Waited for my coins to mature and had my wallet open for 15+ hours. Last night it said 10 minutes until i get the reward. About 6 hours have gone buy and now it say 5 minutes till reward. Is this normal?
maybe you need to try to restart your wallet close and open it back it will do some stake and you will received your rewards. Not sure if this piece of information is of any value but what does this mean. Your weight: 8,336,913 Network weight: 22,507,683 . My weight as been steadily increasing over time do I need to wait for it to reach the full network weight to get my reward? What is your total coins in your wallet? You will stake for sure but it will take sometime if you have very low coins in your wallet. Your weight can go beyond the Network weight but that doesn't mean you will state on estimated time. the staking depends on the number of coins you have against other users on the network. I have 12 thousand coins. I haven't restarted the wallet just yet because I don't want to lose my progress but its now saying 4 minutes until reward after 3 hours have gone by. Mine is doing the same thing. For hours it will count down to 2 minutes..still nothing. I have around 30000 coins. Any ideas? I closed and restarted wallet. No luck. I had my wallet open for 48 hours.. Your coins are too low and you just need to leave your wallet open. Do not close or restart because it wont change anything. I have 15k and since my wallet is open from the beginning, i now stake like twice in 48hrs and sometime when im lucky, i stake in 24hrs. I cant stake continually like someone who has more than 100k. This seems to be a bug or something, and actually I already reported it once some time ago, but dev wasn't interested. Now, look at this image, and let me know if this has anything to do with reality? https://imgur.com/a/CQ17u |
|
|
|
|
Guys, how is that possible that I got 9 confirmations for block that was mined more than 3 hours ago?
Anyone can explain it please...?
|
|
|
|
Copying this one from LIR thread for you guys lol i wasn't aware of this,yes it looks like a complete copy even their signature campaign rates and rules are exactly the same.This is an obvious scam attempt i hope people are smart enough and don't trust a bunch of unknown people who are lacking original ideas and copypasting others. |
|
|
|
After some investigating, it appears Luc send his coins from a forked wallet.. So they never arrived on the correct chain.. Maybe this caused yobit to go in maintenance mode too.. Who knows.. But this is very troublesome and very unfortunate for him.. That said, he did pledge his transaction as he should have.. The funding page did not add the transaction/amount since it was not found in the main chain.. So I will give him a chance to resync and resend the transaction(s).. This will delay the final calculations by ~1 day.. Please be patient and thank you for understanding.. I am just curious if there is a finished wallet for PIO being released soon or are we going to have to do a coin swap in the future?
Just wait until tomorrow, there will be all necessary informations released. Sory to hear that for the wrong chain. But this is Luc's problem. This isn't community problem and I am not agree with your decision. Any change in the ICO rueles affects negatively on the entire platform. You are developer, right but after the end of ICO this platform belongs to the comunity and it is very pity that you're trying to take this serious action with no even ask us. I don't find any problem with the dev decision, someone wanted to invest, he sent his chip and due to technicalities in the block chain, why should we abandon his effort, its not Luc's either, let him get a second chance. There defenetely is a problem which affects each investor. Time of ICO was set earlier and I haven't see serious reason to change it no mater one or many investor have problem with sending funds. I'd agree on allowing this, but only if the coins: (1) were sent out within the time allowed for the round 2 AND (2) were indeed the coins coming from CHIP's main blockchain and not forked coins being produced "out of nowhere" |
|
|
|
After some investigating, it appears Luc send his coins from a forked wallet.. So they never arrived on the correct chain.. Maybe this caused yobit to go in maintenance mode too.. Who knows.. But this is very troublesome and very unfortunate for him.. That said, he did pledge his transaction as he should have.. The funding page did not add the transaction/amount since it was not found in the main chain.. So I will give him a chance to resync and resend the transaction(s).. This will delay the final calculations by ~1 day..
Please be patient and thank you for understanding..
I'm not sure if this is fair. If forked wallet was used then it's forked CHIP and not the one that was used for ICO, right? How are you going to determine that the CHIP sent from forked wallet is the same CHIP coming from the coin's main blockchain? This is similar to ETH/ETC, isn't it? I think you dont undertand the issue "forked" here.. After a complete resync on the correct chain, his coins will be there in his wallet.. Since they we're never sent on the correct chain.. This is something completely different then ETH/ETC lol  Ok then. My understanding was: forked wallet means a wallet working on forked chain. Be precise next time please. People are hypersensitive now with all this ETH/ETC mess |
|
|
|
After some investigating, it appears Luc send his coins from a forked wallet.. So they never arrived on the correct chain.. Maybe this caused yobit to go in maintenance mode too.. Who knows.. But this is very troublesome and very unfortunate for him.. That said, he did pledge his transaction as he should have.. The funding page did not add the transaction/amount since it was not found in the main chain.. So I will give him a chance to resync and resend the transaction(s).. This will delay the final calculations by ~1 day..
Please be patient and thank you for understanding..
I'm not sure if this is fair. If forked wallet was used then it's forked CHIP and not the one that was used for ICO, right? How are you going to determine that the CHIP sent from forked wallet is the same CHIP coming from the coin's main blockchain? This is similar to ETH/ETC, isn't it? |
|
|
|
Why would you ask if I'm part of the team?  just trying to clarify the ico for others. The cheapest coins will actually be on the first day at 7500/btc then falls to 5000 the rest of the first week. I remember the old days when people used to complain about 10% premines, this is on quite a different level.  Just asking if you are part of the team. Looking at the "Team" on the http://decent.ch/about/#team, there's like loads of Advisors & Ambassadors & only 1 Developer. The 50% bonus on day 1 is out of this world. And indeed, from old days people are already complaining & accusing scam when the dev has 10% premine. But so far that level has not yet reached this thread. Maybe the "Decent Team" can tell how many is the total DECENT tokens. And how much they intend to raise to call it a successful ICO and proceed with whatever plans in the Roadmap & deliver whatever promises they make. Thanks for the comments. We have a longterm vision we want to achieve. The goal is to fundamentally transform content distribution in e-books, music and video industries by introducing new products and integrating DECENT Network into existing ones. 35M DCT that belong to DECENT Foundation are going to be used only according to specific milestones. More details about DCT distribution, total number of DCT, DECENT Development Plan & Roadmap will follow up soon. Dev Plan will contain specific scenarios discussing various amounts of raised funds and goals & achievements of DECENT Foundation, respectively. We will keep updated this thread. Thanks! Would be good to have all the very basic info before bounty compaigns are started, ex: -Initial total number of coins -More info on proof-of-retrievability and proof-of-delivery -POS model - elaborate more on this "This is based on the stake of space/time ratio provided by publishers (“miners”) and their CPU time spent by distributing keys." from your whitepaper... please |
|
|
|
0.000165 BTC/PIO?
0.00016582 BTC/PIO 6030.53009883 PIO for 1 BTC @Banzai: what are you gonna do with the collected CHIP? |
|
|
|
Total BTC collected so far: 30,96068805 BTC (19,86478692 BTC + 11,09590113 CHIP) Current PIO price is 0,00016295 BTC, or 6136,814521 PIO for 1 BTCDeposited CHIPs are staking indeed  Where did you find PIO price?  Calculated it Well, it's rather value of 1 PIO based on the current ICO figures. The price will be determined after hitting exchange(s) |
|
|
|
Total BTC collected so far: 30,96068805 BTC (19,86478692 BTC + 11,09590113 CHIP) Current PIO price is 0,00016295 BTC, or 6136,814521 PIO for 1 BTCDeposited CHIPs are staking indeed |
|
|
|
|
Username: tomkat
Rank: Full Member
Current number of posts: 193
|
|
|
|
@tomkat http://blockpioneers.info/shares/project.php#pioneersharesDistribution Model
Example - Round one raises 70 BTC in share offering. Distribution will be 70% PioneerShares for Bitcoin investors, and 30% PioneerShares for Chipcoin investors.
and Share Offering
A total of 190 000 shares will be held for public sale. 10 000 for promotion campaign. You can invest using Bitcoin in round one, and Chipcoin in round two. The Chipcoin marketcap is pegged at 30 BTC (average price) during this share offering.
What makes you believe to conclude that (average price) during this share offering means 300 base??? Please quote Banzai where het sets the base for chipcoin of 300. OK, but what if CHIP price will be changing significantly?
Don't you think the fixed CHIP/BTC ratio should be defined explicitly?
There had to be drawn a line at some height.. So I choose for the avarage trading price of 300 Satoshi.. If the price goes higher because of round two, I will not change the set price. That would be unfair for people in round one.. This is not a swap, but an investment opportunity for both rounds.. There is no telling at this point how many coins will be collected in round two.. or what will happen with the markets.. So, 300 sats is official fixed exchange ratio for CHIP/BTC in round 2, correct...? 100% Correct.. On another note, the holding in chipcoin is very strong.. and long term visioned for most of the people involved.. The ones who do invest, will probably continue that vision in PIO |
|
|
|
NOOOOOOOOOO Been having really bad luck, missing all these deadlines  I don't know how I feel about buying in with CHIP so someone can exit with a profit, only to risk it on an unknown ICO...the whole 'shares calculated at the end of funding' idea hasn't worked out in the past for me. Can someone explain how this 'CHIP pegged @ 300 sat' works? What is this in regards to (seeing as the price on exchange can't be fixed) Basically the crowdfunding price is 300 sats. If you buy below 300 on Yobit, then you have a discount, ex.: 1000 CHIP * 200 sats (bought on Yobit) = 0.002 BTC, but your stake on PIO ICO will be 1000 CHIP * 300 sats = 0.003 BTC I would say it is wrong calculation at all. We have no base price, the first part was set in round 1, it will contain 70% of shares (btc part ) and 30% chipcoin part. This is very simple calculation: 19.86478692 btc = 70% of full amount of shares. X amount of chipcoins = 30% Example with 1.000.000 chipcoins 70% + 30% 100% 19.86478692+(19,86478692/70*30)=28.378267028571428571428571428571 btc What is the max. purchase price for this example (unrealistic, more than 1 Mio. will be pledged, please make your own calculations) (28.378267028571428571428571428571-19.86478692)/1000000=8.51348019e-6 => 0.00000851 btc/chip This means that in theory if only 1 Mio. will be pledged, share worth of the chipcoin part would 851 satoshi, not 300. @Banzai I know it is staking coin and I supposed from beginn on that theree will be no stakes, I was not sure, but like you say, the amount of stakes is not significant to the amount. You mentioned the problem and if everybody would stake until last second, this would be chaos, thats why I transfered from start on. As Skembe mentioned it and I understand his frustration, I am ok with it if he receives my stakes because this could indeed make changes to decision if somebody assumed there will be no stakes. Not sure what are you calculating above, and also not sure what's Banzai's methodology for the final calculation, but I think it should be like this: PIO Price (BTC) = (Total amount in 1st round (BTC) + Total amount in 2nd round (Chipcoin expressed in BTC; 300 satoshi per CHIP) ) / 190000 example (for the current figures) PIO price = (19.86478692 + 874445.37 * 0.00000300) / 190000 = (19.86478692 + 2.62333611) / 190000 = 22.48812303 / 190000 = 0.00011835 BTC Thats why I say, everybody should make own calculations and not such simple one like we both calculated, because they can't tell us anything about real price. In your calculation you set the price to 300 satoshi because during the start it was the price, I calculated the worth of chipcoins in btc for the whole amount btc+chipcoins where I set amount of chipcoins to X and assume there will be pledged max of 1. Mio. Knowing that shares will be spreaded 70/30, I know the value of 70 and of 30 because we know the value of 70. Where at the end you get how much worth is chipcoin in btc in form of an share. The more coins will be pledged, the less the will be. On btc value there will be no changes. Look at bigger wallets and make your own assumptions of how much could be pledged, then you will know more. If you speak about base 300, you should have spoken about max 500, but you did not This phrase is very wrong you set the price to 300 satoshi because during the start it was the pricebecause 300 satoshi is fixed BTC/CHIP exchange rate set by Banzai. This price will be used when caculating BTC amount in round 2 [Edit] 70/30 distribution was just example for 70 BTC in round 1, and 30 BTC in CHIP equivalent (maximum allowed) in round 2 |
|
|
|
NOOOOOOOOOO Been having really bad luck, missing all these deadlines I don't know how I feel about buying in with CHIP so someone can exit with a profit, only to risk it on an unknown ICO...the whole 'shares calculated at the end of funding' idea hasn't worked out in the past for me. Can someone explain how this 'CHIP pegged @ 300 sat' works? What is this in regards to (seeing as the price on exchange can't be fixed) Basically the crowdfunding price is 300 sats. If you buy below 300 on Yobit, then you have a discount, ex.: 1000 CHIP * 200 sats (bought on Yobit) = 0.002 BTC, but your stake on PIO ICO will be 1000 CHIP * 300 sats = 0.003 BTC I would say it is wrong calculation at all. We have no base price, the first part was set in round 1, it will contain 70% of shares (btc part ) and 30% chipcoin part. This is very simple calculation: 19.86478692 btc = 70% of full amount of shares. X amount of chipcoins = 30% Example with 1.000.000 chipcoins 70% + 30% 100% 19.86478692+(19,86478692/70*30)=28.378267028571428571428571428571 btc What is the max. purchase price for this example (unrealistic, more than 1 Mio. will be pledged, please make your own calculations) (28.378267028571428571428571428571-19.86478692)/1000000=8.51348019e-6 => 0.00000851 btc/chip This means that in theory if only 1 Mio. will be pledged, share worth of the chipcoin part would 851 satoshi, not 300. @Banzai I know it is staking coin and I supposed from beginn on that theree will be no stakes, I was not sure, but like you say, the amount of stakes is not significant to the amount. You mentioned the problem and if everybody would stake until last second, this would be chaos, thats why I transfered from start on. As Skembe mentioned it and I understand his frustration, I am ok with it if he receives my stakes because this could indeed make changes to decision if somebody assumed there will be no stakes. Not sure what are you calculating above, and also not sure what's Banzai's methodology for the final calculation, but I think it should be like this: PIO Price (BTC) = (Total amount in 1st round (BTC) + Total amount in 2nd round (Chipcoin expressed in BTC; 300 satoshi per CHIP) ) / 190000 example (for the current figures) PIO price = (19.86478692 + 874445.37 * 0.00000300) / 190000 = (19.86478692 + 2.62333611) / 190000 = 22.48812303 / 190000 = 0.00011835 BTC |
|
|
|
NOOOOOOOOOO Been having really bad luck, missing all these deadlines I don't know how I feel about buying in with CHIP so someone can exit with a profit, only to risk it on an unknown ICO...the whole 'shares calculated at the end of funding' idea hasn't worked out in the past for me. Can someone explain how this 'CHIP pegged @ 300 sat' works? What is this in regards to (seeing as the price on exchange can't be fixed) Basically the crowdfunding price is 300 sats. If you buy below 300 on Yobit, then you have a discount, ex.: 1000 CHIP * 200 sats (bought on Yobit) = 0.002 BTC, but your stake on PIO ICO will be 1000 CHIP * 300 sats = 0.003 BTC so it is better to buy first from yobit then send it to crowdfunding and it will still works? i have 1k chips from yobit can i send it directly to crowdfunding? thanks for the info. Yes, it will work, and you can send directly from yobit. You'll need to put "yobit" in the tx id field on your ICO page because Yobit doesn't provide tx id. OR you can download CHIP wallet (+ bootstrap file), send from Yobit to your wallet address, and then to your ICO address. This will give you some more control and tx id. |
|
|
|
NOOOOOOOOOO Been having really bad luck, missing all these deadlines I don't know how I feel about buying in with CHIP so someone can exit with a profit, only to risk it on an unknown ICO...the whole 'shares calculated at the end of funding' idea hasn't worked out in the past for me. Can someone explain how this 'CHIP pegged @ 300 sat' works? What is this in regards to (seeing as the price on exchange can't be fixed) Basically the crowdfunding price is 300 sats. If you buy below 300 on Yobit, then you have a discount, ex.: 1000 CHIP * 200 sats (bought on Yobit) = 0.002 BTC, but your stake on PIO ICO will be 1000 CHIP * 300 sats = 0.003 BTC |
|
|
|
... Round one is officially over! Thank you all who participated in this round.. Amazing support! Final Balance Round One: 19.86478692 BTC!Round Two will start within 24 hours! We are working on the back end to switch over Congratulations, great results for round 1! Everyone who missed out, there's still a chance to invest during round 2 using Chipcoin: https://yobit.net/en/trade/CHIP/BTC (While the price is still low..)More information about round 2: http://blockpioneers.info/shares/Remember that exchange price for Chipcoin in round 2 is fixed at 300 sats |
|
|
|
Can you confirm I can directly transfer chipcoins from exchange to ICO address? OR I'll need private keys at some point during the ICO?
You should know, it's generally not a good idea to send coins from an address you can't sign from. I don't want to hold ChipCoins, so if there's no need to use private key during ICO, then I just don't want to bother with ChipCoin wallet, sync of blockchain (quite big btw), and all this stuff... |
|
|
|
|
Can you confirm I can directly transfer chipcoins from exchange to ICO address? OR I'll need private keys at some point during the ICO?
|
|
|
|
Poloniex off line Deposit and Withdraw???
message: Temporarily Disabled
I was about to highlight the same. Anyone knows why? And how long this will last? +1 Is it routine poloniex maintenance or they have any issues with LISK chain? If they have issues they would have announced it. I think this is just maintenance and this happens from time to time. It is nothing to get worried. Poloniex is a good and honest exchange. Quote from Rise slack -- alty [7:43 AM] @channel: There seems to have been a fork that happened over one hour ago. It will explain why online wallet is down. Justin has been notified, thanks for patience until we get this fixed! --- Not sure if it applies to Lisk but Rise uses the same code right? Maybe it's coincidence, but who knows... Edit: another one from Rise slack --- aetsen [7:45 AM] Just on the delegates. A known issue in Rise, Lisk and Crypti. Once it is resolved it will be like any transactions people tried to make never happened. Bittrex is still working for internal transactions. [7:46] The web wallet is down as well so it shouldn't be an issue. JD will just have to rebuild the delegates databases. ---- |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
