|
Dal quello che ho visto fino ad ora la regola non esiste e tutto dipende da chi da redtrust e senza un giudizio costante. Ci sono persone che hanno preso redtrust per 50 merit e persone che con un team da 200 e passa non lo hanno preso.
|
|
|
|
What do you think about the need to decrease the merit requirement now that the airdop is almost done? Do we need it?
I will post the exact number when the new file will be avaiable. Have they reduced sources to 79? I've missed this change! |
|
|
|
|
Just saw This 3d (this forum i'ts so huge!), ty for sharing your idea and experience I'm working very hard on my English right now but it's hard to learn the perfect grammar!
|
|
|
|
BitPenta was scam! Manage by "needmoney" from "tokensuite" company, also they fake the bounty thread, they say it was escrowed. Here is the link of bounty https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3221684.0 , I don't know if how much they scam after they start the sale or marketing of this project but, now it was dead. My concern about is why tokensuite or "needmoney" let this happen they are professional bounty managers. Is there a chance that "needmoney" will be give RedTrust? What are you talking about? I got my tokens from the bounty managed from Tokensuite, you can check the eth address sender here with all transactions https://etherscan.io/address/0x2d7246d5a760d78b3af4203e23735e2ac4d0ef99#tokentxnsThe still have tokens on address, they probably paid only signature for now. |
|
|
|
As it is only the 2nd of May did you mean last month?
Yes, obviously. Apart from people who abused the system, I think those who have increased their level in April can be counted in one hand, especially from the full member rank onwards. I ranked up last month, at 25th april if i remember it correctly. I must say no for your suggestion, it would be better if we have more merit sources rather than lowering the requirement.
I've also ranked up on April. But yeah increasing the number of Sources Is a valid alternative. I Think we need more merit in the system, on last check of stats we got 21k sMerit on Aprli (missing last 3 days) with 18k generated from sources, something is not working at the best. (without counting the unknowed quantity of sMerit airdropped) For exemple we both ranked up, but we got merit from "review 3Ds", without those services we probably haven't enough merit for rank up, and this is a contradiction with what wrote above here because if we add merit sources but we have to ask to evaluate our messages, the increased number of the sources doesn't solve anything, right? |
|
|
|
|
What do you think about the need to decrease the merit requirement now that the airdop is almost done? Do we need it?
How many users has ranked up this month?
|
|
|
|
~
You could literally have as many Hero accounts as you wanted just by logging in once a day to claim a giveaway and 1.4 years later you'd have an arsenal of Hero accounts farmed
Imagine now for a second that all Hero accounts on the forum will be declassified with a starting merit of 10. How many of them can even reach the 100 merit for Full member Rank without abusing the system? Imagine the whine. |
|
|
|
Scusa ma non l’avevi scritto tu che pharmacist infatti aveva de-flaggato la gente?
Si li ha deflaggati quasi tutti. |
|
|
|
When I check the merit page I saw that the user has received 73 merit points from the same person...
Thank you. This is more than enough reason to leave negative trust. I think some people have been viewing the lack of a response as an invitation to cheat even more. Well if you have time for check over 200 merit for this group (of alt?) and abusing signatures, eth links proven https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3420918.0 |
|
|
|
Non c'è scritto da nessuna parte "regola: è vietato scambiarsi i merit" quindi queste cose ovviamente succedono e restano impunite, fatto salvo il "disprezzo" che uno scambio simile suscita nella parte "sana" della community.
Son allora da red trust quelli che han dato red trust a qualcuno che abusato del sistema, per abusig the poteri derivati dal trust! edit, come non detto, forse cambia la tendenza? When I check the merit page I saw that the user has received 73 merit points from the same person...
Thank you. This is more than enough reason to leave negative trust. I think some people have been viewing the lack of a response as an invitation to cheat even more. |
|
|
|
|
I think KYC can be usefull to limit abusers on bounties is a great way to do so but I really don't like share my data for few bucks. I really hate when managers ask for kyc at the end of the bounty and not at the start.
|
|
|
|
Vedo gente che si scambia 1 Merit che viene bannata, mentre gente che "spreca" i Merit in questo modo passarla liscia.
Non ha completamente senso. Come dici tu, non gli succederà nulla, perchè nessuno ha mai detto che una cosa del genere non si possa fare.. Ma che senso ha? Come facciamo a sapere che quello che ha ricevuto i Merit non li abbia comprati o abbia fatto un accordo privato con quello che glieli ha donati?
Per lo scambio di merit non hanno dato ban ad ora (al meglio delle mie conoscenze). Han invece taggato degli user e non tanti per il merit abusing, ma la maggior parte è tutt'ora impunita. Bel sistema, complimenti chi ha alt abusa ancora di più. Ha già ottenuto 100 visite, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3420918.msg35753912#msg35753912 ci sono le prove di transazioni di eth, nessuna risposta, nessun TAG. boh. |
|
|
|
What needs to be changed?
- Merit hasn't removed the spam, maybe has reduced it, but who knows?
Merit has not been around long enough to effectively reduce spam.  Theymos stated that although it may be abused, eventually the abusers will run out of merit. Right now there is a market for merit, so people just assume they will be able to buy their way past the wall if they need, so they spam as usual. Once these sales dry up people will stop spamming. Just have patience.  I think it will never slow down, most of the spam comes from low-rank people who do bounty and posts around the forum. In my opinion the quality of the posts of some people will grow while the average quality will drop as these people will spam almost random things around the forum trying to take some points, and as a consequence, spam will increase more and more as the airdrop will end! |
|
|
|
|
Up and down is a normal trend on crypto market + 20% or -20% is quite common the important thing is the trend of for now it's positive, also q2 is a very historiucal good quarter while q1 2018 was very bad. my hope for q2 is +70% overall.
|
|
|
|
|
EOS seems a very nice project already had a good ROI now cause coin is around 18$! Also, it's described as a very good coin with huge potential for this year. Remember even bitcoin is described as Scam from someone so even if the king of coin is called as scam, every remaining coin can be called as scam from someone.
|
|
|
|
Non penso proprio che, purtroppo, sia un'opzione percorribile. Dai toni che leggevo nella sezione internazionale qui non cambieranno proprio nulla, i Merit ce li dobbiamo tenere cosi come sono, e lo stesso dicasi per le quantità necessarie per salire di rank.
Se non lo ho detto il boss non conta nulla!
ecco lo spreadsheet settimanale per circa 4.5k merit overall, 1 mese fa erano quasi 8k  22.04 - 28.04 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1agYMGxJLGVtKiNC1mBceNIaJZCsQ2NkOrVzXRdDe0Mk/edit?usp=sharing |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
