Форекс кухни и легальные брокеры полностью закрывают потребности обычных трейдеров. По поводу финансирования для разных проектов - да, может быть интересно, но пока аудитории у битшары не будет великой, то и им ловить нечего.

Проблема данной системы в сложности. Не в непривычности, а именно в сложности. Поэтому вряд ли такое будет популярно в ближайшие годы, когда есть тот же next.

Думаю все будут только ЗА, проблема в том, что это только маленькая часть вопросов, основная будет по самой бирже (я в ее устройстве разбираюсь слабо, не торгую), тут начало обсуждения:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8569.0
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7555.0

А на подходе уже новые «фичи»:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8832.0

That's ok, it's about aesthetics as much as technical ability in this particular case. Unless there are no specific objections, you're the second judge.


Great, thanks ranlo.

So we have our three judges: serejandmyself, papacrusher and ranlo. Since serejandmyself was the instigator and first judge, he'll be the coordinator. Are you ok with that serej?

What you need to do next is come up with a list of criteria for what you want the site to be, and they don't have to just be technical criteria. Aesthetic criteria are important too - how should it look, other sites comparable, etc. You can be specific, or airey fairy, its up to you, although the more specific you are, the better for designers. You can discuss that here or in pms (you can do a 3-way chat pretty easily on the forum), and once you have a list you're satisfied with, which you think reasonable for a designer, post it here and we'll give it a bounty and deadline for mockups.

What does everyone think about share awards for designs? I'm thinking it might encourage more actual submissions, so if there's a general consensus, I'll propose 1 winning design award of 6 shares, and 2 consolation awards of 3 shares each, for designs the judges like but don't pick. Those consolation awards don't have to be given out, they're only there to reward a good design that didn't win. The full site bounty will then be assessed and proposed based on the estimated time to complete it, and only awarded upon completion. The unique thing about this bounty, is that the designer will have exclusive rights to work on the bounty as proposed, for a period of time we set once we estimate how long it'll take, and then it'll be open to all (to implement the winning design).

If no designs are submitted before the design deadline, we will double the design awards and set another one. How does that sound? Any changes?

https://vps.vircurex.com/welcome/index?base=dvc&alt=btc
is this the only place to trade?

Same here. 1200 coins, sent to Polo well before august 5th, the swap date. I have a pending deposit since then that is not arriving.

I have filed ticket with Polo support, spoke with at least three of their staff, even busoni himself, on irc.
Poloniex confirms the transaction but cannot get a hold of Bcts.

Bcts;s last response to me on IRC regarding the swap that never took place for me, was that he does not have the bcts blockchain live anywhere, and no response since then.

Bcts, before you start any other new project and start asking for funds, why not sending the coins you should have sent in the first place?
Or are you not holding them anymore?

Ну, в этих дебрях мы еще успеем полазить. А тут у нас конкретный тред - о битшарах простым языком. Неплохо бы в одном треде сконцентрировать все основные тезисы работы сети.

И туда то же, я NXT полностью доволен.

А мне кажется, пора из битка выводить активы, т.к. много интересных форков уже работают. NXT например с рынком AE.

Comparing Nxt to BitShares it's a same as to compare Microsoft and Apple, doing same but in different ways. I prefer the BitShares, Nxt looks too complicated and complexity just growing.

1. У кого есть битасеты (BitUSD, BitBTC, и т.д.) – тот и считается держателем актива. Хитростей с «переездом» из BitShares PTS на самом деле никаких нет, у кого на момент снимка были PTS-ы тот, и получает доли в новом DAC, сами PTS-ы как были, так и остаются, их можно дальше копить, продавать, докупать. Сам факт нахождения у Вас определенной суммы PTS само собой дает Вам преимущество, так как кроме того что у Вас они остаются – Вам дают еще доли в новых DAC. Именно поэтому стоимость PTS перед снимком растет, после снимка падает, порядок «взлетов-падений» зависит от того DAC в котором дают доли, чем интересней DAC – тем больше взлет и соответственно больше падение.
2. Ценовая стабильность асетов берется от того как эти асеты создаются, в большей мере она обеспечена залогом в BTSX, подробнее тут: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7555.0
3. Стабильную работу сети (биржи) обеспечивают делегаты, которые и являются своего рода майнерами, они создают блоки (первые 101 делегат), и получают за это BTSX, правда не очень много, делегатов «вибирают» другие пользователи, голосуя своим капиталом, т.е. свои монеты делегатам пересылать не надо, надо просто отметить делегатов за которых Вы голосуете и переслать монеты самому себе, или воспользоваться специальной кнопкой в клиенте – которая делает тоже самое, но без лишних вопросом, т.е. Ваш голос учитываются при транзакциях.

Вся информация есть в вики: http://wiki.bitshares.org, который через месяц будет доступен и на русском языке.

Is there a faucet to get people started like the Nxt faucet?

As I know giveaway not allowed at BTT, if you need some BTSX for register please post at https://bitsharestalk.org, for example here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6163

Brilliant article:

Russia and the Menace of Unreality

In today’s Russia, by contrast, the idea of truth is irrelevant. On Russian ‘news’ broadcasts, the borders between fact and fiction have become utterly blurred. Russian current-affairs programs feature apparent actors posing as refugees from eastern Ukraine, crying for the cameras about invented threats from imagined fascist gangs. During one Russian news broadcast, a woman related how Ukrainian nationalists had crucified a child in the eastern Ukrainian city of Sloviansk. When Alexei Volin, Russia’s deputy minister of communications, was confronted with the fact that the crucifixion story was a fabrication, he showed no embarrassment, instead suggesting that all that mattered were ratings. “The public likes how our main TV channels present material, the tone of our programs,” he said. “The share of viewers for news programs on Russian TV has doubled over the last two months.” The Kremlin tells its stories well, having mastered the mixture of authoritarianism and entertainment culture. The notion of ‘journalism,’ in the sense of reporting ‘facts’ or ‘truth,’ has been wiped out. In a lecture last year to journalism students at Moscow State University, Volin suggested that students forget about making the world a better place. “We should give students a clear understanding: They are going to work for The Man, and The Man will tell them what to write, what not to write, and how this or that thing should be written,” he said. “And The Man has the right to do it, because he pays them.”

The point of this new propaganda is not to persuade anyone, but to keep the viewer hooked and distracted—to disrupt Western narratives rather than provide a counternarrative. It is the perfect genre for conspiracy theories, which are all over Russian TV. When the Kremlin and its affiliated media outlets spat out outlandish stories about the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over eastern Ukraine in July—reports that characterized the crash as everything from an assault by Ukrainian fighter jets following U.S. instructions, to an attempted NATO attack on Putin’s private jet—they were trying not so much to convince viewers of any one version of events, but rather to leave them confused, paranoid, and passive—living in a Kremlin-controlled virtual reality that can no longer be mediated or debated by any appeal to ‘truth.’

http://m.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/09/russia-putin-revolutionizing-information-warfare/379880/