I was at Bosnia fighting Muslims 1993-1994 and we had sort of camp for their POW near Mostar (Heliodrom). I was talking with some of them and few Wahhabi extremists told me if they were killed by woman, they dont get those 72 bitches at afterlife. Most of Muslims we fought dont have clue about that so i guess that could be only Wahhabis belief. One of them told me even they dont go to heaven if that happen but i could misunderstand him, he was member of Mujahid brigade (foreign, did not talk local language) and his English was very bad.
I am glad you made it out of that conflict okay. Basically it looks like the "72 virgins" thing is just one school of thought. This is interesting, from Slate.com. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/recycled/2010/03/honey_im_dead.htmlA female suicide bomber detonated a vest filled with explosives at a university in Baghdad Sunday, killing more than 40 people. If male martyrs can expect to find 72 virgin maidens in paradise when they die, what rewards can female suicide bombers expect? Their husbands. The Quran itself describes little about the specifics of the afterlife, but it does note that believers will find huris, or maidens "of modest gaze, whom neither man nor jinni will have touched before them." (Every believer can end up in heaven; martyrs just get there faster.) Respected commentator Al-Tirmidhi said in a hadith that every man will have six dozen huris in heaven, but very few commentators enumerated the rewards for women. Ninth-century scholar Al-Tabarani did argue that women will be reunited with their husbands in the next world, and those who had multiple husbands can pick the best one to be their eternal spouse. (Other commentators added that a woman who never married can marry any man she wants in paradise.) From the 9th through the 12th centuries, Muslim scholars described paradise as a place of sensual delights—for men. They debated whether men remained married to their wives in heaven, whether they could have sex with the virgins, and whether the heavenly virgins had anuses. (Some said there was no need for elimination in the afterlife.) There was even disagreement on the number of virgins assigned to each man. While Al-Tirmidhi said it was 72, Mulla Ali Qari, an 11th-century imam, counted 70 virgins and two human wives. Imam Al-Bayhaqi was more generous, granting men 500 wives, 4,000 virgins, and 8,000 previously married women. The meaning of the word hur is also open to interpretation, since it reads as "white raisins" when translated as a Syriac rather than Arabic word. Women may not get these particular perks, but religious commentaries argue that paradise will make them beautiful, happy, and without jealousy. The fact that they fasted and worshipped Allah during their earthly lives will also make them superior to the virgins, who only exist in heaven. Some modern clerics argue that in heaven, husbands never grow bored of their wives, even with so many huris around. That may explain why some would-be female suicide bombers have spoken of becoming "chief of the 72 virgins, the fairest of the fair." |
|
|
|
Trump has not healty ideas and i think he is not normal
Maybe maybe not. But I suggest actually read his ideas, then decide. |
|
|
|
Germans have that WW2 complex so they are now extreme liberals and care for every bumpkin from around globe who get there and ask help. I just hope they will eventually get over that and start to use sane brain before those goatfuckers destroy German culture and country. How do you know they are goatfuckers? Are you there when they goatfucking? Or are you a goat and they fucked you? Now go back to your hole squirrel. This is a case of, as they say... "Don't ask, don't tell." |
|
|
|
But what woman wants to go fight ISIS. Oh thats right, a mentally retarded one.
These women fighters are not retarded. They are very courageous and doing the fighting when even some of the males are fleeing from it. The retarded ones are the female recruits from Western Europe (there are hundreds of them, according to the media reports), who end up as the concubines of the ISIS fighters. HIV positive in a month, no doubt. |
|
|
|
.... The bolded areas that PrikiNo.1 has in his post come from a different post of mine. Rather than using the "Quote" button to quote me, he simply copies, pastes and bolds pieces of my post into his post. I don't know why, but that is his way, I guess.  Okay, that's great. Two moldly old book freaks arguing. |
|
|
|
And then you conclude that the only fix is World Fascist Eco Totalitarianism? So that's your only choice? Our current system or a Fascist Totalitarism?  Cause I never said so, I just said that our current economic system is so dumb than even a child can understand it doesn't work... Yeah, you are right. I'll retract "bumbling idiots" and replace it with something like "corrupt manipulators." And there are other possible future outcomes than WFET, but that's the direcion these guys seem to be drifting.... Yeah much better description of our governments  In my country (I'm French btw) all the media and politics are like "omg nobody goes voting, fascist political parties are going up and up wtf people? Why?" Why? Well if our votes had the slightest impact maybe we'd do something xD that's why only extremists parties appeared as a solution... And France is just one country, the whole world is going this direction. I just regret people choose fascism, I prefer the left wing. Personal point of vew though. Lol, don't forget Fascism .... "National Socialism...." birds of a feather, it seems. But more to your point some historian once noted that significant social change, such as "revolution," was the work of tiny, militant minorities. I think that is true, objectively. According to Noam Chomsky, the democratic process isn't working efficiently, unless it's "managed, and guided" by the proper propaganda. According to him, that's when socialism is at its best. But there's nothing "liberal" about socialism as we're seeing it emerge in the last decade. In the USA, during the years of Obama, the perception-ordered-from-up-high of Libertarianism, was that it was not "Left," but "Far Right." Go figure. |
|
|
|
There are a lot of people who speak about the light without talking about Christ. You have asked me two questions here. Yet you have not said that you accept Jesus salvation as the Bible states it. You keep on wanting teasing me with questions while not making a statement.
Besides, the admonition was really rhetorical, anyway, regarding you personally.I am the Light and Christ is the same meaning mate! Sometimes I mix my words and maybe that's why people think that I don't accept the same thing that I speak, but don't worry I am able to solve that problem when someone ask me. All I am trying to tell you is the meaning behind the words of Christ and his Apostles! What is a level of consciousness? Why would one want to be more conscious that he is when he is conscious? If there is something in the idea of being conscious that you like, then go for it.Why not? Well, I definitely suggest you to watch the Matrix and try to find the difference between the material and the spiritual world. Christ was trying to teach is in His words, that we need to stop loving this world and embrace each other! One does not need a special level of consciousness to believe in Jesus salvation.Oh my God... Did I must repeat my self again? - Jesus Christ was that High level of consciousness, His words, acts, and miracles. He was telling us that we able to that only if we believe in HIM! So why did those must old so called "holy books" not need to bold key sentences? |
|
|
|
Idealistic point of view if I may... Problem being that not respecting the agreement and not doing any kind of effort to reduce pollution will give a strong concurential advantage. Imagine everyone respects the agreement and tries to reduce its country pollution. Then it needs only ONE government in ONE country to say "just fuck off, climate change is just a Chinese invention" (I'm not aiming anyone ) and the incredible advantages it will get will lead the whole world to get back to our current status. Not polluting means less consuming means less growth means more problem in our capitalistic and liberal countries. The only way we can save earth is first by finding an economic system that is sustainable, and not just based on an absurd theory of infinite growth in a finite universe. You mean, that these Astute World Leaders are bumbling idiots about basic economic theory that any woman in a supermarket knows? And then you conclude that the only fix is World Fascist Eco Totalitarianism? How about that. "bumbling idiots"? I don't understand why you're saying that. These "Astute World Leaders" are the same that are financing their election campaigns with shady funds, that are sending their own people to war without even asking for their consent first. The same that are allowing the wealth gap to become larger and larger. The same that allow banks to rule the market by letting them spend more than 10 times the money they actually have, then give them money back when they go bankroute. I don't think they're stupid, I think they don't have the same interest than us. And that it would be stupid to count on them. And then you conclude that the only fix is World Fascist Eco Totalitarianism?[/quote] So that's your only choice? Our current system or a Fascist Totalitarism? Cause I never said so, I just said that our current economic system is so dumb than even a child can understand it doesn't work... [/quote] Yeah, you are right. I'll retract "bumbling idiots" and replace it with something like "corrupt manipulators." And there are other possible future outcomes than WFET, but that's the direcion these guys seem to be drifting.... |
|
|
|
Can we just kick Donald Trup out of the country, because what he said to the people is so hate full with his fake hair.
Seriously I want just to hit his face. With a bat or something this man is just stupid. Well I hope America will have good president.
dont get me wrong, i think donald would make a terrible country, but he is smart. hes exploiting the xenophobia that has bred in the USA for the past decade ever since the 9/11 attacks. what better way to get votes from gun toting 'murican citizens than shout hate on all those pesky muslim terrorists? it might give him a bad image with the part of the population that has common sense, but it sure does get him a lot of votes with xenophobic sheep. I would seriously suggest looking at the details of his various proposals for dealing with Mexican illegals and the Muslim incoming. See if they are so full of hate and xeophobic as the propaganda from the Left would have you believe. https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/immigration-reform |
|
|
|
The culture of these women celebrates life, and the knowledge of eternal redemption...but at some point, you just have to look evil in the eye, realize some just have no redemption and squash it. While interesting and noteworthy, these ladies are less than a drop in the bucket needed to eradicate the evil that is radical islam...bolstered by the left, it will feed off their naivete, devour their useful idiots and spread like a cancer. I'm not sure the west, and the liberal enlightenment, has the will to confront this corrosion.
Many times before, fools have peered across the world at the idle and frivolous West, and thought to conquer it. Thought that it would be easy, given their own inner strength and convictions, which unknownst to them was no more than groupthink. They seem to just need to find out the hard way. |
|
|
|
Remember one major thing. The only reason that nations which have gun control don't completely make slaves out of their people is, American still have guns. If those gun-controlled nations made formal slaves of their people, their people would see the freedom in having guns real clearly. They would get guns and collapse their nations. In other words, gun freedom in America is keeping the world free. Other countries are worried about gun violence in the US when they should be worried about horrific incidents that are happening to children in Sudan. The fact the Asia countries are the worst for human trafficking and violence against children. China is a fine one to talk while their people are enslaved in a communistic regime. While the women in Arab countries are enslaved in a culture that is so outdated that it is almost unbelievable. There are atrocities everywhere just not in the US. People who live in glass houses should not be throwing stones Agree with both of you. Guns keep America free. In countries where guns are not allowed, citizens are totally subordinate to the state. Sudanese, Chinese and Saudis are all slaves of the state. Like it or not, pro gun control or against gun control, it's the American people who have the ability, by carrying weapons, to stop Islamic terrorists as well as other types. And they are going to do it. http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/12/08/florida-sheriff-wayne-ivey-only-thing-stops-bad-guy-gun-good-guy-gun |
|
|
|
Idealistic point of view if I may... Problem being that not respecting the agreement and not doing any kind of effort to reduce pollution will give a strong concurential advantage. Imagine everyone respects the agreement and tries to reduce its country pollution. Then it needs only ONE government in ONE country to say "just fuck off, climate change is just a Chinese invention" (I'm not aiming anyone ) and the incredible advantages it will get will lead the whole world to get back to our current status. Not polluting means less consuming means less growth means more problem in our capitalistic and liberal countries. The only way we can save earth is first by finding an economic system that is sustainable, and not just based on an absurd theory of infinite growth in a finite universe. You mean, that these Astute World Leaders are bumbling idiots about basic economic theory that any woman in a supermarket knows? And then you conclude that the only fix is World Fascist Eco Totalitarianism? How about that. |
|
|
|
Religion can't hate people.
Only people have capacity to love, or hate someone else.
I don't think that is right to hate other people because of different religion, race, nationality but it's still our reality today, unfortunately.
Still, I don't think that we can blame any religion or ideology for it.
People are individuals persons and each of us decide every day our actions, to love or to hate others.
Religion can't exist without people. Hate can't exist without people. So can't love, war, or judging other... people. No human concept, ideas or a belief can be divorced from the fabric of mankind as one needs another human to accept or reject what one stand for. A religion is a set of codes. You follow the codes or you do not. "Religion can't hate people" you say. Can faith? I have definitely seen my dogs exhibit the emotion of hate and love. And I think this is well established fact. So why should I believe any further this logic, when premises are flat wrong? |
|
|
|
Trump for mankind! There's only one Trump Lol really? No mankind will try to ban other mankind from entering into his country.... Really? What planet do you live on? |
|
|
|
WASHINGTON — Six years ago, President Obama came away from a round of global climate talks bitter and frustrated, having been reduced to personally chasing other world leaders around a Copenhagen conference center and bursting uninvited into a meeting with them to salvage a pact that left many disappointed. On Saturday, Mr. Obama strode triumphantly into the Cabinet Room of the White House to declare victory in his quest for an ambitious climate agreement, after 195 nations reached an accord in a Paris suburb that commits them to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. “We met the moment,” Mr. Obama said. “Together, we’ve shown what’s possible when the world stands as one.” For Mr. Obama, the agreement represents a legacy-shaping success, destined to join his health care law in the annals of his most lasting achievements. The deal, reached after two weeks of intensive negotiating by world leaders and top diplomats, is a vindication of Mr. Obama’s decision to make tackling climate change a centerpiece of his second term. As the economy improved and Mr. Obama was able to focus on other priorities, he invested substantial time, energy and political capital on forging a pact that he has described as a moral imperative. It also reflects difficult lessons Mr. Obama learned about diplomacy and global leadership along the way. In Copenhagen, he was a first-term president meeting “the stark reality of just how complicated and fractured this issue was on the global stage,” a senior administration official said on Saturday. Mr. Obama’s experience there “underscored that if we were going to make real progress on this, we were going to have to be patient and develop a strategy” both at home and globally. The president, the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the issue candidly, “deliberately and ambitiously pushed the envelope on climate.” And on Saturday, Mr. Obama said the Paris agreement had been possible in large part because he had done so. This year, he issued regulations to slash carbon pollution from power plants, and last year he forged an emissions reduction agreement with President Xi Jinping of China that encouraged other nations to set their own climate goals. <<Blahblah blah praise illegal actions of dwarf president>> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/us/president-obama-once-a-guest-now-a-leader-in-world-talks.html?ref=world&_r=0In other news, the Great Earth herself refuses to dance to the tune of wannabe fascists and Earth Controllers, and for the twentieth year, refused to warm as the fools prophesied. |
|
|
|
The ISIS barbarians are surrounded from all the four sides. If the civilians were not there, then I'd have advocated blasting the entire place with Napalm or White Phosphorus. The Shiite militia must make sure that not a single Jihadi escapes from Ramadi alive. Don't take any captives. Just shoot them and then burn their bodies or throw the corpses into the sewage.
Something like the Nurenburg trials seems warranted for ISIS. For every single last one of them. Let that play on the media for five years. |
|
|
|
Why does everyone abroad think to have a say about the election of the US president?!
We are only voicing our opinions about the candidates and their policies. Unlike the Americans, we are not taking part in the "forced regime change" (Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen.... and at least 60 other countries). And foreigners are especially interested this time, because a win for Billary in 2016 would mean World War III. Do a lot of people think that? If so, why? I have my own opinions but am curious about the international take on Hillary. From my travels, I know how devout Europe was to Obama, how wrongly they perceived him. But it does seem that Hillary is far more transparently ridiculous, and not a choice even for a solid socialist. |
|
|
|
...so what happens when it keeps getting colder? Like I said, this is to help fund a world government.
I'm genuinely surprised you ask this question. We all know that when it keeps getting colder, this means that more of that excess heat is being bottled up deep in the ocean. And this is scary stuff, really scary stuff. Because it means that when the pressure cooker blows up, it is that much more powerful. Doubleplusgood, don't forget that when it keeps getting colder for you, three other places are getting hotter. See? You think the absence of the problem invalidates the problem, when in fact the absence of the problem is, as every person with some understanding of science knows, absolute proof of the problem. I belong on reddit.... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
