|
Why o why?
This looks like spam to me. There are plenty price tracking sites out there. Why would you want a thread that tracks whatever price google and yahoo think is right. Whereever they get their data from.
|
|
|
|
|
If you know JavaScript you can add a script to any site with greasemonkey (FF plugin). Its basically bootstrapping local JavaScript into the downloaded page.
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to use Vanitygen to create a paper wallet?
Could I put a copy of Vanitygen onto a USB stick and run it on an offline computer to generate an address and private key (which can then be printed onto paper)?
Yes, the source of the private key is irrelevant for a paperwallet. You could theoretically use the private keys from your hot wallet. That would not make much sense from a security point of view though. |
|
|
|
the hoster of the vps has physical access to the machine and can read your keys.
There are also possible side channel attacks from other VM's on the same host. see here: https://www.cs.unc.edu/~reiter/papers/2012/CCS.pdfNot sure how much bitcoin you need to make this a worthwhile attack. On the other hand I dont see a need for a server wallet anyway. Whats the benefit here? |
|
|
|
Obvious ban evasion/bought account is obvious: Just a quick question guy, if I will start posting by tomorrow, could I still claim my payment on the 17th ?
Thank you
Some replied with "yeah you need 50 activity though" But the next day "the friend" comes into the picture: Starting posts: 300
Bitcoin address: 1NWJwtpf2sBudpM3CyAcFscShF4uvDPTr3
And casually asks if posts in off-topic will get paid: I've two questions,
1. I've joined the campaign when I was full member, which is today and now I'm Sr. member which is also today, I will be paid as Sr. member, right ?
2. I'm enjoying posting at the off-topic section, will these posts count ?
There have been warnings, but not very strong ones. -snip-
Many keep saying "don't post so much in off-topic" for the PD campaign. -snip-
Well Sr. Member should know, right? |
|
|
|
I've two questions,
1. I've joined the campaign when I was full member, which is today and now I'm Sr. member which is also today, I will be paid as Sr. member, right ?
2. I'm enjoying posting at the off-topic section, will these posts count ?
Of course OT posts count if they are constructive (not trolling nor i agree with...) Past cases like your was paid based on the last member status (So you should expect to be paid as a senior member) I guess somebody forgot to tell him not to spam a 100 shitposts in there  Yeah I had a warning post ready but I though: well its a senior he will not post 100's of off-topic posts and hope to get paid for it. Sooo, I didnt post it. Smells like the account was bought by a newbie. |
|
|
|
I was actually reading this and though well OP is fine, but then I didnt post that because I was not sure what OP actually wants to do. For generating keys thats fine, but an offline wallet would also sign transactions. So the "Transaction malleability-related fixes" might be an issue. Esp. the tightening of "IsStandard()" might result in transactions that are not broadcasted across the network. |
|
|
|
From Ghash.io press release its ~55% which leaves them at 20% of the overall hashrate not 40%. So even if they gain another 10% those individuals still make a significant difference.
Would you mind sharing the link to the press release? Never mind, found it myself. It was published in early Jun though. https://ghash.io/ghashio_press_release.pdfYes, its a bit old by now. But if you read it entirely Ghash.io is concerned about having to much hashingpower. For now they try to push miners gently onto other pools. They might have to charge pool fee's if they just keep pilling up  They also write that they want to allow cex.io users to change pool data. So all those cloudminers should be able to pick a pool. Not sure if thats working allready, maybe someone with some GH/s @ cex.io can take a look. |
|
|
|
|
How do you get it to run?
Did you make the file executable? (RClick in GUI -> Properties -> check "allow execution as programm")
|
|
|
|
Whether it allows you to send a tx with no fee, depends on how many BTC you want to send (the more, the better) and when you received the coins that you are spending (the sooner, then better).
I though "old coins" have a higher priority. So "the sooner, the beter" would be the other way around. Did I get that part wrong? The sooner you received them - then older they are  Oh, yes that makes sense. Thanks! BTT: you can also use a modified version of bitcoin core to send bitcoins without fee, but that might result in problems. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=22434.0 |
|
|
|
Whether it allows you to send a tx with no fee, depends on how many BTC you want to send (the more, the better) and when you received the coins that you are spending (the sooner, then better).
I though "old coins" have a higher priority. So "the sooner, the beter" would be the other way around. Did I get that part wrong? |
|
|
|
The problem with most bots is that you have to trust either your ability to read the code (if its open source) or the person who wrote it. They usually require API access to an exchange and your BTC to work with. I never used a tradingbot, but gekko has been around very long. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209149.0its open source and well reviewed. |
|
|
|
|
less crying, more use escrow
people here like escrow, its safer.
|
|
|
|
Werd ich machen, sollte ich mal soweit kommen. Bin eig. nicht so der Vielposter. ^^ Aber danke auch für diesen Tipp!
Naja 1x posten am Tag reicht völlig um die "Activity" und damit den Rang zu erhöhen. Viele Signaturmieter sind glücklich wenn Du 50 posts im Monat machst. Da bist Du mit 2 am Tag locker drüber. Hier gibts eine schöne Übersicht: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0Richtig  da bekommt man als Sr. Member 0,001BTC schon mit einem einzigen Post =P Sorry, aber ist das nicht etwas merkwürdig (um nicht kontraproduktiv zu sagen) für ein Forum? Was ich meine ist - besteht da nicht die Gefahr, dass einige User einfach ohne Ende sinnfrei rumposten bloß um mehr "Einkommen" zu generieren? Zum einen: Jein.
Der Werber schaut in regelmäßigen Abständen (dann, wenn du deinen Antrag erneuerst, z.B. 1x monatlich) nach, ob du "gut" gepostet hast.
Du wirst also nicht für Spam etc. bezahlt bzw. notfalls auch ausgeschlossen. Von daher sollte man sich gut überlegen ob man das ausnutzt oder nicht. Am Ende macht man mit Spam vielleicht einen Monat ein bisschen mehr hat aber dafür danach Probleme. Das andere ist das die Admins besonders auf Menschen mit vermieteten Signaturen achten. Da wird viel schneller mal für 2-4 Wochen gebannt. Solange Du also normal Postest und nebenbei ein bisschen Werbung in der Signatur hast ist alles schick. Was mir grad noch einfällt ist MinecraftCC. Ein Minecraft Server der einen fürs Zocken bezahlt. Ist vom Aufwand in etwa mit nem Faucet zu vergleichen, nur das man dabei Spaß hat ... also wenn man Spaß an Minecraft hat. |
|
|
|
Ich bin mir jetzt zu 100% sicher, dass du recht hast - das sind keinesfalls Scammer, nur die Seite scheint einige Macken in der Programmierung zu haben. Wie ich darauf komme? Ganz einfach, die Zahlung ist gerade angekommen AAAAAABER statt der 0.000133 BTC kamen jetzt 0,00162168 BTC an. Wenn das immer so abginge würde sich zumindest diese eine Faucet doch lohnen. ^^
Ich würd einfach den Wasserhahn wechseln. Ich glaub nicht das die ~162k satoshi von denen kommen So hab ich das im Endeffekt auch immer gemacht als ich mich noch um Faucets gekümmert hab. Wenn irgendwas komisch war oder nichts rein kam ab zum nächsten. Die benötigen im vergleich zum Einkommen recht viel Zeit. Wenn da was nicht läuft ist es -meiner Meinung nach- den Aufwand nicht Wert sich drum zu kümmern. Der letzte war coinlearn. Die haben einfach mal ne Woche nicht ausgezahlt und dann auch noch zu wenig. Ging aber um ~60-80k Satoshi. Scheiß drauf, gibt genug andere. Guck Dir sonst mal Coinbycall an, ist zwar ab und zu wacklig auf den Beinen, aber die zahlen. Und auf das Minimum von 0.01 BTC kommt man relativ schnell. Ansonsten natürlich Signatur vermieten, wenn Du "Jr. Member" oder "Member" bist. |
|
|
|
since offline computer do not have the update bitcoin address if i already used 5 bitcoin address and i have 5 unused address.. how is my offline computer going to see the 5 new address.
If you generate the new addresses on the offline computer they are there allready. If you dont generate them there, why bother with an offline computer for keeping your private keys anyway? and if i restore from seed.. from an offline computer... how does electrum pull out 5 used address and 5 new address for me to see?
Thats the whole point of the seed. Same seed generates same addresses everytime. |
|
|
|
The gap between Ghosh.IO and there rest is huge.  It's like comparing the value of Bitcoin, to the value of canabiscoin.  Why do they have such a huge portion? Early adopter? or just specialists miners? GHash.io has the miners for cex.io and people like cloudmining. Probably because they dont want to take care of the hardware but still mine. Never forget: its a pool. Its not a single person controlling that much hashingpower, its a group and abandoning a pool is as easy as flipping a switch.
True, but not entirely true. According to eleuthria, at least 40-50% of their hashrate are from their own private farm. GHash.io continues to control a private mining farm of 40-50% of it's pool speed if not more, while trying to get more people to join their pool which has 0 economic sense behind it unless they plan on double spending or stealing from users (they're literally throwing money away to operate a public pool, spending time supporting people, and paying for servers, and gaining NOTHING from it).
From Ghash.io press release its ~55% which leaves them at 20% of the overall hashrate not 40%. So even if they gain another 10% those individuals still make a significant difference. |
|
|
|
Thank you, shorena, your answer was to the point. Sorry for the wrong description, of blockchain.info, I was doing research on exchange matters, and it slipped in. Do these miners, look at those statistics? And what incentive, do they have to switch pools, when the hash power of 1 pool, near 51%? {Only the prevention of possible double spending?} Not sure if they check those stats and how often. Think about what this would do to bitcoin. The price would drop and people would start asking questions. As they allways do when the price changes (up or down). Someone would check and see that Ghash.io has over 50% hashingpower according to those stats and that the number of doublespends has either risen drasticly or the amount of bitcoins in doublespends has risen. Word would spread fast among miners and devs. Miners could switch the pool devs could deploy the counter messure posted above. Bitcoin would recover Bitcoin would survive. Maybe the price would drop 100 USD maybe more, but we wouldnt go to 0. |
|
|
|
Hallo Leute,
ich bin neu hier und neu mit bitCoins allgemein - also nicht gleich den Kopf abreissen falls ich etwas nicht perfekt erkläre oder im falschen Unterforum poste.
Willkommen *Bitcoin oder bitcoin, nicht BitCoin, nicht bitCoin  /Oberlehrer mode Ich teste seit ein paar Tagen Faucets und so ein Zeug durch. Ja ich weiß, dass es sich nicht wirklich lohnt, aber ich möchte gern jeden Aspekt austesten bei BitCoins, auf diese Art verfahre ich beim Lernen in der Regel immer; passt für mich ganz gut die Methode. Ich bin beim Rumprobieren auf eine Seite namens BitVisitor gestoßen und nach den bisher getesteten Faucets scheint man mit dieser Seite schneller Satoshis sammeln zu können als mit den anderen von mir getesteten Faucets.
Soviel zur Theorie....... in der Praxis sieht es jedoch so aus, dass schon zwei Auszahlungen (weit über dem Mindestauszahllimit) nicht angekommen sind. Und ja, ich rede nicht von keine Zahluing nach 5 Min. sondern nach etlichen Stunden immer noch nix. Die ersten zwei Zahlungen vorher hingegen waren nach wenigen Minuten da. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Seiten bietet BitVisitor ja leider nicht die Möglichkeit die "angeblich" erfolgte Zahlung zu verfolgen. Auch das erweckt bei mir nicht gerade den besten Eindruck. Alle anderen von mir getesteten Faucets haben bisher immer schnell und zuverlässig gezahlt. Bei BitVisitor scheint nach 2 tatsächlichen Zahlungen Schluss zu sein und nix mehr ausgezahlt zu werden. Daher meine Frage: Ist BitVisitor als Scammerseite bekannt oder eher sonst eher als zuverlässig eingestuft?
Ich hab in der Vergangenheit ähnliche Erfahrungen mit denen gemacht. Ich glaube nicht das es sich dabei um Scammer handelt, sondern das die Seite einfach schlecht gemacht ist. Ich habs dann irgendwann einfach gelassen und andere Faucets benutzt. Insgesamt aber lohnen die eh nicht, wie Du auch schon geschrieben hast. Wieviel fehlt den und wo hätte es den ankommen sollen? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
