What about 65 euros for both?
Sorry that's far too low for me. Smoothie sells them from the US for 43 LTC each which = ~$102 And his postage to Europe would be 28 LTC = ~$67
|
|
|
how much? interested? do you live in london?
At the moment I am taking offers. However, I will only charge £2 for postage to the UK. If it's to Europe would be a bit more. I'm in the South West.
|
|
|
For sale - 2 x 1/2 Troy oz 999 Fine Silver 10 LTC Lealana Litecoin (with error) I'm from the UK, so you can save money on shipping fees. I purchased these directly from smoothie and they have only been looked at twice so are in perfect condition. They come with the case and certificates of authenticity. I will upload a photo later today. Not sure on exact price yet, but there will definitely be a saving to be made on postage for UK/EU people I would like 43 LTC each for the coins (or BTC equivalent) - the same price as smoothie.
Postage to the UK is FREE, EU postage will be at cost.
|
|
|
The more I stare at photos of these coins, the more I want one. But not sure if I can justify paying Ł91 for one coin. Anybody like molecular or someone else in Europe doing regional resale with lower shipping rates?
I have a couple of the 10 LTC coins in the UK - I've sent you a PM
|
|
|
My two slogan suggestions incase the other thread doesn't count:
"All your bitcoin are belong to us"
"Bitcoin : Decentralized Money"
|
|
|
In the spirit of your previous grammatical error: "All your bitcoin are belong to us"
|
|
|
Bitcoin: Decentralized Money
|
|
|
Is it just by exchanges who change the prices based on how much money they want to make? This is one thing I am concerned about bitcoin by. How is the value calculated?
The people who have bitcoins offer them for different prices, the people who want bitcoins offer to buy them for different prices. When a bid and a sell offer coincide that is the price of a bitcoin. It is not the exchanges who set the price, it is the individual users who agree on the price. The exchange just brings buyers and sellers together in one place. I dont agree with this. The people sell their bitcoins based on what the exchanges say. YOu buy based on what the exchanges say too. I cant go out today and buy a coin for 20 pounds because the exchanges have valued them at 80 pounds. I cant sell a bitcoin at 200 pounds because the exchanges say 80 pounds etc etc. I was passionate about bicoin until I realised this. I even started a business with them. But now after this stark realisation I think I will be sticking to pounds. Just in case you are not trolling.... You can buy a bitcoin for 20 pounds or sell one for 200 pounds on an exchange.... provided there is another person on that exchange who wants to make such a trade. This is the fairest way to decide price - people offer what they think a bitcoin is worth and others can choose to match it or make their own offer. Can you think of a fairer way to decide the price?
|
|
|
(unfortunately, I misplaced a check senbon sent over at one point -- it's worth a fair bit now lol) How much are these worth roughly? I have one or two, just hope they're in good condition!
|
|
|
Mining is interesting, as per their vague definitions technically miners are issuers of money (however miners are not exchanges of money, particularly from BTC to USD), but can also be classified services business because technically a miner is just a transaction processor, from which you are granted new currency as a reward for operating one. I doubt FinCEN has any classification that actually fits this accurately.
Seems FinCEN still isn't sure what to make of this, and so much the better.
I would speculate that FinCEN jumped the gun a bit with their earlier recommendations; I wouldn't be surprised if they amended their guidance on miners.
|
|
|
Like moths to a flame.
Meaning what, exactly? People are listening (and bothering to care) what FinCEN thinks about something that was invented to avoid organizations like FinCEN from having any say in your money. It's like being a drug dealer and asking the police where the safest areas to peddle are. Bitcoin can be used either with or without the government's blessing. Let people make their choice - those that choose to comply won't affect those that don't.
|
|
|
I not even going to claim that I am Satoshi... which means I probably am
|
|
|
What site are they buying? Anyone?
|
|
|
Do you have an axe to grind? Honest question.
|
|
|
While I have a particular distaste for the choice and fitting of his suits, his opinions are worth paying attention to.
Less ego would help win more people over, but maybe he doesn't really care about that? I find him entertaining nonetheless.
|
|
|
I don't think it's a silly question - I am surprised at their popularity as, to me, simple dice games are one of the more boring ways to gamble.
|
|
|
So are we saying that as long as you go through Tor then you are completely anon?
With regards to the guys who were 'uncovered' - I thought that was just through Tor Mail??
Thanks for responding lads
I'm not saying that. I think there is a chance a VPN might have protected them, but I would like to hear what more knowledgeable people think. The people that were uncovered visited websites hosted by Freedom hosting - they downloaded some Javascript code that sent a request outside of Tor to a government server in the US, thus revealing their true IP. I guess the question is, would this code have also by-passed a VPN if it was running?
|
|
|
Hi guys, been reading so much online that in the end it melts your brain lol I wanted to ask all you 'more advanced' guys out there a couple tips, I use Tor to browse - have anon email address - anon coinbase not linked (yet) Should I be looking at downloading VPN's as a guy I asked seemed to think just going through Tor allows me to remain 'covered' and anon online?? Cheers lads You don't need to use a VPN if you are using Tor. Tor keeps you 100% safe and anonymous I wonder if having a VPN running would have protected the Tor users who recently had their true IPs disclosed in the recent Freedom hosting bust.
|
|
|
|