Unless you have at least some proof to back this up, making such allegations in this thread is wrongful. A post without proof is worthless to me.

I don't know what to make out of this yet. This is one of the reasons for which I avoided registering to that website.

I'd rather suspect marco being sold to QS, than it being the other way around. You never know with these types of things though.

0.01 BTC

This topic has been moved to Web Wallets.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1745449.0

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1745222.0

You've been banned for copy-pasting posts, and it is not likely that you're going to get unbanned. Your situation is worsened by the fact that you had a financial incentive to do this.

---

Copy-pasting content to be exact.

Trying to figure out Lauda's identity be like:



Oh you!

---

Added.

I will review this, but I prefer concrete and conclusive proof.

Please take this personal dispute elsewhere.

What are you talking about? You are a registered member and have just created your first post.

---

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=940485 yakuzabar

Analogy is flawed, stop posting nonsense.

Read this: English Grammar for Dummies.

I disagree unless you're talking about 'fiat' as in cash only. Compare the speed of SEPA transactions, international bank transfers (et. al.) to Bitcoin transfers, and you will see how superior it truly is.

It's quite simple: Your included fee rate in satoshis/byte is under the recommended. You can see the required information here. You don't need to be any kind of tech expert, you just need to use your brain (that is for those that have one).

I'm pretty sure that the majority jumped onto 0.13.1 due to Segwit. The other changes that it brings are minimal,thus upgrading was not really important.

Indeed. The other group of people are those that are failing to upgrade despite of the massive improvements in the later versions (e.g. people running 0.12.1 or lower).

There is no proper way to know that for sure. The changes that Segwit brings are huge, thus should be appropriately tested (by them) before being deployed.

There is no fixed or even an estimated date that I'm aware of. The answer is simply: very soon. You will be notified in time, so don't worry about it.

That is not going to happen as the user seems to be banned. You may lock this thread to avoid unnecessary replies (unless there are also other users).

This topic has been moved to Scam Accusations.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1744602.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=413 bg002h



The message verified for me, but you should add a date as suggested by Quickseller.

---

This is the person that you should PM with the signed message and a link to this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=78147 Cyrus.

I believe that one of the fairest methods for distributing the lowest numbers are auctions as opposed to 'first-come-first-serve' (which is basically luck, unless one knows when the reservations will begin / thread will be made).

Just please make sure to properly plan this out (e.g. generic vs. custom hologram), so we don't end up with yet another coin with an absurd 5-10x premium on spot silver.

Can you post some pictures of the back?

I like the design. You should put the lowest numbers on auction and let the market decide the price for those.

---

Preference: .999 silver.

0.55 BTC

It is most perfectly fair for the auctioneer to deny any bids for whatever reason they want.

---

0.0554444 BTC

This topic has been moved to Web Wallets.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1744118.0

I'll open at 0.01 BTC.

---

These do not come funded?