Keep in mind that people are on vacation so you can't expect them to act upon this very quickly. Nevertheless, I've tagged the account in question. Yes, that does help. |
|
|
|
In that case, it would be better if we find the IP of the owner or the person whose making multi's and ban it from creating new accounts.  That doesn't really help when someone has access to a lot of proxies. He's still around, with more accounts and a slightly different grammar, but moderation seems to be on top of him for the most part... Not sure what he wants to achieve beyond giving (even more) work to the moderation.
Indeed. I've noticed the latest report just a few minutes ago. They get quickly resolved because there are a lot of patrollers that are able to handle them (and the violation is pretty clear). |
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Duplicate.
|
|
|
|
I would suggest adding a sticky to all main boards/sections with elements of that topic that are specifically directed at members of signature campaigns.
That wouldn't really help. A lot of people tend to just ignore the sticky threads, especially the signature spammers. It might also be a good idea to add something to that sticky to encourage other users to report posts that break those guidelines. It would be amazing if people who participate in sig-campaigns themselves report users' posts that are unsubstantial/spammy in nature.
There currently isn't really any incentive to report posts. Either you care about the state of the forum and act upon it, or you don't. I have noticed a few campaign participants that actively report posts. I still see a lot of spam in 'Bitcoin Discussion', one of the sections I'm personally most active in and I think it's a good idea to give that warning some more exposure, so other people are more inclined to report posts to combat that behaviour.
The situation in that section has improved after useless threads (e.g. 'What would you do if you had 1 BTC") were moved into the Off-topic section. However, there is definitely a lot of room for improvement. |
|
|
|
Doesn't look spammy at all: 
If you look at the posting frequency, time between posts and factor in the English proficiency, then one can easily conclude that your post quality is bad. |
|
|
|
It's time for this image again. All aboard the rocket to $1000.  |
|
|
|
Worth and value is a tricky thing. Friends of Satoshi is extremely transparent so I will say that the coins are actually quite expensive when produced in this small of quantity. We only make $20-30 per coin, which goes to help fund our organization and produce more content. So as a contributor, you are not just buying a coin for yourself, but you are helping a whole organization grow from nothing. You also must consider that these coins do not have a fixed denomination and continue to slowly grow over time. For these two reasons, it simply is not economically viable for us to sell the coin any less than 0.1. I am sorry you are interested, but if you change your mind we will be here (If we don't sell out first).
Even though I'm not inclined to believe that the numbers that you've provided are completely correct (this applies to everyone though), I hereby thank you for being transparent about the possible profit margin (which is rare in this section). The coin is most definitely a nice looking one, and there are people that value these contributions. I'm not one of those, but will keep my eye out on the auction and secondary market sales.
Congratulations on selling out so quickly! All coins are not sold (or reserved for TNABC).
Is this a typo? |
|
|
|
Luckily, I did remember to make hi-res scans of all 50 encyclopedia mini-doodles. Those autographs mini-doodles will make up their own little chapter in the Bitcoin Penny™ Doodles Book: Senseless Scribbles of a Mad Coinmaker.  Regards, Chris So you're planning to create a book about doodles? Any ETA and/or other information (hard cover vs. soft cover)? Hopefully this doesn't turn out like a trash quality item like the soft cover Encyclopedia that was released this year. Take your time with this project. I'll probably be very interested once I know the price, quantity and other specifications. |
|
|
|
4 days have passed. None of the thread owners mentioned above have received -ve trust from U. U were pretty much active in between as well. Now it seems, I was the one selected to be butchered to clean path for someone else.
As much as you want to incite malicious intent here, you can forget about it. I don't trust account traders, and thus mark them appropriately. I've reviewed the linked threads and tagged the users in question. Really? I can not request to remove -ve trust? Could u please show me a rule for the same?
What Lauda means is that there is no one that you can officially appeal to in order to get a feedback removed. If you want it to be removed, you must contact the person that included the user in their trust list (E.G Blazed included Lauda and can therefore exclude them) or contact the person that left you the feedback specifically (AKA contacting them privately).
This. I hope, u re-consider your action within December 31, 2016. Else, I'll be forced to escalate. Thank You.
There's nothing to re-consider. I don't trust you, nor anyone else who is promoting this shady part of the marketplace. I strongly stand by my opinions and have yet to see some good arguments as to why account sales are good/shouldn't be marked with negatives/etc. Threatening me via some sort of 'escalation' doesn't do you any favors. |
|
|
|
Handled again. This has just become blatant spam now. |
|
|
|
|
The coin does look nice, but is definitely not worth 0.1 BTC (which can purchase 5 oz silver) considering the material type and weight IMO. Good luck with your sales though.
Hopefully this is your last endeavor with Crypto Imperator.
|
|
|
|
Your post can be considered as "Ad-Spam", and I would have reported it aswell, had I seen it.
It is the very definition of Ad-Spam. Posting via several different (brand new) accounts into several different sections at random (whether it be creating their own threads, or posting in someone else's threads). They are putting all the blame to theymos the last time I saw girlbtc ranting about his ban and now this thread pointing to theymos again was created.
That is pretty much pointless since theymos has most likely not banned any of these 'brand new' accounts that are spamming. |
|
|
|
I did notice a few different spam patterns now: Content from Girlbtc forum without links and posting randomly in some Chinese threads. It doesn't look like he/she will stop anytime soon. Girlbtc is a gamble site since it started. and forum is just his sub-function for free talk.
The website and the owner should be put on a public list of shame. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I have recently wiped my node clean (thus also the banlist), and those connections appeared within seconds of me booting up the node. They seem very persistent. The majority seems to have moved away from 52.x range into 100+.x something (my banlist is empty once again, thus I don't see the exact IPs right now) for me. They are fairly easy to spot for those using a GUI (e.g. 3-4 nodes per IP). |
|
|
|
You were promoting the girlbtc copycat forum, thus got banned. Every single account that continues to post any girlbtc links will likely be treated the same way. In the case of brand new accounts, they will most likely be nuked on sight. Girlbtc (& related link) is now 'officially' a known spammer, thus will be dealt like the traditional ones (e.g. KNCMiner, 'Bitcoin ponzi' et al.). I searched that user you mentioned but its only brand new without any post
That's what happens when they get nuked (all of their posts get deleted automatically). |
|
|
|
|
I've nuked all of them. If you find more, you can PM me for faster handling.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
