Nowadays most use Bitcoin as an investment, not only as a store of value. But after some more halvings and after Bitcoin is mature and widely adopted, the value may become rather stable and using it as investment may not bring such high reward.
And Bitcoin primary meaning is to be used as a coin. The store of value is a "secondary effect" of all good/successful coins (back in the days when inflation was big I kept my savings in USD/EUR!).
That's why the development goes in the direction to make the use of Bitcoin-as-a-coin go faster and better.

So I expect Bitcoin get used in 2130 as a coin much more than today.
I don't know how much of the transactions will be off-chain and how much on-chain, but we clearly have to keep miners happy even then (the problems will start much earlier than 2130 actually).


As said by @Deathwing, the network will continue to work even then, just at a lower difficulty, if the miners leave. But if the difficulty drops too much, at some point the network could become vulnerable to 51% attack. So ... we have to find long term solutions to keep the miners happy.

Freedom of speech is a great deal and whether some like it or not, it's great that we have it here too.
This forum is more and more a view over our society, with good and bad, with people that share our views or not, with people which want to help, to scam or to troll (and so on). It's out choice what we read or skip, what we answer to or not.

In my country (Romania) such limit exists for some years now. Just iirc it's about 10000 EUR / cash transaction, so 45000 RM.
And I can tell that I know only 2 cases average Joe faces these limits: when selling/buying a home (house, apartment) or a (new) car, which operations usually happen through bank / credit anyway.
So I think that it's not a real / big problem.

The idea looks good to me. I mean, the questions and answers don't have to be centralized on 2-3 websites. The more the merrier.
Some bugs/improvements/ideas though:

1. You break the browsing history. If I press back after opening a question/thread, I go to main page instead of the list of questions.
2. You need a better UI for displaying the "short view" and the "full view". Also I agree with @pooya87, that text-box looking part invites you edit instead of reading
3. It could be useful to have a way to get the link to one of the questions without opening it. You'll also need to offer direct link to each answer.
4. I think that the main page should already show the newest questions, else some may think that they have to create an user in order to see them. That "let's go" link may not be enough (and also may not be visible enough).

OK, so instead of having a chain of blocks you propose "replacing" one "current state" object.
But sync doesn't happen for everybody in the same time. That's why the mined blocks in a shorter fork will become orphaned.
Yes, I know, you wrote that the best "state" is the one saved with the highest difficulty, but this wold mean that you force the network difficulty increase continuously, which will not happen always, it just cannot happen - the new "states" will be mined slower and slower until the process will stop (that's why Bitcoin has difficulty adjustment).
I think that this is one of the flaws of your logic for now.

Is this a sad attempt for FUD?
If Bitcoin reaches 100k, people will be happy with the easy money they've got and will be more willing to spend/invest in altcoins.
And some (very few!) altcoins deserve such a chance.

As said in other threads, only some 6.2% of Americans own crypto. Such a big business as Disney don't care about crypto. If they add such payments, they'll do it through a payment processor and they'll actually receive US dollars.

I don't think that crypto would make their service "explode", but could give them a slight edge. From what I've read their service is cheaper than Netflix and that's more important for most possible customers (together with the content, obviously).


On another hand I don't know if I can install any Disney+ app on my TV (while Netflix and HBO go are there)....

"Not your keys, not your coins". Unless you (installed a software and) made a wallet and received a private key (or a wallet file) I'd stop dreaming. Most probably that site doesn't exist anymore or has change and would not allow you withdraw.

You need to ask more clearly what you want. This is a forum, it doesn't hold money so there's nothing to withdraw.
Depending on the wallet you use and the coins in it, you may or may not be able to exchange into fiat and withdraw.

Afaik you cannot withdraw fiat (dollars) from Binance, so you may have to do the operation in 2 steps: convert the tokens into Bitcoin, Ethereum, whatever known coin then go to something like Bitstamp or Coinbase pro and transform to fiat you can withdraw.
I don't know if you'll find one place where you can exchange all those tokens, I would try to find the relevant exchanges for each token on worldcoinindex.com, coinmarketcap.com or coingecko.com
I don't have experience with Ethereum tokens, there may be a DEX or anything where you can exchange them all.

It's an awfully lot of money there. If you are not trolling, then you better wait for more answers and do some more research yourself.


PS. If you acquired yourself those tokens or at least that amount of ETH you should know already something. So the chances you are trolling are pretty high.

And they will just lose money, because many will avoid projects advertised by red-trust users, thinking "if they allow scammers for advertising, what if they are also scammers?"

Woah, nu e tocmai o reactie la care m-as fi asteptat, e o surpriza placuta. Sunt curios daca e ceva izolat sau chiar vor fi multe asemenea cazuri.


Mda, iar noi trebuie sa le explicam. Si e simplu. Clar si democratic, cu cat mai multi voteaza cu atat mai corect este rezultatul. Plus ca pana la un anumit numar de votanti este avantajat unul dintre candidati, iar de la o valoare in sus, celalalt, cel putin "pe hartie".
Cum spuneam, trebuie votanti cat mai multi cel putin pentru corectitudine: pentru a avea un castigator care totusi reprezinta un procent semnificativ din populatie, nu doar din votanti (!).

That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.

I find the red trust rule is good, it gives less opportunities to the wrongdoers. And most businesses don't want their name associated with red-trust people.
But indeed, the rules are made by the business owners together with the campaign manager.
In that case, I think that best is to ask the campaign manager or, even better, the business owner (if it's active on btctalk), because it may be just a mistake / forgotten rule.

That's correct, if the discussion was on the reviews from Play Store. Also most apps have a good number of reviews made/bought by the dev, which are obviously good no matter what and when the app is young, they can fool you.
If the discussion is about reviews from blogs and specialized websites, the risk should be smaller, especially if the review exists on multiple sites and some of them are well known. At that point the app may be mature enough too.



OK, this is somewhat more reassuring (for me), thanks.

Not bad. I like the colors for dark mode better chosen than the ones for light. A resize for the panels could be useful (I prefer to see Monero price and I don't care about Nasdaq and S&P).

Coinomi had some weird approach on private keys security, which is probably fixed by now, but I don't trust them anymore. And afaik it's closed source.

I use Mycelium, but I use it seldom, with a couple of view wallets and one Ledger Nano. In both cases I can't lose anything. But that's related with my paranoia about mobile phones lack of security  
Afaik on Android Mycelium is still one of the best options.

Eu ma duc, dar mi-e teama ca prea multi vor absenta (poate mult mai multi decat ieri), fie din dezamagire, fie crezand ca jocurile sunt facute.
Pentru cei care nu-s convinsi: meciul se termina doar dupa ce a fluierat arbitrul.

I am quite scared of the (lack of) security mobile phones offer nowadays. I use a 3rd party antivirus for checking the things I install, but I am aware that some things can easily hidden from antiviruses too.
The phone you had in hand was rooted or not? I hope that only rooted phones are affected...

Also, maybe putting another ROM onto that phone would help get rid of that piece of.. trojan.



It was this year when Google announced me I have installed an app that doesn't behave right. It was only some ad abuse, I think, but I had the app installed for over a year until Google woke up.

This means that fiat operations are to be avoided at Poloniex.
But Poloniex golden days were related to crypto-to-crypto trading, maybe they want to focus on that.
Of course, with all this they should get rid of their KYC requirements, since nobody sane would give anymore their data.