It's actually difficult to see good progress when promoted clubs come to the Premier League because only a few can survive with the harsh competition like the Premier League. Burnley is a promoted club but their performance remains unchanged because they don't last long in the EPL and it's likely that this season will be the same.
3 matches in the past and 3 times they lost. In addition, they are also currently the same as Leeds last season which has always been the goal barn of their opposing club in matches because the 3 matches Burnley has done they have conceded 11 goals and they have only managed to score 3 goals so by looking at a bad start like this it will be very difficult for Burnley to rise if their performance remains the same.

The innovation that bitcoin provides is not wrong but it will disrupt the existence of the government so that some of them will definitely be afraid that if things like bitcoin continue to develop it will increasingly disturb them because it is difficult to regulate which makes them try to regulate so that they are safe and want more authority even though bitcoin cannot be fully regulated.
This is an anticipatory step that is actually quite reasonable, the government has the authority and power to regulate something but with the presence of bitcoin that they cannot regulate, they are confused to find other alternatives to make regulations so that bitcoin can be controlled.
But for people like us who want their own freedom bitcoin will be a good bridge in financial management and I still feel at this time as long as the government does not ban bitcoin (in my country) even though there are some rules that must be followed I will remain in bitcoin.

At least for now they will still be a little safe because until this season ends Mbappe will definitely be at PSG but as you said the possibility of Mbappe leaving next season could happen especially seeing some rumours that Mbappe did extend the contract on the grounds that he could leave next season (for sale) it already indicates that Mbappe is likely to leave very large.

PSG will also definitely find it difficult to maintain the same as now because if in the end their situation is the same as the last 1 season contract without any more clarity like last season then Mbappe will leave as a free agent so inevitably PSG must prepare a replacement for Mbappe from now on because the possibility of him leaving PSG next season is very large.

In terms of experience and team strength, PSG and Milan are the most likely candidates but in this case I want to see something interesting because my big hope is to see Newcastle be able to surprise in this group phase.
Although this is indeed a dream that is too difficult for Newcastle to do but if in the end this can be proven then they will surprise if they qualify in this group phase.
The matches in group F will always be interesting every week and this is the attraction of the Champions League this season because compared to other groups, group F is much more evenly distributed and it seems that anyone can still qualify in this phase.

I agree with what you said, if in the end they had approached when the summer transfer window opened with a 100 million bid for Salah it would have been enough to make him leave without the need to insist on bringing in a higher price and being rejected several times.
The reason is quite simple if Liverpool let Salah go at a big price then they can still look for new options even though it is risky but still possible to happen but for now it seems difficult, the EPL has closed the transfer of players and removing Salah is the same as leaving Liverpool's attack line empty and impacting on performance so it is quite natural if Liverpool think twice about this.

Signature updated sir.

I think it's more accurate to say Inter prefer to wait, it doesn't mean they don't focus on possession because they also try to do that but if you look at the match Inter are not better in midfield especially in terms of teamwork so Fiorentina try to take advantage of that to create better ball possession.
But it needs to be admitted that Inter's attack in this match is very good and the proof that they can score 4 goals in this match is the result of their good momentum.

Next week is likely to be a bit different because Inter and Milan will be in a prestigious derby and I think one of them will drop points. On the other hand Napoli just lost their first 3 matches this time but of course this is a little different if you look at the record of the previous 2 seasons they rarely get defeated at the beginning of the season but things like this are good because they will definitely improve again considering they want to defend the Scudetto and the competition will be better.
Osimhen is also still quite consistent so far because 3 matches have passed Osimhen has scored 3 goals for Napoli

Inter won again in a very impressive manner in today's match.
Their possession was poor but their attacks were really very dangerous especially their counter-attacks in the match at Sansiro.
On the other hand Thuram and Lautaro really played very well and their duo now seems to be the best duo for 3 matches running now especially by looking at the records of the matches that have occurred they are a club that is still cleansheet and this is really very good for Inter.
They are now quite comfortably at the top of the table.

Now that's not important in my opinion because regardless of what Perez and Ancelotti have made the choice of not bringing in any new players for Madrid so with this they have to work on how to maximize their players because currently they also have some good young players like Vini and Rodrygo. Apart from that, regarding striker problems, they will probably continue to trust Joselu as an option if young players such as Vini, Rodrygo and Jude experience deadlock.
What they have to think about is a new scheme as a backup for 2 strikers and 1 second striker because if this continues to be used, it is possible that the longer it goes on, the more gaps there will be in this scheme, so Ancelotti needs to prepare it from now so that when the 4-3-1-2 stuck they can still try with other schemes.

Isn't it in the end when the price goes up there is a condition where demand is high, meaning that when you say you can't afford to buy it is actually like something that is hard to believe when there is a lot of demand that makes the price of bitcoin higher.
On the other hand, we also know together that buying bitcoin does not mean we have to buy 1 bitcoin at a time because in this case whatever money you have if you seriously want to buy bitcoin then everything can be done regardless of profit in the end everything depends on ourselves whether we are willing or not to buy at the risk of higher prices.
Therefore, when we are already serious in bitcoin and try to keep buying at the current price then it is the right thing to do.

Yeb, I also feel that there will be many people who lose this bet because sometimes results like this are not really expected but still possible. This is football, where when you're so confident in your bet, it can backfire because the game lasts 90 minutes.
Overall, there was nothing wrong with Napoli's game as they did well in terms of dominance, but Lazio also defended very well in this match and we need to give them credit as their defence made it difficult for Napoli's players to attack. Osimhen was also unable to move freely in this match as Casale literally tailed Osimhen when he was in the Penalty box.

Problems for Napoli were again seen in terms of gaps when they tried to go all out in this match.
Lazio's counter-attacks were really good and fortunately there were 2 goals that were indeed VAR'd by Lazio because otherwise it would have been a massacre for Napoli where they still had many gaps when doing so.
This is a good lesson for Rudi Garcia because in this match they know there are some gaps that they must fix so that Napoli can compete for the Scudetto again.

Quite an interesting match where Lazio can finally get their first 3 points this season and Napoli began to taste defeat at the beginning of the season after the previous 2 seasons for the beginning of the season Napoli was very difficult to lose
Napoli played very well in this match only they failed to provide opportunities on target because Lazio defended very well in this match.
Lazio's defense was quite tight which made it difficult for Napoli to penetrate the penalty box from Lazio and several attempts outside the penalty box did not go well.
This 1-2 score is enough to make me lose my bet.

I think rather than saying Nottingham were lucky it would be better to say Chelsea still can't be consistent.
Even if in the previous week they were really good and got 3 points with a striking score but in today's match they still have the same problem with the difficulty of finishing for them.
Nottingham did something good by capitalising on the momentum of Chelsea's lack of focus at the start of the second half which allowed Elanga to easily create the winning goal there.

On the other hand, Chelsea's finishing was very poor in this match, they played with full control and they created a lot of opportunities but if you look at the statistics of this match, 21 shots taken by Chelsea are not comparable to their 2 on target so in this case they still have to improve themselves to be better because if it continues like this it will be very natural if there are still a lot of people who still doubt them even though they have won in the previous match,

Actually in this case I don't suggest or consider that trading is also a mistake because those who do it have their own thoughts and their own strategies to collect bitcoins regardless of others doing DCA or trading I think it's their right but when talking about investment then one of the best strategies is DCA. and when we want to be a good investor for the long term trading is too difficult to do because as you said a profit for a few days/weeks or months can just become a loss in one day when trading is bad so traders do have bitcoins but they are not investors for me because they have their own role which is as traders.
Unlike the DCA which is indeed one of the very good bitcoin buying strategies for today because this is a way of collecting bitcoins without having to worry about the bitcoins that we collect experiencing losses if we don't sell that.

Right now Milan just have to focus on their performance and I agree with what you said because Milan still have consistency problems in the middle of the season but actually things like this don't only happen to Milan because looking at last season, only Napoli I was not too affected by consistency problems, the rest they remained the same as before.
Currently Milan must try to be stronger so that they can return to compete in the race for the Scudetto that Napoli took last season.
On the other hand, I still feel that this time the club in Serie A will be more stretched because not only Milan will try to rise but some big clubs like Inter or Juventus will also still do the same.

For now, I haven't seen too much of that. Ansu's start was very good but considering the time Xavi is getting now it's very little for Ansu and we can see that he rarely starts as he's mostly on the bench.
Competition for young players at Barcelona is so strong because there are so many talents who have good progress, now Ansu must be able to prove himself that he can be better because it can make him in the core squad which is still very rare to see him in that position.
On the other hand, his hopes may currently fall on Lamine Yamal because he has been trusted in several matches as a core player even though he is still very young but his progress is quite promising.

I still feel that this is not a big problem because it has always been there from the beginning and even though there are effects produced, the influence of bitcoin is still very much felt and its users are growing until now.
I will not talk about other countries in this case but I will talk about my country Indonesia.
Indeed, for now bitcoin is still prohibited as a legal means of payment but until now the spread of bitcoin in my country has actually continued to increase and even the government is quite welcoming actually it's just that for payment tools it is not allowed.
But I don't think it's a big problem because as long as there are no harmful regulations then I don't mind if the legal means of payment for bitcoin is not enforced in my country.
On the other hand, why do I say the government is quite welcome to the existence of bitcoin, this is evidenced when one of our governors some time ago attended and became a speaker at the bitcoin conference 2023 (in Miami) and said that they would endeavour to provide mining facilities by looking at their resources and I think that is one form of my country's support for bitcoin.

Whilst it's great that Luton managed to keep the score down, I didn't like Luton's goal in the 90+2nd minute.
I had high hopes when I bet 0-2 on West ham and those hopes were dashed when Luton's stoppage time goal reduced the deficit, making my bet worthless.
It's unfortunate, but it was a deserved goal because they worked hard in this game too. Even if their late goal couldn't bring them a point but at least seeing how hard they attacked was worthy of appreciation.

His reply was equally interesting when he saw this tweet


Source

But on the other hand I do agree with what was said because at the end of the day DCA is a bigger winner than trading because as discussed earlier in the tweet "trading btc has been proven to be a losing strategy over the long run" and we have seen many people who were eventually ruined by trading and liquidated so in this case it is important if you really want to be a good investor then adopting the DCA strategy is not the wrong thing.
On the other hand, our discussion from so many pages is not wasted because this is in line with what we will plan and think about in the bitcoin collection scheme as investors.

Even though gambling is done responsibly, there will definitely be impacts, but it can be minimized because by realizing that expenses do not interfere with gambling, I think we can also minimize the risk by maintaining our relationships with those closest to us.
Because what I have felt in this case is that when we are unable to manage spending money on gambling, our financial condition becomes hampered, which makes me often argue with the people closest to me, in this case my wife, and of course this will trigger a rift in the relationship.
So by looking at this condition, as long as we don't disturb our finances for other needs with the gambling activities we do, I think the impact is still there, but it's not as big as those who are not disciplined in gambling.