I think you are right with the understanding of the coin. I have found away to peel the stickers live.
So I will make a count down for the peeling.
I can do it on twitter live feed after checking with the suggestion. So I suggest sat or sunday
That's a good start. So technically OP's buyer is the one that is missing the funds at the moment? I'm not entirely sure how this could be remedied as sending the funded amount to them is much different from getting a funded coin (if they have peeled it already?). I wonder what bitenvy thinks/wants after the video. Anyway also a scammer doesn't pay people back.. before this scam accusation I had already paid back digicoinuser.
Not entirely true. There have been cases of people paying only after being exposed. |
|
|
|
I would also like to thank Bitmixer for all perfectly timely and correct payments.
Certainly it was the best runned campaign in which I participated!
You're welcome and thanks. I wonder if it's the longest running campaign that is still active. |
|
|
|
|
To summarize what I understood here:
Gravitate is supposed to sell coin X with Y BTC funded to bitenvy. Gravitate sells it as a funded coin. Bitenvy later sold the same coin to someone else, who discovered that it was funded with 0 BTC [1]. So either Gravitate sold coin X, but did not fund it or Gravitate sold the wrong coin (which was not funded either). Either way, if it was sold as funded, but was not, then this is the definition of a scam.
Whether or not the intent was malicious, is not something that I want to get into (we've had enough fanboys drop in their useless comment). The question is how to completely resolve the situation?
[1] - Correct me if I misunderstood something.
|
|
|
|
Yes it does.
You're using a false assumption that someone is actually checking these accounts and willing to ban them in a short-time period. This is not the case AFAIK. |
|
|
|
Uugghh!! I've been reverse-engineering my find and I can't figure out where the missing link is. I'll find it it'll just take a while apparently. Let my do some bitcointalk account pricing and I'll get back to you on this one.
I can't figure it out either. If you can't find it / it doesn't exist, then make sure to update the previous post to reflect on it correctly (so I can add them as two separate links). -snip-
Read: Someone should PM izanagi to check whether they've sold those accounts or not. If the other accounts did not get banned then they are probably not alts and a mistake was made somewhere.
No, that's not what it means. |
|
|
|
A bid to bump up post count. The only thing missing are the newbies. I'm out.  |
|
|
|
|
So basically it's a Papersafe but on a Teslin (type of paper)? Is this one of a kind?
|
|
|
|
Accounts connected: Prettygirl01315, yueno, Sponsoredby15, MWesterweele, uwichii, Kalder699, marcuslong, Achargeturry78, Docnaster, Coaxme, Aber1943, recitestores, DoublerHunter, ImHacked, recitestores, ImnotOctopus, You've linked 'recistores' twice. I think you wanted 'coaxme' then 'Devesh' then 'Aber1943' (following order of evidence). Miscellaneous:
So TD;DR, all of these accounts are connected but I believe that the second half of them have been sold/traded/hacked because the way they use wallets is very different and also the way they speak could be interpreted as differently though neither speak ‘perfect English’ by any means.
How exactly are they connected? This is what I was able to gather while reviewing your report: 
Did I miss something? P.S. Nice find. |
|
|
|
|
1) It's not trivial to prove this (+ it's not trivial to give users permissions constantly).
2) Questionable usefulness. #Others can expand on this.
3) Privacy problem -> Theymos (or whoever is doing approvals) would know which node is mine.
|
|
|
|
I am addressing the moderators because they are the ones who will either remove the feedback or not. No funds are missing it is simply a scam accusation. I have nothing to give you. You are not missing any money of funds.
This has nothing to do with forum moderators, unless you are labeling default trust members as 'moderators' (which would be the first time that I've seen this). To send someone the coins and let them peel it and keep the value will cost me around 200 pounds.
Why does the person have to keep the value? They can just as easily redeem it and send the funds back to you. |
|
|
|
DimensionZ is my only active alt account. bestcoins1 is not. 16pp5ZXeQbfjU76eZgh5bxS8YrJu7xw3A6 is a DirectBet wallet if I remember correctly. 14DDMfstHe5pMQpZ1rKr8v1WmYvLrWK2e4 is a NitrogenSports wallet. You can ask Theymos for IP logs if you want as I don't use VPN on the forum.
You might get other false positives because a lot of people use these wallets. Happy now?
https://archive.fo/GX9I2
IP logs are worthless depending on usage patterns (and I'm most certainly not going to bother theymos for something like this). I favor blockchain evidence. We are just getting warmed up here. Could have saved me time if you just came clean in the first place. |
|
|
|
This is WIP. Accounts Connected: Wendigo, bestcoins1, DimensionZProof of Connection:Wendigo posts the address 16pp5ZXeQbfjU76eZgh5bxS8YrJu7xw3A6 here. https://archive.fo/8DftL
bestcoins1 posts the address 1FRyUmjWfE6TbcS4r4dicT8GjvRxSo5v3v here. https://archive.fo/IfY74Both addresses were used as inputs in a single transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/179aeac0980a3d8dec0b40399d09b23604254b238a3d8570924fb8bb50cf1f1c
Wendigo posts the address 14DDMfstHe5pMQpZ1rKr8v1WmYvLrWK2e4 here. https://archive.fo/hgU5ODimensionZ posted the same address 14DDMfstHe5pMQpZ1rKr8v1WmYvLrWK2e4 here (now deleted) according to Blocktrail. Addresses:[s]16pp5ZXeQbfjU76eZgh5bxS8YrJu7xw3A6 #Input 1
1FRyUmjWfE6TbcS4r4dicT8GjvRxSo5v3v #Input 2
1Ke1ZR1SM21x4FQvjiyKLLrv5uLxmcjaXe #Output 1
3A3q4Eqq7Nds5Hw8naoZsdV9UqsDvcrPL4 #Output 2[/s]
14DDMfstHe5pMQpZ1rKr8v1WmYvLrWK2e4 #Second connection
The language patterns do not seem to match on the first two accounts, but the blockchain evidence is strong in that case. However, on the second match (which is likely a positive hit) you can see clear similarities if you view user statistics.
Update: The match on the first two is likely a false positive.
|
|
|
|
How exactly is this official?
It is most certainly not official. Title is misleading. Unjust treatment of forum members is a violation of their rights and this should not be tolerated.
This must be a (bad) joke that I did not understand? Rights under whose authority? UN? I have also a case in the pipeline which is my own.
So that's what this is about? Let's hear it. |
|
|
|
 Someone may have mistakenly moved it there or moderated without drinking coffee first.
|
|
|
|
Back-porting a report with a correction (it contains a mistake). It was not guitarplinker who used that address, but quoted the user Insertion when they applied to a campaign here. Wallet addresses: 1C3dHBqsciQvvsa2c6BUvW9H3U23fy83tT
1Cqd4L45LMVL2BmizDUzmPiNit6nhCQmdY
18ySABh1vMk5jFunSaYFvz2dkMCLHPFBwa
12hvTp8tbwQJtVxEQ7VvZEj9Nq9cb12exA
1LeG1NN72dVahGBL6jaG8YPxRNGBwQAk3X
1BeWdcxCQ2em1HcN4gPvAjCqmmYz5omsfp
1ErMGaLqkmoJCoCXE1Dbwjn1yGD3CPsdF9
1C3dHBqsciQvvsa2c6BUvW9H3U23fy83tT used by klf here (archived): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg16407673#msg16407673
Looks like another ring of alt accounts that were(some still are) in FortuneJack. Yeah. My investigation started from november 2016 tho and they still using the same address
The address was posted by izanagi 2+ years ago. You should PM them and see whether they sold those or not.
One question : What is (') in the Top Contributors table? like Darkstar's and Dustboy's Score.
One possible reason: They had 1 line (in the table) removed/merged for some reason (I don't harm their score when recounting later). Other possible reason: Check post by Chris! |
|
|
|
Everyone who knows me personally knows what I am facing and would certainly frown against this tarnishing of my name.
Don't appeal to emotion/pity (logical fallacy). I still don't see a potential resolution out of this dispute. Why dont you pay the guy whats he's out and just apologize.
I'm not entirely sure what OP wants. They've made some demands, but it doesn't seem like gravitate will comply (e.g. video of peeling). |
|
|
|
|
Why is this being discussed in the SMAS thread? Split it. FYI: I'd trash almost all of those right now.
It's been a quick week over here.
|
|
|
|
I still wonder why the fuck such threads with such title are allowed tho: as far as i can understand we are allowed to insult other users as long as it is motivated and with a critical-constructive tone.
That is correct (allowed if it contains *anything* constructive in it), and I do not know the answer to that.
 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
