Everything that was quoted in your post is specifically regarding the malleability fix. However, there are plenty of other benefits down below:

• Linear scaling of sighash operations
• Signing of input values
• Increased security for multisig via pay-to-script-hash (P2SH)
• Script versioning
• Reducing UTXO growth
• Efficiency gains when not verifying signatures
• Block capacity/size increase
• Moving towards a single combined block limit

Each one has been described further down in the post.

---

Keep in mind that in order to make Segwit transactions you have to update your wallet to one that supports Segwit. [/list]

No. That is entirely different. He's not the only person to blame there, as the code was reviewed by others.

Yes he/she/it did in order to combat spam, the same spam which we're dealing with today.

I'm pretty sure his identity is still sound, so definitely a no on the prison part.

No. Segwit signaling will start after the first re-targeting after 15/11 (which is today). The first re-targeting should happen around the 18th of November. Anyhow, soft forks take time to activate so don't expect everyone on board in the first few days.

---

I'm pretty confident that a successful activation is going to have a positive effect on the price, especially after >1MB blocks start getting mined.

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Duplicate.

As it currently stands you need to have control over your e-mail address in order to reset the password (for safety) in order to use the Beta. I'm pretty sure that something similar will be used once a *full* transitional phase is in check. However, you will be informed on time so there is no need to worry/speculate just yet.

FYI Satoshi was not particularly good in coding, and Bitcoin is probably much better off without a leader (although Satoshi may be around under a different alias).

Even if he/she/it did or did not, it would have changed nothing.

If he/she/it wanted to kill decentralization, then the answer is probably yes.

We can only speculate at this point.

You mean effective in creating bugs, like the one that broke the Bitcoin supply?

Has nothing to do with luck. Someone was either using a script or a bot, and I confirmed this on the last order today. They ordered it within <2-3 seconds which is impossible for a human. This applies for the last two orders. I can not say anything regarding the previous ones as I was not there to witness them.

That functionality was disabled long ago (if it even was ever available?). Theymos has most likely made changes in the background (code) to enable the video to be embedded and autoplayed in this specific post.

This was already suggested for Signature Campaigns as a sub-board of services a few times. I guess it could incorporate all the mentioned above.

The forum should not force users/services to use escrow.

No.

---

I would honestly not mind this change. Such threads constantly get bumped up, so even when not high in number they push down the other services quite frequently and damage exposure.

Here's the link to the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1679177.0

---

OP you should lock this one.

Finally, a win for the community! Good luck Yahoo, I'll keep an eye out for potential alts and farmers.

Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545652.0

Usually not. You can ask for a secondary review after some time (read the thread), but considering that you have multiple alts enrolled in campaigns, then it's permanent (IMO).

Not that I'm aware of. I've checked the old thread and found no official stance from Bitmixer regarding this.

Correct. I'd probably warn a user promoting a direct competitor first.

This topic has been moved to Altcoins (Hrvatski).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1678726.0

Hello.
I'm a different kind of manager (I don't enroll nor pay people; I just ban offenders) and have no connections to Bitmixer aside from that. If you are interested in custom dealings with Bitmixer, you should contact them directly via their profile (which is not likely to work as they have not logged in for a while) or contacting them via their email. Generally, you're more likely to secure such a deal somewhere else much more quickly.

~Lauda

I do not have data on date of joining, thus all users are treated equally in this regard.

You should have sent me a PM regarding this then. Now it is too late until Bitmixer gives me an unban option. Good luck with other campaigns though.

013506 - 0.01 BTC

Mexxer is inactive. No, there isn't really a convenient way to search through this thread. Maybe someone should just create a duplicate thread and continue working on this (I could do it, if the other users participating agree to this) and ask for an archival of this thread.

False assumption. I've been contacting several managers and campaigns regarding this issues. Some of us are also working on another method of combating spam.

I can't delete it. Even if I could, it would have little effect. It is pretty impossible to clean up after every spammer.

No. This isn't an action from a staff member, but rather a member of the default trust system. Those are not necessarily connected.

---

P.S. Look at the findings from rizzarolla.

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Insubstantial duplicate. Use the search function. The answer to your question can be found in here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.0

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1678303.0