I know nothing about BNB ^{(other than it being a centralized shitcoin)}, but if it's "BEP2", FixedFloat might be what you're looking for.

I think you should rethink this idea:
What are the 1000 characters per wallet you're trying to store? There's probably a better solution, if you explain what exactly you're trying to do.
Can you start with an example: create a (throw away) Bitcoin wallet, and post everything you want to store here.

Allow me to be the first: that was stupid! But what's more stupid, is waiting 2 years before explaining it.

I hope this is because of your English: asked > offered!

Nothing is more reputed than a signed message: if you're going to do stupid things, you can sign a message upfront to prove later on that it was intentional.

So, post this somewhere in Archival:
Don't edit this post anymore.

Then, later, you can prove your intentions by posting this:
Signed by 1LoyceVGjMmUj6Na79M9Ju8N52KXkbKMQE (staked here).
I forgot the words "I'm going to say", but don't want to sign again.
Disclaimer: I'm not theymos!

Of course, if you start posting signatures without ever posting what they're for, you could be building up a pile of shady shit and selectively deciding what to use. Don't go down that road.

Support isn't online 24/7, it may take up to a few days.

You can't withdraw less than 0.001BTC from ChipMixer. That's why, on step 1: Deposit, it shows:
From the FAQ:

Most are quite expensive, especially for large storage (thanks to Chia mining I guess).

Loyce.club is hosted on AWS, sponsored by suchmoon. But AWS charges ridiculous rates for bandwidth, so it's not worth it for large files. My addresses with a balance costs about 1% of what AWS would charge for the bandwidth. But it's currently offline. AWS is never offline

I prefer to get one that accepts crypto directly. I'm keeping an eye on LowEndTalk for new offers. Some are good, some just disappear after a while.

I have a pay-by-the-hour account at RamNode, that will work. But it's not worth keeping online all the time (and some work to setup for one-time use). I've used it a few times, performance is good.

---

---

What exactly do you need? Just a (sorted) list of all Bitcoin addresses ever used (including emptied addresses, about 20 GB compressed), updated up until yesterday? Or would you need frequent updates too?

Where's the option: "All of the above"?

I don't think many people will want to use a wallet that takes all their money every few months! Even though you announce it up front, this will likely end in terrible disappointment for some of your customers.

The fact that your wallet/mixer doesn't work in Tor browser isn't encouraging. There's much more to browser identification than just a new IP address, and Tor browser is much easier than booting up a different VPN.

From your fees section:

It looks vaguely familiar, did this overview come from Moneypot? What does "eco" and "free" mean here?
You're comparing your fees to "Any Wallet", but use ridiculously high fees to compare with. My wallet doesn't have a receive fee, and my last send fee was 111 sat. No decent wallet charges 49368 sat for a transaction.

---

---

I was hoping for an easy implementation of "theymos' Blinded Bearer Certificates".

This doesn't include a UTXO list. I'm not even sure if a pruned node does that nowadays. I'd like the feature though: that would allow to load an old wallet.dat into a pruned node.

It's part of the "verify, don't trust" mantra. As long as you're not limited on data, any half decent computer should be able to download and prune Bitcoin Core in about a day. If you have enough RAM you could even fit it on a RAM drive to beat SSD speed (I've done this as a test on /dev/shm).

There's a site for that too: bitrawr.com: it shows there are actually a few more blocks found than expected since the last difficulty adjustment.

It works again, thanks guys, I'm locking this topic

That's just bad! Is Zuckerberg running it or something?

For me it works again through Tor, but not (yet?) on my own computer. It works again
https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/loyce.club shows it's up too.

The good news is that AWS just keeps running, so none of the notifications (or other data) should have been lost.

I'm posting on this board hoping someone can help me: loyce.club is offline. I still have an old working SSH login, but can't reach the domain:
At Namecheap.com, my DNS settings didn't change.

Any idea where to start searching?

Update:

Just not for myself yet. It works again

I just noticed this, and I don't know why

I can't be absolutely sure, but it wouldn't make sense otherwise: why would someone get banned for a mistake he corrected on his own? If the reporter doesn't want to give that chance, he shouldn't post publicly about the plagiarism and use only Report to moderator.

Showing a link is enough to prevent a plagiarism ban indeed, but dumping 10 links doesn't help someone who wants to verify what you copied from the original source.
If you use separate quote/author-tags for anything you quote, or just add it as a description to a hyperlink, you give credits in a much better way.

There's not really a point in investigating an accusation without proof. But if it really happens someone gets his account on DT1 by using sockpuppets, all it takes is one topic in Meta to blacklist them from DT1-voting.

Experience: fees are usually lowest on Sunday.

I'm always expecting that Still, at the previous new ATHs this year, fees were nowhere near what they were at the end of 2017. If I zoom out on Johoe's Bitcoin Mempool site, there was a massive amount of blue (low-fee) transactions unconfirmed around April this year, while 4 years ago there were many high-fee transactions unconfirmed for a very long time. I remember paying around $25 (much more than 0.001BTC) back then for a small transaction (one input, one output).
It probably helps that exchanges like Binance trick people into withdrawing their own centralized shitcoin tokens instead of real Bitcoin. Those suckers keep fees low by accepting basically counterfeit Bitcoin.
And maybe Bitcoin users (and companies) in general have become smarter selecting fees.

I don't think so.

If a user corrects his own post, he doesn't get banned.

I tested this large QR-code with my old QR code reader (it seems to have disappeared from the Play Store), and it worked fine.

Are my alterations too subtle to notice? For you 2 seconds may not seem important, but on a space-time scale it's huge!
I already said too much.

Thanks again for your flawless timing I'm aiming to be fashionably late, but not too much. About 2 seconds should be enough.