What's dangerous is a room full of people with no idea spouting opinion as factual usefulness. All the hate doesn't mean anything but hate.
Whether or not pedophilia has any usefulness is a conversation that is not possible.
Whether it is possible to be a respectable pedophile is another converstaion that must not be had.
These conversations must never be had, pedophilia must be destroyed by my internet powers!
readmyblog : myawesomeopinion-yetanotherignorantasshole.com/fuckyoupedofile-i-have-a-blog
You could have a direct link here so people don't have to use google. Read the website name again and think about it real hard and you may get the point  |
|
|
|
Shocking Times: Movement for Pedophile “Rights” Marches On: Thread title 100% accurate. Everybody agrees now.
Yep, didn't expect to come out of this thread agreeing with you... this fucking forum.It's OK. You can fight me in another battle, in another thread.  The people fought to say the title was a lie. Then the fought to say the gay lobby was right to distance themselves from nambla. Then the same people said being born gay is a natural thing. Then the next logical step was to not see pedophiles as predators but as "born this way" humans. Then it was: for this to happen, a movement needs to march on, to change people's mind. Hmm... Now in their mind the pedophile defenders are accepting the fact the gay lobby was wrong to reject nambla as part of their minority group, as we are all humans. Not predators.  This is where things go south in your argument. Pedophiles should be seen as potential predators and I don't think many people in this thread disagree with that, but they should also be seen as people that were born with a disorder to make them attracted to kids, and focus on all the possible alternatives you can give since you can't convict somebody on a thought crime. @Yugo, I don't see what your issue is with To Catch a Predator at all. I see it as the same as trying to bait out a potential rapist in a way that the show could show things to look out for. The key is that you wouldn't appear on the show had you not attempted to commit a crime and been caught by the Cyber Watchdog group. It's not just some random guy showing up at the house and getting on TV, they always have extensive chat logs showing the adult knew the victim was underage, many times sending them nude pictures in the chatting process. Like it or not, honeypotting is a completely legal method of catching criminals as long as it doesn't cross the line to entrapment. Also, we have shows like COPS that focus on potential criminals all the time and they are just going off a random call half the time. Simple jedi mind trick by the pedophile defenders: substitute the word "predator" with the word "criminal". The "hunting" done by "predators" is criminal activity so I think predator=criminal is correct.
Shocking Times: Movement for Pedophile=predator=criminal “Rights” Marches OnIt is that simple.
But you can be pedophile without breaking any laws so that isn't correct.
It is that simple.Thank you. Posting my post again to prove your point:
Simple jedi mind trick by the pedophile defenders: substitute the word "predator" with the word "criminal".A - pedophiles are predators
B - having pedophile dreams is not a crime
A - pedophiles should be seen as a threat to children, as predators
B - you cannot criminalize people for having dreams
A - pedophiles are predators dreaming of abusing small children
B - so what, this is not a crime and it should not be
A - are pedophiles predators?
B - no one is defending people abusing children here, but they should have the right not to be seen as sick because they have dreams, just like everyone else.
A - are pedophiles predators?
B - they are not criminalsYou did exactly that. It is that simple. "Simple jedi mind trick by the pedophile defenders: substitute the word "predator" with the word "criminal"." I already said predator=criminal so what does it matter if we replace word "predator" with word "criminal"? |
|
|
|
Shocking Times: Movement for Pedophile “Rights” Marches On: Thread title 100% accurate. Everybody agrees now.
Yep, didn't expect to come out of this thread agreeing with you... this fucking forum.It's OK. You can fight me in another battle, in another thread. The people fought to say the title was a lie. Then the fought to say the gay lobby was right to distance themselves from nambla. Then the same people said being born gay is a natural thing. Then the next logical step was to not see pedophiles as predators but as "born this way" humans. Then it was: for this to happen, a movement needs to march on, to change people's mind. Hmm... Now in their mind the pedophile defenders are accepting the fact the gay lobby was wrong to reject nambla as part of their minority group, as we are all humans. Not predators. This is where things go south in your argument. Pedophiles should be seen as potential predators and I don't think many people in this thread disagree with that, but they should also be seen as people that were born with a disorder to make them attracted to kids, and focus on all the possible alternatives you can give since you can't convict somebody on a thought crime. @Yugo, I don't see what your issue is with To Catch a Predator at all. I see it as the same as trying to bait out a potential rapist in a way that the show could show things to look out for. The key is that you wouldn't appear on the show had you not attempted to commit a crime and been caught by the Cyber Watchdog group. It's not just some random guy showing up at the house and getting on TV, they always have extensive chat logs showing the adult knew the victim was underage, many times sending them nude pictures in the chatting process. Like it or not, honeypotting is a completely legal method of catching criminals as long as it doesn't cross the line to entrapment. Also, we have shows like COPS that focus on potential criminals all the time and they are just going off a random call half the time. Simple jedi mind trick by the pedophile defenders: substitute the word "predator" with the word "criminal". The "hunting" done by "predators" is criminal activity so I think predator=criminal is correct.
Shocking Times: Movement for Pedophile=predator=criminal “Rights” Marches OnIt is that simple. But you can be pedophile without breaking any laws so that isn't correct. It is that simple. |
|
|
|
Shocking Times: Movement for Pedophile “Rights” Marches On: Thread title 100% accurate. Everybody agrees now.
Yep, didn't expect to come out of this thread agreeing with you... this fucking forum.It's OK. You can fight me in another battle, in another thread. The people fought to say the title was a lie. Then the fought to say the gay lobby was right to distance themselves from nambla. Then the same people said being born gay is a natural thing. Then the next logical step was to not see pedophiles as predators but as "born this way" humans. Then it was: for this to happen, a movement needs to march on, to change people's mind. Hmm... Now in their mind the pedophile defenders are accepting the fact the gay lobby was wrong to reject nambla as part of their minority group, as we are all humans. Not predators. This is where things go south in your argument. Pedophiles should be seen as potential predators and I don't think many people in this thread disagree with that, but they should also be seen as people that were born with a disorder to make them attracted to kids, and focus on all the possible alternatives you can give since you can't convict somebody on a thought crime. @Yugo, I don't see what your issue is with To Catch a Predator at all. I see it as the same as trying to bait out a potential rapist in a way that the show could show things to look out for. The key is that you wouldn't appear on the show had you not attempted to commit a crime and been caught by the Cyber Watchdog group. It's not just some random guy showing up at the house and getting on TV, they always have extensive chat logs showing the adult knew the victim was underage, many times sending them nude pictures in the chatting process. Like it or not, honeypotting is a completely legal method of catching criminals as long as it doesn't cross the line to entrapment. Also, we have shows like COPS that focus on potential criminals all the time and they are just going off a random call half the time. Simple jedi mind trick by the pedophile defenders: substitute the word "predator" with the word "criminal". The "hunting" done by "predators" is criminal activity so I think predator=criminal is correct. |
|
|
|
Now a days adsense will ban you for faucet sites
This is not true. Do you have any proof for that? There is still many many faucets with adsense. That few faucets got banned for invalid clicks doesn't mean they are banning all faucets... Adsense banned one* adsense account for invalid clicks, that is your proof for that all faucets are getting banned? (*moonbit.co.in,moonliteco.in,bonusbitcoin.co all had same owner and same single adsense account if you didn't know) I think these faucets were banned because they used too many ads on page. Max allowed is 3 ads per page. Many faucets are still using adsense without problems. Maybe they are lucky, but i believe that if you use 3 ads and have some wrote texts or articles you can enjoy adsense profits without any issue.
I am pretty sure too many ads will get you only warning. And they have said that they got banned for invalid activity. |
|
|
|
User cryptodevil is currently going around every thread in the Gambling section and leaving this BS warning. I think it's redundant because it's the GAMBLING section. If users want to make their own decisions in investing in a site, it should be up to them to do so. They know the risks involved, and the warning is stated boldly across the top of the forums. Well, this guy just entered a thread for a game (click the quote) and threatened everyone involved in that game of getting a negative trust rating. Well, here's the thing. The site he is referencing is in no way shape or form a ponzi, a HYIP, or even a site that accepts investments. It's simply a browser based MMORPG like Mafia Wars or freaking Farmville. If I end up getting negative trust from this idiot, does that mean I will get banned from the sig campaign? I feel like he will give me negative trust just out of spite. If I get negative trust, is there anything I can do to correct it or get it reversed? I don't want some idiot ruining my account over something he has no idea what he's talking about. I encourage you to click on the link in the quote heading below to check out the original thread in which he posted his warning. Public Service Announcement -
This is just another Ponzi Scam
Do Not Invest!
Those who choose to post of their participation
support or encouragement for this scam will
be tagged with negative trust for proving
they wish to help the scammers operate this
Ponzi in return for a share of the funds stolen
from other users. Thereby proving they are not
trustworthy forum members.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
He has changed it now. But this is good example what kind of people here are spamming negative trust to whoever they want to. He is just spamming his warnings without doing any research what he is calling scam... And yes, unfortunately, if someone in default trust doesn't like you they can give you red trust and get you kicked out of this campaign. |
|
|
|
First time I saw that thread the date was wrong and couple minutes after it stunna corrected it but it looks weird since I thought he changed this sentence aswell : Only bets from 9,350,000,000 will count toward this promotion. When first time I read it, I think it was : Only bets from 9,300,000,000 will count toward this promotion. Is that right(stunna changed the min bet id) or I was misreading? Thanks! I think it was 9,300,000,000 before editing too. I may be wrong though but if it was then it is quite unfair for those who made bets before the edit. |
|
|
|
Reserving post doesn't work in this giveaway because edited posts are not allowed! Do not edit. Entry will be taken as final once posted.
|
|
|
|
"Only bets from 9,350,000,000 will count toward this promotion."
Was that edited? I think it was 9,300,000,000 at the time it was first posted. |
|
|
|
Too high minimum requirements for me  Need 1btc wagered and I only have 0.28btc wagered. Oh well, at least I got 0.015btc last giveaway. I think it is easy to wager 1btc since you have wagered 0.28 already. But I think you can join the promo even though you have not wagered 1btc yet, because there is other requirement "25,000 rolls" Have you checked your stats on how many rolls you made so far? No, unfortunately I have only 714 rolls  |
|
|
|
Too high minimum requirements for me Need 1btc wagered and I only have 0.28btc wagered. Oh well, at least I got 0.015btc last giveaway. 1 BTC wagered is nothing. You can just bet 1 BTC using the 99% win rate. Hopefully you won't lose that bet however. Exactly, if I lose it I have lost more than I can get in any giveaways in like 10 years But I guess it is kind of the point with these giveaways. So I am just going to pass this one still. |
|
|
|
|
Washington Wizards 102 @ Cleveland Cavaliers 108
|
|
|
|
Too high minimum requirements for me Need 1btc wagered and I only have 0.28btc wagered. Oh well, at least I got 0.015btc last giveaway. |
|
|
|
|
You can't reserve posts because you are not allowed to edit your entry post.
|
|
|
|
is there any way to set a higher payout threshold  Just go to settings and you should be able to change the withdrawal threshold. |
|
|
|
Right now the title should be the opposite than it is. It is more like people here are demanding more rights to punish pedos. If he can't stop thinking about children then only solution is chemical castration.
Deliberately taking from contexts what you need. I once told this is psychiatric disorder and must be treated. One way how you can help them is that - quote They are not normal people they have psychiatric disorders and they can harm child. They are potential predators and they lurking mainly from internet.. So what it is mental disorder? Autism and sleep disorder caused by caffeine are also mental disorders. That doesn't mean they couldn't live almost completely normal life. And law doesn't work that way someone is potential criminal.
Nobody is criminal until they have committed crime.Isn't it not the case in USA? I'm not sure of course but they don't have the "innocent until proven guilty principle" do they? Yes it is. And it should be. Still people here want to punish people for thinking about kids because "they are potential predators". |
|
|
|
Right now the title should be the opposite than it is. It is more like people here are demanding more rights to punish pedos. If he can't stop thinking about children then only solution is chemical castration.
Deliberately taking from contexts what you need. I once told this is psychiatric disorder and must be treated. One way how you can help them is that - quote They are not normal people they have psychiatric disorders and they can harm child. They are potential predators and they lurking mainly from internet.. So what it is mental disorder? Autism and sleep disorder caused by caffeine are also mental disorders. That doesn't mean they couldn't live almost completely normal life. And law doesn't work that way someone is potential criminal. Nobody is criminal until they have committed crime. |
|
|
|
Shocking Times: Movement for Pedophile “Rights” Marches On: Thread title 100% accurate. Everybody agrees now.
Yep, didn't expect to come out of this thread agreeing with you... this fucking forum. Yeah, I mean what kind of people aren't ready to punish other people for their sick thoughts. Oh you think it's what they reproach us? That we're not ready to punish pedophiles for thinking about kids but only if they actually comit a crime? Damn if that's this... Then I just don't want to live in the same country than them... Right now the title should be the opposite than it is. It is more like people here are demanding more rights to punish pedos. If he can't stop thinking about children then only solution is chemical castration.
|
|
|
|
Shocking Times: Movement for Pedophile “Rights” Marches On: Thread title 100% accurate. Everybody agrees now.
Yep, didn't expect to come out of this thread agreeing with you... this fucking forum. Yeah, I mean what kind of people aren't ready to punish other people for their sick thoughts. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
