I find it bizarre that day trading is still well thought of here. Almost everyone is useless at it and finishes up worse off than how they started.
As long as you're patient enough buying and holding has a far better track record provided that day trading mentality didn't creep in and you FOMO'd buying everything all at once.
|
|
|
Simple. Uncrackable transactions whenever you want. You can't say the same about paper or hot wallets.
However people seem to be far too quick to trust anyone and anything, or not verify at all, and I think there are going to be some hardware wallet scares in the future.
|
|
|
Thread revival time.
1 BTC now has very different connotations compared to the start of the year. We're really starting to get a sniff of a world where 1 BTC is the stuff of dreams, and indeed now it already is for many.
How many people achieved what they wanted?
|
|
|
The only crash so far is the CMOE or whatever website.
|
|
|
It hasn't crashed? I thought Wall St promised this to us.
|
|
|
Hi, I am new to NEM.
As I understood right there is no Inflation. You can harvest by choosing a supernode and get rewards from the transaction fees that the supernode collects by putting transactions in a block.
1. How is the supernode rewarded?
2. If NEM gets more used, do the fees also rise like at BTC?
3. By higher usage the value of the token would also rise. So why should a company use this blockchain, if they have to pay more and more for the usage when NEM gets more popular.
The supernodes are subsidised by a preallocated fund that should last for a few more years. NEM will soon get a huge capacity upgrade so fees will probably never rise above the standard level. If they do then it's a nice problem to have. If the XEM USD price rises then of course the fee costs more, but developers have already reduced the fee once and can again. Companies will use a private version of the NEM chain and there won't be any fees. They will occasionally need to use the main chain but only to transact with other companies.
|
|
|
Are you talking about banks closing accounts of customers who have any links to bitcoin? That is not usually possible, because they probably wouldn't know. It is one thing to find out that a business involves cryptocurrency, another to detect that one transaction of a customer could have a cryptocurrency link. They already have their hands full trying to catch the money trail of terrorists and money launderers.
Yes. I've heard of plenty of cases of it but I think 9.5 times out 10 what's really happening is that they're selling shitloads on Localbitcoins and not telling them. In that scenario it's more the unauthorised use as a business account that pisses them off rather than the Bitcoin bit, but money laundering must be up there too. I've never had any trouble myself but I haven't had any banking interactions with crypto for years now. But this thread is specifically about commercial level banking. That's almost always been unavailable to Brits.
|
|
|
One company that I use happens to pay out with a personal name on the bank account, rather than the company name.
There you go. It's P2P. They can't stop that. Intersango was the biggest UK BTC exchange in the old days. They got their business account by lying to Barlcays about it. They eventually found it and it was game over. The GBP operations like Coinfloor have to bank in Poland.
|
|
|
I'm imagining a future where they is indeed a frenzy over coins, but not our coins. You see people rushing to buy FiatCoin and BOAcoin in their TD Ameritrade account. Meanwhile you are extremely frustrated and going 'omg you idiot that isn't a real coin. that isnt bitcoin. that isnt decentralized. why arent you on our illegal exchange trading real coins? ? havent you ever been in the crypto community or read the whitepaper or know what pki is? [no]'. But all of this just goes completely over their head and they are buying whatever is trending, as always.
Yup. I recently got in on this new thing called the Pound. It's backed by the actual UK government and all the banks and that's going to be announced on the Pound Slack soon. It offers returns of up to 0.75% a year, but don't tell no one and especially don't tell them about the 3-8% inflation bit.
|
|
|
So it's placing trust in third party payment processors and/or third party escrows, neither of which are secure or truly irreversible by our standards.
Um, yeah. It's fiat. Cash or this pretty much.
|
|
|
Are there a list of these brokers? Specifically in the UK?
Try Coinfloor. Their OTC page says it's institutional only but they do private people too. Lots of people seem to have used them. The two biggest are probably Genesis Trading, which is Barry Silbert's operation, and Cumberland Mining. They may well have GBP clients waiting too as it's all case by case. Genesis Trading only do trades above 25 BTC last time I checked. Itbit does a lot of it too.
|
|
|
So it's like doing local bitcoins trades for millions of dollars? If I were bob I wouldn't be comfortable with sending hundreds of coins in return for a suitcase full of funny money. How would he know if it's real money in the suitcase,or if it's funny money?
No. You go to a professional OTC broker who acts as the matchmaker and possibly the escrow too. There are plenty of them. If I ever need to sell then that's straight where I'm heading. Sod exchanges.
|
|
|
No, I think anything that's already been publicly demonstrated can't be patented, so you can't patent Taylor Swift then send her a cease and desist order.
So isn't that the entire crypto market? It's been running around with its knickers on its head in public for years, or are we talking the internal workings? In which case they can demonstrate they've been using them for years too. I'll try with Taylor anyway.
|
|
|
If they cut liquidity in X country, then an exchange just needs to move to Y country, and X country no longer gets a cut from the business operating in X country.
Also, governments have been trying to kill Bitcoin since day one by trying to fork it and overtake Bitcoin's #1 spot with the fork (be it XT, Classic, Unlimited, Cash.. you name it). They have realized that they cannot kill it from the technical aspect, so they will try to be a dominant force in the market. They cannot also simply naked short it to hell, so they will buy it up as much as possible. Get ready for crazy numbers in 2018.
But if that mindset exists why haven't UK banks taken it on? It's one the world's financial centres. There are plenty of other places with little or no regulation where you can bank just fine. You cannot sell lemonade for Bitcoin and maintain a business account in the UK.
|
|
|
What people think BOA patent news means: mass adoption of crypto
What it actually means: Cease and desist orders to all existing crypto exchanges, and either no use of the patent or use for proprietary bank coins
Ah, you're a wee ray of sunshine. I know nothing about patents. How is it possible that something that's been operating for years across the world thousands of times over can suddenly be restricted like this when they had nothing to do with its creation? Can I patent KFC or Taylor Swift and fire them?
|
|
|
I really don't get why they're referencing Kraken. It's not regulated, the USD market is tiny, plus it doesn't really work.
|
|
|
In the UK no crypto business has a bank account. I think this is primarily because there's no regulation so they can't be arsed to try and interpret laws that might bite them on the arse in the future. There's also the likelihood that they don't like crypto too of course.
In other places I assume it's kind of similar yet there are enough places that do have banking.
Many of these banks must now be taking in and sending out billions per year in crypto business. Considering the ball ache and potential future implications, why are they still tolerating it? It's business of course, but there's plenty of other business out there that's less trouble.
Whether we like it or not, Bitcoin and friends at present is largely dependent on company banking. They know perfectly well they can put a lid on it by cutting off bank accounts and your average exchange has no leverage over them. Why isn't it happening more often?
|
|
|
How exactly are you going to do an OTC sale for an "obscene amount of fiat" without exposing yourself to extreme risks?
You go to Genesis Trading or Cumberland Mining who telephones one of their nice clients looking to buy. You deposit your coins with them. Their client pays Genesis Trading. When the money is cleared everyone gets what they want. Plus you get a nice man or woman to hold your hand throughout who won't freeze your arse because you're nothing more than an anonymous reference number on a status page.
|
|
|
Get the feeling we’re marshalling the forces for another big upwards move within the next 48 hours
Gotta love this. I missed that 17,000 dollars price for my monthly allowance. By the way, CBOE tomorrow is cancelled already? One joint said they won't participate in settlement or something. Everyone else is go.
|
|
|
I'm totally fucked at Coinbase. Sitting on an obscene amount of fiat from a recent sale, but don't have access to my Funding/Withdrawal page. Something 'tarded like below is what I'm getting.
Sheeeeeeit.
Why on Earth didn't you do an OTC sale? There's no way I'd trust any exchange with amounts above a few grand. They're too prone to freeze you over AML shite.
|
|
|
|