|
Except with those that have been mentioned. In case that list isn't enough for you and if you have free time, you can go through pages of this section and look for those writers.
You have plenty of choice as we have a lot of writers here who are ready to work for your article.
|
|
|
|
To join any gambling website, it is mandatory to read the TOS. If you do not read the TOS then you will get into trouble later. I once deposited a few dollars on an online gambling site without a TOS and later when I went to withdraw, I saw that they wanted KYC. If you want to avoid such unpleasant incidents, you must read the TOS before joining.
Honestly, I don't read all of the parts of the TOS. But I do read but only those important parts which I've seen where others have caught a problem. To avoid the same experience and problem, I always go through the TOS with the specific rule like in KYC, deposits and withdrawals. Others are about the agreement you have with the casino. As for my experiences, I've never had problems with any of them but still read those important sections for me of the TOS. |
|
|
|
Accurate. The media's create some salty headlines and articles whenever they had a scope of a transaction like that in bitcoin.
well, that is what they are being paid for. to create a bad image to those who they don't like. Who could be paying them voluntarily for doing that? banks? I don't think that any establishment would do that anymore for an enemy or competitor that's no one is controlling and is automatically rolling through its community. I could understand if it's just another crypto exchange paying for bad publicity of another competitor exchange. But who knows if there really are establishments who are still doing this, knowing that they can't beat bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
Then choose a good bounty manager that doesn't have history of comprising bounty hunter's reward. They have their own style of campaign/bounty management and you can just avoid a bounty if you don't like the bounty manager's style of managing his/her bounties. You can also ask the manager if he/she can hire an escrow for the rewards. There were projects that have been doing this but you can't just see that most of them do it as mandatory.
|
|
|
|
It is one that I can say at least the reason of the pump that we're having. I'm surprised that it's able to got up to $12,700 and near to break $13,000. Anytime soon if it won't have to correct, we'll see the peak at that price, $13,000. The feature will start to be active on 2021. It's just a few months away and this news have been confirmed. This adds to the bullish speculation of everyone and it's just a matter of time we will able to see the after-effect of it once it's operating.
Im not really much into sentiment when it comes to crypto price movement but this one about Paypal is trying up to tie up with crypto? thats pretty unusual for a centralized platform to accept crypto. In that case then i can say that it did really have some effect but i dont see for this price movement to last that long.Best move to be done? Its better to sell out to those people who had purchased bitcoin when it was still on 11k levels. Selling now isnt really a bad idea to do so. We are almost breaking or touching 13k which it has been a while where the first attempt had failed and lets see if this one will make it through. It isn't unusual. It's the same as other centralized exchanges service, nothing has been done unusual or new to us. Might be unusual to you because it's PayPal. Selling could be the best choice but if you're only a short term guy and you are okay riding the trend of today's move. And whenever it goes down again, use your profit to rebuy your sold bitcoins. And for the record, we've just broken to $13,000 and we will see if it's going to break $13,500. |
|
|
|
I still remember what he did before. And that opened my mind about what these big names from the financial industry that whatever they say, the people listens. the funny thing is that when one dude does something illegal with bitcoin worth 10 bucks the media renders us deaf with the nonstop negative news but when these banks are caught in their illegal act worth trillions of dollars we only see a small article with a very mellow tone that nobody really reads either. in fact the topic is mostly discussed in bitcoin forums and not many place else.
Accurate. The media's create some salty headlines and articles whenever they had a scope of a transaction like that in bitcoin. |
|
|
|
but you stated before that crypto withdrawals will not undergo KYC. so final answer towards crypto withdrawals?
In my understanding, with the quote and rule 9.5 that they've said. It's like that they can ask it anytime they want. I think, I've read the same rule from other casino and that's a basic KYC rule. They haven't mentioned that it's in general for all accounts but if they've found an specific account and has to be processed and asked for KYC, you have no option but to take and follow it. For most cases these rule applied to all casinos out there where they can really ask out if something is unsual towards your betting etc. but in most case when you are just starting up to play then they dont really ask out most of the time. Yes, it's the basic rule. And I think they've made themselves clear that they are requiring it whenever they want or if caught by any circumstance and they will apply it with the rule that have been mentioned. For starters, they wouldn't ask for it as you're about to deposit. But when the withdrawal comes and it's not clear that the gambler have understood the rule, he/she will be confused and it is a good step for asking questions like that to clarify their stand if the rule isn't clear before depositing. |
|
|
|
This might be the reason of the recent pump of bitcoin because we are now able to shop and buy and sell with our bitcoins. But I am not a big fan of Paypal because I have encountered some issues and problems when it comes of making transactions online. It is one that I can say at least the reason of the pump that we're having. I'm surprised that it's able to got up to $12,700 and near to break $13,000. Anytime soon if it won't have to correct, we'll see the peak at that price, $13,000. The feature will start to be active on 2021. It's just a few months away and this news have been confirmed. This adds to the bullish speculation of everyone and it's just a matter of time we will able to see the after-effect of it once it's operating. |
|
|
|
but you stated before that crypto withdrawals will not undergo KYC. so final answer towards crypto withdrawals?
In my understanding, with the quote and rule 9.5 that they've said. It's like that they can ask it anytime they want. I think, I've read the same rule from other casino and that's a basic KYC rule. They haven't mentioned that it's in general for all accounts but if they've found an specific account and has to be processed and asked for KYC, you have no option but to take and follow it. |
|
|
|
|
IIRC, a few years ago there were discussions about PayPal accepting crypto and here we go. That discussion came into reality because it's been known that Paypal is one of the competitor of bitcoin or any cryptocurrency as a payment processor. But as a large corporation, they've realized the huge market that they are taking after adopting it. They cannot beat it and that is the reason why they just have to adopt and accept it. We will more of these good news for other big and reputable payment processors soon.
|
|
|
|
im glad that there is a free version because others are just offering a paid version right at the start but i almost forgot or i remember now rather that theres also a scam that offers free plan but that is if you cant withdrew until you start depositing some amount stated by them . paid version can also be a sign of legitimacy
Paid or not, the majority of the cloud mining companies that are existing today are scams. IMHO, you shouldn't be glad that there's a free version but rather be disappointed because there are cloud mining companies that are kept on coming and trying to get victims with their trick in a smaller way. The denomination and value with dogecoin are very small and that's why others wouldn't take look at it seriously even if they will be scammed. But the scam is still a scam. |
|
|
|
|
If we're going to follow the 4-year cycle, everyone's expectation would lean on 2021. But as early as this year, we've seen major changes and price appreciation quickly. The skyrocketing has happened and then it calmed down and correction came. But looking to the present times, we're about to reach back to $12,000 and it didn't take a long time to get back there. With the expected bull run, where we will see such skyrocketing prices then give it for 2021-2022.
|
|
|
|
I won't discuss the referral as it's already being pointed out by most. To OP, when you're trying to send a website or asking a visitor to come by to the casino you want to, make sure that it's working and no problem shall not be met as we visit it. Future deposits are manual by contact customer service and credits will be applied once the bitcoins are confirmed.
Manual? does this mean when someone deposits even if it's already confirmed by the network, the admin or any staff of that casino will manually do the crediting of accounts balance? I don't think that's a good rule or enlighten if I didn't understand it correctly. |
|
|
|
|
Sometimes they do respond positively at the same time. But many times we've seen that it doesn't. Bitcoin's up and nothing that much with the stocks.
We should stop looking at both rivers and compare the flow of it. Anyway, for someone who has both investments with it, well, it's important for you to assess and can't be avoided to compare their ups and downs.
|
|
|
|
It was at the bottom of the article. Maybe you haven't go through until at the bottom of the page. Yeah, that was the issue and Marcial would be stepping in on it. But with all of those reactions that I've seen on fb, they're just making fun of the commissioner as if he's not respectable for his decisions, poor guy. And too bad for NorthPort, that game was for them until that call and free throw came, just 2 points at the end of the game which made their lose and that's the most disappointing part of any game. When they're close enough and then just lose because of unperfect call.
The call is very close and even how many replays it should be a let go call and allow the game to go to overtime, I don't see the reason why ref call this and change the direction of the game. It's not going to be easy for everyone especially with Northport as they really played well on that final quarter with one controversial call they lose the game. This very serious as ref can change the game but nt as obvious like this one, many disappointed fans will surely react to this kind of action, very alarming to gambling side of this league. Yes, the disappointment by the fans have been shown on this game. It had called the attention of Marcial and do we have any updates about this matter? I think the game's result will never change nor be forfeited. It's already an ended game and the record is already there. But as for the sanctions, the referee has been charged and will be going home soon. As per spin.ph's article based from Marcial's statement. ( https://www.spin.ph/basketball/pba/marcial-vows-not-to-let-costly-call-against-northport-left-unpunished-a793-20201019) |
|
|
|
The hot issue about a referee, involving Taha and Nambatac is also included on that article. What can you say about that crucial moment? 1.3 second remaining and both at 68 points.
I didn't see it on the article, was this about the last game, where Nambatac was fouled and give a 2 points lead as he makes his two free throws? I saw the game and it seems like the refs made a bad call on the foul which should not be a foul. It was at the bottom of the article. Maybe you haven't go through until at the bottom of the page. Yeah, that was the issue and Marcial would be stepping in on it. But with all of those reactions that I've seen on fb, they're just making fun of the commissioner as if he's not respectable for his decisions, poor guy. And too bad for NorthPort, that game was for them until that call and free throw came, just 2 points at the end of the game which made their lose and that's the most disappointing part of any game. When they're close enough and then just lose because of unperfect call. |
|
|
|
will it be accepted by some other countries close to China
I don't think that any country would be happy to accept their CBDC. China alone is a huge country to use this as a new type of money. As we know, many countries don't really like them and there are a lot of shadowing through international media about them. With shadowing, I mean those news about them being portrated as a bad country and while praising their economy to be going up, it just so happened because the world is in crisis. |
|
|
|
|
You're describing two different things. Bitcoin is not an employment opportunity and as you have said, it is a currency - a digital currency - a decentralized cryptocurrency. But the activity which you have been paid with bitcoin can be called the opportunity that you do. Apart from those that have been mentioned, someone can make a career through trading but again it's not bitcoin that's giving the actual opportunity but with the usage or activity that you'll do through it.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
