Și eu cred că se vor liniști. "Ei" vor face un cadru legal făcut mai cu capul (sper că apropiat de cel nemțesc, unde dacă ai ținut monezile mai mult de 1 an nu se mai impozitează!!), iar "noi" o să fim mai cuminți la plătit taxele. Că na, până la urmă asta e normalitatea.

Cum minezi virtual? Tu te faci că minezi, iar ei se fac că plătesc?
Nu știu cum e cu Electroneum, că nu mi-am bătut capul, dar cam numai newbies am văzut minându-l și lăudându-l.

Yes, it can lead to spam, that's why I wrote that I hope that they know what they are doing.
On the other hand, there are certainly ways to post more than 20 in gambling without spam, I think I know at least 2 ways, but I don't gamble enough to do that.

I do post in gambling, but not 20 post/week on a regular basis. That's why I didn't join.

But if they want that from their advertisers, they have the right to ask for that. We can only hope they know what they are doing.

I think that it somehow makes sense. I mean, from what I've read the important services are disrupted.
The maintenance personnel should stay mostly home for now. I'm not sure how do they live in the mine as the owner claims, I'm not sure that's also legal.
And.. what if such a facility catches fire? I'm not sure the fire service will come to extinguish it.

The cooldown option is too restrictive, especially if it's done for the whole forum. Let the owner of the thread do as he thinks.
The scam accusations board has now 10 locked threads on the first 10 pages. I understand what you mean, but you can always open your own thread and make your point. And you can even keep it more active than the other / related thread.

Smartwatches still have quite a small display and you may end up missing some info and making mistakes. I'm not sure what you can type there, the small display is again an issue. And if a smartwatch wallet would be made, in a way or another, such a wallet will have to support hardware wallet.

I think that we should see the notifications on smartwatch, but keep the wallets of the smartphone for now.

Well, Dash does a great job at advertising itself as privacy coin, but it should not be in the list. I won't say more because I would go off topic.
Grin, on the other hand, IS interesting and it could be soon quite a competitor for Monero.

Whenever in doubt, check https://bitcoin.org or in this case https://bitcoin.org/en/exchanges  

Most may recommend Binance, especially if you also play with altcoins.
I also like Bitstamp, Bittrex and some others, but these will ask for KYC documents.

You should have said if you exchange fiat, Bitcoin, major altcoins, lesser known altcoins...


Edit: about "easy", well, there's a learning curve.. but I am sure you'll find tutorials if you search a little.

Self-evaluation is in most cases incorrect and basically means nothing. No offense, it's the case for anyone.


I don't know all the names from the topic, but the ones I know do fit in that category.
And I agree to @o_e_l_e_o : mods will have to check the facts and make a decision.

All the rest of the discussion is basically meaningless and you don't have to "convince us". The facts are there to be checked.


PS: shouldn't be the advertising like this stay in the product ANN thread (at most!) ?

After using Google Authenticator for years, some months ago I thought I'll give a try to Aegis since it was praised here by people I trust. And the backup/restore functionality is very handy (although I still have my paper with the 2FA seeds I kept as backup for Google Auth).

But I've got quite a surprise lately: it's off. The numbers it generates are not accepted by the websites. Luckily I still have Google Auth on my phone and I've successfully used that, but I feel that I may be missing something.
I didn't find any time sync functionality in Aegis.


I know that if I sync my phone to an atomic clock it'll work again, but there has to be a better way. Google has it.

Bitcoin's blockchain records basically the money flow. It doesn't care about the actual wallet and how "final" you feel the funds in it are.

This being said, all you know is if an input has "enough" (which can have various meanings) number of confirmations and you can or cannot spend it (it's yours or not). That's just simply all.

I think that you should have been asking this in the altcoin speculation area.
Yes, some altcoins were lately recovering nicely and the numbers show that. This may mean a lot or may mean nothing, since we are mostly focused here on Bitcoin and I didn't see proper TA for the major worthy altcoins.
I think that altcoin season (constant bigger gains than Bitcoin) may be sooner than 3 years though. It may depend (or not) on when Bitcoin surpasses 20k and how long the good side of the market cycle will last.
Since money is comeing back into Bitcoin, it's not unexpected that some altcoins get their share too. But I am not convinced we are close to altcoin season. One flower doesn't make it spring.

If you do day trade this should usually not be a problem.
But gold backed coins are not necessarily for day trading. Their better use is holding, on the premise that gold is bound to rise.
And if a gold backed coin is actually not backed (as I expect from Tether), the holders may face an ugly surprise at some point sooner or later.

I am not sure what you mean but the way the data is stored doesn't matter as long as the protocol and the content of the data is the same.
So your gibbering means nothing.

So .. what are FUD-ing about?

I think that you are wrong. USDT is not backed, not for real. They failed to provide proper, reliable 3rd party audit for the funds.
And I think that Tether issuing gold-backed coin is just another marketing gimmick to fool investor wannabes and they will, again, not back it with anything, just pull numbers out of the hat.

It's a great list and I think that's not so hard to adapt to basically anything if somebody has a bit of artistic skills.
And I didn't know it.

No offense OP, but imho social media needs somewhat "less sober" stickers 

You have started this wrong. The fact that legal stable coins might replace current centralized stable coins don't make them a replacement to decentralized proper crypto coins. But they could help in the exchange between our (crypto, anonymous or pseudo anonymous, not much regulated) world and the fiat/banking world. And you know why? Exactly because of the lack of acceptance. Exactly because only designing a coin to be .. a coin, won't make the shop at the next corner accept it. At least not yet.

How many times did you pay with Bitcoin?
How many times did you pay with ... Monero?
And.... how many times did you pay with ... IOTA? 

Mda, asa mai vii de-acasa. Bine ai venit la (crunta) realitate.
Actualizarea probabil ca au trimis-o cu porumbelul si l-a mancat pisica.
Na, sorry sa fiu eu cel care vine cu noutatile naspa, dar acum macar stii cum stai.

Actually they might help. We'll see how they are implemented.
What I am thinking is that they are supposed to be stable coins. Probably the most trusted stable coins.
If they manage to replace Tether and other shady ( = not properly audited ) stable coins it would be good for the crypto markets: there may be less cries about price manipulation.