Ask yourself this again after looking at all the facts and realizing that none of the price growths have ever been real. Everything is artificial, including this recent x2 growth (but to be fair, it was perhaps undervalued too quickly).

Banks are pro RIPPLE technology, not pro XRP token. Be aware of this and understand that their token can still be 0 cents and the tech would be just as great.

For this to be Ripple year, it has to be back at ATH and then some.

Thanks for the reminder! I was sure I got my picks in but I hadn't so all in now for the next 3 weeks.


Wasn't Zaha from United before? I didn't recognize him from his face and I looked him up and he recently complained about being alone in his time at Manchester and was even loaned out after Ferguson bought him. Didn't even realize until I read him up now that he's no longer an England player (how is it possible people switch nationalities like that??).

He reminds me a little bit about guys like Jermain Defoe. Always reliable to score, and always gets bought by teams like Crystal Palace. I thought Benteke would also be that type of striker but good luck to him. I have a small heart for those type of underrated goal scorers.

Hooray, another dice game. Will add this to my list to check out.

But as player above points out: The most important thing for anyone who is putting up a new casino here is this. Proof of funds. Bankrolls are important we all know that and with dice you can lose big but also win big. Once you hit a few big whales trying out their luck on a new site, they will eat up funds at the beginning. We need to know you can survive that!

We are offline betters but we use Telegram. Come on, why would anyone using Bitcoin with good odds and guaranteed payouts want to trust sending money to some guy who has all these claims but cannot prove anything ever? Not even a signed message with lots of fund on an address.

I'm really curious to know if anyone has ever successfully made placings with these guys on the forum, or why they would be looking online without all these proofs. If it was a problem of big money, I would still use other options like SyGambler mentions!

I arrived on the scene last year, and my first alt was Dogecoin (big surprise right) but then after learning more about the different uses and purposes, I was convinced enough to get Monero, of which I am probably the happiest among all my alts, plus also Litecoin, merely for the purpose of fast payments with existing network of merchants.

Did I go for other alts? Yes, I actually invested in two ICOs. Did I go crazy for others? No, but I did buy a handful just to spend a bit of my bitcoin, but BTC at the time as it is today still accounts for more than I guess 70%. I still really like Waves, and even though the Elastic I bought is never coming back up, my hopes for them remain.

Did I also try to get into other alts for speculation? Of course and I made some profits too, but now the ones I entered even Ether this year at $400 are down. Do I believe in them? Only for price. So will they die? Probably, because everyone came into them for profit.

But Monero, Litecoin, those types, they won't die.

Stupid headlines when I saw something in the news feed I thought Pocchetino was getting sacked haha, turns out he was just saying he could face being fired if they lose to Brighton. But if that really happens then we can confirm Tottenham have a really shit board of directors (we are only thinking it not yet confirming it).

Looks like everybody wants to parlay easy wins but I think one or two draws not necessarily upsets can kill a parlay. Too dangerous for me. Southampton might draw to Liverpool. City might stumble after Champions League. Chelsea might hit a blip. Spurs maybe cannot score.

I would choose Brighton +1 handicap.

The best way to deal with game-protect is just to take everything he says with a dash of salt and lots of herbs and spices. He just seems to troll all the threads, seems to talk about legality and especially licensing but actually doesn't really understand the finer points of jurisdictions, and how crypto casinos fit into all that.

@OP thanks for really being active on the discussions here. A lot of important stuff that needs clarification, and really good to see people like you respond, even when there is criticism.

Nice win if you parlayed, what was the payout? I don't think the Sevilla game would have big payout though.

Big difference in level is actually the tricky bit, especially when playing with teams that have no good attacks and who don't score often in normal league games, then you have them just playing passing and defending, very difficult to break down such teams, so you get shock draws.

Rangers nicked their goal to draw, so they got a really good point from their group. They are still average team but Gerrard seems to have made them capable of scoring. 2 goals at Spain is special.

I'm thinking to just grind a lot and then at least get 10k tix from all my rewards, and then by then use my balance to just play dice multiplier and limit losses, just to get free tickets. I already have quite a bit lost from that when I was impatient months ago and busting so now trying to stick to grinding. Meanwhile who knows, I hit with double digit ticks. Just a way to pass the time on mobile to be honest. Don't lose anything and don't expect anything and my life is less stressful!

I know at least two other dice sites with four decimals, and exactly so that you can go for high multipliers/payouts. That's sort of why dice is so popular IMO, the chance to hit it big with such a small bet. Personally never go for max payout except occassionally and I've won x100 a few times but seen plenty of hits of x10k or more. 100 satoshi on autobet hunting for that big payout seems to be popular with regular dicers.

I don't see how 2 decimals can make a big jackpot too. 1 in 10,000 will mean a lot of jackpot hits.

Urgh, I know. This keeps making me feel tempted to go ahead and buy 3000 tickets with my remaining rewards points, stored up since forever. I mean, if a guy can win it with 2 tickets several rounds ago and we keep seeing below 1000 tickets winning the big prizes, I stand a chance right?

But every time I visit the lottery page and see my chance of winning, and I try to multiply by 3000 or so, it's not even 0.1%, so I change my mind haha.

Goes back to grinding rewards points.

I like Crypto-Games investment too, but they also have a minimum, actually, and if you take away your investment before 4 weeks, you lose some penalty for early divest. Much lower minimum I think, but still a minimum.

Invest minimum at Bitvest is the same as Bustadice (0.01 BTC), I see no problems recommending even with high minimum, which makes sense, no fees for divest at any time. Bitvest also lets you do x10 leverage so that's also pretty good but of course if they incur losses, you lose much more. Also, your profit is 0.006 but if you add that to your investment, then you surely have enough? 60% is a lot of profit...

Yeah, among many stupid rules, and I really wish newbies would spend 15 minutes to read ToS of casinos before signing up. I say 15 because it should take 5 minutes but nowadays Casinos put their TOS and conditions all over the place, with different requirements and different conditions for everything. Terrible practice!

Yes, dice is my favorite Bitcoin game, fast, and lets me play really small when I just want to have fun, plus the dice site I advertise shares dividends if they do well, so it's a form of investment too. I'll check out Onehash, thanks for letting me know, perhaps after reading your update on them.

Well, I assumed he came online to complain because he though the pressure would help move his case quickly. And guess what? I was right, he finally came and posted his proof of conversation, and you can see the admin actually uses a Gmail email (!what?!) and then takes the site down later.

Some people also suggest opening an account and asking on Twitter/FB/bitcointalk for support to move faster on exchanges and on casinos, so I see nothing wrong with newbie accounts coming to post a complaint. But you are right on the last point. He should have made his complaint in the official thread AND left a red trust on the 36eyes profile https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2074144

He has even been online 2 days ago.

It was violent misconduct red card, so fair enough. You never pull someone's hair in football, that is only for little boys and girls in the playground and I have only ever seen that in women's football, but let us not go there for being sexist.

What is funny for me is not the hair pulling, everyone who isn't blind to Ronaldo knows he is capable of such things, but that he was complaining about a guy for faking an injury and not getting up. Ronaldo, the serial diver and faker, asking someone to get up by pulling his hair. And the way he still whined and cried, what a brat.

Thank you for your response Ronnie at least we see that you guys are being open about this, and this is exactly what I'm trying to say actually.

You are right, players like me are absolutely never going to sign up at a site that needs KYC. But this means for me, as long as there is the possibility that kyc is required, I am never playing, and I know almost 100% anyone who wouldn't sign up because of KYC at signup, would also never sign up if there would be kyc down the line.

So it is extremely important you make it clear at the site on sign up. So people don't get unfairly "trapped".

What I'm saying is, if they HAVE to enforce KYC, and they know at some point they must, then it is onboarding that KYC should be implemented and not "surprise surprise we need to verify you" after the player decides he wants to withdraw his balance.

I think KYC shouldn't be enforced at all, but if they must because of law, actually I'm pretty sure the law states they must identify their customers whom they are taking money from. So either they have KYC or they don't. And if they do, make it clear from the beginning so that nobody is trapped.

AH! I guess I didn't check their website out recently after all! That's actually... a really really good deal, since I would only get half of that on my own even at maximum value. Thanks for the note and link, I haven't had much luck lately at the normal games, thought I would soon try change that luck with a new and fresh account with nothing to remind me I have lots of BTC losses to "recover".

Will continue PM'ing btcgrinders after I sign up... probably after I end my campaign at CL

I used to think Brazilians weren't really suited for English games, and especially never really successful with type of clubs like Liverpool under attacking managers like Klopp, but then again Firminho isn't really a suitable Brazilian! That kind of celebration was totally worth watching football for, and I don't know if any other team played as well, since it was the only game I watched after my own team was 4-0 last night, and that was the best game I saw from them in a very long time.

Long live Messi!

Everyone and anyone can claim to have funds in their bankroll. But not many casinos actually post the proof of this. We all use Bitcoin, and if the casinos claim they use and support Bitcoin, then providing proof of funds on cold storage wallet is a matter of 5 minutes. Show a signed message from the wallet, make it public, and there are no more doubts.

Anyone can see if funds are moved from the wallet too, so that's one way to build assurance.

Of course it doesn't mean the casino won't just decide to exit scam one day, but that's the risk we all take with exchanges and casinos.