I go with b3 here. There can be issues, sure, but it's the best move in this position. The matter of c4 is pressing.
Seriously? One whole square? |
|
|
|
I like h3 too.) b3 doesn't save us at the queen side in any case, h3 is uncomfortable for black at the king side, we can quickly open the center after black c4 and start active game at the king side.
Seriously? Move one whole square? |
|
|
|
Is anybody else interested in Ng5?
If it was a local game, I would have played it. I am not sure if it is the right move against a Grand Master.
Not really, once the Knight on f5 moves, the Ng5 would be taken by the Bishop on e7 |
|
|
|
Knight takes pawn on b5 thank you.
Then pawn takes knight on b5. Please try to think at least one move ahead. I am thinking ahead, Next move is pawn to a6 threatening both the Bishop and the Queen. The Bishop through take and the Queen by the Rook Do try to keep up. ...and don't be so condescending. |
|
|
|
|
Knight takes pawn on b5 thank you.
|
|
|
|
There are plenty of people on what's known as the default trust here who will give you negative feedback / trust if you answer their questions the wrong way (wrong in their eyes that is)
I tried to do a trade with Monbux a few weeks ago who claims to be in Canada (lovely part of the world BTW) he was all stand off-ish wanting government issued ID and the like which I was prepared to post to him at which point he got cold feet (the posting of physical paper) Still curious he kept asking round-about for more information and nearly fell over himself to make a deal when I provided my eBay user name which has had some $10,000 worth of trades.
The only problem for Monbux (who is double digit green on the Default Trust list) is he'd already said I was untrustworthy and point blank refused to say what he intended to do with the government issued I D paperwork (which here would be enough for a person to open a bank account with).
There's been accusations here in this venue that person's who ask for copies of your government issued id are just farming fake id's for scams which are long term (months if not years) in the making.
Which is why you're going to have trouble trying to make a deal here with anonymity - be careful how you respond to anyone "suggesting" for your own safety that you use escrow - one person has been confirmed outted as self escrowing, thus taking two bight's of the same cherry marking up the price of BTC and taking a fee to escrow (without revealing they are the Escrow) - a triple digit green Default Trust member by the name of Quickseller who since being Dox'ed (outted and identified) is now in triple digit red and has lost his Default Trust ranking.
Do your home work, read someone's trust / feedback - some players have negative feedback and are still trusted enough to do trades here. It's all very confusing, but welcome.
No. I simply wanted a picture of the ID so I could confirm that you are indeed using YOUR OWN paypal account. If that doesn't click in your brain, I'm not sure what else I can say. YOU wanted to mail it to me and started questioning me on how I would use the physical documents. Nowhere did I request for you to send me the physical docs. I'm not sure why you're holding on to this, I believe I have the right to refuse a trade at any point. You would send me lengthy essays on this and that when all I needed was confirmation that you are indeed who your paypal account states that you are. I asked your to send me your username on bitcointalk on your ebay account to my ebay account but you simply posted your own. I answered the question that was put to me. Buyer Beware as the saying goes. |
|
|
|
Hello,
I am selling 1.3 BTC for 350 USD 340$
for paypal or payoneer
i can send 1st if you have some solid trading history here.
ofcourse trade will be done with a trusted member only.
escrow can be used.
...but if he sends the BTC first as he's saying, ^^^^^^ what do you care? He's the one taking the risk. |
|
|
|
|
There are plenty of people on what's known as the default trust here who will give you negative feedback / trust if you answer their questions the wrong way (wrong in their eyes that is)
I tried to do a trade with Monbux a few weeks ago who claims to be in Canada (lovely part of the world BTW) he was all stand off-ish wanting government issued ID and the like which I was prepared to post to him at which point he got cold feet (the posting of physical paper) Still curious he kept asking round-about for more information and nearly fell over himself to make a deal when I provided my eBay user name which has had some $10,000 worth of trades.
The only problem for Monbux (who is double digit green on the Default Trust list) is he'd already said I was untrustworthy and point blank refused to say what he intended to do with the government issued I D paperwork (which here would be enough for a person to open a bank account with).
There's been accusations here in this venue that person's who ask for copies of your government issued id are just farming fake id's for scams which are long term (months if not years) in the making.
Which is why you're going to have trouble trying to make a deal here with anonymity - be careful how you respond to anyone "suggesting" for your own safety that you use escrow - one person has been confirmed outted as self escrowing, thus taking two bight's of the same cherry marking up the price of BTC and taking a fee to escrow (without revealing they are the Escrow) - a triple digit green Default Trust member by the name of Quickseller who since being Dox'ed (outted and identified) is now in triple digit red and has lost his Default Trust ranking.
Do your home work, read someone's trust / feedback - some players have negative feedback and are still trusted enough to do trades here. It's all very confusing, but welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
My $$$'s for his 0.25 BTC (I went first) smooth transaction and great communicator.
|
|
|
|
|
I take it we haven't moved yet?
|
|
|
|
|
Rook to a3 please
(we don't want the Queen being able to punch out if we move other pieces and the Rook will be on hot standby later)
|
|
|
|
... lot of Blah ...
Don't forget if you fall off your DT perch, then all your negative trusts become meaningless...
...and I'd like to remind you of my PM reply to your PM to me, I am considering your message to me.
Regards,
Which is why I wrote this Follow up on tomatocage / extraKrispy ...
I got a message from tomatocage about his transactions and why he used extraKrispy's account which sounds plausible, but have to read further into it, (no mention one way or the other about the self escrowing, but am still reading...
the same day you sent your message. |
|
|
|
Yep... and here you are again handing out negative trust / feedback and "suggesting" the user uses escrow - which you have admitted to self escrowing previously. BitcoinGB1106 -8: -3 / +0 2015-09-16 0.00000000 Reference PayPal scammer. Insists that you send PayPal first and he will not fund escrow. I'm confused, so please help me understand this (granted, I did just wake up). How do you interpret my rating with anything remotely resembling a suggestion that he uses escrow (and I'm guessing you're trying to imply that would give me a chance of receiving the job). It clearly states that BitcoinGB1106 will NOT use escrow. I guess I'm confused on how I could have been more clear about it. You'd be best refraining from giving out negative trust to someone using terms such as "won't escrow" or "use escrow" where you haven't first posted such caution in the thread to the OP where all can see (OP included) that you have first advised the OP of the risk of PayPal (or similar reversible payment methods) and then if the OP rejects the advice slapping a negative might be warranted. I say might because the OP might not understand the risk involved in using a reversible payment method and reply politely, however, if the OP were to become belligerent in rejecting the suggestion of escrow, then negative trust would be warranted. Don't forget if you fall off your DT perch, then all your negative trusts become meaningless... ...and I'd like to remind you of my PM reply to your PM to me, I am considering your message to me. Regards, |
|
|
|
An hour after Tomatocage posted the previous to this message this newbie signed up. Scammed me of 235usd, do not trust.... Paypal wont refund as i sent as gift.
...and his first post was to try to buy 50 BTCI would like to buy 50btc... PM me
... and no previous messages from this newbie in this thread to make contact. IDK, it *looks* a little sus...  |
|
|
|
Why did the OP get a negative trust from this? I don't see anything that necessarily made me think that he was trying the send-first PayPal scam.
Tomatocage is one of the users on what's called the Default Trust where they arbitrarily give out negative feedback, in the past he and Quickseller would also attach "use escrow" and then offer themselves up as the escrow agent without revealing that they are both the buyer and the escrow. Tomatocage today has worded his negative feedback very carefully to imply the OP is trying something on (ie PayPal scam) without using the term "use escrow" no doubt another newbie will come on and suggest escrow and months later we'll find out that it was another Alt of Tomatocage. Since Quickseller was outted as an escrow scammer persons on the DT and others have posted advice in the form of replies to the OP's instead of arbitrarily giving the OP negative feedback / trust without a chance to respond (ie using terms "I will remove if they ...") You can add Tomatocage to you list of untrustworthy in the trust --> Trust Settings --> then put ~Tomatocage in your Trust list (as untrustworthy by adding the tilda "~" before his name.. Quoted for preservation, and trust rating has been removed. I'll revisit the matter later, if needed. Yep... and here you are again handing out negative trust / feedback and "suggesting" the user uses escrow - which you have admitted to self escrowing previously. BitcoinGB1106 -8: -3 / +0 2015-09-16 0.00000000 Reference PayPal scammer. Insists that you send PayPal first and he will not fund escrow. |
|
|
|
TimeLord is just sore that I gave one of his scam accounts negative Trust. Damn autocorrect.
...and yet you haven't posted a scam accusation in the scam accusation section, nore have you used the phrase "this user is an alt of Timelord2067..." in your own trust section... ...so no... you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
I totally agree that the colour's alone can get muddled in peoples minds; especially anyone with even a slight colour deficiency could see two near colours the same violet/purple comes to mind.
The x: -y / +z [n] looks like a good suggestion together with tilting the oblique the other way
eg x: -y \ +z [n] to show someone is on Default Trust perhaps? (the n would be zero in that case)
*edit* and in each case it is from each persons own perspective so no two users will necessarily have the same values as they may not necessarily trust the same users (including those on the DT, especially if they have removed the DT list)
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
