Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 09:21:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
941  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Merge of DGC and ARG Development Teams on: June 14, 2013, 02:32:36 PM
Quote from: Jcw188 on June 14, 2013, 02:21:58 PM
This seems weird.  Aren't Argentum and DGC pretty similar?  You would think they would be competing...

Edit:  Not trying to cause trouble, and I have supported both coins.

if the coins can capitalize on shared coding and support I'm all for it.  As long as you are able to differentiate each one.  I don't want to see the same features being implemented in both coins if they are meant to serve different purposes.  I would like to see what your development paths are for each coin and what makes then distinct.
942  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BlockBurner - Crucible FPGA Scrypt Miner - Going Legit on: June 13, 2013, 12:59:57 PM
Why the "Going Legit" in the title.  Was it not legit before.  Are you moving toward legitimacy?
943  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [WTB] IFC 100 million IFC per 4 LTC. on: June 13, 2013, 01:50:36 AM
Quote from: GSnak on June 13, 2013, 01:48:08 AM
What the hell's an "IFC"?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=225891.0
944  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [WTB] IFC 100 million IFC per 4 LTC. on: June 12, 2013, 11:57:08 PM
bought 150 million IFC from Rubberduckie.  Reputable trader
945  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [WTS][Exchange] I exchange 1.000.000 Infinitecoin IFC for 10.000 Goldcoin GLD on: June 12, 2013, 05:22:15 PM
Quote from: BlazinBeaches on June 12, 2013, 03:25:27 PM
That price is insane. You should raise it, that is way too low.  Low prices so early kill the coin.

not really.  better to start low and build a base than to have bagholders that are pissed the price dropped on them.  a market's history is reflective of its future.
946  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [WTB] IFC 100 million IFC per 1.5 LTC. on: June 12, 2013, 05:19:38 PM
Quote from: dolfcao on June 12, 2013, 12:05:29 PM
View here: the price is 0.5 million IFC/1LTC.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232517.0

yeah that is outrageous.  Someone is bad at math or its an attempt to fix a market price.  Mining rates do not warrant that valuation.

I'm updating my price points 100 million IFC / 4 LTC

no rush as I have 2 rigs pulling in plenty.
947  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [WTS] 100,000,000 IFC Infinitecoin - Make an offer in BTC, LTC, or PPC on: June 12, 2013, 03:22:00 PM
What about 1LTC per 40 million
948  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [WTB] IFC 100 million IFC per 5 LTC. on: June 12, 2013, 11:32:53 AM
Kwuak Kwuak

I pull in 5 million an hour on 2 dedicated rigs.  They could pulling .375 LTC in the same amount of time.
949  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / [WTB] IFC 100 million IFC per 4 LTC. on: June 12, 2013, 11:08:32 AM
PM with offers.
950  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ARG] Argentum {INITIAL DISTRIBUTION} Giveaway 25 ARG to First 1000 on: June 12, 2013, 10:30:32 AM
AT6GYkMysLXrYkvz3n1XM6PET2YyCtqxTs
951  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What is all this "Unkown" suddenly on LTC's network hashrate? on: June 11, 2013, 03:14:18 PM
its probably Ltcoin.net.  when a pool drops for some reason they appear as unknown.
952  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Infinitecoin - IFC - Launched!! 524,288 coins per block!!! on: June 11, 2013, 03:12:13 PM
18,416 block mined under 99% left till happy fun time.
953  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alt valuations versus BTC - why still? on: June 11, 2013, 06:55:40 AM
Quote from: BitJohn on June 11, 2013, 03:56:44 AM
Quote from: mercSuey on June 11, 2013, 03:52:26 AM
If a virtual currency can be exchanged for USD on a website then Fincen classifies said website as a money exchanger and requires a permit.  Cryptsy is Fincen compliant, and you'll be able to exchange your coins into USD soon.

We are working the legal hurdles to be sure cryptsy.com is fully compliant and then we will allow for FIAT trading. It is coming.

Thanks, ask and ye shall receive.  And timely I might add.
954  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Alt valuations versus BTC - why still? on: June 11, 2013, 02:56:43 AM
In light of the recent ASIC attacks on BTC  Tongue  the difficulty has been shutting out GPU miners making BTC less profitable to mine.  In addition a lot of ASIC owners are selling BTC in order to recoup their ASIC hardware investments.  This has put a lot of pressure on BTC prices.

However alt coins are still pegging to BTC price.  Coinchoose identifies coins based on profitability to BTC.  Cryptsy only allows trading of alt coins against BTC (3 versus LTC).  The damage ASIC's are doing to BTC is rippling through Alt coin valuations.

I think we are coming close to a significant cross road.  

1. We continue to peg to BTC past the GPU profitability break even point.  As a result alts are not profitable to mine and most die a slow death.
2. Alts decouple from BTC and are gauged not by their profitability to mining vs. BTC but to valuations against other fiat currencies (USD, EUR, GBY, JPY)  

2. will require the implementation of a better exchange than Cryptsy.  Cryptsy is great, don't get me wrong but it has its limitation and while it helps reduce the scamming that occurs on forums it does not do enough to get alts decoupled from BTC and trading independently.
955  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN][ARG] Argentum ~ Modern Digital Currency || Fast. Optimized. Improved. on: June 11, 2013, 12:44:57 AM
interesting
956  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Feathercoin + BTC-E on: June 10, 2013, 09:53:52 PM
Quote from: gnomicide on June 10, 2013, 09:15:40 PM
Quote from: btc-e.com on June 10, 2013, 08:55:29 PM
We stopped deposits.
Сoins will be added tomorrow after updating wallet

Thanks for the update!

will be a massive dump tomorrow then
957  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Scrypt (Litecoin) ASIC Prototype on: June 10, 2013, 05:32:18 PM
Quote from: Operatr on June 10, 2013, 05:14:53 PM

You need to provide something real right now or please just stop it. There are quite enough scammer/wannabes on these boards.



ditto.  youtube video would be nice of the prototype.
958  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Scrypt (Litecoin) ASIC Prototype on: June 10, 2013, 04:58:03 PM
Quote from: ASIC SKY Sebastian on June 10, 2013, 04:32:14 PM
Maybe this is not a ASIC in the sence that we placed every single transistor on our own but we assembled something that is definitely specialized on scrypt mining with useable success, so this can't be called a FGPA either.
959  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BITBAR Asic PROJECT "included inside each BitBar USB wallet drive" on: June 10, 2013, 04:56:47 PM
Quote from: Dervana on June 10, 2013, 04:52:07 PM
Quote from: TruCoin on June 10, 2013, 04:08:54 PM
people there are two scammy people asking for donations to develop an ASIC miner please be careful. A real developer wont ask for donation to fund the project !! they will get a buisness loan. Plus to complete  a device and have it on time you wont the developers money on the LINE.

the scammers:

ASIC SKY Sebastian

ASIC SKY Yvonne

Yep, they include zero proof of product don't they? One of the many typical hallmarks of a scammer...

So in that regards you can add Operatr(Blockburner) and jasinlee to the list.  For as much as they are reporting having development underway and production coming in +3 months there has been no prooft that any of the development devices function.  A youtube video is easy to create with the furom presenting the required specifications of proof (cgminer stats, pool it was run on for the test, etc.)
960  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Scrypt (Litecoin) ASIC Prototype on: June 10, 2013, 04:37:50 PM
Quote from: ASIC SKY Sebastian on June 10, 2013, 04:32:14 PM
Well, I didn't expect that kind of shit storm but I can understand your mistrust.
Only three people successfully working on an ASIC doesn't sound very authentic especially considering the costs you have in mind but I think this widely overestimated. I was suprised too that this worked out that well in only one year, but I really don't know what went wrong at BFL and friends. We largely used existing hardware and just assembled it in the right way. Some parts we had to design our selves of cause but this was and still is not a million dollar effort.
And we are talking about "ASIC proof" scrypt algortihm here. In my oppinion the memory related design made it even more easy to build an ASIC because you don't need a extreamly high specialized computing section but the right memory and this is what we've been working on.

Maybe this is not a ASIC in the sence that we placed every single transistor on our own but we assembled something that is definitely specialized on scrypt mining with useable success, so this can't be called a FGPA either.

I agree all this looks quite unorgnized at the moment. And you are right that we didn't prepare a bullet proof launch of all this but please give us some time to provide enough information before labelling us as scammers.
Nobody forces you to donate right away if you have doubts. Just wait before complaining about somethin you have no conception of yet.


what type of memory are you using QDR++ SRAM or on-die?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!