cruise each year, mainly in one special season (summer) and then they make that money back, but they spend so much and gain so much all together.

When you cancel even one of that, you are going to be in big big trouble and finding money again to try to do it again is harder. Some tried it 3-4 times and failed because of pandemic period, which means that we are not going to end up seeing them recover easily, or maybe not even recover.

The "exact" formula of what and how they pay is not known and will probably never be known. Don't get me wrong it's not a big deal, because if you gamble just for this, you are already doing something wrong, if you are not gambling for this, then whatever you get is a benefit.

There are some people who love to maximize their profit as much as possible, and if you give the exact formula to everyone, there will be plenty of people who will try to maximize their profits and that's not doable and understandable. However, what we could do instead is to get to a point where we just ignore all the additions and rewards and extras, and instead just end up with regular gambling, which happens to get some stuff.

Honestly? I just did an exchange approach and I am fine with it. I know it sounds risky and all, but doesn't feel that bad to me. Think about it this way, I put all my money on Binance and it is a great place and if any person would hack into binance, they would be more than powerful enough to hack into mine as well.

Yes, I am leaving my future up to Binance, which is someone else and not me, but that is still fine by me and I do not feel like that's a trouble. All in all I believe that we shouldn't be shocked about what we are doing, just focus on what you feel the most comfortable with and you will get it done. I felt most comfortable with Binance, over all software and hardware wallets.

Trabzon made some money off last year, and they are spending that to get better, which is always a good proof that they want to repeat what happened last year. Some teams sell half of the roster when they become a champion, in order to profit from the situation, Trabzon went the other way hence why I think they should be fine. However, Fener added even more players that should be great for them.

It's going to be a troubling thing for a while, they need to get used to each other first. Based on what I have seen from Galatasaray today though? One thing is for sure, they are not going to be the champions, it would be a miracle if they even get to any European competition levels, so top 6-7 is out for them again I believe.

I agree that they have the money for it, but there is a new wave in football where teams are trying to make a profit. I have zero clue why it's like that, but the greatest ever in history example is Dortmund for example. They sold Sancho last year and made a great chunk of money, but they didn't spend it at all, they might have spent it somewhere else but they didn't bought players at those prices at least.

This year they sold Haaland that much and they made a ton of money again, and yet not buying any players again. They may end up selling that midfielder English kid to a lot of money too, forgot his name, but not buying anyone. Napoli may do something similar, gain a ton of money, but spend it in operational stuff or debt repayment or something like that, and not players.

That is not really a shock, it was expected. In the end we are talking about Bayern here and he is one of the important players of that club. Which means that it would be very understandable for him to do something like this.

Of course he would love to play for another team that would pay a ton of money to them, but in the end we are talking about something that is a bit less risky for the team and him if he stayed and that's how they went ahead. Playing in City or Liverpool or Madrid could have paid Gnarby a lot more, he could have been offered x2 money in those clubs, but would you rather have that for like 2 years and not be wanted after that, or would you rather get paid like this for another 5 or more years?

I would guess that the biggest reason why they fail is that they are not used to the tournament style all that much. They are amazing in the league because even if they lose a few, they win more than enough. But, when it's tournament style, you can't make a comeback with a small time left if you are not used to it.

Plus, Real keeps playing against decent opponents, and there are some other teams like that too, but PSG keeps playing against teams that are much worse than them, which makes them a bit more lazy when playing because they are used to winning anyway. Same goes for City as well, so many years of dominating EPL and yet they fail in UCL so far.

Only thing you should get "professional" about gambling is to having fun and stopping when you are done. There are way too many people who make a big deal out of gambling and then turn that into a professional "job" type of thing, like somehow make their incomes from it and that can't happen.

We have to agree that gambling is a null thing that will always cause you to stop profiting and you will always have a low bankroll at the end of it. Then why would you do that? Well, our life is filled with things we spend money on and have fun, so why not do it with gambling as well, you could always spend money on other things to have fun, and gambling is also one of them.

I would say that Suns were already not interested in signing him anyway. I think it is going to be a good trading piece for Pacers. Let’s face it, some teams do not have a chance to be champions, no matter what happens they do not have that championship fabric. I do not expect Orlando, Cavs (again anyway), Suns, OKC etc etc to be champions.

There are like 15 of these teams and they are not championship material season in and season out, and they do this for over a decade, some for over two decades. This isn't just "not being champions" thing, they haven't been contenders for that long. This is why Pacers getting Ayton will not be a big deal neither, but they could trade him for some stuff at least.

I do agree that Xavi definitely made Barcelona much better. Just remember the el classico they had with Xavi as manager last year, they won against Real Madrid 4-0 and not like Madrid played youth or bench players, they were with their best team and Barcelona still managed to beat them very easily.

This shows that if they let Xavi get at least some people that he likes, then it would be impossible to stop their improvement. They are going to end up with something special for sure. This is why I believe that we should not be looking for them getting any worse, they will fight to win the title this year, will be hard but not impossible for them. If they do that, paying the debt back will be easier.

Weak hands are not the type of people who would make any kind of profit during the bear months, they will make a good amount of profit during bull though, because people who are newbies and do the things they shouldn't do, take higher risks, and some of them do lose a lot of money to scams, but some of them get super lucky.

Someone who knows how to invest, will do the right and thinkable thing and will not take that silly risk, and will earn a good chunk of money, but not like the newbie who made a mistake. I know people who bought the wrong token and made profit more than I did, that’s how newbies could get lucky, of course many lose money while doing that as well.

They might be in even bigger trouble. Chiellini left, but De ligt has some interested parties as well. If he leaves as that that is 2 giant wholes in the defense that they need to fill. Di Maria is certainly not a bad transfer and Pogba will be a big deal as well, those are good, even great.

But, if they can't handle the defense, that is not going to matter all that much. These people are some of the greatest defenders they had in a while, and both leaving on the same season would create some trouble for them. Maybe De ligt would stay, it is not guaranteed but at the same time it is not going to be a big deal if he leaves and brings in a lot of money so they could get 2 others.

The problem is that the manager they got is not one that is famously known, or ever won any UCL before. Which means that the players may not care about what he has to say. Sure they will act as if they care for a while and if the results come from what he says then they will care even more, but if they do not suddenly become much better team then they won't care about it and they will start to ignore him as well.

This is the problem with hiring a manager and saving some money from it. They should have spent as high as possible, because having a great manager is as important as having Mbappe. If you ask me would you rather be me as manager and mbappe on the team, or Zidane as manager without Mbappe, I say zidane would be a better choice.

I think it was a bad decision to make him play with another player who gets inside, and a 6'8 280 pounds version of westbrook as well. This is why we should also see him play with shooters. For example him in Pacers wouldn't be a bad idea, they have Hield and they have some other players and that could work out well for the team.

Of course the problem is that, if you are willing to get westbrook, then you should be hoping to get something else. The biggest trouble with the Irving deal is that if you give Westbrook, and even if you give some picks which Lakers barely have any, you are sending him to Durant, which we all know they both dislike each other and that would be a problem.

I agree that people who can't hold made a mistake, I wouldn't say they are weak or anything, because there could be a valid reason to sell, the problem is them buying and not selling. If you are in a financial situation where you can't hold something for years, then you shouldn't get in to begin with. That’s why the selling part is not wrong, they may need it and I understand it, I had the same thing as well, so I understand selling part.

I shouldn't have bought though, and they shouldn't neither. Those people who get into bitcoin with their last bullet with the hopes that it would finally give them financial freedom, and get out when they realize it won't happen that quickly, do not understand what bitcoin is all about.

There are some who do not want to see bitcoin do great, because they have lived all their life from getting money out of each trade regular people make. If bitcoin does better, then binance will profit, or coinbase would, but not wall street. So, there are some "experts" who hope that bitcoin would go down, so that they would make some profit based on what trades people make on stock markets so they could get a cut out of it.

Stock traders will never enjoy crypto, maybe individually but not on a business scale. Or they will find a way to make money from it themselves, and that's how they are going to hope they could profit from bitcoin and in that case they will support it.