LoyceV: Coins are minted **Talks jibbrish ** bla bla I like how you refer to me several times, but resort to "bla bla" the moment you can't use my post for your crusade. |
|
|
|
The same as for xhomerx10 This one strikes me as odd: I trust him to make deals with because without knowing me at all, has designed me an avatar in a totally disinterested way and without asking for anything in return. What do you think about it? It doesn't make sense to me to trust someone in a deal that hasn't happened yet, just because he made an avatar. For the record: I have no reason not to trust xhomerx10.I visited loyce.club to see if the trust had been updated (I see it hasn't yet) It's updated now. I have to tell you that I find it a bit difficult to navigate. Once you go into the folder, can you search for users with any command or do you have to go through them one by one until you find the one you want? On the latest Trust list overview, just use CTRL-F to find a user. Or this: I usually click " Trust list" to jump from one user's Trust list to another (within the same week). I don't know if you have somewhere an explanation about loyce.club for dummies. Are they ftp files? I never got to add some (long planned) design to loyce.club, so it's still mainly about raw data. Maybe [overview] LoyceV's useful data on Bitcointalk helps a bit.
I have two positive feedbacks to ~ for being scam and spam fighters. To me that fact gives me confidence if I were to trade money with them For $200, sure, but for larger amounts: being a scam fighter doesn't mean much. I've seen "scam fighters" turn into scammers the moment they had the chance. There's one in particular I have in mind, I think he defaulted on a several Bitcoin loan, but I can't remember his name (and I searched for a long time). |
|
|
|
Most did, I think chipmixer did accept one or two and Bestchange too. Hhampuz is my biggest export, he takes them every now and then. I groom and make them exportable lol. During the short time I ran signature campaigns, my best users were always the first ones to get swooped by a campaign with better rates too. It's basically the same as any job/employee IRL  |
|
|
|
Would you join one of lightlord's campaigns? No, I wouldn't join it (and even rejected managing the campaign because of the low payments for participants, which means I wouldn't be able to get quality posters). But if the campaign I'm in wouldn't pay for a week, I wouldn't leave either. And I can imagine that week could get longer and longer next time without leaving. It is also possible that lightlord collects some kind of interest on people's money. I highly doubt that. Some would not be accepted in other campaigns, as they themselves admit: That was (more or less) my point: the participants don't leave despite the late payments, they trust they'll get it eventually, and they have no other options anyway. Kinda sad though. The 777coin and Bitvest.io campaigns have been accused several times of being full of shitposters. I wouldn't say as much, but it's clear that campaigns that pay 150 per post in the lowest tier are not going to be full of top quality posters. Those signatures usually mean I don't consider the post worth reading. I don't know if LoyceV is saying that we should change the feedbacks if people don't have left That's up to you, I didn't tag him myself. So, I don't think we can take the fact of whether or not the current participants leave the campaign as a reference for Lightlord's trust. In that case, assuming they're all just shitposters, getting rid of the campaign altogether would be better for the forum. I have even requested to recreate thread, reduce members and make the campaign more productive It's not entirely on you, at a certain pay rate you can only get certain quality. You think you're better than them, the campaign has produced quite some high quality member that I'm pretty sure if the payment was on time they'll still be with us. Did the high quality members leave for a campaign with a better pay rate? |
|
|
|
The matter is resolved for now, but that doesn't mean it won't happen again. If you read carefully, most of those ratings still apply. It remains to be seen whether lightlord will change his business practices on this forum. As suchmoon wrote in his review, "Pretty much the definition of high risk". Question for CryptopreneurBrainboss: Once the campaigns continue, can you post here how many people left because of the late payments? I don't expect many of them to have left, and in that case I assume they don't consider lightlord to be high risk. |
|
|
|
I like how you compare it to gift cards: blindmixer works similar to a gift card provider. Instead of gift cards, blindmixer provides you with coins, which you can trade for bitcoin. However, instead of taking a fee when conversing, as most gift card providers do, blindmixer will once in a while reclaim all the "dead" gift cards (coins) which have yet to be used. This allows us to run all of our services at cost, which provides clients with the lowest possible fees. This is done by rolling over the custodian every so often. But that's also the problem I have with it: Bitcoin isn't a gift card, private keys are forever! Alternatively say we would never exit-scam (obviously not our intention), would you rather pay a fixed fee of ~ 1% in return for a "promise" that we so long as bitcoin exists guarantee your funds?
That would also be misleading:
A. We cannot promise anything forever.
B. We cannot promise someone does not somehow exploit our software.
C. We cannot promise we do not get seized. I appreciate being open about this, I just don't think people will exchange their Bitcoin for a gift card. Maybe for small amounts if there's a useful application for it, just like I'm okay having small amounts of Lightning funds in a custodial wallet. But even though all the same limitations apply to for instance BlueWallet, they're not scheduling regular "exits" by taking all user funds. |
|
|
|
Hi, I received 10,000 bitcoins 10 years ago I'm not buying it. When 1f1miYFQWTzdLiCBxtHHnNiW7WAWPUccr received 10,000 BTC, that was worth 33,200.00 USD. You wouldn't just forget about that when you sell your computer. I have spent my whole life finding these bitcoins for 4 years And I have no hope in life anymore. Let me guess: next, you're going to ask for donations? |
|
|
|
I think you missed this post: I am not accepting participants for this campaign. Everything is done on the yobit website, just follow the instructions above. I will however be able to ban anyone I feel is spamming, anyone with justified negative trust, or anyone breaking any of the forums rules as far as campaigns go.
Basically I am a quality checker. The yobit-spam was really bad at some point, and this was the best option as long theymos didn't ban them. Note that yahoo62278 didn't add users to the campaign, he only removed them. A crucial distinction. His existence annoys me that's why. If you get annoyed by random people on the internet, you should re-evaluate your priorities. Hint: see my personal text. [Muchmoon, SuchGay & JollyWood, and HollyGood] Is that the best you can do? You're not making a strong case if you resort to name calling. I'm a bad person Lol, I can believe that. You have no problem promoting a scam in your signature.
Let's read back what I wrote about this 2.5 years ago: It's a double-edged sword: we're better off without the spam, but helping them hire higher quality posters helps them to get better quality advertising and reduce the (already very slim) risk of their campaign getting banned by theymos. I'm dead sure he was looking at $$$ instead of his respect at the moment Now you've got him, he needed the money so badly, he gave away 0.116BTC.
If you wouldn't be a hypocrite, you'd petition for the forum to ban scams! But I guess that will hurt your own income. To quote yourself: "I'm dead sure he was is looking at $$$". |
|
|
|
But does this still include plagiarism because he added some text from other articles without the source? This shouldn't be allowed. I've reported that post, let the Mods decide The OP has already deleted the post. I think it was deleted by a Mod, DIA7 is Banned!. Modlog: Autoban user: N/A in topic #0 by member #831236
Delete reply: Re: Premier League Prediction Thread 2021/2022 in topic #5271157 by member #831236 To be honest, I don't think it was a wise decision. Instead of getting it off, I expected him to do the proper citation ( edit and put it in a quote ). How is the Mod going to work without proper evidence? It's very bad he got himself into this situation. As far as I know, Mods won't ban a user if he removed the plagiarism by himself. This user has far too many of them though, it wouldn't have helped him. |
|
|
|
Fiat is dying, and if they can artificially suppress the price of BTC in the meantime, that just gives us more time to stack cheap sats.  |
|
|
|
Lightlord has just paid. I would expect an early adopter to know to avoid dust inputs. Paying for 10 weeks in one transaction would have reduced the fees participants have to pay to consolidate the dust they've received. Such a missed opportunity when paying late anyway. Take this address for example: 6 inputs, total amount received: 0.00017901 BTC. It looks like he doesn't have the time, in which case he should just hire a trusted escrow to make payments on time. I called it  |
|
|
|
But does this still include plagiarism because he added some text from other articles without the source? This shouldn't be allowed. I've reported that post, let the Mods decide |
|
|
|
Are you trying to say that bitcoin is "not" designed to pump forever? I'm saying the planet isn't designed to pump forever  Whether we are talking 1 house per BTC or 10 houses per BTC or some other price point, there is a bit of a suggestion that houses (in your example) are as scarce as bitcoin, amiNOTrite? Make it 100 houses per Bitcoin, 2.1 billion houses on the planet seams about right. I will concede with an overall point that our bitcoin price trajectory (including ongoing BTC prices) is going to likely become more and more flat with the passage of time, but I am having some doubts that bitcoin would stay flat relative to any particular asset, such as 10 houses because that would suggest that houses are as rare as bitcoin... It can't keep going up, otherwise at some point 1 Bitcoin would be worth a billion houses. Accordingly, maybe 1 year from now, we have bitcoin valued at 1 house,
then 5 years from now we have bitcoin valued at 10 houses,
then 9 years from now we have bitcoin valued at 16 houses,
then 13 years from now we have bitcoin valued at 24 houses,
then 17 years from now we have bitcoin valued at 34 houses,
then 21 years from now we have bitcoin valued at 44 houses,
then 25 years from now we have bitcoin valued at 52 houses,
then 29 years from now we have bitcoin valued at 58 houses, A flattening S-curve makes sense. |
|
|
|
the user did not add any quotes or links, but at the same time said "Manchester Unaide announced" ... and then added a line of his own text. I just got the impression that the user abstractly shared what he learned today, adding a couple of his thoughts, but it turned out that this is literal copy/paste. What do you think can this text be considered plagiarism/c&p? It looks like "Manchester Unaide" isn't the direct source, he copied someone else quoting Manchester Unaide from another site. I'd say it's plagiarism, but it might be the same loophole as adding a bunch of links under your post. I checked one other post from this user: challenge from Andorra but this is still a game that England should be expecting to win. Google shows StevieDay1983 as a source, but the link itself doesn't show the post anymore so I can't verify everything. Another post: Manchester United have reached an agreement with his Brazilian team Flamengo, regarding the loan of midfielder Andreas Pereira.
Pereira spent last season on loan with Lazio, Italy. Pereira's loan to Flamengo will be his fourth as a Manchester United player, after loaning him previously to Granada and Valencia.
Pereira most of his participation came in season 19/20 with 40 games at Manchester but the signing of Bruno Fernandes in the winter of 2020, and Donny van de Beek last summer, reduced Pereira's chances of participating primarily with the team.
It looks like it's rewritten from goal.com. The article on goal.com was posted later. I guess many "sports sites" post more or less the same things, so maybe this is "normal" in that business.
Google gives 26 million hits when I search for "announced today". Example: Pharmaceutical manufacturer, Cambrex Corporation, will create 78 new jobs in Guilford County, Governor Roy Cooper announced today. The company will invest $30 million to expand its manufacturing center of excellence in High Point. Adding a source is so easy! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
