I have additional questions about this if you are a Merit source how many sMerit you have. I've seen reports as low as 10 for some Merit sources, and I know at least one source must have been around 2000 per month. Many of the "recently" added new sources get 1000. Is it given by months or by week? After the initial lump sum, each spent source sMerit comes back exactly (probably up to the second) 30 days later. If you are merit source and you Hodl your sMerit is it possible that it reach 1k or more sMerit? The source Merit won't be more than the initial amount. The faster you send them, the more you can spend in total. |
|
|
|
Probably, but to be thorough, you can compare blockchair.com too. |
|
|
|
Could it be something about them being written in different file system or older windows?
What happens with files that get moved between FAT and NTFS, in case it was at some point stored on a thumbdrive and I just copied over the files before wiping it for other use.
Maybe the hdd recovery messed something up in them? HDD recovery can lead to incomplete files, but other than that, "untouched" files should remain just fine. However, I've seen far too many topics made by people complaining about corrupted old wallets, and I don't know what causes that. All my files from years ago are still accessible (unless the disk stops working), so I would expect wallet.dat files not to change "by themselves". I didn't join Bitcoin early enough to have files from before 2015, so I can't test if it's a compatibility problem. Gonna try move them to a FAT formated thumbdrive, but I suspect I shouldn't make a difference. Unless you're getting the file from "the original", moving the existing corrupted file won't matter. |
|
|
|
a wallet_backup.dat dated to 2017. ~ (1336 kb) Have you tried loading this one into Bitcoin Core? The file size looks much more similar to my own backups, so don't dismiss it without trying. |
|
|
|
i should remind you that this forum use Cloudflare which can see traffic activity when you access this forum. I would recommend you to read these, Or just this: Cloudflare is very probably an NSA honeypot |
|
|
|
my posts were deleted Any chance they broke the rules? Your posts weren't the only ones wiped from that topic: Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2651480
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #923049
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #542434
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #923049
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #724245
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #525492
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #543468
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #724245
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #724243
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #2787299
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #112208
Delete reply: Re: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 in topic #209508 by member #3295042 |
|
|
|
The quality of a post is at the discretion of the merit giver. The assumption is that someone who's posts are good enough to earn Merit is also able to judge other posts. And from what I've seen that works in most cases. I think it depends on ~ the amount of merits being expected by the user As a Merit source, this isn't on my list. The highest number of merits issued per post I have seen is 50merits. I've seen 100 Merit too, just not at once. |
|
|
|
Knoppix is available in English, but by now I would recommend Tails instead. |
|
|
|
Now I've renewed my wallet. I waited a long time for 60 months to load.
Now I see mBTC 0.00 - so the wallet is empty.
No error message. For what it's worth: my old transactions showed up when I restored my backup. If there are no transactions: any chance you have the wrong backup? |
|
|
|
What's more common in your experience, users not including a username at all or sending you the wrong one? Usually they forget their username. I included it in the OP, because I can imagine they might think I can search their email address, but that option is disabled on the forum. |
|
|
|
I've sent several people a reply similar to this: I wanted to whitelist you, but the username you gave doesn't exist. I love how people rage at me for failing the simplest test.
For the record: I don't earn anything from whitelisting users, nor from evil fees, I do this because I feel the "units of evil" also block Newbies who don't deserve it. Who knows, maybe posting it here helps  |
|
|
|
LoyceV: post the how-to summary here. See: Online:Install Electrum on your PC. Import your address to create a watch-only wallet. Preview the transaction, Copy the unsigned transaction. Put it on a USB stick. Offline and running without hard drive storage:Get a Linux LIVE DVD. Use Knoppix for instance, or any other distribution that comes with Electrum pre-installed. Unplug your internet cable. Close the curtains. Reboot your computer and start up from that DVD. Don't enter any wireless connection password. Keep it offline. Start Electrum. Import your private key. Copy your unsigned transaction from the USB stick, load it into Electrum. CHECK the transaction in Electrum. Check the fees, check the amount, check all destination addresses ( character by character). If all is okay, sign the transaction. Copy it back to your USB stick. Turn off the computer. That wipes the Live LINUX from memory and all traces are gone. Online:Use your normal online Electrum to (check again and) broadcast the transaction. Bonus:After moving all your Bitcoin, and once the transaction confirmed, check if you own Forkcoins. |
|
|
|
16.384 bnb hard cap per user
Tokes offered 4.000.000 Porto
Price per token 1usd=0.0016364 Bnb
8.380.684,368 Bnb committed
By 190.556 users
İn this scenario
8380684%190556=43.9801633116 Please provide more details, starting with what this is all about. Google brings me to FC Porto on CMC, which suddenly is worth $480M. Binance writes this: Binance has completed the subscription format Launchpad for FC Porto Fan Token and the final token allocation results are now showing on the FC Porto Fan Token Launchpad Page.
A total of 190,453 participants committed 8,379,322.4306 BNB during the subscription period, representing an oversubscription of 1,280x. Now I still have no idea what this is about, but it sounds like Binance is using their own centrally controlled made-up coin to hype another made-up token. Why did people "commit" 5 billion dollars (in Binance's centralized coin) to this? Back to Binance's announcement: Users that committed 50 BNB received an allocation of 25.3706624 PORTO and will have 0.04151655 BNB deducted. That doesn't seem to match this: I committed 16.364 BNB which is hard cap per user, in return i only allowed to buy with 0.00625 BNB. Do you see what's wrong here. I see a hype that reminds me of the peak of the ICO, but I'm not sure what you're getting at. Can you start by not using a "dot" for thousands and for decimals? It's quite confusing to read now. |
|
|
|
Seems legit: BTC Address: bc1qpmnfr8hn9a7uner27mewrv30ucdmfwm0jnnyrf BTC Address: bc1qx0fc90vtrmfwye75kyzz2plepm574d0tph3567 BTC Address: bc1q7etu3e44a83hdz23flvk8atl6tcvy0mgn3r0sn BTC Address: bc1qsvceqszm5aqd7vul2wjyk0835xu9fwjwzlx8cj BTC Address: bc1qj7dkj74dsvlqul0cuhrtqjfqup6za2pu8hlmmq But they're all red-tagged already, and obviously they're willing to promote a scam, so they have nothing more to lose. |
|
|
|
BITCOIN IS CRASHING TO PRICE LEVELS NOT SEEN IN THE LAST 9 DAYS!!! I know, we're spoiled, right?  |
|
|
|
In all the cases I've seen, the payment goes through a centralized service (payment processor) I've seen several non-standard implementations, which makes me think they accept crypto payments directly without middle man. One of them is a hoster that just disappeared, the other is Mullvad VPN. I'm pretty sure they run their own nodes. |
|
|
|
So you have 100+ BTC and you want to sell it in a public place. That means that if someone wants them, you will carry around 5.5 million euros in...what exactly? Backpack?! By my math, 100,000 50 euro bills will fit a 120 liter backpack. That's huge and totally not suspicious at all counting the money in a public place. Seriously though: this is either a scam, money laundering, or robbery. Or a combination of the above. Anyone who engages in deals like this will get into a whole lot of trouble. But that's okay, as the only people interested in such deals are scammers, money launderers, or robbers.... |
|
|
|
So, if my holdings is 80k and the price of doge is 70k then I will be able to withdraw 10k. Any reason why they're counting their scam in dollars and not in Doge? but if my spot balance is lower than the doge then I will not be able to withdraw. So any deposit you make will be confiscated until they've drained you for $80k. They say Binance is actively working with the DOGE project team to resolve the issue. This sounds like they're once again trying to reverse transactions. Nice to see they (ab)use their fuckup to pretend their made-up centralized tokens are real Doge: users are still able to withdraw DOGE on other networks during this time. I can't find any of this on Binance's own site, only external sites mention that Binance is blaming their users for their own problems.
Providing some clarification the Binance situation: 1) A bit over a year ago, Binance notified us that they had stuck transactions. We were not shown these transactions, but it was suggested that they were 'stuck' due to insufficient fees...
2) Binance opted to resend/reissue these transactions. We instructed Binance to use the inputs to the stuck transactions to force them to be invalidated by the replacement transactions. We were not notified as to whether or not they followed these instructions...
3) Binance later notified us that they had account reconciliation issues. We were unable to reproduce those issues with the data we were given by Binance, but we suggested (months ago, now) issuing -zapwallettxes to mitigate the issue...
4) Yesterday we were notified that previously stuck transactions (insufficient fee) had suddenly relayed successfully, post 1.14.5 update - likely because minfees have been lowered in 1.14.5...
5) The sole example we have, from Binance, is a transaction with fees which are valid as of v1.14.5, but were invalid (too low) in 1.14.3 and before. Note, Binance updated directly from v1.14.3 to 1.14.5, in the past few days...
6) Currently what we believe has happened is the previously stuck transactions have been retried automatically, as would happen on each node restart after upgrade - and went through, since now the minfee is lower....
7) Takeaways: Invalid transactions don't have a defined timeout limit, but are typically disposed of due to memory limits. However they can hang around if mempool isn't maintained...
8) Correct handling to cancel a transaction is to spend the to-be-cancelled transaction's inputs to a different transaction, which invalidates the first...
9) For any providers with concerns about stagnant invalid transactions, we recommend stopping the nodes, removing the mempool.dat file just in case, and then starting the node with -zapwallettxes....
10) Moreover, this should likely be done as a routine maintenance practice; especially if you know that a number of invalid transactions have been reissued. TL;DR: Binance messed up and blames someone else.
Imagine you go to an ATM and take out $500. A year later, the same ATM spits out $100,000 when you're not around and the bank wants you to pay it back! That's basically what Binance is doing now.
Suggestion: fix "Binance" in the title. |
|
|
|
If you used your VPN for 1,000 minutes, you'd pay $0.12. If you used it another minute, you wouldn't pay another $0.00012 as there isn't such subunit for the dollar. I actually can get pretty close to paying for just one minute, but unfortunately I have to use an altcoin for it. I've had high hopes for LN taking over those small transactions for years now, but unfortunately altcoins are still more mainstream than LN. |
|
|
|
If not for that, most DT members would easily tag anyone who disagrees with their point of views. Theymos addressed that already: The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas. There are people who love power and won't hesitate to use it on others unjustly. Tagging people for their opinion doesn't give you power, it makes you a Trust abuser. Not caring about their opinion means they have no power over you. Can you imagine many people choose to let some anonymous person somewhere on the internet make them feel bad? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
