Upravo sam pisao nešto o tome u onoj 'scam accusation' niti. Sredstva koja imate tamo moći ćete dokazati samo dok web stranica ostane aktivna. Ako je isključe, dokazivanje će postati komplicirano, i sumnjam da će screenshotovi ili slični postupci biti prihvaćeni kao valjani dokazi. Možda bi najbolje bilo zatražiti povlačenje sredstava dok je još moguće i sačuvati potpisanu poruku (letter of guarantee) koju WhirlWind generira pri tom zahtjevu. Takva poruka sadržava sve bitne podatke za potvrdu (javna adresa note, datum i vrijeme, withdraw adrese i iznosi). Mislim da bi to trebalo biti dovoljno kao dokaz za oslobađanje sredstava iz escrow-a.


Vi koji imate novac zarobljen tamo, možete također napraviti Type 2 ili 3 flag. Vjerujem da ćete dobiti potrebnu podršku.

If nothing has changed since I last used WhirlWind, I believe there are two possible scenarios here that need to be addressed:

1. Users with remaining funds on their notes: To verify this, a potential solution would be to share the private key of the note with a trusted forum member who can verify its contents. This action should be taken promptly while the WhirlWind site is still accessible.

2. Users who requested withdrawals, either in full or partially, from their WhirlWind note to a private wallet: In this scenario, the available balance on the note would either be decreased by the withdrawn amount or down to zero. To prove an unsuccessful withdrawal, affected users should provide a signed message (letter of guarantee) generated by the WhirlWind during the withdrawal request. By comparing the information within the signed message with blockchain transactions, it should be possible to verify the status of the withdrawal and the amount owed.

Yeah, their website does look really good, and I wouldn't immediately call it an obvious scam.  I mean, someone clearly put in a lot of work and money to make it seem legit. But you know what? Looks can be deceiving. If they're scamming people selectively, like you're saying, they could keep it up for ages. Just like how 1xBit does it.

The dexsport.io account, which had been quiet for a while, suddenly came to life today, probably just after you called out the scam. Maybe now the casino's representative will actually show up on the forum and try to explain these disputed situations.

It's most likely just you. The error message you're encountering, "429 Too Many Requests," typically indicates that the server is receiving an excessive number of requests from the same IP address in a short period. It's not uncommon for faucets or websites to implement rate limiting to prevent abuse. The best thing to do is to wait for a while and try again later. Also, you could try turning off your VPN if you're using one, as VPNs can sometimes trigger such request limits. Alternatively, you might consider changing your public IP address, which could help resolve the error you're facing.

I see no reason why you couldn't. You are free to employ any strategy you wish, but that won't help you in overcoming the house edge. The casino always has that advantage, no matter what tricks you try.

Yeah, that's really good news, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. We still don't have any official word on what's happening with the service. And from what I know, there's still no confirmation that the withdrawals are actually working.

There's no sign of any notifications or warnings on their website, and if I start the mixing process, the system will give me a deposit address. So basically, Whirlwind is still accepting deposits from people like everything's cool. But they know their system is down and you can't take out any money. Honestly, that's pretty messed up and unprofessional behavior for a business.

As mentioned by ranochigo, you can use the "Contacts" tab within Electrum as your address book. Also, the "Address Labels" feature can help you achieve a comparable functionality to your described scenario. This feature allows you to assign custom labels to addresses that you commonly use.

---

Well, this isn't really an option because lots of those centralized services won't let you change your deposit address. So, many of us end up sending funds to the same addresses over and over again.

Are you suggesting that if I send my money to you, I will get more coins instead of buying them directly myself? How?
I mean no offense, but I genuinely hope no one would be stupid enough to take interest in your "project."


Here's a suggestion: Find something else to do with your free time!

Speaking of which, does anyone know what that symbol is supposed to represent? It looks like cutting through the top of a mountain or an iceberg... and that interpretation would actually make sense.

Ovo što pišeš nema previše smisla i nemoguće je dati konkretan odgovor ili mišljenje bez više detalja. Novčići ne mogu tek tako "nestajati" iz novčanika osim ako je novčanik kompromitiran ili ako radiš nešto što ne bi trebao. Osim toga, tvoje se "pare" sigurno neće magično vratiti u tvoj novčanik same od sebe.

I completely agree with the point about chasing losses - it's one of the most common pitfalls for novice gamblers.

Take my early gambling days as an example. I made the classic rookie mistake of chasing losses when I was just starting out. There's this distinct memory I have of losing a certain amount of money on an online casino, which, in retrospect, wasn't even all that significant. However, instead of being sensible and cutting my losses, I convinced myself that all I needed was a one more round to recover. So, I continued throwing more funds into the game, desperately hoping for that elusive big win. Regrettably, things didn't unfold as I had wished, and I ended up losing far more than I had initially been prepared to part with. The experience served as a tough but valuable lesson, one that remains etched in my memory.

You might want to give the OP's post another look. He's not trying to recover coins (tokens) from confirmed transactions, but rather tokens that are still available at his address/wallet.

Haha, you're right! Seems like they aimed for that message to pop up solely on the "clernet" domain, but somewhere along the line, the dev had a little slip-up.

But that doesn't matter. I don't think "Onion Names" is related to SecureDrop directly. They're simply using that feature for their own services, and I stumbled upon their article that explains it. As an example, you can access their SecureDrop instance for CNN at either qmifwf762qftydprw2adbg7hs2mkunac5xrz3cb5busaflji3rja5lid.onion or cnn.securedrop.tor.onion addresses. This means that the Tor browser is somehow capable of translating the "<name>.securedrop.tor.onion" URL into the correct real .onion domain. I'm guessing that's the part that dkbit98 is interested in.

I haven't been keeping up with the Tor scene recently, so I'm not up to date on the latest developments. However, I'm curious about what happened to the "Onion Names" concept that was supposed to be integrated into all newer versions of Tor Browser, if I'm not mistaken. I remember reading about it some time ago, but I'm currently unable to find anything useful except for this article from SecureDrop: https://securedrop.org/news/introducing-onion-names-securedrop/

It might be worth exploring.

You might also consider getting creative and mapping ENS domains to .onion addresses: https://medium.com/@brantly.eth/ens-now-supports-tor-onion-address-resolution-9bb3bdff6217
Although I have a feeling that might be a bit too daring for your taste. 

Flag supported.


I believe he is fully aware of his actions. It has already been 10+ days since he missed his initial deadline, and he was active on the forum during this period, giving him ample opportunity to return the payment if he really wanted to. The requirement for a refund is clearly stated in the initial conditions of the review campaign, which he had agreed to. Moreover, it's worth noting that the extension of his first deadline was granted at his own request, as indicated here. Given these circumstances, I believe that his current lack of communication is intentional.

I've noticed that many members claim there's no solution when dealing with a sweeper bot that automatically executes transactions. However, I came across information stating that it is theoretically possible to create transactions that can perform both functions at the same time - funding the address with ETH to cover gas fees and withdrawing tokens from the address. Such a transaction would be executed in the same block, thereby preventing the sweeper bot from stealing the funds.

I'm not expert enough to provide you with precise instructions, but you can read this comment on the Ethereum Stack Exchange to learn more: https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/a/112099

No one can help you complete KYC verification with your personal documents except Bittrex, and I'd strongly advise against handing over your account details to anyone, even with good intentions. Have you checked if you have the option to internally send funds to another Bittrex account? This could be a possible solution if someone with a verified account is willing to help.

Well, as we all already know, the Bitcoin market can be quite unpredictable. So, it is always wise to approach this with a healthy dose of caution. While some sources are indicating that we might be transitioning from the bear market (Markdown Circle) to a potential bull run (Markup Circle), this does not mean that past performances will be repeated in each new cycle. Each cycle is unique, and can lead to different outcomes. Personally, I'm currently in an accumulation cycle, and I'm continuing to buy as much as my finances allow. I still see no reason not to believe that we will experience the next bull run and reach ATH again, just as we've done many times before.

It can't. It is a fake USDT token with zero value, and such transactions are made for the purpose of phishing attacks. Do not interact with that contract and be careful which addresses you use for your transactions. Always double check the whole address when sending, not just the first or last few characters.

Oh, absolutely! Casinos always have their ways to make the odds work in their favor. That's probably the whole point. Wagering requirements is a clever tactic to keep people playing and hoping for that big win. And you're right, those high-rollers, the whales, they're the ones who can afford to play the game. But the higher the stakes, the higher the risks.