Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 01:13:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 »
921  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin-Qt / bitcoind version 0.8.0 release candidate 1 on: February 10, 2013, 12:54:56 AM
Quick question regarding this. Does importprivkey still work? It rescans the block chain to see if it has been used, would this still work with the way it stores the historical transaction ids? Or would I need to use the txindex=1 if I plan on importing keys?

No problem - rescan just goes through all old blocks again, one by one. Those are still available in 0.8. The only thing that changes is that no information in the index is kept about spent transactions, so without txindex, it's impossible to find a transaction given just its txid. In practice, really the only thing affected is the getrawtransaction RPC.


Oh duh, I knew that. I've read what we are doing here and also about light nodes. I mistook the spent tx as creation of a light node. My mistake. I understand now. The bloom feature is groundwork for a light node. I'm going to test on another windows machine and a linux machine later. But so far I love what I see.

This really opens up the, hey, download bitcoin and try it out I'll send you some coins instead of; hey, check out bitcoin, but get an alternate client because of the official one takes too long.
922  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin-Qt / bitcoind version 0.8.0 release candidate 1 on: February 10, 2013, 12:42:51 AM
Quote
This release no longer maintains a full index of historical transaction ids
by default, so looking up an arbitrary transaction using the getrawtransaction
RPC call will not work. If you need that functionality, you must run once
with -txindex=1 -reindex=1 to rebuild block-chain indices (see below for more
details).

Quick question regarding this. Does importprivkey still work? It rescans the block chain to see if it has been used, would this still work with the way it stores the historical transaction ids? Or would I need to use the txindex=1 if I plan on importing keys?


I've tested on a couple of set up of windows:
Windows XP New install, download block chain: Works okay. Much faster than previous versions on downloading.
Windows 7 New install, download block chain: Works okay. Much faster than previous versions on downloading.

Windows XP block chain was at about 190,000 never finished downloading because it took too long for what this used to be used for. Took about an hour minutes to reindex what it had then it downloaded the rest nice and quickly. This was an older P4 machine.

Windows 7, had full block chain. It reindexed fine nice and fast in about an hour. I did notice during the first 3/4 of the block chain it didn't really use extra CPU. It's near the end when it started to crank up the engine. This machine was a more modern machine multiple cores and I set the dbcache to 2000.
923  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: February 09, 2013, 10:30:48 PM
Awesome - List updated. Good luck finding the first all-lowercase address ever Smiley

haha thanks, bet I'm not the only one. I wish the GPU version of vanitygen allowed for regex... would be much faster!
924  Economy / Goods / Re: Which goods would you like to be made available for sale via btc and lc? on: February 08, 2013, 09:23:11 PM
Cocaine and cocaine accessories would be nice.

Silkroad already has these available.

Do you want a list of what people want or a list of what is not available but would like in BTC?
925  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BFL added tax on: February 08, 2013, 05:17:47 PM
I guess it's time to order

I didn't say that Smiley But it does look like the tax disappears at least.
926  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BFL added tax on: February 08, 2013, 05:07:35 PM
Follow it through to checkout.. the tax goes away for me once you do.
I think it's just an issue with their cart.

I'm not going to go all the way through, but just on the check out page, you hit your shipping option and the Grand Total has the sales tax disappearing.
927  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BFL added tax on: February 08, 2013, 04:57:01 PM
Wyoming and Kansas do not have any charge sales tax laws if the item is ordered online and shipped out of state.


EDIT: What's interesting is that this isn't being mentioned at all at BFL forums. Or maybe it's being suppressed.
928  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bitcoing gambling server hosting on: February 08, 2013, 04:06:23 PM
Just find one from a country who hates America, and wont extradite, nor send the US any information if they ask.

Code:
Countries which have neither diplomatic relations nor extradition treaties with the US are Andorra, Angola, Bantu Homelands, Bhutan, Bosnia, Cambodia, Ciskei, Cuba, Iran, Korea (North), Libya, Maldives, Serbia, Somalia, Taiwan, Transkei, Vanuatu, and Vietnam.

Those might not be the best web hosting countries.

I beleive that satoshidice is hosted in Ireland at least that's what a reverse lookup of their ip 54.247.163.243 says
929  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Recipient;s BTC Balance still shows 0.00 BTC even after 20 Confirmations [qt] on: February 08, 2013, 04:03:55 PM
Hi, thank you

Yes, I know I must have the private keys of these 3 addresses in order to use the money that was sent to them, or even just to see that the btc is there. (I have some psychological problem that I have to see this method works for me at least once before I do this again, and send all my mined btc to a new, offline, btc wallet) so, is there a way to import secret keys of bitcoin-qt with Sudo comments?

Also, if I want to download the blocks to my pc while using the Ubuntu Live os, that means I should get a 8gb RAM, right? I tried to download the blocks to my 16gb USB Flash Drive, but ubuntu didn't even let me open "bitcoin-qt.exe" because apparantely there is a problem with opening .exe files from a portable device.

Thank you.

To dump the private key from qt, open up the console and use dumpprivkey <bitcoinaddress>

That will export the private key for you. Then, you can import those keys into blockchain.info and have access to the funds on them. Or you could use the function importprivkey <bitcoinprivkey> [label]

on a full node with the whole block chain and have access to the coins locally.

The reason that you cannot open bitcoin-qt.exe on linux is because an .exe is made for windows. Try the linux files from bitcoin.org and you should be fine Smiley
930  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics on: February 08, 2013, 03:16:31 PM
Do you provide API support for test net?

No not currently.

Is this something you would consider? Blockchain info for testnet and the API to test on? It would be a little nicer from a development standpoint to test applications with play money before real BTC start flying around in beta code.
931  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Recipient;s BTC Balance still shows 0.00 BTC even after 20 Confirmations [qt] on: February 07, 2013, 10:09:15 PM
The balance won't show until the entire block chain is downloaded on #2. You can verify the balance on blockchain.info

If you want to retrieve the funds, export the keys or the wallet and put them on a computer with enough hard drive to download the chain or import the keys into blockchain.info and send them back out from there.

932  Economy / Speculation / Re: Do you really belive that you won't be able to buy at 20$ again? on: February 07, 2013, 08:09:44 PM
Why are you fueling this rally like crazy? It dosen't seem to me that more than doubling the price in a month or so is healthy for this small economy.

I admit it, I want the price to go down to buy, but hell, 22$ is a crazy price. Someone is gonna hurt.

I'm long on BTC and am always buying a few coins. I stopped since we've we were right at $20. I hate not to keep getting in but at the same time it feels wrong. If it stabilizes somewhere near here for a while I'll hop back on the train but at this point I'm a little scared. I can kick myself in the ass later when it never gets down to $20 again.
933  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for people to store some of the forum's money on: February 07, 2013, 04:57:32 PM
Let the people who donated the coins hold their excess donations, you have a list of the transactions just send them back the coins when you need them ask for them. Nice and f@#$ simple no need to scam on it, no need to pay fees, no need for complicated key systems, no risk of theft,no trust issues, no people begging to hold the coins.  My suggestion is the only one that makes sense.   I will not donate to the fund if these funds are given to insiders.     

I'm sure a lot of the funds are raised from ads. Those are not necessarily donations and wouldn't be returned to the advertiser.
934  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL 1/3 plan on: February 07, 2013, 04:43:21 PM

I cannot argue against that point. By the way, some Chinese customer said they received their Avalon unit. So the landscape of situations is changing it appears.

Heh. If so, they'll have it torn apart and a clone up on DealExtreme for $13 by the end of the month.

Avalon is a Chinese company... having an ASIC chip doesn't mean you can clone it by having the physical chip.
935  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for people to store some of the forum's money on: February 07, 2013, 04:00:08 PM
There are of course plenty of people that are both invested in the success of Bitcoin as well as those that simply believe in what Bitcoin stands for that will do this for free. Theymos has a list of willing candidates and their terms. Is anyone suggesting that with such a list, that Theymos is not a smart enough person to review the offers and pick someone that would hold them for free, have public accountability of the coins, and is well known both with their avatar and in real life over someone who wants to charge a fee and wants to play SD with the forums money? Come on. If you think he would choose the latter, maybe you should start your own Bitcoin forum because if you don't trust him with that you should absolutely have a suspicion that he is reading your private messages and reporting your IP address to three letter government agencies for being a threat.

I see lots of things for 'free' but bitcoin managing isn't one of them. There are risks even in FREE, and taking provisions for those risks are NOT FREE. So who shall pay?  I already donated so I've shown my support. Now, you want free?

I'm not really looking for this, he posted. I didn't request. I provided an option, he might not like it. So, don't take it.

TBH, it's a headache of responsibility that I normally wouldn't care to hold for a length of time. I assume, he has the same headache and is trying to spread the pain. I offered my aspirin but FREE would be a migraine.

I'm not saying that he wouldn't pick you or someone that is charging either. If he has 10 options and wants to choose 3, and 2 of them he highly likes and are free and 100% reserves, he may pick those depending on the level of trust. If he wants a third one and that person is charging a reasonable fee for taking the risks involved, because you are right, there are risks, if that charge still gives a 100% reserve and the member is well trusted, then a fee is reasonable and he'll choose it. I am absolutely not arguing that free is better than paid. There is much more to the argument than that. The people that are willing to do it at not cost are aware of what it will cost them and are offering their service as a donation to the community, again because they trust in it.

However, from a contract stand point, some payment, even if nominal, may be needed. Depending on how much money is being distributed a hundred bucks to consult with an attorney and email with their paralegal may be worth it.
936  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for people to store some of the forum's money on: February 07, 2013, 03:21:56 PM
There are of course plenty of people that are both invested in the success of Bitcoin as well as those that simply believe in what Bitcoin stands for that will do this for free. Theymos has a list of willing candidates and their terms. Is anyone suggesting that with such a list, that Theymos is not a smart enough person to review the offers and pick someone that would hold them for free, have public accountability of the coins, and is well known both with their avatar and in real life over someone who wants to charge a fee and wants to play SD with the forums money? Come on. If you think he would choose the latter, maybe you should start your own Bitcoin forum because if you don't trust him with that you should absolutely have a suspicion that he is reading your private messages and reporting your IP address to three letter government agencies for being a threat.
937  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL 1/3 plan on: February 07, 2013, 03:17:32 PM
March 2013, here we come. Be of good cheer. We Avalon customers are still waiting on ours. Wink

(see how I inserted that jab for equalizations sake?)


Both are better than where bAsic left off at? Right?

Avalon is for sure better than bASIC. The step from one ASIC to lots of ASICs is small and cheap.

Unfortunately BFL did not yet master this first step to one ASIC. It's still open if they do not follow Tom.


Agreed. At this point I'm merely suggesting if you want to hop off the train, you can. BFL is refunding those that want it. However, if you paid with BTC to Tom, my understanding is most people are holding their hands out still waiting for their money.
938  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: February 07, 2013, 02:58:17 PM
Yep I'm getting the same error. I just updated to CCC 13.1, which updated the OCL runtime to 1084.4.
Getting same issue I assume as others.

Anyone got a solution?

[img]http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/6134/errfv.jpg[/img
I think the solution that was working for everyone else was rolling back your drivers Sad
Which is a terrible solution, IMO. I've actually stopped using this on my 7970, as it doesn't run as fast as it should - it seems it's not fully compatible with SDK 2.6 or newer on 7xxx cards, and these newer drivers (which also updates your OCL runtime) just make things worse.

You could always put a bounty up for someone to fix it if you don't like it.
939  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Which mining pool and why? on: February 06, 2013, 09:39:00 PM
But it seems that it takes years till 1 NMC is achieved...

I think he is saying Slush but he can clarify that.

The other thing about NMC... is since it is merged mine you earn the same amount of BTC and the NMC are free... so why not?

You'll earn about 3x as many NMC as BTC and NMC are currently worth about 700 times less than BTC. Will merged mining make you rich? Nope. But why not contribute to a cool project at the same time and get a little bit of value from them. Or use them and register a couple of Namecoin addresses?
940  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Which mining pool and why? on: February 06, 2013, 09:18:33 PM
Slush and BTC Guild offer merged mining. Pick your poison. BTC is PPS and the pool takes the risks for long blocks. Slush is round based score based to prevent pool hoping, lower fees, and they share the block fees with miners.

Both have been around forever and both use stratum protocols once you get your miner online.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!